The Prevalence and Quality of Source Attribution in Middle and High School Science Papers.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1673Abstract
Plagiarism is a commonly cited problem in higher education, especially in scientific writing and assignments for science courses. Students may not intentionally plagiarize, but may instead be confused about what proper source attribution entails. Much of this confusion likely stems from high school, either from lack of or inconsistent instruction across classes. To determine the extent of plagiarism issues in middle and high school student science papers, the authors surveyed student research reports to evaluate their use of in-text and reference page citations. While most of the students had a reference page, fewer than 35% of high school students properly used in-text citations. Furthermore, 12th grade students did not perform any better than 9th grade students in providing proper citations. A survey of college science faculty showed that they do not feel that students are receiving adequate training in source citation in high school. While proper source citation, including the use of in-text citations, is clearly indicated in state education standards, students may not be receiving consistent instruction for a variety of reasons. At a minimum, teachers and officials who supervise student research projects should ensure that students give proper attribution to their sources. This will avoid the development of bad habits that may be troublesome in college. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Downloads
References
American Association of School Librarians. 2007. Standards for the 21st Century Learner. Chicago, IL: American Library Association. Available from http://www.ala.org/aasl/sites/ala.org.aasl/files/content/guidelinesandstandards/learningstandards/AASL_Learning_Standards_2007.pdf
Association of College and Research Libraries. 2015. Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. Chicago, IL: American Library Association. Available from http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework
Breen, L. & Maassen, M. 2005. Reducing the incidence of plagiarism in an undergraduate course: The role of education. Issues in Educational Research. 15(1): 1-16. Retrieved from http://www.iier.org.au/iier15/breen.html
Common Core State Standards. 2015. English & Language Arts Standards for Science & Technical Subjects, Grades 6-12. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/RST/introduction/
Dant, D.R. 1986. Plagiarism in high school: A survey. The English Journal. 75(2): 81-84. doi: 10.2307/817898
DeVoss, D & Rosati, A.C. 2002. "It wasn't me, was it?" Plagiarism and the web. Computers and Composition. 19: 191-203. doi: 10.1016/S8755-4615(02)00112-3
Eret, E., & Gokmenoglu, T. 2010. Plagiarism in higher education: A case study with prospective academicians. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2:3303-3307. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.505
Franklyn-Stokes, A. & Newstead, S.E. 1995. Undergraduate cheating: Who does what and why? Studies in Higher Education. 20(2): 159-172. doi: 10.1080/03075079512331381673
Georgia Department of Education. 2006. English Language Arts (ELA) Standards. Retrieved from http://gadoe.georgiastandards.org/english.aspx.
Glynn, S.M. & Muth, K.D. 2006. Reading and writing to learn science: achieving scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 31(9): 1057-1073. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660310915
Harwood, N. 2009. An interview-based study of the functions of citations in academic writing across two disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics. 41: 497-518. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.001
Hauptman, R. 2008. Authorial ethics: How writers abuse their calling. Journal of Scholarly Publishing. 39:323-353. doi: 10.3138/jsp.39.4.323
Head, A.J. 2013, Dec. 5. Learning the Ropes: How Freshmen Conduct Course Research Once They Enter College. Seattle, WA: Project Information Literacy. Retrieved from {http://www.projectinfolit.org/uploads/2/7/5/4/27541717/pil_2013_freshmenstudy_fullreportv2.pdf}
McCabe, D. 1997. Classroom cheating among natural science and engineering majors. Science and Engineering Ethics. 3: 433-445. doi: 10.1007/s11948-997-0046-y
McCabe, D. 2005. It takes a village: Academic dishonesty and educational opportunity. Liberal Education. 91(3): 26-31.
McCabe, D., & Katz, D. 2009. Curbing cheating. Education Digest. 75(1): 16-19.
McCabe, D.L., Trevino, L.K., & Butterfield, K.D. 2001. Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior. 11(3): 219-232. doi: 10.1207/S15327019EB1103_2
Newcombe, R.G. 1998. Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods. Statistics in Medicine. 17: 873-890. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<873::AID-SIM779>3.0.CO;2-I
Park, C. 2003. In other (people's) words: Plagiarism by university students - literature and lessons. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 28: 471-488. doi: 10.1080/02602930301677
Roig, M. 1997. Can undergraduate students determine whether text has been plagiarized? Psychological Record. 47: 113-122. Retrieved from http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/tpr/vol47/iss1/7
Savannah River Site. 2012. Savannah River Regional Science and Engineering Fair. Retrieved from http://educationoutreach.srs.gov/srrsef.htm
Selwyn, N. 2008. Not necessarily a bad thing ...": A study of online plagiarism amongst undergraduate students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 33(5): 465-479. doi: 10.1080/02602930701563104
Sheard, J., Dick, M., Markham, S., McDonald, I. & Walsh, M. 2002. Cheating and plagiarism: perceptions and practices of first year IT students. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 183-187. doi: 10.1145/544414.544468
Simon, C.A., Carr, J.R., McCullough, S.M., Morgan, S.J., Oleson, T. & Ressel, M. 2004. Gender, student perceptions, institutional commitments and academic honesty: who reports in academic dishonesty cases? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 29(1): 75-90. doi: 10.1080/0260293032000158171
Sisti, D.A. 2007. How do high school students justify Internet plagiarism? Ethics & Behavior. 17(3): 215-231. doi: 10.1080/10508420701519163
Society for Science & the Public. 2012a. Intel International Science and Engineering Fair International Rules and Guidelines 2013. Retrieved from {https://web.archive.org/web/20130117213149/https://www.societyforscience.org/document.doc?id=396}
Society for Science & the Public. 2012b. Most Common Reasons for Projects to Fail to Qualify at Intel ISEF. Retrieved from {https://web.archive.org/web/20121102032541/https://www.societyforscience.org/page.aspx?pid=802}
Society for Science & the Public. 2008. 2010 Affiliated Fair Information. Retrieved from https://student.societyforscience.org/affiliated-fair-network.
South Carolina Department of Education. 2008. South Carolina Academic Standards for English Language Arts. Retrieved from http://ed.sc.gov/agency/programsservices/59/documents/StateBoardApprovedFinalMay14.pdf
Southworth, A.J. 2015. Plagiarism can be a learning opportunity. School Library Monthly. 31(4): 12-15.
Whitley, B.E. 1998. Factors associated with cheating among college students: A review. Research in Higher Education. 39: 235-274. doi: 10.1023/A:1018724900565
Wilson, E.B. 1927. Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 22: 209-212. doi: x10.1023/A:1018724900565
Yeo, S. 2007. First-year university science and engineering students' understanding of plagiarism. Higher Education Research & Development. 26(2): 199-216. doi: 10.1080/07294360701310813
Yore, L.D., Hand, B.M., & Prain, V. 2002. Scientists as writers. Science Education. 86: 672-692. doi: 10.1002/sce.10042
Yore, L.D., Hand, B.M. & Florence, M.K. 2004. Scientists' views of science, models of writing, and science writing practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 41(4): 338-369. doi: 10.1002/tea.20008
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Michelle Vieyra, Kari Weaver
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.