Paper Titles

Comparative Study of Different Materials for Occlusal Matrix Technique in Posterior Teeth
p.50

Calcium Hydroxide - A Biomaterial Used in the Infectious Therapy in Dental Medicine
p.55

Computational Study of Physicochemical Properties of the Monomers Used in Stomatology
p.59

Proposal for a Short Patch Test Series of Dental Materials for Patients with Suspected Oral Contact Allergy
p.65

In Vitro Chewing Simulation Model Influence on the Adhesive-Tooth Structure Interface
p.77

Toxicity of Dental Amalgams vs Composite Resins
p.83

SEM Evaluation of Denture Base Materials Used in Clinical Practice
p.91

Fibrin Sealants in Orthopaedic Surgery
p.99

Fixation System Design in Ipsilateral Proximal Femur and Diaphyseal Fractures in Elderly Patients
p.106

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 695In Vitro Chewing Simulation Model Influence on the...

In Vitro Chewing Simulation Model Influence on the Adhesive-Tooth Structure Interface

Article Preview

Abstract:

Loss of hard dental tissues of the posterior teeth during caries removal represents an important issue for conservative dentistry. The use of direct dental biomaterials in this case have to satisfy the requirements of the restored area. The studies have shown higher values of chewing forces at the molar teeth level (20-120N) compared to other teeth [1,2]. Thus, for a long-term clinical success the dental biomaterials have to assure a good marginal sealing and a high resistance to thermal and mechanical stresses developed in the lateral zones of the oral cavity [3]. The aim of this study was carried out to assess the effect of an in vitro chewing simulation model on the adhesively-bonded resin composite restorations. Standardized extended proximal cavities were prepared and restored in forty five sound human third molars. Three in vitro aging methods: a chewing simulation model (mechanical cycling and periodontal ligament simulation) (MC+PDL), thermocycling (TC) and distilled water storage (WS), were used to test the marginal sealing behavior of two adhesive techniques (an adhesive-free flowable resin composite and a self-etch all-in-one adhesive system). A weight-controlled dual-axis chewing device (CS-4.2, SD Mechatronik, Germany) was used for mechanical testing (MC) of the samples. Significantly higher marginal leakage values were observed for the chewing simulation model (MC) compared to TC and WS groups (p<0.05). No statistical correlations were found with regard to aging methods for the tracer’s infiltration of the two adhesive techniques. The dual-axis chewing simulator (CS-4.2) due to its facile mechanical adjustment system may be used for different other in vitro aging models or simulated clinical settings.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Biomaterials and Regenerative Biomedicine

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 695)

Pages:

77-82

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.695.77

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

May 2016

Authors:

Adriana Caracostea Objelean*, Anca Labunet, Laura Silaghi-Dumitrescu, Marioara Moldovan, Sorina Sava, Mindra Eugenia Badea

Keywords:

Chewing Simulation, Mechanical Loading, Microleakage, Self-Etch, Tooth Model

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S.D. Heintze, How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods, Dent Mater. 22 (2006) 712–734.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.02.002

[2] M. Steiner, M. E. Mitsias, K. Ludwig, M. Kern, In vitro evaluation of a mechanical testing chewing simulator, Dent Mater. 25 (2009) 494–499.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.09.010

[3] S.D. Heintze, Clinical relevance of tests on bond strength, microleakage and marginal adaptation, Dent Mater. 29 (2013) 59-84.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.07.158

[4] M. Ghazal, M. Kern. Wear of human enamel and nano-filled composite denture teeth under different loading forces, J Oral Rehabil. 36 (2009) 58-64.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01904.x

[5] A.M. Marchionatti, V.F. Wandscher, J. Broch, C.D. Bergoli, J. Maier, L.F. Valandro, O.B. Kaizer, Influence of periodontal ligament simulation on bond strength and fracture resistance of roots restored with fiber posts, J Appl Oral Sci. 22(5) (2014).

DOI: 10.1590/1678-775720140067

[6] A. Vichi, M. Margvelashvili, C. Goracci, F. Papacchini, M. Ferrari, Bonding and sealing ability of a new self-adhering flowable composite resin in class I restorations, Clin Oral Investig. 17(6) (2013) 1497-1506.

DOI: 10.1007/s00784-012-0846-6

[7] I. Radovic, F. Monticelli, C. Goracci, Z.R. Vulicevic, M. Ferrari, Self-adhesive Resin Cements: A Literature Review, J Adhes Dent. 10(4) (2008) 251-258.

[8] P. Czasch, N. Ilie, In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of a self-adhesive and four novel flowable composites, J Adhes Dent. 15 (2013) 1229–1236.

[9] F.L.B. Amaral, V. Colucci, R.G. Palma-Dibb, S.A.M. Corona, Assessment of in vitro methods used to promote adhesive interface degradation: A critical review, J Esthet Restor Dent. 19 (2007) 340-354.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00134.x

[10] F.H.O. Mitsui, A.R. Peris, A.N. Cavalcanti, G.M. Marchi, L.A.F. Pimenta, Influence of thermal and mechanical load cycling on microtensile bond strengths of total and self-etching adhesive systems, Oper Dent. 31-2 (2006) 240-247.

DOI: 10.2341/05-20

[11] M. Rosentritt, M. Behr, J.M. van der Zel, A.J. Feilzer, Approach for evaluating the influence of laboratory simulation, Dent Mater. 25(3) (2009) 348–52.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.08.009

[12] T. Brosh, R. Zary, R. Pilo, A. Gavish, Influence of periodontal ligament simulation and splints on strains developing at the cervical area of a tooth crown, Eur J Oral Sci. 120(5) (2012) 466-471.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2012.00990.x

[13] G.R.S. Naveh, N. Lev-Tov Chattah, P. Zaslansky, R. Shahar, S. Weiner, Tooth–PDL–bone complex: Response to compressive loads encountered during mastication – A review, Arch Oral Biol. 57 (2012) 1575-1584.

DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.07.006

[14] Vertise Flow - Technical Bulletin. http: /www. kerrdental. com/cms-filesystem-action/KerrDental-products-techinfo/vertiseflow_techbulletin_34929b. pdf, (2010).

[15] OptiBond All-In-One - Technical Bulletin. http: /www. kerrdental. com/cms-filesystem-action?file=KerrDental-Products-TechSpecs/optibond-aio-techbulletin-july. pdf, (2009).

[16] Herculite XRV Ultra - Technical Bulletin. http: /www. kerrdental. eu/catalog-files/0/405/files/Herculite_XRV_Ultra_Technical_Bullettin_E_en-US. pdf, (2009).

[17] Y.J. Wei, N. Silikas, Z.T. Zhang, D.C. Watts, Hygroscopic dimensional changes of self-adhering and new resin-matrix composites during water sorption/desorption cycles, Dent Mater. 27 (2011) 259-266.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.015