North-Western Rwanda's hilly and mountainous topography, high elevation, frequent torrential rainfall, and high population density render it highly susceptible to landslides and floods. A comprehensive understanding of community vulnerability to these hazards is crucial for effective risk assessment and mitigation strategies. To address data scarcity in the region, this study is based on a household survey approach that incorporates hazard-specific variables to compare vulnerability across three hazard categories: landslides, floods, and a combination of both. The survey encompasses 904 households across 50 cells (local administrative units), purposively selected according to hazard susceptibility distribution. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was applied to derive a contextualized Social Vulnerability Index (SoVI). Five principal components accounting for 73.2% of the variance were identified. The first component, contributing 23.4%, highlights the vulnerability associated with unplanned settlements and low income. The second component, representing 19.5% of the variance, emphasizes demographic and social factors. The third component (12.6% of the variance) points to the vulnerability of households solely reliant on agriculture for their income. The fourth component (9% variance) is associated with land ownership, with households lacking land assets experiencing lower vulnerability. The fifth component (8.7% variance) underlines the relevance of household structure variables, indicating the high vulnerability of single-person households. SoVI scores classified 19 cells in the very high or high vulnerability category, predominantly those prone to landslides. These highly vulnerable cells are concentrated in the Northern Province, emphasizing the need to prioritize interventions in this region, such as effective land use planning and livelihood improvement strategies. This study provides a comprehensive vulnerability assessment and valuable insights for prioritizing interventions. The inclusion of hazard-specific variables and a comparative vulnerability approach across areas susceptible to landslides, floods, and both hazard types enhances the specificity and applicability of the findings. These insights are invaluable for local policymakers and disaster prevention and management authorities, enabling them to develop context-specific strategies to improve community resilience and reduce vulnerability to natural hazards.

Keywords: Community Vulnerability, Landslides, Floods, Noth-Western Rwanda, Social Vulnerability Index