CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · World J Nucl Med 2020; 19(02): 118-123
DOI: 10.4103/wjnm.WJNM_39_19
Original Article

Less influence of body mass index on bone mineral density of radius as compared to proximal femur: Possible role in the diagnosis of osteoporosis

Isa Asli
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Taleghani Educational Hospital, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
,
Mahsa Sheikhnezami
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Taleghani Educational Hospital, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
,
Mohsen Qutbi
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Taleghani Educational Hospital, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
,
Faraneh Farsad
1   Department of Rheumatology, Loghman Educational Hospital, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
,
Sadaf Asli
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Taleghani Educational Hospital, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
,
Shahla Ranji
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Taleghani Educational Hospital, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
,
Maryam Karami
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Taleghani Educational Hospital, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

It has been shown that body mass index (BMI) and obesity may affect the mineral density of bones, regionally on weight-bearing bones or systemically through hormones and cytokines. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of BMI on bone mineral density (BMD) of the radius. In this cross-sectional study, 260 patients, 233 postmenopausal women and 27 men over 50, were included who underwent a bone densitometry scanning using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry after obtaining an informed consent. The scanning was performed in three areas (i.e., spine, proximal femur, and radius), then densitometric data (BMD, T- and Z-score) were extracted. Regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of independent variables of age, gender, and BMI on the BMD of the above regions. By grouping the patients in two categories (BMI <25 as normal or underweight and BMI >25 as overweight and obese), the discordance in the diagnosis following the inclusion of radius into interpretation (diagnosis based on 2 vs. 3 areas), was assessed by an agreement test. The study is approved by the ethics committee of the university. Of 260 participants in the present study, mean and standard deviation for age were 61.48 ± 8.95 for all patients, 65.81 ± 10.59 for male and 60.98 ± 8.62 for women. An increasing effect of BMI was found to be statistically significant in weight-bearing areas (total femur and femoral neck) and BMI increase was not associated with increased BMD of radius. An agreement test between two diagnoses is used that showed a discordance of 28.5% in diagnosis (diagnosis based on 2 vs. 3 areas) with a kappa coefficient of 0.547 (P = 0.001). In total, 25.4% was minor discordance and 3.1% was major discordance. Based on the results of this study, it is concluded that the BMI is not associated with increased BMD in bones that are not weight bearing, such as radius. Therefore, it may be preferred to include the densitometric data of radius into the diagnosis.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.




Publication History

Received: 22 May 2019

Accepted: 20 June 2019

Article published online:
19 April 2022

© 2020. Sociedade Brasileira de Neurocirurgia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Cummings SR, Kelsey JL, Nevitt MC, O'Dowd KJ. Epidemiology of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. Epidemiol Rev 1985;7:178-208.
  • 2 Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 2006;17:1726-33.
  • 3 Petrella RJ, Payne M, Myers A, Overend T, Chesworth B. Physical function and fear of falling after hip fracture rehabilitation in the elderly. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2000;79:154-60.
  • 4 Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO study group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 1994;843:1-29.
  • 5 Jackson RD, Mysiw WJ. Insights into the epidemiology of postmenopausal osteoporosis: The women's health initiative. Semin Reprod Med 2014;32:454-62.
  • 6 Chung KC, Spilson SV. The frequency and epidemiology of hand and forearm fractures in the United States. J Hand Surg Am 2001;26:908-15.
  • 7 Saryazdi MA, Mojibian M. Osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Eur J Med Res 2011;16:121-2.
  • 8 Watts NB. Postmenopausal osteoporosis: A clinical review. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2018;27:1093-6.
  • 9 Hirota T, Nara M, Ohguri M, Manago E, Hirota K. Effect of diet and lifestyle on bone mass in Asian young women. Am J Clin Nutr 1992;55:1168-73.
  • 10 Glauber HS, Vollmer WM, Nevitt MC, Ensrud KE, Orwoll ES. Body weight versus body fat distribution, adiposity, and frame size as predictors of bone density. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1995;80:1118-23.
  • 11 Gourlay ML, Brown SA. Clinical considerations in premenopausal osteoporosis. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:603-14.
  • 12 De Laet C, Kanis JA, Odén A, Johanson H, Johnell O, Delmas P, et al. Body mass index as a predictor of fracture risk: A meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 2005;16:1330-8.
  • 13 Albala C, Yáñez M, Devoto E, Sostin C, Zeballos L, Santos JL. Obesity as a protective factor for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1996;20:1027-32.
  • 14 Felson DT, Zhang Y, Hannan MT, Anderson JJ. Effects of weight and body mass index on bone mineral density in men and women: The Framingham study. J Bone Miner Res 1993;8:567-73.
  • 15 Kameda T, Mano H, Yuasa T, Mori Y, Miyazawa K, Shiokawa M, et al. Estrogen inhibits bone resorption by directly inducing apoptosis of the bone-resorbing osteoclasts. J Exp Med 1997;186:489-95.
  • 16 Whyte MP, Mumm S. Heritable disorders of the RANKL/OPG/RANK signaling pathway. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2004;4:254-67.
  • 17 Roux S. New treatment targets in osteoporosis. Joint Bone Spine 2010;77:222-8.
  • 18 Boyle WJ, Simonet WS, Lacey DL. Osteoclast differentiation and activation. Nature 2003;423:337-42.
  • 19 Reid IR. Relationships among body mass, its components, and bone. Bone 2002;31:547-55.
  • 20 Holecki M, Wiecek A. Relationship between body fat mass and bone metabolism. Pol Arch Med Wewn 2010;120:361-7.
  • 21 Alonso AC, Gonçalves TA, Almeida JK, Machado-Lima A, Ernandes RC, Greve JM, et al. Relationship between bone mineral density and body composition in elderly. Acta Ortop Bras 2018;26:27-9.
  • 22 El Hage R, Bachour F, Sebaaly A, Issa M, Zakhem E, Maalouf G. The influence of weight status on radial bone mineral density in Lebanese women. Calcif Tissue Int 2014;94:465-7.
  • 23 Sutter T, Toumi H, Valery A, El Hage R, Pinti A, Lespessailles E. Relationships between muscle mass, strength and regional bone mineral density in young men. PLoS One 2019;14:e0213681.
  • 24 Forsmo S, Aaen J, Schei B, Langhammer A. What is the influence of weight change on forearm bone mineral density in peri- and postmenopausal women? The health study of Nord-Trondelag, Norway. Am J Epidemiol 2006;164:890-7.
  • 25 Amiri L, Kheiltash A, Movassaghi S, Moghaddassi M, Seddigh L. Comparison of bone density of distal radius with hip and spine using DXA. Acta Med Iran 2017;55:92-6.
  • 26 Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Oden A, Melton LJ 3rd, Khaltaev N. A reference standard for the description of osteoporosis. Bone 2008;42:467-75.
  • 27 Woodson G. Dual X-ray absorptiometry T-score concordance and discordance between the hip and spine measurement sites. J Clin Densitom 2000;3:319-24.
  • 28 Lloyd JT, Alley DE, Hawkes WG, Hochberg MC, Waldstein SR, Orwig DL. Body mass index is positively associated with bone mineral density in US older adults. Arch Osteoporos 2014;9:175.
  • 29 Tóth E, Ferenc V, Mészáros S, Csupor E, Horváth C. Effects of body mass index on bone mineral density in men. Orv Hetil 2005;146:1489-93.
  • 30 Silva HG, Mendonça LM, Conceição FL, Zahar SE, Farias ML. Influence of obesity on bone density in postmenopausal women. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol 2007;51:943-9.