Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Social Health and Diabetes 2017; 05(01): 043-046
DOI: 10.4103/2321-0656.193999
Original Article
NovoNordisk Education Foundation

Does diabetes blight work productivity: A cross-sectional investigation on selected Type 2 diabetes participants

Sivapriya Thiyagarajan
Department of Home Science, Women's Christian College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Sheila John
Department of Home Science, Women's Christian College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 November 2018 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background: Diabetes is one of the leading global health predicaments of the 21st century. Due to rapid urbanization and lifestyle changes, more and more people become victim to diabetes every year. Many countries spend a chunk of their total health expenditure on diabetes. Thus, the disease is a major challenge for individuals, their families, and the healthcare system. It has become a hurdle to sustainable economic development as it cripples productivity.

Methodology: With this background, the daily routine, work place productivity, and accomplishment of goals, both short- and long-term, were assessed for 200 diabetic subjects using a diabetes productivity measure.

Results: Since Type 2 diabetes subjects with 1-3 years of disease duration and without any comorbid conditions were selected for this study, 44% indicated that diabetes slightly had an impact on their long-term goal whereas 2% identified that diabetes was a burden and it prohibited them from achieving their long-term goals.

Conclusion: Massive education and awareness programs are crucial to improve the diagnosis and management of all types of diabetes and to embed lifestyle changes that will slow the rise in Type 2 diabetes.

Diabetes productivity measure - goals - productivity - work place
 

  • References

  • 1 Zimmet P, Alberti KG, Shaw J. Global and societal implications of the diabetes epidemic. Nature 2001; 414: 782-787
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Patterson CC, Dahlquist GG, Gyürüs E, Green A, Soltész G. Eurodiab Study Group. Incidence trends for childhood type 1 diabetes in Europe during 1989-2003 and predicted new cases 2005-20: A multicentre prospective registration study. Lancet 2009; 373: 2027-2033
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Yamuna A, Mary S, Ping Z. Cost-effectiveness of the interventions in the primary prevention of diabetes among Asian Indians: Within-trial results of the Indian diabetes prevention programme (IDPP). Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 2548-2552
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bastida E, Pagán JA. The impact of diabetes on adult employment and earnings of Mexican Americans: Findings from a community based study. Health Econ 2002; 11: 403-413
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Vijan S, Hayward RA, Langa KM. The impact of diabetes on workforce participation: Results from a national household sample. Health Serv Res 2004; 39 (6 Pt 1): 1653-1669
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 6 United Nations. Report of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: United Nations; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Satman I, Akalin S, Ozdemir O. Impairment of work productivity and daily activities in Turkish patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Value Health 2012; 15: A277-A575
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Lavigne JE, Phelps CE, Mushlin A, Lednar WM. Reductions in individual work productivity associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Pharmacoeconomics 2003; 21: 1123-1134
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Korff M, Katon W, Elizabeth H, Gregory S, Ciechanowski P. Work disability among individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 1326-1332
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes Atlas. 7. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation; 2015
    Google Scholar