Volleyball coaches behavior assessment through systematic observation

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/20205
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: Volleyball coaches behavior assessment through systematic observation
Autor/es: Zetou, Eleni | Amprasi, Evagelia | Michalopoulou, Maria | Aggelousis, Nikolaos
Palabras clave: CBAS | Feedback | Coaching behavior | Systematic observation | Volleyball
Área/s de conocimiento: Educación Física y Deportiva
Fecha de publicación: dic-2011
Editor: Universidad de Alicante. Área de Educación Física y Deporte
Cita bibliográfica: ZETOU, Eleni, et al. “Volleyball coaches behavior assessment through systematic observation”. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise [en línea]. Vol. 6, No. 4 (2011). ISSN 1988-5202, pp. 585-593. http://www.jhse.ua.es/index.php/jhse/article/viewArticle/260 [consulta: 4 enero 2012]
Resumen: The purpose of this study was to record and evaluate the practice behaviors of 12 Greek Volleyball National Division coaches, mean age 47.36 (SD=6.1) through feedback that they provided to their athletes throughout the 2010-11 seasons. Verbal and non verbal behaviors were video recorded during four practices, of each coach. A total of 13.400 behaviors were observed and were coded using the Revised Coaching Behavior Recording Form which corresponded to the 12 categories of the instrument. The analyses of videotaped behaviors were made by two trained observers who were checked in the internal and external reliability. Results indicated that there were 279.11 coded coaching behaviors in each training session. A large proportion of reported coaching behaviors 17.38% (n=48.34) were about "Tactical Instruction", followed by "General Instruction" 15.92% (n=44.45) and "Technical Instruction" 12.42% (n=34.68). "Encouragement" and "Motivation" were 10.76% and 10.73% respectively. "Other Comments" (8.67%) and "Demonstration" (8.26%) were in lower rate. ANOVA revealed that there were not differences between 1st and 2nd division coaching behavior, instead of "Criticism" (p < 0.05) with 2nd division coaches have more comments and "Non verbal reward" (p < 0.05) which 1st division coaches were used more often.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/20205
ISSN: 1988-5202
DOI: 10.4100/jhse.2011.64.02
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor: http://dx.doi.org/10.4100/jhse.2011.64.02
Aparece en las colecciones:Journal of Human Sport and Exercise - 2011, Vol. 6, No. 4

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
Thumbnailjhse_Vol_VI_N_IV_585-593.pdf216,67 kBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa


Este ítem está licenciado bajo Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons