Degradation Behaviour of Metallic Biomaterials for Degradable Stents

Article Preview

Abstract:

The short-term need of scaffolding function of stent and the prevention of potential longterm complication of permanently implanted stent have directed to the original idea of biodegradable stent. Selecting and developing materials showing appropriate mechanical and degradation properties are key steps for the development of this new class of medical devices. Therefore, the study of their in vitro degradation behaviour is mandatory for the selection of potential candidate materials suited in vivo. In this work, the degradation behaviour of current studied biodegradable metals including three magnesium alloys (Mg, AM60B and AZ91D), pure iron and Fe-35Mn was investigated. The tests were performed in a simulated blood plasma solution at 37±0.1 oC, using three different methods; potentiodynamic polarization, static immersion, and dynamic test in a test-bench which mimics the flow condition in human coronary artery. Degradation rate was determined as ion release rate measured by using atomic adsorption spectroscopy (AAS) and also estimated from weight loss and corrosion current. Surface morphology and chemical composition of corroded specimens were analyzed by using SEM/EDS. The three degradation methods provide consistent results in corrosion tendency, where Mg showed the highest corrosion rate followed by AZ91D, AM60B, Fe-35Mn and iron. Potentiodynamic polarization gives a rapid estimation of corrosion behaviour and rate. Static immersion test shows the effect of time on the degradation rate and behaviour. Dynamic test provides the closest approach to the environment after stent implantation and its results show the effect of the flow on the materials degradation. In conclusion, the three investigated methods can be applied for screening, selecting and validating materials for degradable stent application before going further to in vivo assessments.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 15-17)

Pages:

113-118

Citation:

Online since:

February 2006

Export:

Price:

[1] A. Schoemig, A. Kastrati, H. Mudra, R. Blasini, H. Schuhlen, V. Klauss, G. Richard and F.J. Neumann: Circulation Vol. 90 (1994), p.2716.

Google Scholar

[2] M. El-Omar, G. Dangas, I. Iakovou and R. Mehran: Curr. Interv. Cardiol. Rep. Vol. 3 (2001), p.296.

Google Scholar

[3] S.T. Rab, S.B. King 3rd, G.S. Roubin, S. Carlin, J.A. Hearn and J.S. Douglas Jr.: JACC Vol. 18 (1991), p.1524.

Google Scholar

[4] A. Colombo and E. Karvouni: Circulation Vol. 102 (2000), p.371.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Niemeyer, T. Fabian, V. Kaese, B. Heublein, R. Rohde, H. Windhagen, F. Witte, A. M-. Lindenberg and E. Switzer: Proc. Euromat 2001 (2001), p.17.

DOI: 10.1515/bmte.2001.46.s1.238

Google Scholar

[6] J. Lévesque, D. Dubé, M. Fiset and D. Mantovani: Mater. Sci. Forum Vol. 426 (2003), p.521.

Google Scholar

[7] F. Witte, J. Fischer, J. Nellesen, H. A. Crostack, V. Kaese, A. Pisch, F. Beckmann and H. Windhagen: Biomaterials Vol. 27 (2005), p.1013.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.037

Google Scholar

[8] H. Kuwahara, Y. Al-Abdullat, M. Ohta, S. Tsutsumi, K. Ikeuchi, N. Mazaki and T. Aizawa: Mater. Sci. Forum Vol. 350-351 (2000), p.349.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.350-351.349

Google Scholar

[9] S.A. Brown, L.J. Farnsworth, K. Merritt and T.D. Crowe: J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Vol. 22 (1988), p.321.

Google Scholar

[10] M. Peuster, P. Wohlsein, M. Brugmann, M. Ehlerding, K. Seidler, C. Fink, H. Brauer, A. Fischer and G. Hausdorf: Heart Vol. 86 (2001), p.563.

Google Scholar

[11] Y. Okazaki and E. Gotoh: Biomaterials Vol. 26 (2005), p.11.

Google Scholar

[12] M.F. Lòpez, A. Gutiérrez and J.A. Jiménez: Electrochimica Acta Vol. 47 (2002), p.1359.

Google Scholar

[13] D. Sun, P. Monaghan, W.H. Brantely and W.M. Johnston: J. Prosthetic Dentistry Vol. 87 (2002), p.86.

Google Scholar

[14] ASTM F 2129-04: Standard Test Method for Conducting Potentiodynamic Measurements to Determine the Corrosion Susceptibility of Small Implant Devices (ASTM, 2004).

DOI: 10.1520/f2129-15

Google Scholar

[15] ASTM G 59-97: Standard Test Method for Conducting Potentiodynamic Polarization Resistance Measurements (ASTM, 2001).

Google Scholar

[16] ASTM G 31-99: Standard Practice for Laboratory Immersion Corrosion Testing of Metals, (ASTM, 2001).

Google Scholar

[17] S. M-. Hülsbeck, J. Grimm, T. Jahnke, G. Häselbarth and M. Heller: Eur. Radiol. Vol. 11 (2001), p.893.

Google Scholar

[18] P.A. Doriot, P. -A. Dorsaz, L. Dorsaz, E. De Benedetti, P. Chatelain and P. Delafontaine: Coronary Artery Disease Vol. 11 (2000), p.495.

DOI: 10.1097/00019501-200009000-00008

Google Scholar

[19] J. Emsley: The Elements (Clarendon Press, Oxford 1998).

Google Scholar