J Korean Breast Cancer Soc. 2002 Jun;5(2):91-101. Korean.
Published online Jun 30, 2002.
Copyright © 2002 Korean Breast Cancer Society
Original Article

A Comparative Study of Breast Cancer of Korean Women according to Age in Radiological, Pathological, and Clinical Findings

Young Rahn Lee, M.D.,1 Bo Kyoung Seo, M.D.,2 Kyoo Byung Chung, M.D.,2 Kyu Ran Cho, M.D.,2 June Young Lee, Ph.D.,3 Young Hen Lee, M.D.,2 Hyung Joon Noh, M.D.,2 Seung Hwa Lee, M.D.,2 Ok Hee Woo, M.D.,2 Bo Kyung Je, M.D.,2 Kyoung Rae Kim, M.D.,2 Jung Hyuk Kim, M.D.,2 Jeoung Won Bae, M.D.,4 and In Sun Kim, M.D.5
    • 1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Cheongju Hankook Hospital, Korea.
    • 2Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
    • 3Department of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
    • 4Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
    • 5Department of Pathology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Received July 01, 2002; Accepted July 20, 2002.

Abstract

Purpose

The incidence of breast cancer is continuously increasing in Korea, and the age of the initially detected breast cancer is younger than western people. The purpose of this study was to compare radiological, pathological, and clinical findings of breast cancers according to age and then contribute to the basis of screening program of breast cancer.

Methods

Retrospectively, the 325 patients who had pathologically confirmed breast cancer were included in this study. The patients were classified into 6 groups according to age, 20~29, 30~39, 40~49, 50~59, 60~69, and more than 70 years. We evaluated the radiological findings of 325 cases of mammography and 144 cases of breast ultrasonography, classified as four types; mass, microcalcification, others, and non-detected lesion, and then analyzed radiological findings according to age. We evaluated pathological and clinical findings according to age and compared with radiological findings. We used Mantel-Haenszel's χ2 test and trend test for comparison according to age.

Results

The incidence of breast cancer was 61 cases (19%) in 30~39 years, 122 (38%) in 40~49 years, 92 (28%) in 50~59 years. Most of breast cancer was invasive ductal carcinoma, 258 (79%) and in situ carcinoma was 32 (10%). Most of in situ carcinoma was detected in 20~59 years, 31/32 (97%). Mammography showed mass in 237 (73%), microcalcification in 45 (14%), other finding in 13 (4%), and non-detected lesion in 30 (9%). Twenty-one (47%) of 45 cases with microcalcification were in situ carcinoma and most of in situ carcinoma was presented as microcalcification on mammography, 21/32 (66%). In twenty-eight of 30 cases (93%) with non-detected lesion on mammography, breast cancer was detected on ultrasonography. In terms of clinical findings, there was no symptom in 12/32 (38%) with in situ carcinoma and 57/258 (22%) with invasive ductal carcinoma.

Conclusion

The incidence of breast cancer is abruptly increasing from 4th decades and there is no significant difference in radiological and clinical findings according to age. But, most of in situ carcinoma was detected in 20~59 years and presented as microcalcification on mammography. Thus, Screening mammography should be considered from 4th decades.

Keywords
Breast neoplasm; Breast neoplasms; Diagnosis


Metrics
Share
PERMALINK