MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery: A novel non-invasive technique in the treatment of adenomyosis –18 month’s follow-up of 12 cases

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background: Adenomyosis is a gynecological condition of the uterus, characterized by the presence of ectopic endometrial tissue in the myometrium. Hysterectomy, uterine artery embolization, and endometrial ablation therapy are the various surgical treatment options available for adenomyosis. A novel and globally upcoming technique is MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery “MRgFUS,” which is a promising non-invasive surgical treatment option. This study was carried out to determine the effectiveness of MRgFUS in the symptomatic management of adenomyosis. Subjects and Methods: This study was carried out as a long-term follow-up study among 12 cases of adenomyosis, which were treated by MR-guided focused ultrasound. In all these participant’s, three parameters – symptom severity score (SSS), menstrual pain score accessed using visual analogue score (VAS), and number of approximate pads used during menstruation were recorded prior to the treatment and on follow-up at 3, 9, and 18 months, respectively. The Friedman’s test was used to test the difference in the values of scores before and after treatment. Results: There was a significant improvement in the SSS, VAS, and the numbers of sanitary napkins used after surgery and sustained during the long-term follow-up. These values were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: MRgFUS can be used in successful treatment of adenomyosis/focal adenomyoma by careful selection of the participant, good planning, and proper monitoring of the technique during ablation.

Publication History

Received: 20 February 2019

Accepted: 05 July 2019

Article published online:
22 July 2021

© 2019. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

• References

• 1 Benagiano G, Brosens I. History of adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2006; 20: 449-63
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Taran FA, Stewart EA, Brucker S. Adenomyosis: Epidemiology, risk factors, clinical phenotype and surgical and interventional alternatives to hysterectomy. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2013; 73: 924-31
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Rabinovici J, Stewart EA. New interventional technique for adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2006; 20: 617-37
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Zhou YF. High intensity focused ultrasound in clinical tumor ablation. World J Clin Oncol 2011; 2: 8-27
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Al Hilli MM, Stewart EA. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery. Semin Reprod Med 2010; 28: 242-9
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Novellas S, Chassang M, Delotte J, Toullalan O, Chevallier A, Bouaziz J. et al. MRI characterstics of the uterine junctional zone: From normal to the diagnosis of adenomyosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196: 1206-13
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Harding G, Coyne KS, Thompson CL, Spies JB. The responsiveness of the uterine fibroid symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire (UFS-QOL). Health Qual Life Out 2008; 6: 99
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Spies JB, Coyne K, GuaouGuaou N, Boyle D, Skynarz MK, Gonzalves SM. The UFS-QOL, a new disease specific symptom and health related quality of life questionnaire for leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 290-300
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Fukunishi H, Funaki K, Sawada K, Yamaguchi K, Maeda T, Kaji Y. Early results of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery of adenomyosis: Analysis of 20 cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008; 15: 571-9
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Ishihara Y, Calderon A, Watanabe H, Okamoto K, Suzuki Y, Kuroda K. A precise mapping using proton chemical shift. Magn Reson Med 1995; 34: 814-23
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Cline HE, Hynynen K, Watkins RD. Focused US system for MR imaging-guided tumor ablation. Radiology 1995; 194: 731-7
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Hindman JC. Proton resonance shift of water in the gas and liquid states. J Chem Phys 1966; 44: 4582-92
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 13 Morita Y, Ito N, Hikida H, Takeuchi S, Nakamura K, Ohashi H. Non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound treatment for uterine fibroids-early experience. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008; 139: 199-203
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Hindley J, Gedroyc WM, Regan L, Stewart E, Tempany C, Hynyen K. et al. MRI guidance of focused ultrasound therapy of uterine fibroids: Early results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183: 1713-9
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Kim KA, Yoon SW, Lee C, Seong SJ, Yoon BS, Park H. Short-term results of magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery for participants with adenomyosis: Symptomatic relief and paid reduction. Fertil Steril 2011; 95: 1152-5
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Jolesz FA, Hynynen K. Magnetic resonance image-guided focused ultrasound surgery. Cancer J 2002; 8 Suppl (01) S100-12
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Chung AH, Jolesz FA, Hynynen K. Thermal dosimetry of a focused ultrasound beam in vivo by magnetic resonance imaging. Med Phys 1999; 26: 2017-26
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Ferrari F, Arrigoni F, Miccoli A, Mascaretti S, Fascetti E, Mascaretti G. et al. Effectiveness of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) in the uterine adenomyosis treatment: Technical approach and MRI evaluation. Radiol Med 2016; 121: 153-161
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Fan TY, Zhang L, Chen W, Liu Y, He M, Huang X. et al. Feasibility of MRI-guided high intensity focused ultrasound treatment for adenomyosis. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 3624-30
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Zhang X, Li K, Xie B, He M, He J, Zhang L. Effective ablation therapy of adenomyosis with ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2014; 124: 207-11
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Lee JS, Hong GY, Park BJ, Kim TE. Ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for uterine fibroid and adenomyosis: A single center experience from the Republic of Korea. Ultrason Sonochem 2015; 27: 682-7
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar