Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_308_19
Impact of a standardized reporting format on the quality of MRI reports for rectal cancer staging
Financial support and sponsorship Nil.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Besides providing a surgical roadmap, rectal MRI plays a major role in treatment planning. We recently started using a structured template for reporting rectal cancer via MRI. We study the impact of using this template at our hospital in terms of number of essential imaging parameters described in the reports as compared to the pre-template free-text reports. Methods: A structured rectal MRI reporting template was created in consensus with members of the colorectal tumour board and was introduced in the department, which included 14 essential parameters to be mentioned in the reports. We conducted a retrospective analysis of rectal MRI reports of 100 cases with histologically proven rectal cancer, comprising 50 consecutive free-text reports before the template was introduced and 50 consecutive structured reports after its introduction, checking for the presence or absence of inclusion of the 14 parameters. An anonymous online feedback survey was conducted as well after the introduction of the template for the members of the colorectal tumour board. Results: Overall, the total number of parameters reported increased from a median value of 10 (range 6-13) to 14 (range 12-14). The common unreported parameters prior to template introduction included T staging, presence or absence of restricted diffusion, anterior peritoneal reflection (APR) involvement, and presence or absence of extramural vascular invasion; these were reported in 16%, 22%, 30% and 50% respectively. These improved to 98-100% reporting after template introduction. Maximum improvement was in T staging (16% to 98%) (P < 0.0001), restricted diffusion on DWI (from 22% to 100%) (P < 0.0001) and APR involvement (from 30% to 100%) (P < 0.0001). The most common unreported parameter after template introduction was the “tumoral T2 signal intensity” (unreported in 4% cases). The results of the survey were as follows: 100% felt a decreased need to talk to the radiologist to clarify the report, 81.8% felt an improvement in the quality of reporting as compared to free style reports, and 91% felt that the new template is easier to interpret. Conclusion: The introduction of a structured template for rectal cancer significantly improved the quality of rectal MRI reports, along with the satisfaction of referring providers.
Publication History
Received: 15 July 2019
Accepted: 09 January 2020
Article published online:
19 July 2021
© 2020. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India
-
References
- 1 Tersteeg JJC, Gobardhan PD, Crolla RMPH, Kint PA, Niers-Stobbe I, Boonman-de Winter LJM. et al. Improving the quality of MRI reports of preoperative patients with rectal cancer: Effect of national guidelines and structured reporting. Am J Roentgenol 2018; 1: 1240-4
- 2 Sahni VA, Silveira PC, Sainani NI, Khorasani R. Impact of a structured report template on the quality of MRI reports for rectal cancer staging. Am J Roentgenol 2015; 205: 584-8
- 3 Nörenberg D, Sommer WH, Thasler W, D’haese J, Rentsch M, Kolben T. et al. Structured reporting of rectal magnetic resonance imaging in suspected primary rectal cancer: Potential benefits for surgical planning and interdisciplinary communication. Invest Radiol 2017; 52: 232-9
- 4 Gollub MJ, Arya S, Beets-Tan RG, Gonen M, Jhaveri K, Kassam Z. et al. Use of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer patients: Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) rectal cancer disease-focused panel (DFP) recommendations 2017. Abdom Radiol 2018; 43: 2893-902
- 5 Beets-Tan RG, Lambregts DM, Maas M, Bipat S, Barbaro B, Curvo-Semedo L. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for clinical management of rectal cancer: Updated recommendations from the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting. Eur Radiol 2018; 28: 1465-75
- 6 Cho SH, Cho YS, Choi IY, Ha HI, Huh J, Hur BY. et al. Essential items for structured reporting of rectal cancer MRI: 2016 consensus recommendation from the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology. Korean J Radiol 2017; 18: 132-51
- 7 Ganeshan D, Duong PA, Probyn L, Lenchik L, McArthur TA, Retrouvey M. et al. Structured reporting in radiology. Acad Radiol 2018; 25: 66-73
- 8 Neri E, Brady AP, Gibaud B, Visser J, Nahum Goldberg S, Pyatigorskaya N. et al. ESR paper on structured reporting in radiology. Insights Imaging 2018; 9: 1-7
- 9 Herts BR, Gandhi NS, Schneider E, Coppa CP, Mody RN, Baker ME. et al. How we do it: Creating consistent structure and content in abdominal radiology report templates. Am J Roentgenol 2019; 212: 490-6
- 10 Flusberg M, Ganeles J, Ekinci T, Goldberg-Stein S, Paroder V, Kobi M. et al. Impact of a structured report template on the quality of CT and MRI reports for hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis. J Am Coll Radiol 2017; 14: 1206-11
- 11 Wetterauer C, Winkel DJ, Federer-Gsponer JR, Halla A, Subotic S, Deckart A. et al. Structured reporting of prostate magnetic resonance imaging improves interdisciplinary communication. Eur Urol Suppl 2018; 17: e2562
- 12 Brown PJ, Rossington H, Taylor J, Lambregts DM, Morris E, West NP. et al. Standardised reports with a template format are superior to free text reports: The case for rectal cancer reporting in clinical practice. Eur Radiol 2019; 22: 1-8