Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T00:41:42.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Type of Finite Element Gradient Recovery Method based on Vertex-Edge-Face Interpolation: The Recovery Technique and Superconvergence Property

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2015

Qun Lin*
Affiliation:
LSEC, ICMSEC, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
Hehu Xie*
Affiliation:
LSEC, ICMSEC, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
*
Corresponding author. Email: linq@lsec.cc.ac.cn
Corresponding author. Email: hhxie@lsec.cc.ac.cn
Get access

Abstract

In this paper, a new type of gradient recovery method based on vertex-edge-face interpolation is introduced and analyzed. This method gives a new way to recover gradient approximations and has the same simplicity, efficiency, and superconvergence properties as those of superconvergence patch recovery method and polynomial preserving recovery method. Here, we introduce the recovery technique and analyze its superconvergence properties. We also show a simple application in the a posteriori error estimates. Some numerical examples illustrate the effectiveness of this recovery method.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Global-Science Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Ainsworth, M. and Oden, J. T., A Posteriori Error Estimation in Finite Element Analysis, Wiley Interscience, New York, 2000.Google Scholar
[2] I. Babuška and Strouboulis, T., The Finite Element Method and Its Reliability, Oxford University Press, London, 2001.Google Scholar
[3]Bank, R. E. and Xu, J., Asymptotic exact a posteriori error estimators, Part I: Grids with super-convergence, SIAM. J. Numer. Anal., 41(6) (2003), 22942312.Google Scholar
[4]Bramble, J. H. and Schatz, A. H., Higher order local accuracy by averaging in the finite element method, Math. Comp., 31 (1977), 94111.Google Scholar
[5]Brenner, S. C. and Scott, L. R., The Mathematical Theory of Finite Element Methods, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994.Google Scholar
[6]Chen, C. and Huang, Y., High Accuracy Theory for Finite Element Methods, Hunan Sci. Tech. Press, China, 1995.Google Scholar
[7]Ciarlet, P. G., The finite Element Method for Elliptic Problem, North-holland Amsterdam, 1978.Google Scholar
[8] M. Křížek, Neittaanmäki, P. and Stenberg, R. (EDs.), Finite Element Methods: Superconvergence, Post-processing, and A Posteriori Estimates, Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics Series, Vol. 196, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1997.Google Scholar
[9]Li, B., superconvergence for higher-order triangular finite elements, Chinese J. Numer. Math. Appl. (English), 12(1) (1990), 7579.Google Scholar
[10]Li, B. and Zhang, Z., Analysis of a class of superconvergence patch recovery techniques for linear and bilinear finite elements, Numer. Methods PDEs, 15 (1999), 151167.Google Scholar
[11]Li, J., Convergence and superconvergence analysis of finite element methods on highly nonuniform anisotropic meshes for singularly perturbed reaction-diffusion problems, Appl. Numer. Math., 36(2-3) (2001), 129154.Google Scholar
[12]Lin, Q. and Lin, J., Finite Element Methods: Accuracy and Inprovement, China Sci. Tech. Press, 2005.Google Scholar
[13]Lin, Q. and Xie, H., Superconvergence measurement for general meshes by linear finite element method, Math. Pract. Theory, 41(1) (2011), 138152.(In Chinese).Google Scholar
[14]Lin, Q. and Yan, N., The Construction and Analysis of High Efficiency Finite Element Methods, HeBei University Publishers, P.R. China, 1995.Google Scholar
[15]Lin, Q. and Zhu, Q., Preproceesing and Postprocessing for the Fininite Element Method (in Chinese), Shanghai Scientific & Technical Press, 1994.Google Scholar
[16]Naga, A. and Zhang, Z., A Posteriori error estimates based on the polynomial preserving recovery, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 42(4)(2004), 17801800.Google Scholar
[17]Shaidurov, V. V. and Xie, H., Richardson extrapolation for eigenvalue of discrete spectral problem on general mesh, Comput. Technol., 12(3)(2007), 2437.Google Scholar
[18]Wahlbin, L. B., Superconvergence in Galerkin Finite Element Methods, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 1605, Springer, Berlin, 1995.Google Scholar
[19]Wang, J., A superconvergence analysis for finite element solutions by the least-squares surface fitting on irregular meshes for smooth problems, J. Math. Study, 33(3) (2000).Google Scholar
[20]Wiberg, N.-E. and Li, X. D., Superconvergence patch recovery of finite element solutions and a posteriori L 2 norm error estimate, Comm. Numer. Methods Engrg., 37 (1994), 313320.Google Scholar
[21]Xu, J. and Zhang, Z., Analysis of recovery type a posteriori error estimators for mildly structured grids, Math. Comp., 73 (2004), 11391152.Google Scholar
[22]Zhang, Z., Ultraconvergence of the patch recovery technique II, Math. Comp., 69 (2000), 141158.Google Scholar
[23]Zhang, Z., Polynomial preserving gradient recovery and a posteriori estimate for bilinear element on irregular quadrilaterals, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Model., 1(2004), 124.Google Scholar
[24]Zhang, Z. and Naga, A., Validation of the a posteriori error estimator based on polynomial preserving recovery for linear elements, Internt. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 61 (2004), 18601893.Google Scholar
[25]Zhang, Z. and Naga, A., A new finite element gradient recovery method: Superconvergence property, SIAM J. Sci. Comp., 26(4)(2005), 11921213.Google Scholar
[26]Zhu, Q. D. and Lin, Q., Superconvergence Theory of the Finite Element Method, Hunan Science Press, China, 1989 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
[27]Zienkiewicz, O. C. and Zhu, J. Z., The superconvergence patch recovery and a posteriori error estimates. Part 1: The recovery technique, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 33 (1992), 13311364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar