|
[1]
|
Aitchison, C. (2009). Writing groups for doctoral education. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 905-916. doi:10.1080/03075070902785580
|
|
[2]
|
Baker, V. L., & Lattuca, L. R. (2010). Developmental networks and learning: toward an interdisciplinary perspective on identity development during doctoral study. Studies in Higher Education, 35, 807- 827. doi:10.1080/03075070903501887
|
|
[3]
|
Barnacle, R., & Mewburn, I. (2010). Learning networks and the journey of “becoming doctor”. Studies in Higher Education, 35, 433-444. doi:10.1080/03075070903131214
|
|
[4]
|
Barnes, B. J., Williams, E. A., & Stassen, M. L. A. (2012). Dissecting doctoral advising: A comparison of students’ experiences across disciplines. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 36, 309-331.
doi:10.1080/0309877X.2011.614933
|
|
[5]
|
Bourner, T., Bowden, R., & Laing, S. (2001). Professional doctorates in England. Studies in Higher Education, 26, 65-83.
|
|
[6]
|
Cumming, J. (2010). Doctoral enterprise: A holistic conception of evolving practices and arrangements. Studies in Higher Education, 35, 25-39. doi:10.1080/03075070902825899
|
|
[7]
|
Delamont, S., Atkinson, P., & Parry, O. (2004). Supervising the doctorate—A guide to success. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
|
|
[8]
|
Dinham, S. & Scott, C. (2001). The experience of disseminating the results of doctoral research. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 25, 45-55. doi:10.1080/03098770020030498
|
|
[9]
|
Evans, T. (2010). Understanding doctoral research for professional practitioners. In M. Walker, & P. Thomson (Eds.) The Routledge doctoral supervisor’s companion (pp. 66-75). London and New York: Routledge.
|
|
[10]
|
Franke, A., & Arvidsson, B. (2011). Research supervisors’ different ways of experiencing supervision of doctoral students. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 7-19. doi:10.1080/03075070903402151
|
|
[11]
|
Gardner, S. K. (2007). “I heard it through the grapevine”: Doctoral student socialization in chemistry and history. Higher Education, 32, 383-408. doi:10.1007/s10734-006-9020-x
|
|
[12]
|
Gardner, S. K. (2010). Faculty perspective on doctoral student socialization in five disciplines. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 5, 39-53.
|
|
[13]
|
Gasper, D. (2010). Interdisciplinarity and interdisciplinarity—Diverse purposes of research: Theory-oriented, situation-oriented, policy-oriented. In P. Thomson, & M. Walker (Eds.), The Routledge doctoral student’s companion (pp. 52-67). London and New York: Routledge.
|
|
[14]
|
Golde, C. M. (2005). The role of the department and discipline in doctoral student attrition: Lessons from four departments. Journal of Higher Education, 76, 669-700. doi:10.1353/jhe.2005.0039
|
|
[15]
|
Golde, C. M. (2010). Adapting signature pedagogies in doctoral education: The case of teaching how to work with the literature. In M. Walker, & P. Thomson (Eds.), The Routledge doctoral supervisor’s companion (pp. 106-120). Abingdon: Routledge.
|
|
[16]
|
Green, R., Hutchison, E., & Sra, B. (1992). Evaluating scholarly performance: The productivity of graduates of social work doctoral programs. Social Services Review, 66, 441-466. doi:10.1086/603932
|
|
[17]
|
Halse, C., & Malfroy, J. (2010). Retheorizing doctoral supervision as professional work. Studies in Higher Education, 35, 79-92.
doi:10.1086/603932
|
|
[18]
|
Hawley, P. (2010). Being bright is not enough: The unwritten rules of doctoral study (3rd ed.). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.
|
|
[19]
|
Hunt, C. (2001). Climbing out of the void: moving from chaos to concepts in the presentation of a thesis. Teaching in Higher Education, 6, 351-367. doi:10.1080/13562510120061214
|
|
[20]
|
Ives, G., & Rowley, G. (2005). Supervisor selection or allocation and continuity of supervision: Ph.D. students’ progress and outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 30, 535-555.
doi:10.1080/03075070500249161
|
|
[21]
|
Johnston, B., & Murray, R. (2004). New routes to the Ph.D.: Cause for concern? Higher Education Quarterly, 58, 31-42.
doi:10.1111/j.1468-2273.2004.00258.x
|
|
[22]
|
Kamler, B. (2008). Rethinking doctoral publication practices: Writing from and beyond the thesis. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 283- 294. doi:10.1080/03075070802049236
|
|
[23]
|
Kwan, B. S. C. (2010). An investigation of instruction in research publishing offered in doctoral programs: The Hong Kong case. Higher Education, 59, 55-68. doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9233-x
|
|
[24]
|
Lee, A., & Kamler, B. (2008). Bringing pedagogy to doctoral publishing. Teaching in Higher Education, 13, 511-523.
doi:10.1080/13562510802334723
|
|
[25]
|
Lee, A. (2011). Professional practice and doctoral education: Becoming a researcher. In L. Scanlon (Ed.), “Becoming” a professional: An interdisciplinary analysis of professional learning (lifelong learning book series, Volume 16) (pp. 153-169). London: Springer.
doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1378-9_8
|
|
[26]
|
Lillis, T., & North, S. (2006). Academic writing. In S. Potter (Ed.), Doing postgraduate research (2nd Edition, pp. 114-151). London: Sage Publications.
|
|
[27]
|
Lucas, R., & Willinsky, J. (2010). Open access and the ongoing transformation of scholarly publishing. In P. Thomson, & M. Walker (Eds.), The Routledge doctoral student’s companion (pp. 344-355). London and New York: Routledge.
|
|
[28]
|
Miller, B. (2010). Skills for sale: What is being commodified in higher education? Journal of Further and Higher Education, 34, 199-206.
doi:10.1080/03098771003695460
|
|
[29]
|
Molesworth, M., Nixon, E., & Scullion, R. (2009). Having, being and higher education: The marketisation of the university and the transformation of the student into consumer. Teaching in Higher Education, 14, 277-287. doi:10.1080/13562510902898841
|
|
[30]
|
Morley, L., Leonard, D., & David, M. (2003) Quality and equality in British Ph.D. assessment. Quality Assurance in Education, 11, 64-72.
doi:10.1108/09684880310471489
|
|
[31]
|
Morrison-Saunders, A., Moore, S. A., Hughes, M., & Newsome, D. (2010). Coming to terms with research practice: Riding the emotional rollercoaster of doctoral research studies’ in M. Walker, & P. Thomson (Eds.), The Routledge doctoral supervisor’s companion (pp. 206-218). Abingdon: Routledge.
|
|
[32]
|
Mullins, G., & Kiley, M. (2002). It’s a Ph.D., not a Nobel Prize: How experienced examiners assess research theses. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 369-386. doi:10.1080/0307507022000011507
|
|
[33]
|
Nettles, M. T., & Millett, C. M. (2006). Three magic letters: Getting to Ph.D. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
|
|
[34]
|
Pearson, M., Evans, T., & Macauley, P. (2008). Growth and diversity in doctoral education: Assessing the Australian experience. Higher Education, 55, 357-372. doi:10.1007/s10734-007-9059-3
|
|
[35]
|
Phillips, E. M., & Pugh, D. S. (2000). How to get a Ph.D.: A handbook for students and their supervisors (3rd ed.), Maidenhead: Open University Press.
|
|
[36]
|
Rugg, G., & Petre, M. (2004). The unwritten rules of Ph.D. research. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
|
|
[37]
|
Sankey, M., & St. Hill, R. (2009). The ethics of designing for multimodality: Empowering nontraditional learners. In U. Demiray, & R. C. Sharma (Eds.), Ethical Practices and Implications in Distance Learning (pp. 125-154). Hershey: Information Science Reference.
|
|
[38]
|
Seddon, T. (2010). Doctoral education in global times: “Scholarly quality” as practical ethics in research. In M. Walker, & P. Thomson (Eds.), The Routledge doctoral supervisor’s companion (pp. 219-230). London and New York: Routledge.
|
|
[39]
|
Servage, L. (2009). Alternative and professional doctoral programs: What is driving the demand? Studies in Higher Education, 34, 765- 779. doi:10.1080/03075070902818761
|
|
[40]
|
Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134, 52-59. doi:10.1162/0011526054622015
|
|
[41]
|
Taylor, S. (2002). Managing postgraduate research degrees. In S. Ketteridge, S. Marshall, & H. Fry (Eds.), The effective academic: A handbook for enhanced academic practice (pp.131-147). London: Kogan Page Ltd.
|
|
[42]
|
Taylor, S., & Beasley, N. (2005). A handbook for doctoral supervisors. Abingdon: Routledge.
|
|
[43]
|
Thomson, P., & Walker, M. (2010). Doctoral education in context: The changing nature of the doctorate and doctoral students. In M. Walker, & P. Thomson (Eds.), The Routledge doctoral supervisor’s companion (pp. 9-26). Abingdon: Routledge.
|
|
[44]
|
Trigwell, K. (2010). The relationship between doctoral students’ approach to research and experiences of their research environment. In M. Walker, & P. Thomson (Eds.), The Routledge doctoral supervisor’s companion (pp. 282-291). London & New York: Routledge.
|
|
[45]
|
Unsworth, K. L., Turner, N., Williams, H. M., & Piccin-Houle, S. (2010). Giving thanks: The relational context of gratitude in postgraduate supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 35, 871-888.
doi:10.1080/03075070903348396
|
|
[46]
|
Wagner, J. (2010). Ignorance in educational research: How not knowing shapes new knowledge. In P. Thomson, & M. Walker (Eds.), The Routledge doctoral student’s companion (pp. 31-42). London & New York: Routledge.
|
|
[47]
|
Watts, J. H. (2008). Challenges of supervising part-time Ph.D. students: Towards student-centred practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 13, 369-373. doi:10.1080/13562510802045402
|
|
[48]
|
Watts, J. H. (2009) From professional to Ph.D. student: Challenges of status transition. Teaching in Higher Education, 14, 687-691.
doi:10.1080/13562510903315357
|
|
[49]
|
Watts, J. H. (2010) Supervising part-time doctoral students: Issues and challenges. In P. Thomson, & M. Walker (Eds.), The Routledge doctoral supervisor’s companion (pp. 123-130). London & New York: Routledge.
|
|
[50]
|
Watts, J. H. (2012). Preparing doctoral candidates for the viva: Issues for students and supervisors. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 36, 371-381. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2011.632819
|
|
[51]
|
Wellington, J. (2010). Weaving the threads of doctoral research journeys. In P. Thomson, & M. Walker (Eds.), The Routledge doctoral student’s companion (pp. 128-142). London & New York: Routledge.
|
|
[52]
|
Wellington, J., & Torgerson, C. J. (2005). Writing for publication: What counts as a “high status, eminent academic journal?” Journal of Further and Higher Education, 29, 35-48.
doi:10.1080/03098770500037739
|
|
[53]
|
Wisker, G., Robinson, G., Trafford, V., Warnes, M., & Creighton, E. (2003). From supervisory dialogues to successful Ph.D.s: Strategies supporting and enabling the learning conversations of staff and students at postgraduate level. Teaching in Higher Education, 8, 383- 397. doi:10.1080/13562510309400
|
|
[54]
|
Yates, L. (2010). Quality agendas and doctoral work: the tacit, the new agendas, the changing contexts. In P. Thomson, & M. Walker (Eds.), The Routledge doctoral student’s companion (pp. 299-310). London & New York: Routledge.
|