1. INTRODUCTION
Organophosphorus compounds are of great interest because many biological processes such as energy transfer, bone synthesis, amino acid synthesis, among others are related to them1. Consequently, it is not so strange that many researchers are studying them to understand their role in biological systems2–4. Moreover, phosphorus compounds are employed in numerous synthetic procedures to manufacture detergents, fertilizers, pesticides, toxic industrial phosphate esters, natural products, among others5,6.
Recently, mentoxy dichloro phosphorous (C10H19OPCl2) (MEPCL2) was synthesized from the reaction of 2-(2-propyl)-5-methyl-1-cyclohexanol (menthol) with PCl3. This new organophosphorus compound exhibits a maximum absorbance at 227 nm, this value indicates that MEPCL2 has important absorption properties in the visible region of the electromagnetic spectra, by which may useful in the fabrication of photovoltaic devices. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no information about the electronic properties and the chemical behavior of MEPCL2. Thus, it is necessary to get a deeper knowledge about this compound, to identify its potential uses and applications. In this sense, the evaluation of these properties may result expensive and complicated from the experimental point of view. However, the accepted theories of the quantum chemistry provide advantages to analyze the electronic properties and reactivity of molecules reliably7. Therefore, in the present work, we perform a computational and theoretical quantum study about the electronic properties and chemical reactivity exhibited by MEPCL2. We consider that this kind of study will contribute to getting a better understanding of the chemical behavior of this new organophosphorus compound.
2. METHODOLOGY
The entire quantum chemical calculations have been performed at HF and DFT (B3LYP) methods with 6-311++G(d,p) basis sets using the Gaussian 03W program8. The optimized structural parameters have been evaluated for the calculations of vibrational frequencies by assuming Cs point group symmetry. At the optimized geometry for the title molecule no imaginary frequency modes were obtained, therefore there is a true minimum on the potential energy surface was found. As a result, the unscaled calculated frequencies, reduced masses, force constants, infrared intensities, and depolarization ratios are obtained. In order to fit the theoretical wavenumbers to the experimental, the scaling factors have been introduced by using a least square optimization of the computed to the experimental data. Vibrational frequencies are scaled as 0.9067 for HF and 0.961 for B3LYP9 to account for systematic errors caused by basis set incompleteness, neglect of electron correlation and vibrational anharmonicity. The assignments of the compound are calculated by using VEDA program10.
The electronic absorption spectra for optimized molecule calculated with the time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) at B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level in gas phase and solvent (Acetonitrile, chloroform, and water). The 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) chemical shifts of the molecule were calculated by the gauge-independent atomic orbital (GIAO) method in CDCl3 and compared with experimental results.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3.1. Molecular geometry
The geometry optimization of MEPCL2, see Fig. 1, was carried out at the HF/6-311++G(d,p) and B3LYP//6-311++G(d,p) levels of theory.
No imaginary frequencies were obtained, which ensures us that each gradient optimization located corresponds to true minimum energy on the energy potential surface. The selected optimized structural parameters, bond lengths and bond angles of the title compound are reported in Table 1. From this table, it is possible to observe that the bond lengths and bond angles values calculated at the HF/6-311++G(d,p) and B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) levels of theory compare favorably well with those reported in the literature. A linear fit of the optimized data, see Fig. 2 suggests that the bond lengths values calculated at the HF/6-311++G(d,p) level is slightly better than the geometry obtained at the B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level. However, this difference is in the order of the error associated with the resolution of the wavefunction when numerical algorithms are employed. Thus, no significant differences were obtained, which is indicative that the electronic correlation has a little effect on the molecular geometry of the MEPCL2.
Bond length | HF/6-311++ G(d,p) (Å) | B3LYP/6-311++ G(d,p) (Å) | Experimental Value (Å)7 | Bond angle | HF/6-311++ G(d,p) (°) | B3LYP/ 6-311++ G(d,p) (°) | Experimental Value (°)7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1-H12 | 1.083 | 1.093 | H12-C1-O11 | 107.0 | 106.4 | ||
C2-H13 | 1.085 | 1.095 | 0.970 | H13-C2-C3 | 105.6 | 105.8 | |
C3-H14 | 1.086 | 1.094 | 0.970 | H14-C3-H15 | 105.8 | 105.7 | 108.1 |
C3-H15 | 1.088 | 1.096 | 0.970 | H15-C3-C4 | 108.9 | 109.0 | 109.5 |
C4-H16 | 1.086 | 1.094 | 0.970 | H16-C4-C5 | 109.2 | 109.3 | 109.5 |
C4-H17 | 1.087 | 1.095 | 0.970 | H17-C4-H16 | 106.2 | 106.1 | 108.1 |
C5-H18 | 1.088 | 1.096 | 0.970 | H18-C5-C7 | 106.6 | 106.9 | 107.9 |
C6-H19 | 1.082 | 1.090 | 0.970 | H19-C6-C1 | 109.2 | 109.2 | 109.3 |
C6-H20 | 1.085 | 1.094 | 0.970 | H20-C6-H19 | 106.8 | 106.9 | 107.9 |
C7-H21 | 1.086 | 1.094 | H21-C7-H23 | 107.4 | 107.4 | ||
C7-H22 | 1.087 | 1.094 | H22-C7-H21 | 107.7 | 107.8 | ||
C7-H23 | 1.086 | 1.093 | H23-C7-H22 | 107.4 | 107.3 | ||
C8-H24 | 1.088 | 1.098 | H24-C8-C10 | 106.0 | 106.2 | ||
C9-H25 | 1.087 | 1.094 | H25-C9-H27 | 107.1 | 107.1 | ||
C9-H26 | 1.084 | 1.093 | H26-C9-H25 | 107.5 | 107.3 | ||
C9-H27 | 1.083 | 1.091 | H27-C9-H26 | 108.5 | 108.4 | ||
C10-H28 | 1.086 | 1.094 | H28-C10-H30 | 107.7 | 107.7 | ||
C10-H29 | 1.084 | 1.092 | H29-C10-H28 | 108.0 | 108.0 | ||
C10-H30 | 1.087 | 1.094 | H30-C10-H29 | 107.6 | 107.7 | ||
C1-C6 | 1.526 | 1.528 | 1.534 | C4-C3-C2 | 114.6 | 114.5 | 110.5 |
C4-C3 | 1.531 | 1.535 | 1.521 | C2-C1-C6 | 115.7 | 115.9 | 110.8 |
C2-C1 | 1.537 | 1.540 | 1.532 | C7-C5-C6 | 112.6 | 112.5 | |
C7-C5 | 1.537 | 1.538 | C9-C8-C2 | 118.4 | 118.1 | ||
C9-C8 | 1.534 | 1.539 | C10-C8-C9 | 110.1 | 110.0 | ||
C5-C4 | 1.535 | 1.543 | 1.523 | C6-C5-C4 | 109.1 | 109.2 | 111.7 |
C10-C8 | 1.539 | 1.540 | C8-C2-C3 | 107.7 | 107.6 | ||
C6-C5 | 1.536 | 1.546 | 1.525 | O11-C1-C6 | 113.9 | 113.8 | |
C3-C2 | 1.546 | 1.552 | 1.513 | P31-O11-C1 | 132.3 | 130.1 | |
C8-C2 | 1.447 | 1.567 | Cl32-P31-O11 | 102.4 | 102.8 | ||
O11-C1 | 1.563 | 1.576 | Cl33-P31-Cl32 | 98.4 | 98.5 | ||
P31-O11 | 1.568 | 1.600 | |||||
Cl32-P31 | 2.093 | 2.141 | |||||
Cl33-P31 | 2.093 | 2.141 |
3.2. Vibrational analysis
The number of potential active fundamental vibrations of a non-linear molecule which contains N atoms is equal to (3N-6), apart from three translational and three rotational degrees of freedom. Therefore, MEPCL2 molecule has 33 atoms with 93 normal modes of vibrations. In the present work, we have done a detailed vibrational assignment of the experimental wavenumbers reported in a previous work, through the comparison with theoretically scaled wavenumbers evaluated at the HF/6-311++G(d,p) and B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) levels of theory. In order to fit the theoretical wavenumbers to the experimental data, the scaling factors have been introduced by using a least square optimization of the computed to the experimental data. Vibrational frequencies are scaled as 0.9067 for HF and 0.961 for B3LYP10 to take into account the systematic errors caused by basis set incompleteness, neglect of electron correlation, in the case of HF calculations, and vibrational anharmonicity. The assignments of the compound are calculated by using VEDA program10. The calculated experimental and scaled frequencies using HF and DFT (B3LYP) with the 6-311++G(d,p) basis set are listed in Table 2.
Modes species | Expa | HF/6-311++G(d,p) | B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) | Mode description b | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Infrared7 | unscaled | scaled | IIR | unscaled | scaled | ||
1. A′ | 3266 | 2962 | 31.7 | 3111 | 2989 | γCH cyclohexane | |
2. A′ | 3255 | 2951 | 21.4 | 3109 | 2988 | γCH cyclohexane | |
3. A′ | 3243 | 2941 | 24.1 | 3104 | 2983 | γCH cyclohexane | |
4. A′ | 3237 | 2935 | 37.4 | 3097 | 2976 | γCH cyclohexane | |
5. A′ | 3227 | 2926 | 44.0 | 3086 | 2966 | γCH cyclohexane | |
6. A′ | 3224 | 2923 | 52.6 | 3085 | 2965 | γCH cyclohexane | |
7. A′ | 2957 vs | 3219 | 2918 | 16.5 | 3081 | 2961 | γCH cyclohexane |
8. A′ | 3216 | 2916 | 64.0 | 3064 | 2944 | γCH cyclohexane | |
9. A′ | 3208 | 2908 | 9.3 | 3056 | 2937 | γCH cyclohexane | |
10. A′ | 3205 | 2906 | 15.4 | 3053 | 2934 | γCH cyclohexane | |
11. A′ | 2928 vs | 3198 | 2899 | 33.4 | 3052 | 2933 | γCH3 sym |
12. A′ | 3189 | 2892 | 11.1 | 3034 | 2916 | γCH3 sym | |
13. A′ | 3175 | 2879 | 52.9 | 3031 | 2913 | γCH3 sym | |
14. A′ | 3173 | 2877 | 35.7 | 3030 | 2912 | γCH3 sym | |
15. A′ | 3163 | 2867 | 33.0 | 3026 | 2908 | γCH3 sym | |
16. A′ | 3162 | 2867 | 15.4 | 3024 | 2906 | γCH3 sym | |
17. A′ | 3159 | 2864 | 6.7 | 3017 | 2899 | γCH3 sym | |
18. A′ | 3155 | 2860 | 16.6 | 3012 | 2894 | γCH3 sym | |
19. A′ | 3145 | 2851 | 22.0 | 2994 | 2877 | γCH3 sym | |
20. A′ | 1456 m | 1644 | 1490 | 9.0 | 1519 | 1459 | γC-C ring |
21. A′ | 1637 | 1484 | 10.5 | 1515 | 1456 | γC-C ring | |
22. A′ | 1630 | 1478 | 3.9 | 1512 | 1453 | γC-C ring | |
23. A′ | 1627 | 1475 | 19.4 | 1506 | 1447 | βCH | |
24. A′ | 1621 | 1470 | 3.3 | 1502 | 1444 | γC-C | |
25. A′ | 1620 | 1469 | 2.2 | 1500 | 1441 | γC-C ring | |
26. A′ | 1617 | 1466 | 9.9 | 1494 | 1436 | γC-C | |
27. A′ | 1610 | 1459 | 1.4 | 1488 | 1430 | γC-C ring | |
28. A′ | 1607 | 1457 | 0.5 | 1485 | 1427 | γC-C ring | |
29. A′ | 1388 m | 1560 | 1415 | 8.6 | 1431 | 1375 | βCH |
30. A′ | 1370 m | 1555 | 1410 | 13.8 | 1422 | 1366 | γC-O |
31. A′ | 1546 | 1402 | 1.9 | 1418 | 1363 | γC-C | |
32. A′ | 1538 | 1394 | 1.6 | 1409 | 1354 | γC-C | |
33. A′ | 1348 w | 1532 | 1389 | 8.5 | 1401 | 1347 | βCH |
34. A′ | 1521 | 1379 | 1.0 | 1396 | 1341 | βCH | |
35. A′ | 1330 w | 1512 | 1371 | 1.9 | 1384 | 1330 | βCH |
36. A′ | 1500 | 1360 | 2.2 | 1375 | 1322 | βCH | |
37. A′ | 1493 | 1354 | 0.5 | 1368 | 1315 | βCH | |
38. A′ | 1480 | 1342 | 2.3 | 1361 | 1308 | βCH | |
39. A′ | 1478 | 1341 | 3.4 | 1358 | 1305 | βCH | |
40. A′ | 1457 | 1321 | 1.6 | 1330 | 1278 | βCH | |
41. A′ | 1447 | 1312 | 7.3 | 1325 | 1274 | βCH | |
42. A′ | 1432 | 1298 | 4.3 | 1303 | 1253 | βCH | |
43. A′ | 1224 m | 1381 | 1252 | 4.2 | 1272 | 1222 | βCH m |
44. A′ | 1358 | 1231 | 0.9 | 1258 | 1209 | βCH m | |
45. A′ | 1180 m | 1305 | 1183 | 3.0 | 1205 | 1158 | βCH m |
46. A′ | 1283 | 1164 | 0.5 | 1188 | 1142 | βCH | |
47. A′ | 1277 | 1158 | 1.9 | 1173 | 1128 | βCH m | |
48. A′ | 1255 | 1138 | 3.7 | 1155 | 1110 | βCH m | |
49. A′ | 1060 m | 1193 | 1082 | 4.0 | 1109 | 1066 | βCH m |
50. A′ | 1188 | 1077 | 0.8 | 1100 | 1057 | βCH m | |
51. A′ | 1174 | 1065 | 2.4 | 1089 | 1046 | βCH m | |
52. A′ | 1140 | 1034 | 4.7 | 1054 | 1013 | βCH m | |
53. A′ | 992 s | 1128 | 1023 | 5.3 | 1042 | 1001 | γP-O |
54. A′ | 974 s | 1120 | 1015 | 38.5 | 990 | 951 | βCCC ring |
55. A′ | 1067 | 968 | 3.2 | 988 | 950 | βCCC | |
56. A′ | 934 m | 1066 | 967 | 455.3 | 973 | 935 | βCCC ring |
57. A′ | 1043 | 946 | 30.6 | 967 | 929 | βCCC | |
58. A′ | 1032 | 935 | 13.2 | 959 | 921 | βCCC ring | |
59. A′ | 1021 | 926 | 2.6 | 948 | 911 | βCCC | |
60. A′ | 997 | 904 | 0.7 | 929 | 893 | βCCO | |
61. A′ | 879 w | 979 | 887 | 2.8 | 905 | 870 | βPOC |
62. A′ | 937 | 850 | 3.2 | 872 | 838 | βPOCl | |
63. A′ | 825 w | 929 | 842 | 18.6 | 862 | 829 | βClPCl |
64. A″ | 770 vw | 857 | 777 | 15.6 | 792 | 761 | φCH |
65. A″ | 829 | 752 | 4.3 | 774 | 744 | φCH | |
66. A″ | 794 | 720 | 1.6 | 745 | 716 | φCH | |
67. A″ | 723 | 656 | 3.1 | 670 | 644 | φCH | |
68. A″ | 586 vw | 646 | 585 | 2.8 | 604 | 581 | φCH |
69. A″ | 495 w | 582 | 527 | 1.6 | 543 | 522 | φCH |
70. A″ | 447 vw | 535 | 485 | 64.7 | 482 | 463 | γΡ-Cl |
71. A″ | 499 | 452 | 18.9 | 440 | 423 | γΡ-Cl | |
72. A″ | 469 | 425 | 108.2 | 428 | 411 | φCH m | |
73. A″ | 457 | 414 | 40.4 | 414 | 398 | φCH m | |
74. A″ | 454 | 411 | 15.4 | 411 | 395 | φCH m | |
75. A″ | 424 | 384 | 3.5 | 390 | 374 | φCH m | |
76. A″ | 416 | 377 | 3.3 | 381 | 366 | φCH m | |
77. A″ | 387 | 351 | 3.7 | 349 | 335 | βClPCl | |
78. A″ | 368 | 334 | 2.8 | 338 | 325 | φCH m | |
79. A″ | 347 | 314 | 1.9 | 319 | 306 | φCH m | |
80. A″ | 318 | 289 | 0.2 | 288 | 277 | φCH m | |
81. A″ | 308 | 280 | 0.3 | 280 | 270 | φCCC ring | |
82. A″ | 247 | 224 | 0.4 | 231 | 222 | φCCC ring | |
83. A″ | 234 | 212 | 0.0 | 221 | 212 | φCCC | |
84. A″ | 233 | 211 | 0.2 | 214 | 206 | βClPCl | |
85. A″ | 222 | 201 | 0.4 | 196 | 188 | φPOCC | |
86. A″ | 204 | 185 | 0.5 | 185 | 178 | φClPOC | |
87. A″ | 180 | 163 | 1.7 | 163 | 157 | φCCC | |
88. A″ | 142 | 129 | 1.6 | 129 | 124 | φCCC | |
89. A″ | 90 | 82 | 1.1 | 86 | 83 | φClOlP | |
90. A″ | 79 | 72 | 0.5 | 70 | 67 | φCCC | |
91 A″ | 60 | 55 | 0.2 | 50 | 48 | φCCC | |
92 A″ | 57 | 52 | 0.2 | 46 | 44 | φCCC | |
93 A″ | 34 | 31 | 0.2 | 26 | 25 | φPCCl |
as: strong; vs: very strong; m: medium; w: weak; vw: very weak.
bγ: stretching; β: in-plane bending; φ: out-of-plane bending; IIR: IR intensity.
3.2.1 Cyclohexane ring vibrations
Cyclohexyl ring in MEPCL2 contains three methylene (CH2) groups, each group has six modes of vibration namely asymmetric and symmetric stretching, scissoring, rocking, wagging and twisting modes. In general, in cyclohexane, the CH2 stretching vibrations are usually observed below 3000 cm-1 11. The asymmetric CH2 stretching vibration generally observed in the region is 3000-2900 cm−1 while the CH2 symmetric stretch is between 2900 and 2800 cm-1 12,13. In MEPCL2, the calculated wavenumbers at 2934, 2933, 2916, 2913, 2912, 2908 and 2906 cm−1 are attributed to asymmetric CH2 stretching vibrations, while the symmetric CH2 stretching wave numbers are calculated as 2899, 2894 and 2877 cm−1 at the B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level of theory. One stretching vibration of cyclohexyl ring is observed in MEPCL2, as very strong band at 2928 cm−1 in FT-IR spectrum. The vibrations due to aromatic C-H in-plane bending are observed in the region 1000-1300 cm-1 14. For this compound, the C-H in-plane bending vibrations were observed at 1224, 1180 and 1060 cm−1 in FT-IR. The theoretically scaled vibrations predicted at the y B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level are obtained at 1305, 1274, 1253, 1222, 1209, 1158, 1142 1110 and 1066 cm−1. The C-H out-of-plane bending vibrations are appearing within the region 900-675 cm-1 15. The vibrations identified at 770, 586, 4985 and 447 cm−1 in FT-IR are assigned to C-H out-of-plane bending for MEPCL2.
3.2.2. C-C vibrations
The ring stretching vibrations are useful to identify characteristic of the ring itself. For the title compound, the C=C stretching vibrations are recorded at 1456 and 1388 cm−1 in FT-IR with medium intensities. All bands are appearing in the expected range, except first band. Most of the bands are observed with medium and strong intensities. The computed values are at 1459, 1456, 1453, 1441, 1430 and 1427 cm−1 at the B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level of theory. The other C-C vibrations are computed at 1447, 1444, 1436, 1375 and 1366 cm−1. These vibrations are downshifted when they are compared with those exhibited by aromatic compounds and other C-C vibrations are more shifted with ring C-C vibrations. Only two bands at 992 and 974 cm−1 are assigned to C-C-C in-plane bending vibrations of MEPCL2. The two bands are in infrared region with very strong intensities. The computed vibrations are tabulated to C-C-C in-plane and out-of-plane bending vibrations at 1001, 951, 921 and 270, 222 and 266 cm−1.
3.2.3. Methyl group vibrations
For the assignment of CH3 group frequencies, nine fundamental vibrations can be associated with each CH3 group. Three stretching, three bending, two rocking modes and single torsional mode describe the motion of the methyl group. In the experimental FT-IR band is observed at 2928 cm−1 for MEPCL2 have been assigned to CH3 symmetric stretching vibration. The CH3 stretching vibrations are calculated as 2893, 2916, 2913, 2912, 2908, 2906, 2899, 2894 and 2877 cm−1 at the B3LYP/6-311G++(d,p) level of theory. The FT-IR band observed at 1388 cm−1 have been assigned to CH3 in-plane bending vibration for MEPCL2.
3.2.4. P-Cl and P-O vibrations
The experimental P-Cl stretching vibrations are observed in the interval 587-435 cm−1. Also, a band at 447 cm−1 is assigned as P-Cl vibration. The calculated P-Cl in-plane and out-of-plane bending vibrations are observed at 387, 233 and 34 cm−1. The P-O phenyl linkage gives rise to two bands. A strong band at 1260-1160 cm−1 is mainly due to the stretching of the C-O bond of the phenyl group. Also, the band at 992 cm−1 is related to a C-O stretching vibration.
The simulated infrared spectra of MEPCL2 obtained at the HF/ 6-311G++(d,p) and B3LYP/6-311G++(d,p) levels of theory are shown in Fig. 3.
3.3. Frontier molecular orbitals (FMOs)
The highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest-lying unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) may describe the electronic transition, non-linear optic properties, and UV-Vis spectra of a molecular system16. Also, the energy gap between HOMO and LUMO determines the kinetic stability, chemical reactivity and, optical polarizability and chemical hardness- softness of a molecule17,18. The hard molecules are less polarizable than the soft ones because they need big energy to excitation. The electronic calculated through the TD-DFT method. In order to evaluate the energetic behavior of MEPCL2 in the solvent, we carried out calculations considering acetonitrile, water, chloroform and gas phases. The energies of the four molecular orbitals of MEPCL2: the second highest and highest occupied MO's (HOMO and HOMO-1), the lowest and the second lowest unoccupied MO's (LUMO and LUMO+1) were calculated at the TD-DFT/B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level of theory and they are reported in Table 3. Also, the 3D plots of the HOMO- 1, HOMO, LUMO and LUMO+1 orbitals computed at TD-DFT/B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level of theory for MEPCL2 molecule are depicted in Fig. 4. It is clear from this figure that, while the HOMO is localized on almost the whole molecule, LUMO is especially localized on the ring. Also, note that both, the HOMOs and the LUMOs are mostly anti-bonding type orbitals.
TD-DFT/B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) | Acetonitrile | Water | Chloroform | Gas |
---|---|---|---|---|
Etotal (Hartree) | -1729.77 | -1729.77 | -1729.76 | -1729.76 |
EHOMO (eV) | -7.90 | -7.91 | -7.89 | -7.85 |
ELUMO (eV) | -1.60 | -1.61 | -1.58 | -1.54 |
ΔEHOMO-LUMO gap (eV) | 6.30 | 6.30 | 6.31 | 6.32 |
EHOMO-1 (eV) | -8.05 | -8.05 | -8.08 | -8.19 |
ELUMO+1 (eV) | -1.18 | -1.18 | -1.58 | -1.14 |
ΔEHOMO-1-LUMO+1 gap (eV) | 6.87 | 6.86 | 6.50 | 7.05 |
EHOMO-2 (eV) | -8.18 | -8.18 | -8.21 | -8.34 |
ELUMO+2 (eV) | -0.24 | -0.24 | -0.28 | -0.43 |
ΔEHOMO-2-LUMO+2 gap (eV) | 7.94 | 7.94 | 7.93 | 7.92 |
The calculated energy values of the HOMO and LUMO energy gaps are 6.3017, 6.3008, 6.3085 and 6.3183 eV in acetonitrile, water, chloroform and gas phases, respectively. Thus, it is clear that the highest energy gap is obtained when chloroform solvent is employed which suggest that MEPCL2 is more chemically stable in such solvent. In view of calculated absorption spectra, the maximum absorption wavelength corresponds to the electronic transition from the HOMO to LUMO with 92% and from the HOMO to LUMO+1 with 9% contribution, see Table 4. The other wavelength, excitation energies, oscillator strength and calculated counterparts with major contributions are listed in Table 4.
Solvent | Energy (eV) | Wavelength | Oscillator strength | Major contribution |
---|---|---|---|---|
Acetonitrile | 5.4418 | 227.8 | 0.0794 | HOMO->LUMO (96%) |
5.6102 | 220.9 | 0.0005 | H-2->LUMO (10%), H-1->LUMO (80%) | |
5.8609 | 211.5 | 0.0014 | H-2->LUMO (84%), H-1->LUMO (11%) | |
5.9338 | 208.9 | 0.0332 | H-5->LUMO (10%), H-4->LUMO (15%), HOMO->L+1 (69%) | |
6.1502 | 201.6 | 0.0558 | H-1->L+1 (87%) | |
Water | 5.4427 | 227.8 | 0.0789 | HOMO->LUMO (96%) |
5.6072 | 221.1 | 0.0005 | H-2->LUMO (10%), H-1->LUMO (80%) | |
5.8559 | 211.7 | 0.0014 | H-2->LUMO (84%), H-1->LUMO (11%) | |
5.9353 | 208.9 | 0.0330 | H-5->LUMO (13%), H-4->LUMO (11%), HOMO->L+1 (70%) | |
6.1475 | 201.7 | 0.0554 | H-1->L+1 (87%) | |
Chloroform | 5.4331 | 228.2 | 0.0839 | HOMO->LUMO (97%) |
5.6409 | 219.8 | 0.0005 | H-1->LUMO (81%) | |
5.9147 | 209.6 | 0.0095 | H-2->LUMO (67%), HOMO->L+1 (18%) | |
5.9202 | 209.4 | 0.0260 | H-4->LUMO (19%), H-2->LUMO (18%), HOMO->L+1 (50%) | |
6.1769 | 200.7 | 0.0579 | H-1->L+1 (84%) | |
Gas | 5.4788 | 226.2 | 0.0579 | HOMO->LUMO (96%) |
5.7101 | 217.1 | 0.0612 | H-1->LUMO (81%) | |
5.9263 | 209.2 | 0.0002 | H-3->LUMO (24%), HOMO->L+1 (55%) | |
6.0786 | 203.9 | 0.0146 | H-2->LUMO (89%) | |
6.2299 | 199.0 | 0.0003 | H-1->L+1 (80%) |
Note that the calculations of the molecular orbital show that the visible absorption maxima of MEPCL2 corresponds to the electron transition between frontier orbitals such as translation from HOMO to LUMO, see Table 4. The calculated absorption spectra showed five bands at 227.8, 220.9, 211.5, 208.9 and 201.6 nm for acetonitrile and at 227.2 nm in the experimental UV spectrum with maximum absorbance in the same solvent. In chloroform, water and gas phases, the theoretical maximum absorption bands are predicted at 228.2, 227.8 and 226.2 nm, respectively. All the maximum absorption bands are coming from HOMO to LUMO transition with energy contribution about 96 to 97 %. The next maximum peaks are predicated on HOMO-1 to LUMO+1 in all UV spectra with 80 to 90% around 200 nm. In Fig. 5 are shown the theoretical UV spectra obtained at the TD-DFT/6-311++G(d,p) level of theory, in all cases, it is possible to observe that the maximum absorbance is in the range 226-228 nm.
3.4. Ή and 13C NMR spectra from quantum calculations
The theoretical values for 1H and 13C NMR of MEPCL2 are given in Table 5. The theoretical 1H and 13C NMR chemical shifts of MEPCL2 have been compared with the experimental data measured in water and CDCl3 solvents.
Atom | Experimental (ppm)7 | Theoretical (B3LYP) (ppm) | |
---|---|---|---|
Water | CDCl3 | ||
H12 | 5.123 | 5.085 | |
H19 | 2.288 | 2.277 | 2.238 |
H13 | 2.092 | 2.207 | 2.206 |
H15 | 2.047 | 2.100 | 2.056 |
H18 | 2.038 | 2.080 | 2.053 |
H16 | 1.988 | 1.998 | 1.970 |
H20 | 1.826 | 1.814 | 1.813 |
H24 | 1.788 | 1.786 | 1.754 |
H27 | 1.511 | 1.591 | 1.529 |
H23 | 1.466 | 1.480 | 1.459 |
H14 | 1.439 | 1.468 | 1.441 |
H26 | 1.390 | 1.214 | 1.250 |
H29 | 1.353 | 1.192 | 1.237 |
H17 | 1.331 | 1.189 | 1.174 |
H28 | 1.310 | 1.087 | 1.103 |
H25 | 1.077 | 1.082 | 1.082 |
H21 | 0.975 | 0.958 | 0.995 |
H30 | 0.947 | 0.958 | 0.950 |
H22 | 0.809 | 0.814 | 0.799 |
C1 | 129.88 | 91.018 | 107.714 |
C2 | 75.14 | 49.268 | 66.567 |
C8 | 63.21 | 41.677 | 59.452 |
C6 | 48.24 | 38.348 | 55.768 |
C5 | 48.26 | 34.568 | 52.099 |
C3 | 48.15 | 32.526 | 50.223 |
C4 | 48.01 | 28.808 | 46.545 |
C10 | 43.19 | 27.558 | 45.318 |
C9 | 40.47 | 22.992 | 40.696 |
C7 | 34.74 | 18.220 | 35.978 |
A comparison, between the experimental and computed 13C NMR spectra of MEPCL2, indicates an increase in the value of the chemical shifts of the carbon atoms C1 and C2 of cyclohexane, due to heavy substitutions, which is caused by the electronic charge distribution around of these carbon atoms.
The hydrogen peaks in the cyclohexane are observed experimentally from 2.228 to 1.331 ppm, while that the evaluated at the B3LYP/6-311+G (d,p) level of theory are in the range 2.238 – 1.174 ppm.
The methyl hydrogen atom H22 peak identified at 0.809 ppm is the lowest chemical shift among the entire hydrogen atoms. Probably, it is because of its electronic interaction with other atoms is lesser. The correlation graphs of the experimental and theoretical 1H, and 13C NMR chemical shift are presented as supplementary material in Fig 6. A good correlation between predicted and observed 13C and 1H NMR chemical shifts is found. Moreover, the slope and intercept of the least-square, correlation lines were used to scale the GIAO isotropic absolute shielding constants. From Fig. 6 it is clear that the solvent water shows more deviation that the observed in the CDCl3 solvent. The relation is usually linear and described by the following equations (1-4):
Proton NMR
Carbon NMR:
These results indicate that the calculations performed at the B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) predicted adequately the experimental behavior of the Ή and 13C NMR spectra of MEPCL2.
3.5. Global Chemical Reactivity of MEPCL2
The reactivity of a molecular system can be analyzed employing the global reactivity descriptors derived from the DFT theory, which are evaluated through the total energies of the neutral, anionic and cationic systems. Thus, the ionization potential is determined from the energy difference between the energy of the compound derived from electron-transfer (radical cation) and the respective neutral compound; IP = Ecation- En; while the electron affinity is evaluated as the energy difference between the neutral molecule and the anion molecule: EA = En - Eanion. According to the Koopmans’ theorem, in HF calculations, ionization potentials (IP) and electron affinities (EA) may be approximated to the HOMO and LUMO's energies respectively. On the other hand, the validity of the Koopmans’ theorem within the DFT approximation is controversial, nonetheless, it has been shown that the Khon-Sham orbitals produce DFT reactivity descriptors that correlate quite well with the reactivity descriptors obtained from Hartree-Fock calculations19. Thus, in the present work, we decided to employ the second approximation. Additionally, from IP and EA values it is possible to evaluate the electronegativity (χ), hardness (η), softness (ζ), and electrophilicity index (ψ) of the molecular system, through the equations (5-8)20:
The values of electronegativity, chemical hardness, softness, electrophilicity index and dipolar moment are reported in Table 6, in the solvents acetonitrile, water, chloroform and gas phases.
B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) | Acetonitrile | Water | Chloroform | Gas |
---|---|---|---|---|
Electronegativity χ (eV) | 4.75 | 4.76 | 4.74 | 4.70 |
Chemical hardness η (eV) | 3.15 | 3.15 | 3.15 | 3.16 |
Softness ζ (eV)−1 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.16 |
Electrophilicity index ψ (eV) | 3.59 | 3.59 | 3.55 | 3.49 |
Dipolar moment (Debye) | 3.87 | 3.89 | 3.67 | 3.15 |
From these values, observe that the values of χ, η, ζ, and ψ are similar, this means that MEPCL2 is showing the same global chemical behavior in the different solvents, but it is clear that the dipolar moment has different values which depend on the solvent in where the molecule is immersed. The above mentioned is indicative of the presence of different intramolecular interactions between the solvent and MEPCL2.
3.6. Local reactivity of MEPCL2 from Molecular Electrostatic Potential
In the present study, the molecular electrostatic potential (MESP) of MEPCL2 is plotted in order to analyze its local reactivity, see Fig. 7. The MESP is a plot of the electrostatic potential mapped onto an electron density isosurface and is useful to identify electrophilic and nucleophilic regions around the molecule. In the majority of the MESP, while the maximum negative region, which preferred site for electrophilic attack indications as red color, the maximum positive region which preferred site for nucleophilic attack symptoms as blue color. The electrophilic attack is more around phosphorous and carbon atoms. It is extended around chlorine atoms. Similarly, nucleophilic attacks are shown in hydrogen atoms and more in methyl group substitutions. The different values of the electrostatic potential at the MESP surface are represented by different colors; red, blue and green represent the regions of most negative, most positive and zero electrostatic potential, respectively. The color code of these maps is in the range between −0.02335 e. (deepest red) to 0.02335 e (deepest blue) in the compound, where blue indicates the strongest attraction and red indicates the strongest repulsion21–26.
CONCLUSIONS
In this work, the geometric parameters and vibrational frequencies of the mentoxy dichloro phosphorous (C10H19OPCl2) were evaluated at the HF/6-311++G(d,p) and B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) levels of theory. In comparison to the experimental results, the computed vibrational frequencies obtained by the B3LYP method are better than those obtained by the Hartree-Fock method. Fundamental vibrations with their mode were fully discussed in order to give a better understanding of the electronic structure of MEPCL2. The HOMO-LUMO gaps and implications of the electronic transitions were examined. The kinetic stability, chemical reactivity, optical polarizability, and chemical hardness-softness were discussed by frontier molecular orbital gaps. With orbital analysis, it has been suggested that MEPCL2 is more stable in chloroform than in other solvents. The 1H, and 13C NMR recorded and isotropic chemical shifts were calculated and they compare favorably well with the experimental results. The evaluation of the global reactivity descriptors suggests a similar chemical behavior of MEPCL2 in the different solvents analyzed. The molecular electrostatic potential isosurface provides a visual performance of the chemically active sites and comparative reactivity of atoms. Thus the present investigation provides complete vibrational assignments, structural information, chemical shifts and electronic properties of the MEPCL2.