SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.77 issue2Resistance level and target-site mechanism to fenoxaprop- p -ethyl in Beckmannia syzigachne (Steud.) Fernald populations from ChinaApplication of silicon fertilizer affects nutritional quality of rice author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Chilean journal of agricultural research

On-line version ISSN 0718-5839

Chilean J. Agric. Res. vol.77 no.2 Chillán June 2017

http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392017000200155 

RESEARCH

Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of leaves of mycorrhized sea-buckthorn ( Hippophae rhamnoides L.)

Anna Jaroszewska1 

Wioletta Biel2  * 

1West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Department of Agronomy, Papieża Pawła VI 3, 71-434 Szczecin, Poland.

2West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Department of Pig Breeding, Animal Nutrition and Food, Judyma 10, 71-460 Szczecin, Poland.

ABSTRACT

The leaves of sea-buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) can be a rich source of nutrients and biologically active substances. Their levels depend on growing conditions, agricultural technology and climate. The studies however, mainly focus on nutritious value of fruit and seeds and there is shortage of the information regarding to buckthorn leaves. The aim of the experiment was to determine the effect of symbiotic mycorrhizal fungi on the chemical composition and antioxidant activity of sea-buckthorn leaves. The study was conducted in 2014 and 2015 at the Experimental Station in Lipnik, Poland. Mycorrhization improved the nutritional value of leaves of sea-buckthorn by increasing levels of total protein (3%), N free extract (1%), Ca (9%), Na (16%), Fe (18%), Cr (34%), and partially elevating antioxidant activity by increasing the concentration of polyphenols (7%). Leaves of 'Habego' had a higher nutritional value, containing more total protein (4%), crude fat (7%), crude fiber (30%), and all fractions of dietary fiber. 'Hergo' had more beneficial levels of minerals (P-27%, K-67%, Mg-4%, Na-30%, Zn-8%, and Cr-21%), polyphenols (51%), total flavonoids (35%), carotenoids (10%), and L-ascorbic acid (8%), as well as higher antioxidant activity (40%). The results of our study partly confirmed the earlier scientific reports on the impact of mycorrhiza on the chemical composition of plants. However, it is not possible to compare our results with data on berry plants, including sea-buckthorn, due to the lack of information in the literature.

Key words: Antioxidants; chemical composition; fiber fractions; mycorrhiza; vitamins.

INTRODUCTION

Natural products, either as extracts or as pure compounds, give limitless possibilities for the discovery of new drugs and improving food quality, also thanks to their wide availability. Sea-buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) contains a series of compounds including, among others, carotenoids, tocopherols, sterols, flavonoids, lipids, ascorbic acid, and tannins. These compounds are of interest not only from the chemical point of view, but also because many of them exhibit biological and therapeutic activities, including antioxidant, antitumor, hepato-protective, and immunomodulatory properties (Saikia and Handique, 2013). Evaluation of the nutritional value of sea-buckthorn usually concerns its fruit and seeds, while the leaves are rather neglected. However, some studies confirm that also its leaves are a rich source of compounds with anti-inflammatory (Padwad et al., 2006) and antibacterial properties (Upadhyay et al., 2011). They contain large amounts of crude protein, relatively high crude fat, and are a good source of macroelements (Jaroszewska et al., 2016). Therefore, sea-buckthorn leaves may be an excellent source of biologically active phytochemicals in both medicine and human nutrition.

The arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis is recognized for its multiple positive effects on plant growth and for its important contribution to the maintenance of soil quality. In spite of these benefits to agriculture, the realization of the full potential of this symbiosis has not yet been reached (Karagiannidis et al., 2012). During the establishment of the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis, a range of chemical and biological parameters is affected in plants, including the pattern of secondary compounds (Karagiannidis et al., 2012). Previous studies confirm that arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) affects the content of phenols (Hazzoumi et al., 2015). Higher content of flavonoids has been demonstrated in mycorrhizal roots of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) (Larose et al., 2002). The AMF root colonization factor leads to significantly increased concentrations of most of the phenolics in purple coneflower (Araim et al., 2009) and in strawberry fruits (Castellanos-Morales et al., 2010).

Currently, there is little information on the chemical composition and antioxidant properties of sea-buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) leaves. There is also a lack of data concerning the potential impact of symbiotic mycorrhizal fungi on the quality of berry plants, including sea-buckthorn. Therefore, in this study we conducted a field experiment to evaluate the impact of symbiotic mycorrhizal fungi on the chemical composition and antioxidant activity of leaves of two varieties of sea-buckthorn.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted in 2014 and 2015 at the Experimental Station in Lipnik (53°20'35" N, 14°58'10" E, 7 m a.s.l.), Poland. The soil on which the experiment was carried out belonged to typical rusty soils (Polish Soil Classification, 2011), classified as Haplic Cambisol according to IUSS Working Group WRB (2015). At the Ap level, the soil has a slightly acidic loamy sand. The level of humus is formed from clay sands. The analysis of soil minerals showed high P levels and moderate Mg and K levels. The experiment was designed according to a completely randomized method in five replicates (one shrub = one repeat). Shrubs were planted in 4 ( 3 m spacing. The size of single plot was 12 m2. The total number of plots in the experiment was 20. The subject of the study included 2 and 3 yr old shrubs, female varieties Habego and Hergo. Mycorrhization was conducted with ectomicorrhizal mycelium, which is symbiotic for plants of the olive family. The isolate was obtained from the natural ecosystems in Croatia. It contains symbiotic mycorrhizal fungi (Glomus spp., Gigaspora spp., Pochonia spp., Lecanicillium spp.), and the root bacteria (Bacillus spp.) A dose of 15 mL was applied in two places the root zone of plants in the first year of experiment. The mycelium contained an addition of hydrogel (ensuring humidity essential for the initial fungi development). Leaves for the analysis were collected during harvest from shoots without fruiting. Leaves were collected from the outside of the bush, at half of their height. The leaves were taken from the 1 yr old shoots without any signs of aging or mechanical damage.

The experiment factors were mycorrhiza (half of the bushes from each variety were subject to mycorrhization, and half were used as a control group) and variety (Habego and Hergo).

All determinations were expressed on a dry weight (DW) basis. Dry matter, crude protein, ether extract, crude fiber, crude ash and N free extract (NFE) were determined by AOAC (2012). Dry matter was evaluated by drying at 105 °C to constant weight; ether extract by Soxhlet extraction with diethyl ether; crude ash by incineration in a muffle furnace at 580 °C for 8 h; crude protein (N × 6.25) by Kjeldahl method using a Büchi Distillation Unit B-324 (Büchi Labortechnik AG, Flawil, Switzerland); crude fiber was determined with a fiber analyzer ANKOM 220 (ANKOM Technology, Macedon, New York, USA); total carbohydrates were calculated as: N free extract (NFE) (%) = 100 − % (moisture + crude protein + crude fat + crude ash + crude fiber).

The fiber components were determined using the detergent method according to Van Soest et al. (1991) performed with a fiber analyzer ANKOM 220. Determination of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) was conducted on an ash-free basis and included sodium dodecyl sulfate (NaC12H25SO4) (822050, Merck, Kenilworth, Nueva Jersey, USA). Determination of acid detergent fiber (ADF) included hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (C16H33)N(CH3)3Br (Merck 102342), while acid detergent lignin (ADL) was determined by hydrolysis of ADF sample in 72% sulfuric acid (H2SO4). Hemicellulose (HCEL) was calculated as the difference between NDF and ADF, while cellulose (CEL) as the difference between ADF and ADL.

The material for the macro-components concentration analyses was subjected to mineralization in concentrated sulfuric acid (H2SO4) and perchloric acid (HClO4), whilst the material for micro-components concentration analyses was digested in a mixture of nitric acid (HNO3) and perchloric acid (HClO4). The concentration of P was determined by the Egner-Riehm colorimetric method, with ammonium molybdate, at wavelength 660 nm, by using a Specol 221 apparatus (866287, Carl Zeiss Jena, Germany). An atomic absorption spectrometer (ASA) (iCE 3000 Series, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) was used to determine K, Na, and Ca - by means of emulsion flame spectroscopy, and Mg, Zn, Fe, Pb, Cr and Cu - by means of absorption flame spectroscopy. The nitrate content was determined by potentiometry. Prior to assay Ca content, K and Mg trials were appropriately diluted. Other mineral compounds were determined in concentrated samples.

For total polyphenols, total flavonoids, and antioxidant activity determination, methanol extracts were prepared according to Kumaran and Karunakaran (2007). The total phenolic content of plant extracts was determined using Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (Yu et al., 2002); 0.1 cm3 plant extract was mixed with 0.5 cm3 Folin-Ciocalteu reagent and 1.5 cm3 20% sodium carbonate. The mixture was shaken thoroughly and made up to 10 cm3 using distilled water. The mixture was allowed to stand for 2 h. Then the absorbance at 765 nm was determined. These data were used to estimate phenolic content using a standard curve obtained from various concentrations of gallic acid. Total polyphenol content in samples was calculated as the amount of gallic acid equivalent (GAE) in mg kg-1 sample DW.

The total flavonoids content was determined by the method of Kumaran and Karunakaran (2007) using quercetin as a reference compound; 1 cm3 plant extract in methanol was mixed with 1 cm3 aluminum trichloride in methanol and a drop of acetic acid, and then diluted with ethanol to 25 cm3. The absorption at 415 nm was read after 40 min. Blank samples were prepared from 1 cm3 plant extract and a drop of acetic acid, and then diluted to 25 cm3 with methanol.

The antioxidant capacity was assayed by Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (TEAC) method (Re et al., 1999). This method is based on the generation of a stable colored free radical in aqueous solution and the measurement of antioxidant capacity, or free radical scavenging, as the decrease in the absorbance of the colored solution in a UV-VIS spectrometer following addition of the antioxidant. The radical used is 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) with an absorption maximum of 734 nm. ABTS was dissolved in deionized water to give a stock solution with a concentration of 7 mM. The ABTS radical cation (ABTS•+) was produced by reacting 9 cm3 ABTS stock solution with 1 cm3 24.5 mM potassium persulfate and allowing the mixture to stand in the dark at room temperature overnight before use. The ABTS•+ solution was diluted with deionized water (approximately 50-fold) to give an absorbance close to 0.70 at 734 nm. A 3 cm3 aliquot of ABTS•+ solution was put into a cuvette in the spectrophotometer and absorbance measured. An aliquot of 30 mm3 of methanol extract was then added and a second absorbance reading taken after 6 min, by which time the discoloration was effectively complete.

Carotenoids were extracted with 80% solution of acetone and determined according to Lichtenthaler and Wellburn (1983). These compounds were determined in wavelength 440 nm, after having subtracted the concentration of chlorophyll A and B, using wavelengths 663 and 645 nm, respectively, and corresponding absorption coefficients at which carotenoids do not absorb.

Tocopherols were extracted from plants samples with hexane and were determined by Prieto et al. (1999) method. A sample volume of 0.5 cm3 hexane extract was mixed in a test tube with 5 cm3 reagent solution (0.6 M sulfuric acid, 28 mM sodium phosphate, and 4 mM ammonium molybdate) and incubated at 37 °C for 90 min with vigorous shaking. Absorbance of the aqueous phase at 695 nm was measured against the appropriate blank. A typical blank contained 5 cm3 reagent solution and 0.5 cm3 pure hexane, and it was incubated under the same conditions as the samples. An UV-VIS spectrophotometer (UV-1800, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) was used.

Solution for extraction of water-soluble vitamins was made by mixing 50 cm3 acetonitrile with 10 cm3 glacial acetic acid and the volume was finally made up to 1000 cm3 with double distilled water. A sample of 10 g was transferred into conical flasks and 25 cm3 extraction solution was added, water bath was kept shaking at 70 °C for 40 min. Thereafter, the sample was cooled down, filtered, and finally the volume was made up to 50 mL with extraction solution (Aslam et al., 2013).

The contents of vitamins thiamine (B1), riboflavin (B2), ascorbic acid (C), and niacin (PP) in extracts were measured using a high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method described by Klódka et al. (2008); using an HPLC system (Series 200, PerkinElmer, Shelton, Connecticut, USA) equipped with Hypersil ODS column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm particle). The mobile phase was 50 mM KH2PO4 (A) and methanol (B) in gradient from 0% to 30% A in 8 min, then this ratio was maintained for 7 min. Wavelength was λ = 245 nm, flow rate 1 cm3 min-1, and injection of 20 mm3. Retention times and recoveries for C, B1, PP, and B2 were 1.45, 5.50, 7.20, 9.80 min, and 96.20, 93.51, 89.53, and 92.41 respectively.

Two-factor ANOVA was carried out on the experimental results using the mycorrhization and genotype as independent variables, after assessing normality and homogeneity of variance. The significance of differences between means was compared by Tukey's multiple range tests (admissible error for determinations of chemical components was 5%). Results were presented as mean ± standard deviation of three independent determinations. Statistical significance was considered at p ≤ 0.05. The results from the experiment were analyzed using the Statistica version 12.0 software (StatSoft, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

We found nonsignificant effect of mycorrhization on the content of dry weight, crude ash, and crude fat in sea-buckthorn leaves (Table 1). Moisture content of fresh leaves used in the experiment was 68 ± 7% of fresh weight (FW). It was lower than the range of 82% to 96% FW in most vegetables (lettuce, green beans, asparagus, green peppers, and spinach) reported by Granado et al. (1992), but comparable with that (67% FW) of tea leaf (Li et al., 2012). Morgenstern et al. (2014) found the highest DW content in leaves of sea-buckthorn collected at the end of July (32%). Our analysis did not distinguish a variety of sea-buckthorn that differs significantly in DW content in the dried leaves (p ≤ 0.05). The average dry weight content was 95.3%, with a standard deviation of 0.9.

Table 1: Chemical composition (n = 3) of sea buckthorn leaves (g kg-1 DW). 

Mean values with the same letter in each line are non-significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 according to the Tukey test, DW: Dry weight, FW: fresh weight, NFE: nitrogen free extract.

Mycorrhization resulted in an increase in protein content and NFE in sea-buckthorn leaves (by 2.63% and 1.21%, respectively, relative to the control) and a reduction in crude fiber content (by ~ 3.24%). In the present study variety had an impact on the level of crude ash, crude protein, crude fat, crude fiber, and NFE.

The leaves of the studied varieties of sea-buckthorn showed a considerable diversity in mineral content measured by crude ash. Its average level was 4% DW and ranged from 3.72% to 4.29% DW, with a standard deviation of 0.39. 'Habego' contained 13.3% more ash than 'Hergo'. This study confirmed sea-buckthorn leaves as a rich source of protein. 'Habego' leaves had 145.4 g protein kg-1 DW, that is more than the level reported by Kashif and Ullah (2013) (120.35 g kg-1 DW). The difference is probably due to the genotype and the impact of environmental conditions (Zheng et al., 2012). It is worth noting that the protein content in sea-buckthorn fruit (more frequently used as food) stands at a more than 2.5 times lower level of 47 g kg-1 DW (Selvamuthukumaran and Farhath, 2014).

The leaves of the studied varieties of sea-buckthorn differed in crude fat content. Similar to protein, the highest crude fat levels were found in 'Habego' (56.7 g kg-1 DW). This confirms the results of other studies, which show that its leaves are a good source of lipids. Fulkerson et al. (2008) report that leaves of fodder radish, rape, chicory, and plantain contain on average 55.6% less crude fat than sea-buckthorn.

The properties of dietary fiber and its value depend on the source and the mutual proportions of the respective fractions. Dietary fiber contains many structures with diverse physical and chemical properties, and is capable of inducing physiological effects on the human body (Mann and Cummings, 2009). The leaves of 'Habego' contained ~ 23% more crude fiber than 'Hergo'. Mycorrhization significantly reduced levels of crude fiber (Table 1) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) (Figure 1). We also observed some downward trends in the levels of acid detergent fraction (ADF), hemicellulose (HCEL), and cellulose (CEL) in the mycorrhized leaves of sea-buckthorn, although these were nonsignificant. No such trend was observed for acid detergent lignin (ADL). The leaves of 'Habego' contained significantly more crude fiber (23%, Table 1) and all evaluated dietary fiber fractions (Figure 1). In the literature there are no data on the composition of the dietary fiber fractions obtained by the detergent method. In this study, the average content of NDF ranged from 219.3 to 278.7 g kg-1 DW, and again, it is impossible to compare this data to literature due to the lack of reports relating directly to sea-buckthorn. Fulkerson et al. (2008) examined NDF in fodder radish (Raphanus sativus L. var. oleiformis Pers.), rape (Brassica napus L.), chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) and plantain (Plantago lanceolata L.), which ranged from 156 to 489 g kg-1 DW.

NDF: Neutral detergent fiber, ADF: acid detergent fiber, ADL: acid detergent lignin, HCEL: hemicelluloses, CEL: cellulose, DW: dry weight. Mean values with the same letter are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 according to the Tukey test.

Figure 1: Fiber components (n = 3) of sea-buckthorn leaves. 

The determined average ADF, consisting of cellulose and lignin, ranged from 167.9 to 205.1 g kg-1 DW. 'Habego' leaves contained ~ 18% of this fraction than those of 'Hergo'. ADF level, just like NDF, was similar to fodder radish, rape, chicory, and plantain in the study by Fulkerson et al. (2008).

Acid detergent lignin (ADL), which to some extent influences the hardness of sea-buckthorn leaves, differed between 'Habego' (71.8 g) and 'Hergo' (65.9 g) by as much as 8%.

Hemicellulose content was in the range of 73.6 to 51.4 to g kg-1 DW. A common significant source of HCEL are cereal grains, herbs, and vegetables (Biel and Jacyno, 2014; Cerniauskiene et al., 2014). Schädel et al. (2010) examined four herb species (Geum urbanum L., Leontodon hispidus L., Salvia pratensis L., Silene flos-cuculi (L.) Greuter & Burdet) and reported HCEL content between the range of 60-220 g kg-1 DW. These authors found higher concentrations in silene, while the lowest HCEL concentrations were measured in leaves of geum, leontodon, and salvia, at less than 10% DW.

In this study, the average CEL content was 117.6 g kg-1 DW and varied from 102 to 133.2 g kg-1 DW. Fraser and Rowarth (1996) found a similar CEL level in the herbs of chicory and plantain. In the present study 'Habego' leaves contained significantly more CEL (~ 23%) than 'Hergo'.

Sea-buckthorn leaves are a rich source of minerals (Jaroszewska et al., 2016), but their levels depend on many factors, including genetic characteristics, climate, soil conditions, maturity of the plant, and the time of harvesting, which was confirmed in our study (Table 2). Compared to the levels found in berries of sea-buckthorn (Ercisli et al., 2007) the average mineral content of the leaves was similar, with the exception of K (116% greater), Mg (31%), Ca (94%), and Fe (574%).

Table 2: Macro- and microelements (n = 3) and nitrates in sea buckthorn leaves. 

Mean values with the same letter in each line are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 according to the Tukey test, nf: Not found, DW: dry weight.

Mycorrhization significantly differentiated macro- and microelements in leaves of sea-buckthorn. Compared to control, leaves of the mycorrhized sea-buckthorn had significantly lower concentrations of P (by 0.5 g kg-1 DW, i.e. 12%), K (by ~ 2.7 g kg-1 DW, i.e. 18%), Mg (by ~ 0.78 g kg-1 DW, i.e. 33%), and Zn (by ~ 3.6 g kg-1 DW, i.e. 11%). Although there was nonsignificant effect of mycorrhiza on the Cu concentration, we observed a downward trend in Cu levels, which confirms the results of Kowalska et al. (2015), stating that the mycorrhiza significantly reduced content of Cu and Zn in leaves of mycorrhized lettuce.

The tested leaves of mycorrhized sea-buckthorn contained significantly more Ca (by ~ 0.32 g kg-1 DW, 9%), Na (by 13.9 g kg-1 DW, 16%), Fe (8.8 g kg-1 DW, 18%), and Cr (by 0.32 g kg-1 DW, 34%) than control. Lower K and higher Ca levels in leaves of mycorrhized sea-buckthorn were reported by Jaroszewska et al. (2016). Similarly, Baslam et al. (2011) reports an increase in the concentration of Ca and Fe in fresh weight of mycorrhized lettuce. Sea-buckthorn leaves grown in mycorrhized plots were also characterized by higher nitrate (by ~ 39.4 g kg-1 DW, i.e. 26%), probably due to the mycorrhiza enabling better uptake of N by plant roots, and also by the soil pH. An increase in acidity increases the intensity of nitrate uptake by plants (N-NO3 -).

Lead belongs to the group of metals hazardous to health. It can cause severe anemia, brain damage, neurological disorders, reproductive problems, and reduced intelligence. Plants normally contain trace amounts of lead which increase with the contamination of soil and air. Significantly, in the analyzed samples of sea buckthorn leaves, we found no lead.

The content of the tested mineral components in the two examined varieties of sea-buckthorn leaves were significantly different, which points to the various capability to absorb and to cumulate in the biomass the mentioned components, by specific varieties cultivated in the same habitat conditions. A significantly higher concentration of the analyzed elements was found in 'Hergo'. Its leaves had more P (1.08 g kg-1 DW, i.e. 27%), K (6.8 g kg-1 DW, i.e. 67%), Mg (0.7 g kg-1 DW, i.e. 4 %), Na (24.1 g kg-1 DW, i.e. 30%), Zn (2.5 mg kg-1, i.e. 8%), and Cr (0.21 mg kg-1 DW, i.e. 21%) than 'Habego'. 'Hergo' leaves also had less nitrate (~ 2.6 mg kg-1 DW, i.e. 1%). The results correspond with previous reports by Jaroszewska et al. (2016), which showed significant differences in mineral content between varieties of sea-buckthorn.

Sea-buckthorn is a natural source of bioactive compounds with antibacterial and anti-stress properties, used in the treatment of cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and diabetes. The average concentrations of antioxidants tested (Table 3) were higher than those in sea-buckthorn berries which contain 530 to 970 mg carotenoids kg-1 DW (Pop et al., 2014) and 380 mg flavonoids kg-1 DW (Chu et al., 2003).

Table 3: Content of antioxidants (n = 3) in sea buckthorn leaves. 

Mean values with the same letter in each line are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 according to the Tukey test, GAE: Gallic acid equivalent, DW: dry weight, QE: quercetin equivalent.

In our study, leaves of the mycorrhized sea-buckthorn contained significantly more polyphenols (by 590.2 mg GAE kg-1 DW, i.e. 7%), compared to plants from control plots. However, they had fewer total flavonoids (261.3 mg quercetin equivalent (QE( kg-1 DW, i.e. 16%) and carotenoids (58.2 mg kg-1 DW, i.e. 6%). Previous studies on the influence of mycorrhization on the content of secondary metabolites in plants (purple coneflower and lettuce) (Araim et al., 2009; Baslam et al., 2011) confirm the significant role of AMF in increasing their concentration. The leaves of the mycorrhized sea-buckthorn had significantly higher antioxidant activity (by 18.2 µmol Trolox kg-1 DW, i.e. 3%) (Figure 2), which is reflected in the research of Ordookhani et al. (2010), reporting increased antioxidant activity in fruits mycorrhized tomatoes.

Mean values with the same letter are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 according to the Tukey test. DW: Dry weight, ABTS: 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid).

Figure 2: Antioxidant activities (n = 3) measured by ABTS assay in sea-buckthorn leaves. 

The studied 'Hergo' had clearly superior antioxidant properties, with significantly more polyphenols (3624.7 mg GAE kg-1 DW, i.e. 51%), total flavonoids (723 mg QE kg-1 DW, i.e. 35%), and carotenoids (90.6 mg kg-1 DW, i.e. 10%). The leaves of this variety were also distinguished by higher antioxidant activities (by ~ 188.3 (mol Trolox-1 DW, 40%) (Figure 2). Morgenstern et al. (2015) showed that sea buckthorn leaves are very rich in beneficial phenolic compounds. The significant differences in antioxidant levels between the two varieties of sea-buckthorn were probably due to the varietal characteristics, as the plants were grown under the same conditions of climate and soil. The results as well as other analysis (Alfaro et al., 2013) highlight the importance of genotype as a crucial factor affecting the content of antioxidants in berry plants.

The harmful effects of free radicals are counteracted by antioxidants, which include, among others, vitamins A, C, and E, abundant in fruits and vegetables. In the studied sea-buckthorn leaves, mycorrhization and variety significantly differentiated only the level of ascorbic acid (Table 4). Depending on the ecotype, sea-buckthorn berries are reported to contain L-ascorbic acid at levels ranging from 360 to 2500 mg 100 g-1 (Bal et al., 2011). The examined leaves contained an average of 2139.6 mg kg-1 DW, compared to 155.3 mg kg-1 DW (7%) in control. Baslam et al. (2011) demonstrated a significant increase in L-ascorbic acid in fresh weight in mycorrhized lettuce. The leaves of 'Hergo' sea-buckthorn had a 164.1 mg kg-1 DW (8%) higher concentration of L-ascorbic acid than leaves of 'Habego'. Although we did not find significant differences in the concentrations of the remaining vitamins (tocopherols, thiamine, riboflavin, and niacin) in sea-buckthorn leaves, there was a tendency towards their higher levels in the leaves of non-mycorrhized sea-buckthorn and 'Hergo' leaves.

Table 4: Content of vitamins (n = 3) in sea buckthorn leaves. 

Mean values with the same letter in each line are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 according to the Tukey test.

CONCLUSION

The leaves of mycorrhized sea-buckthorn had a higher content of total protein, N free extract, Ca, Na, Fe, Cr, and polyphenols, which means that the cultivation of mycorrhized sea-buckthorn may improve the intake of these compounds with diet without the need to increase their consumption. Leaves collected from mycorrhized sea-buckthorn also showed an increased antioxidant activity.

The concentration of test compounds in the leaves of different varieties was clearly dependent on the varietal characteristics. The Habego variety was characterized by a higher nutritional value, containing more total protein, crude fat, crude fiber, and all tested fractions of dietary fiber. On the other hand, leaves of 'Hergo' sea-buckthorn had more minerals (P, K, Mg, Na, Zn, and Cr), polyphenols, total flavonoids, carotenoids, and L-ascorbic acid. The leaves of 'Hergo' also showed higher antioxidant activity.

Summing up the results of the experiment is difficult to assess the impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on the chemical composition of sea buckthorn leaves and their antioxidant activity. The results of our study partly confirmed the earlier scientific reports on the impact of mycorrhiza on the chemical composition of plants (fruits, leaves). However, it is not possible to compare our results with data on berry plants, including sea-buckthorn, due to the lack of information in the literature. Therefore, further research in this area seems necessary.

REFERENCES

Alfaro, S., Mutis, A., Palma, R., Quiroz, A., Seguel, I., and Scheuermann, E. 2013. Influence of genotype and harvest year on polyphenol content and antioxidant activity in murtilla (Ugni molinae Turcz) fruit. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 13(1):67-78. [ Links ]

AOAC. 2012. Official methods of analysis. 18 ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC), Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA. [ Links ]

Araim, G., Saleem, A., Amason, J.T., and Charest, C. 2009. Root colonization by an arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus increases growth and secondary metabolism of purple coneflower, Echinacea purpurea (L.) Moench. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 57:2255-2258. [ Links ]

Aslam, J., Khan, S.H., and Khan, S.A. 2013. Quantification of water soluble vitamins in six date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cultivar's fruits growing in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, through high performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Saudi Chemical Society 17:9-16. [ Links ]

Bal, L.M., Meda, V., Naik, S.N., and Satya, S. 2011. Sea buckthorn berries: A potential source of valuable nutrients for nutraceuticals and cosmoceuticals. Food Research International 44:1718-1727. [ Links ]

Baslam, M., Garmendia, I., and Goicoechea, N. 2011. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) improved growth and nutritional quality of greenhouse-grown lettuce. Journal Agricultural and Food Chemistry 59:5504-5515. [ Links ]

Biel, W., and Jacyno, E. 2014. Chemical composition and nutritive value of protein in hulled dwarf oat lines and the effect on serum lipid profile in rats. Italian Journal of Food Science 26:203-209. [ Links ]

Castellanos-Morales, V., Villegas, J., Wendelin, S., Vierheilig, H., Eder, R., and Cárdenas-Navarro, R.E.R. 2010. Root colonisation by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices alters the quality of strawberry fruits (Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.) at different nitrogen levels. Journal Agricultural and Food Chemistry 90:1774-1782. [ Links ]

Cerniauskiene, J., Kulaitiene, J., Danilcenko, H., Jariene, E., and Jukneviciene, E. 2014. Pumpkin fruit flour as a source for food enrichment in dietary fiber. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj Napoca 42(1):19-23. [ Links ]

Chu, Q.C., Qu, W.Q., Peng, Y.Y., Cao, Q.H., and Ye, J.N. 2003. Determination of flavonoids in Hippophae rhamnoides L. and its phytopharmaceuticals by capillary electrophoresis with electrochemical detection. Chromatographia 58:67-71. [ Links ]

Ercisli, S., Orhan, E., Ozdemir, O., and Sengul, M. 2007. The genotypic effects on the chemical composition and antioxidant activity of sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) berries grown in Turkey. Scientia Horticulturae 115:27-33. [ Links ]

Fraser, T.J., and Rowarth, J.S. 1996. Legumes, herbs or grass for lamb performance? Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 58:49-52. [ Links ]

Fulkerson, W.J., Horadagoda, A., Neal, J.S., Barchia, I., and Nandra, K.S. 2008. Nutritive value of forage species grown in the warm temperate climate of Australia for dairy cows: Herbs and grain crops. Livestock Science 114:75-83. [ Links ]

Granado, F., Olmedilla, B., Blanco, I., and Rojas-Hidalgo, E. 1992. Carotenoid composition in raw and cooked Spanish vegetables. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry 40:2135-2140. [ Links ]

Hazzoumi, Z., Moustakime, Y., Elharchli, E., and Joutei, K.A. 2015. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and water stress on growth, phenolic compounds, glandular hairs, and yield of essential oil in basil (Ocimum gratissimum L.) Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture 2(10):1-11. [ Links ]

IUSS Working Group WRB. 2015. World reference base for soil resources 2014, update 2015. World Soil Resources Reports 106. 203 p. FAO, Rome, Italy. [ Links ]

Jaroszewska, A., Biel, W., Stankowski, S., and Bosko, P. 2016. Evaluation of the influence of symbiotic mycorrhizal fungi on basic chemical compounds and minerals of sea buckthorn leaves. Journal of Elementology 21(4):1029-1041. [ Links ]

Karagiannidis, N., Thomidis, T., and Filotheou, E.P. 2012. Effects of Glomus lamellosum on growth, essential oil production and nutrients uptake in selected medicinal plants. Journal of Agricultural Science 4(3):137-144. [ Links ]

Kashif, M., and Ullah, S. 2013. Chemical composition and minerals analysis of Hippophae rhamnoides, Azadirachta indica, Punica granatu and Ocimum sanctum leaves. World Journal Dairy and Food Sciences 8(1):67-73. [ Links ]

Klódka, D., Telesinski, A., and Bonkowski, M. 2008. Estimating the dependence between the content of fluorine and of selected vitamins in different kinds of tea infusions. Bromatologia i Chemia Toksykolgiczna 41(4):957-963 (in Polish, with abstract in English). [ Links ]

Kowalska, I., Konieczny, A., and Gastol, M. 2015. Effect of mycorrhiza and the phosphorus content in a nutrient solution on the yield and nutritional status of lettuce grown on various substrates. Journal of Elementology 20(3):631-642. [ Links ]

Kumaran, A., and Karunakaran, R.J. 2007. In vitro antioxidant activities of methanol extracts of five Phyllanthus species from India. Food Science and Technology 40(2):344-352. [ Links ]

Larose, G., Chênevert, R., Moutoglis, P., Gagné, S., Piché, Y., and Vierheilig, H. 2002. Flavonoid levels in roots of Medicago sativa are modulated by the developmental stage of the symbiosis and the root colonizing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. Journal of Plant Physiology 159(12):1329-1339. [ Links ]

Li, X., Xie, C., He, Y., Qiu, Z., and Zhang, Y. 2012. Characterizing the moisture content of tea with diffuse reflectance spectroscopy using wavelet transform and multivariate analysis. Sensors 12(7):9847-9861. [ Links ]

Lichtenthaler, H.K., and Wellburn, A.R. 1983. Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophyll a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochemical Society Transactions 11:591-592. [ Links ]

Mann, J.I., and Cummings, J.H. 2009. Possible implications for health of the different definitions of dietary fibre. Nutrition Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases 19:226-229. [ Links ]

Morgenstern, A., Ekholm, A., Scheewe, P., and Rumpunen, K. 2014. Changes in content of major phenolic compounds during leaf development of sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) Agricultural and Food Science 23(3):207-219. [ Links ]

Morgenstern, A., Ekholm, A., Scheewe, P., and Rumpunen, K. 2015. Major phenolic compounds in processed sea buckthorn leaves. p. 74-77. In Kauppinen, S., and Petruneva, E. (eds.) Producing sea buckthorn of high quality. Natural Resources Institute, Naantali, Finland. 14-16 October. Helsinki, Finland. [ Links ]

Ordookhani, K., Khavazi, K., Moezzi, A., and Rejali, F. 2010. Influence of PGPR and AMF on antioxidant activity, lycopene and potassium contents in tomato. African Journal of Agricultural Research 5(10):1108-1116. [ Links ]

Padwad, Y., Ganju, L., Jain, M., Chanda, S., Karan, D., Banerjee, P.K., et al. 2006. Effect of leaf extract of sea-buckthorn on lipopolysaccharide induced inflammatory response in murine macrophages. International Immunopharmacology 6:46-52. [ Links ]

Polish Soil Classification (PSC). 2011. Soil Science Annual 62(3):1-193. (in Polish with English summary). [ Links ]

Pop, R.M., Weesepoel, Y., Socaci, C., Pintea, A., Vincke, J.P., and Gruppen, H. 2014. Carotenoid composition of berries and leaves from six Romanian sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) varieties. Food Chemistry 147:1-9. [ Links ]

Prieto, P., Pineda, M., and Aguilar, M. 1999. Spectrophotometric quantitation of antioxidant capacity through the formation of a phosphomolybdenum complex: Specific application to the determination of vitamin E. Analytical Biochemistry 269:337-341. [ Links ]

Re, R., Pellegrini, N., Proteggente, A., Pannala, A., Yang, M., and Rice-Evans, C. 1999. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 26(9-10):1231-1237. [ Links ]

Saikia, M., and Handique, P.J. 2013. Antioxidant and antibacterial activity of leaf and bark extracts of seabuckthorn (Hippophae salicifolia D. Don) of north East India. International Journal of Life Sciences Biotechnology and Pharma Research 2(1):80-91. [ Links ]

Schädel, Ch., Richter, A., Blochl, A., and Hoch, G. 2010. Hemicellulose concentration and composition in plant cell walls under extreme carbon source-sink imbalances. Physiologia Plantarum 139:241-255. [ Links ]

Selvamuthukumaran, M., and Farhath, K. 2014. Evaluation of shelf stability of antioxidant rich sea buckthorn fruit yoghurt. Food Research International 21:759-765. [ Links ]

Upadhyay, N.K., Yogendra Kumar, M.S., and Gupta, A. 2011. Antioxidant, cytoprotective and antibacterial effects of Sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) leaves. Food and Chemical Toxicology 48(12):3443-3448. [ Links ]

Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B., and Lewis, B.A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Sciences 74(10):3583-3597. [ Links ]

Yu, L., Haley, S., Perret, J., Harris, M., Wilson, J., and Qian, M. 2002. Free radical scavenging properties of wheat extracts. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50:1619-1624. [ Links ]

Zheng, J., Yang, B., Trépanier, M., and Kallio, H. 2012. Effects of genotype, latitude, and weather conditions on the composition of sugars, sugar alcohols, fruit acids, and ascorbic acid in sea buckthorn (Hippophaë rhamnoides ssp. mongolica) berry juice. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 60(12):3180-3189. [ Links ]

Received: December 13, 2016; Accepted: February 23, 2017

*Corresponding author (wioletta.biel@zut.edu.pl).

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License