EGU24-20365, updated on 11 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-20365
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Bridging Field Surveys and Remote Sensing for Enhanced Landscape Feature Analysis in EU Agriculture

Talie Musavi1, Jon Skøien1, Bálint Czúcz2, Andrea Hagyo3, Fernando Sedano1, Laura Martinez-sanchez1, Renate Koeble1, Marijn van der velde1, Jean-Michel Terres1, and Raphaël d’Andrimont D'andrimont1
Talie Musavi et al.
  • 1European Commission Joint Research Center (JRC), Ispra, Italy, (talie.musavi@ec.europa.eu)
  • 2Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Torgarden, P.O. 5685, 7485 Trondheim, Norway
  • 3European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark

This study conducts a comprehensive comparison of landscape feature data derived from different sources — Small Woody Features (SWF) product from Copernicus Land Monitoring system, LUCAS Landscape Feature (LF) Module, and LUCAS Transect Module — in EU agricultural landscapes. Additionally, we consider the European Monitoring of Biodiversity in Agricultural Landscapes (EMBAL) project's approach of in-situ data collection for land cover, landscape elements, and biodiversity. This approach offers a promising avenue for integrating detailed field survey data with broad-scale remote sensing observations. Furthermore the EMBAL project has the potential to enhance the previously mentioned datasets by incorporating additional information, such as the nature value of all surveyed land units, habitat types or pollination potential among others. This inclusion could contribute to having better insights  into the ecological significance and monitoring of agricultural landscapes. Our analysis further explores the potential of incorporating cutting-edge datasets for enhanced monitoring of landscape features. Specifically, we consider the high-resolution (3-meter) dataset from Liu et al. (2023), which presents a detailed canopy height map and quantifies tree cover and woody biomass across Europe. 

We critically assess the strengths and limitations of each source: SWF's remote sensing foundation provides broad coverage but focuses only on woody features, the LUCAS LF Module combines photo-interpretation with field survey for a more detailed typology, and the LUCAS Transect, though discontinued, offered valuable field data for linear features. Strategies for monitoring landscape features have been considered for a long time, but are continually updated with the latest available data and methods. A comprehensive comparison and evaluation of the new data sources has not yet been carried out. Our study aims to identify complementarities between the different datasets to  improve both quantitative and qualitative monitoring of landscape features informing sustainable agricultural practices and biodiversity conservation strategies.

How to cite: Musavi, T., Skøien, J., Czúcz, B., Hagyo, A., Sedano, F., Martinez-sanchez, L., Koeble, R., van der velde, M., Terres, J.-M., and D'andrimont, R. D.: Bridging Field Surveys and Remote Sensing for Enhanced Landscape Feature Analysis in EU Agriculture, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-20365, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-20365, 2024.