Does Corporate Governance Affect Performance? Evidence from the Textile Sector of Pakistan

This study takes evidence from Pakistan Stock Exchange’s top 10 listed textile companies to investigate the relationship between corporate governance and firm performance. The relationship is investigated through three important corporate governance mechanisms (board size, board composition, and audit committee composition) and two performance measures (return on assets and net profit ratio). No direct relationship was found between any of the corporate governance variables on performance variables. The findings of this study were consistent with results from many other studies conducted in developing countries. Future studies can be conducted with some additional variables to strengthen the research model and different industries can be tested to validate the findings of the study.


Introduction
Better governance practices play a vital role in developing and enhancing investor perception.This is the reason why firms with good governance practices are able to raise investments at a much lower cost (Agrawal et al., 1996) which impacts the overall performance of the firm.There are many studies on the basis of which we can

Abstract
This study takes evidence from Pakistan Stock Exchange's top 10 listed textile companies to investigate the relationship between corporate governance and firm performance.The relationship is investigated through three important corporate governance mechanisms (board size, board composition, and audit committee composition) and two performance measures (return on assets and net profit ratio).No direct relationship was found between any of the corporate governance variables on performance variables.The findings of this study were consistent with results from many other studies conducted in developing countries.Future studies can be conducted with some additional variables to strengthen the research model and different industries can be tested to validate the findings of the study.___________________________________________________________________________________ ______________ Kaukab Abid Azhar and Waqas Mehmood (2018), Journal of Southeast Asian Research, DOI: 10.5171/2018.859648distinguish good and bad governance practices.Some of the common indicators include the proportion of independent directors, the role of chairman and CEO etc. (Bebchuk et al., 2004;Mishra and Mohanty, 2004).
The area of corporate performance and corporate governance is widely debated.Empirical research has shown a close association between the two variables.Some researchers have explored the relationship with the aid of agency theory (Brown and Caylor, 2005; Gompers et al., 2003) The theory suggests that corporate governance helps in higher valuation and better performance resulting in lower agency costs (Jensen and Meckling, 1976).Gomers et al. (2003) linked higher valuation of the firm with corporate governance practices.Brown and Caylor (2005) concluded that firms with better corporate governance practices have a higher ROE (Return on Equity) and ROA (Return on Assets).On the other hand, there have been instances where no evidence is found between the two variables; hence, the earlier findings cannot be generalized universally.Investors are skeptical about the relationship between governance and performance (Azeez, 2015).
Corporate governance mechanisms are different in different countries; there is a huge difference if we compare corporate governance of developed countries and emerging countries.The difference in nature of corporate governance is because emerging markets are different from developed economies in terms of the legal environment, regulatory stages, and institutions (Millar et al., 2005).Pakistan is an emerging economy.In recent times, businesses in Pakistan have suffered from many corporate governance issues and scandals which increase the significance of conducting a study to understand various dimensions of corporate governance in Pakistan.
In developed countries, including UK, Japan, France, Germany and US, many researchers have examined the linkage between corporate governance and performance of the firm in which we have observed varied findings.Only a few studies are found in emerging economies.Studies in the context of Pakistan are also limited.
The objective of the research is to investigate and study the relationship between corporate governance practices and firm performance in the textile sector of Pakistan.The textile sector contributes to around 57% of the total exports of Pakistan; therefore, we have chosen this sector to assess corporate governance's impact on firm performance.Research related to corporate governance is quite limited with respect to Pakistan.The literature review section is therefore focused more on literature available from developed countries and neighboring countries of Pakistan due to the cultural similarities.A change of corporate structure can also lead to a change in culture; however, if the culture is strong and shared across the society then it overpowers the corporate structure (Gordon and Roe, 2004).In Pakistan, it becomes interesting to study corporate governance because only changes in policies by regulatory authorities may not be able to change the cultural dimensions.
Most of the previous studies on examining corporate governance have focused on board size, independent directors, the role of chairman and CEO, sub-committees (Dwivedi & Jain, 2005).Some other studies have adopted a much more expansive approach by developing multiple metrics (Gompers et al., 2001).
A study was conducted on examining the relationship with context to the Textile industry of Pakistan.This study was conducted on the basis of data from 2007-2011, a lot has changed since then because of changes in the corporate governance code.The empirical analysis of the data from 2007 -2011 of 12 listed companies showed that return on assets was affected by the board size whereas no effect was observed in case of its relationship with return on equity.The study also included the dual role of CEO and chairman; however, at present, corporate code of governance restricts the duality of role.Hence for our study, we will eliminate that variable (Akbar, 2014).Instead, we have included the composition of the audit committee in our study.

Literature Review
Previous researchers have been unable to establish a conclusive result as results have varied in different contexts especially when comparisons have been drawn between emerging and developed countries (Boubaker & Nguyen, 2014).Very little academic work is available in the context of emerging countries such as Pakistan.This paper is focused on examining the relationship between corporate governance practices and firm performance, in the context of the textile industry of Pakistan.This section discusses some of the major studies conducted examining the relationship between firm performance and corporate governance.
In a research study by Lausten (2002), CEO turnover was linked to the corporate performance.A longitudinal study of Danish firms revealed that CEO turnover had an inverse relationship with firm performance.Several corporate governance measures were used as evidence to study the relationship.Bauer et al. (2004) analyzed the impact of good governance on firm value and stock performance.They compared the performances of poorly governed with wellgoverned companies by differentiating the two through Deminor Corporate Governance Ratings.Surprisingly, a negative association was found between performance and governance.Bhagat and Bolton (2008) studied the linkage between stock performance and corporate governance.Contrary to the popular beliefs, they found that none of the governance measures were related to the stock performance of the firm.However, the disciplinary management turnover was related to the independence of the board and stock ownership (board members).Firms with better governance were less likely to suffer from disciplinary management takeover despite their poor performances.This study opened up new avenues for researchers to examine the different dimensions of corporate governance.
The first significant study, in context to developing economies, (to the best of the knowledge of the researcher) was conducted by Kajola (2008) in Nigeria.On the basis of panel data of 20 Nigerian companies, he found mixed results as some of the performance measures were related to better governance while some were not.Another study in Nigeria was conducted by Ehikioya (2009)

Firm Performance
Managerial performance, traditionally, is measured on a firm's financial performance (Jr, 1991).Many accounting ratios, such as return on equity, return on assets, return on sales etc., can be used to assess a firm's performance.The stock price of a firm is positively correlated with ROA, theoretically (Selling and Stickney, 1989).Since the study is based on listed firms of PSX, ROA is considered as a better measure as the increase in ROA will imply a higher return for shareholders.The other performance variable used in this study is related to the profitability of the firm, Net Profit Ratio.

Board Size
It is always a difficult task to find an ideal size of the board (Ning et al., 2015); however, some studies have suggested that, ideally, a board should consist of members between 7-10 (Jensen, 1993; Lipton and Lorsch, 1992).Large board sizes are susceptible to blaming others for performance failures and relying on others for risky decisions (Hermalin and Weisbach, 2001).On the other hand, smaller board size will lead to a lack of diversity of opinions and issues of staffing other committees.In Pakistan, board size is not fixed as it may vary depending on the size of the company; however, there should be a minimum of five directors ("Code of Corporate Governance 2012 Amended July 2014 -SECP," 2017).Previous studies have established that firm performance and board size have a strong positive correlation (Dalton et al., 1999).

Board Composition
It relates to the composition of the board and the presence of independent directors.Board composition, with a majority of independent directors, is more inclined to respond to the poor performance of CEO (Weisbach, 1988) 1992).

The composition of Audit Committee
It relates to the presence in audit committee of independent directors.Corporate governance code of Pakistan states that there should be at least one independent director in the audit committee.For our study, we have included the number of non-executive directors as well in the composition of the audit committee.It also states it is preferred that the independent director is the chairman of the audit committee.Investors are more inclined to trust those companies in which the proportion of independent directors is higher in comparison (Uzun et al., 2004).

Hypothesis
H1: Board size has a significant impact on firm performance H2: Board composition has a significant impact on firm performance H3: Audit committee composition has a significant impact on firm performance

Methodology
Secondary data were collected from audited financial reports of top 10 listed companies in the textile sector.The top 10 companies (Azgard Nine, Nishat Mills, Gul Ahmed, Nishat Chunian, and Artistic Denim Mills, Crescent Textiles, Kohinoor Textile Mills, Sapphire Textiles, Redco Textiles and Masood Textiles) were selected on the basis of market capitalization after reviewing annual reports of listed textile firms.A regression model was used to assess the relationship between the performance variable (ROA and Net profit ratio) and corporate governance mechanism (audit committee, board composition, and board size).The data for the study were derived from audited financial statements from company annual statements of 2012 -2016.

Model Specification
Below is the model used for this study: Where, Y is the dependent variable i.e. firm performance i) ROA ii) Net Profit Ratio β0 is constant e is the error term If we expand the model with relevance to our study, we will get:

Descriptive Statistics
All the variables of the study are represented in Table 1.It shows that the average board size of the top 10 textile listed companies is 7 board members.The mean of board composition represents that on an average there are 4 members that are either nonexecutive directors or independent directors, present in the board.The majority (87%) of the audit committees is composed of members other than executive directors and chairman.The mean return on assets during that period was 3%.The mean net profit ratio during that period was 2%.1.3 explains the regression after applying the model for firm performance indicator ROA.Correlation of return on assets with the model is explained by R (Standardized coefficient of correlation) = -0.07 which explains the relationship of the combined variables with the dependent variable.The coefficient of determination (R 2 ) explains 0.70 or 70% variance in return on assets with a change in combined independent variables; whereas, the overall model is significant (F = 7.17, Sig = 0.00).Relationship between board size and return on assets is insignificant as t = 1.70 and Sig = 0.09.
Relationship between board composition and return on assets is insignificant as t = -1.32 and Sig = 0.19.The relationship between the audit committee and return on assets is insignificant as t = -.02 and Sig = 0.76.The results are somewhat similar to the results by Velnampy (2013), the study found that corporate governance mechanisms were not related to the performance measures of 28 manufacturing companies in Sri Lanka.Return on assets was also used as a performance measure and no effect was found on corporate governance (Velnampy, 2013).Another study in Sri Lanka showed different results in which data were collected from 174 firms for one year (2010).Board size and board composition had a significant impact on listed firms on firm performance (Guo and Kga, 2012).Another research in Sri Lanka studied the same relationship with data from 37 companies and found that there is a positive relationship between corporate governance and firm performance.(Heenetigala and Armstrong, 2011) The findings from our study are quite similar to the study conducted in South Korea and India (Gupta and Sharma, 2014).The study did not evaluate the same performance measures that are used in our study; however, they concluded that share price and financial performance of companies was not linked to corporate governance practices.Another research in India studied data from 2008-2012 of 119 Indian companies and concluded that ROA had a negative relationship with board variables (Garg and Singh, 2017).

Board
The area of corporate governance is gaining importance day by day.Many frauds like World Com and Enron have increased the significance of corporate governance.Developed countries have researched heavily on finding strong evidence for establishing a valid relationship between performance and governance mechanisms.Results from various countries have been differing.In developing and emerging countries, studies have shown contrasting findings.Some indicated a positive relationship while some showed no relationship.There have been studies in which even a negative relationship has been found.Our study suggests that in the textile sector of Pakistan, there is no impact of corporate governance measures on firm performance.

Limitation and Future Research
Our research is based on a small sample size.Future research can get conclusive findings by increasing the sample size.For our research, only two performance variables were used (return on assets and net profit ratio).Other studies may include other performance variables, such as ROE, to study if the same findings are applicable or not.The empirical literature suggests that most of the studies have been conducted on large scale businesses; therefore, studies on small-scale companies might reveal some interesting findings.A comparative study can also be conducted comparing findings from emerging and developed countries.

Firm
= Net Income/Total Assets Net Profit Ratio = Profit after Interest/Total Sales Journal of Southeast Asian Research ____________________________________________________________________________________ ______________ Kaukab Abid Azhar and Waqas Mehmood (2018), Journal of Southeast Asian Research, DOI: 10.5171/2018.859648Independent Variables: Board size = Number of members on the board Board Composition = Number of N.E.D. (Non-Executive Directors) and independent directors on the board Audit Committee = Number of independent directors and members of the audit committee outside the directors