ABSTRACT

This volume of writings by outstanding twentieth-cnetury American historians presents one aspect of the problem which results from the conflict between the subjectivity of the historian and the objectivity of the past. It examines in particular the relationship between the historian and the climate of opinion in which he does he work.

chapter 101|5 pages

Introduction

part 1|49 pages

Historians of the Earlier 1900s

chapter 1|11 pages

Written History as an Act of Faith

Charles Beard (1934)

chapter 2|11 pages

The Rise of American Civilization

Charles and Mary Beard (1927)

chapter 3|10 pages

Main Currents in American Thought

Vernon Louis Parrington (1927–1930)

chapter 4|15 pages

Commentary on Progressive Histories

Charles Crowe (1966)

part 2|46 pages

Historians Since World War II

chapter 5|12 pages

The Liberal Tradition in America

Louis Hartz (1955)

chapter 6|9 pages

The Genius of American Politics

Daniel Boorstin (1953)

chapter 7|13 pages

The Age of Reform

Richard Hofstadter (1955)

chapter 8|10 pages

Commentary on “Consensus and Continuity” in Post War Historical Interpretations

J. Rogers Hollingsworth (1962)

part 3|61 pages

A Dissenting Neo-Progressivism in the 1960s: The New Left Historians

chapter 9|14 pages

The Historian as Participant

Staughton Lynd (1967)

chapter 10|16 pages

Populism, Authoritarianism, and the Historian

Norman Pollack (1964)

chapter 11|29 pages

Commentary on the New Left Historians

Irwin Unger (1967)

part 4|49 pages

The Historian and the Climate of Opinion: An Obstacle or an Opportunity?

chapter 12|21 pages

The Attempt to Write a More Scientific History

Allan Bogue (1967)

chapter 13|8 pages

A Critique of the Scientific Hope

Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. (1962)

chapter 14|18 pages

The Historian as Moral Critic

John Higham (1962)