Abstract
Background
Cages have been widely used for the anterior reconstruction and fusion of cervical spine. Nonmetal cages have become popular due to prominent stress shielding and high rate of subsidence of metallic cages. This study aims to assess fusion with n-HA/PA66 cage following one level anterior cervical discectomy.
Materials and Methods
Forty seven consecutive patients with radiculopathy or myelopathy underwent single level ACDF using n-HA/PA66 cage. We measured the segmental lordosis and intervertebral disc height on preoperative radiographs and then calculated the loss of segmental lordosis correction and cage subsidence over followup. Fusion status was evaluated on CT scans. Odom criteria, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) and Visual Analog Pain Scales (VAS) scores were used to assess the clinical results. Statistically quantitative data were analyzed while Categorical data by χ2 test.
Results
Mean correction of segmental lordosis from surgery was 6.9 ± 3.0° with a mean loss of correction of 1.7 ± 1.9°. Mean cage subsidence was 1.2 ± 0.6 mm and the rate of cage subsidence (>2 mm) was 2%. The rate of fusion success was 100%. No significant difference was found on clinical or radiographic outcomes between the patients (n=27) who were fused by n-HA/PA66 cage with pure local bone and the ones (n=20) with hybrid bone (local bone associating with bone from iliac crest).
Conclusions
The n-HA/PA66 cage is a satisfactory reconstructing implant after anterior cervical discectomy, which can effectively promote bone graft fusion and prevent cage subsidence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Robinson RA. Fusions of the cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1959;41-A: 1–6.
Smith GW, Robinson RA. The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1958;40-A: 607–24.
Malloy KM, Hilibrand AS. Autograft versus allograft in degenerative cervical disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;394:27–38.
Zdeblick TA, Phillips FM. Interbody cage devices. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:S2–7.
Faldini C, Leonetti D, Nanni M, Di Martino A, Denaro L, Denaro V, et al. Cervical disc herniation and cervical spondylosis surgically treated by Cloward procedure: A 10-year-minimum followup study. J OrthopTraumatol 2010;11:99–103.
Kao FC, Niu CC, Chen LH, Lai PL, Chen WJ. Maintenance of interbody space in one- and two-level anterior cervical interbody fusion: Comparison of the effectiveness of autograft, allograft, and cage. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;430:108–16.
Siddiqui AA, Jackowski A. Cage versus tricortical graft for cervical interbody fusion. A prospective randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003;85:1019–25.
Silber JS, Anderson DG, Daffner SD, Brislin BT, Leland JM, Hilibrand AS, et al. Donor site morbidity after anterior iliac crest bone harvest for single level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:134–9.
Bagby GW. Arthrodesis by the distraction-compression method using a stainless steel implant. Orthopedics 1988;11:931–4.
Majd ME, Vadhva M, Holt RT. Anterior cervical reconstruction using titanium cage with anterior plating. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:1604–10.
Eck KR, Bridwell KH, Ungacta FF, Lapp MA, Lenke LG, Riew KD. Analysis of titanium mesh cages in adults with minimum two-year followup. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:2407–15.
Brantigan JW, Steffee AD. A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion. Two-year clinical results in the first 26 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993;18:2106–7.
Faldini C, Chehrassan M, Miscione MT, Acri F, d’Amato M, Pungetti C, et al. Single level anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion using PEEK anatomical cervical cage and allograft bone. J Orthopaed Traumatol 2011;12:201–5.
Chen JF, Lee ST, Wu CT. A hollow cylindrical PMMA strut for cervical spine reconstruction after cervical multilevel corpectomy. J Spinal Disord Tech 2010;23:321–7.
Chen JF, Wu CT, Lee SC, Lee ST. Hollow cylindrical PMMA strut for spinal reconstruction after single level cervical corpectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 2006;5:287–93.
Yang X, Song Y, Liu L, Liu H, Zeng J, Pei F. Anterior reconstruction with nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide-66 cage after thoracic and lumbar corpectomy. Orthopedics 2012;35:e66–73.
Ou Y, Jiang D, Quan Z, An H, Liu B. Application of artificial vertebral body of biomimetic nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 composite in anterior surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. Zhong guo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2007;21:1084–8.
Zhao Z, Jiang D, Ou Y, Tang K, Luo X, Quan Z. A hollow cylindrical nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide composite strut for cervical reconstruction after cervical corpectomy. J Clin Neurosci 2012;19:536–40.
Boakye M, Mummaneni PV, Garrett M, Baldus C, Blanke K. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion involving a polyetheretherketone spacer and bone morphogenetic protein. J Neurosurg Spine 2005;2:521–5.
Niu CC, Liao JC, Chen WJ, Chen LH. Outcomes of interbody fusion cages used in 1 and 2-levels anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: Titanium cages versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages. J Spinal Disord Tech 2010;23:310–6.
Wang X, Li Y, Wei J, de Groot K. Development of biomimetic nano- hydroxyapatite/poly (hexamethyleneadipamide) composites. Biomaterials 2002;23:4787–91.
Huang M, Feng J, Wang J, Zhang X, Li Y, Yan Y. Synthesis and characterization of nano-HA/PA66 composites. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2003;14:655–60.
Liang Y, Jiang DM. In vivo study on intervetebral fusion cage made by nanohydroxyapatite and polyamide 66 composites [Article in Chinese]. J Third Mil Med Univ 2001;29:2333–5.
Xu Q, Lu H, Zhang J, Lu G, Deng Z, Mo A. Tissue engineering scaffold material of porous nanohydroxyapatite/polyamide 66. Int J Nanomedicine 2010;5:331–5.
Schmieder K, Wolzik-Grossmann M, Pechlivanis I, Engelhardt M, Scholz M, Harders A. Subsidence of the wing titanium cage after anterior cervical interbody fusion: 2-year followup study. J Neurosurg Spine 2006;4:447–53.
Nakase H, Park YS, Kimura H, Sakaki T, Morimoto T. Complications and long term followup results in titanium mesh cage reconstruction after cervical corpectomy. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006;19:353–7.
Chen Y, Chen D, Guo Y, Wang X, Lu X, He Z, et al. Subsidence of titanium mesh cage: A study based on 300 cases. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008;21:489–92.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, X., Liu, L., Song, Y. et al. Outcome of single level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide-66 cage. IJOO 48, 152–157 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.128753
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.128753