Numerical Study on Fluid Structure Interaction of Slug Flow in a Horizontal Pipeline

Article Preview

Abstract:

It is well-known that when slug flow occurs in pipes it may result in damaging the pipe line. Therefore it is important to predict the slug occurrence and its effect. Slug flow regime is unsteady in nature and the pipelines conveying it are indeed susceptible to significant cyclic stresses. In this work, a numerical study has been conducted to investigate the interaction between the slug flow and solid pipe. Fluid Structure Interaction (FSI) coupling between 3-D Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) and 3-D pipeline model code has been developed to assess the stresses on the pipe due to slug flow. Time – dependent stresses results has been analyzed together with the slug characteristic along the pipe. Results revealed that the dynamic behavior of the pipelines is strongly affected by slug parameters. The FSI simulation results show that the maximum stresses occurred close to the pipe supports due to slug flow, where the pipe response to the exerted slug forces is extremely high. These stresses will subsequently cause fatigue damage which is likely reduce the total lifetime of the pipeline. Therefore a careful attention should be made during the design stage of the pipeline to account for these stresses. The system has been investigated under multiple water velocities and constant air velocity, the maximum stress was obtained at the water velocity of 0.505 m/s. Moreover, when the water velocity is increased from 0.502 to 1.003 m/s the maximum stress magnitude is decreased by 1.2% and when it is increased to 1.505 m/s the maximum stress is diminished by 3.6%.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

319-325

Citation:

Online since:

January 2016

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R. Swindell, Hidden integrity threat looms in subsea pipework vibrations, Offshore, vol. 71, (2011).

Google Scholar

[2] O. Kvernvold, V. Vindøy, T. Søntvedt, A. Saasen, and S. Selmer-Olsen, Velocity distribution in horizontal slug flow, International journal of multiphase flow, vol. 10, pp.441-457, (1984).

DOI: 10.1016/0301-9322(84)90055-7

Google Scholar

[3] B. Abuali, F. J. Smith, G. W. Brown, and J. P. Pontaza, Flow-Induced Vibrations of Subsea Piping: A Screening Approach Based on Numerical Simulation, in SPE Offshore Europe Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, (2013).

DOI: 10.2118/166661-ms

Google Scholar

[4] A. Nair, C. Chauvet, A. Whooley, A. Eltaher, and P. Jukes, Flow Induced Forces on Multi-Planar Rigid Jumper Systems, in ASME 2011 30th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, 2011, pp.687-692.

DOI: 10.1115/omae2011-50225

Google Scholar

[5] J. P. Pontaza and R. G. Menon, Flow-induced vibrations of subsea jumpers due to internal multi-phase flow, in ASME 2011 30th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, 2011, pp.585-595.

DOI: 10.1115/omae2011-50062

Google Scholar

[6] L. Chica, R. Pascali, P. Jukes, B. Ozturk, M. Gamino, and K. Smith, Jumper analysis with interacting internal Two-phase flow, Rhodes, Greece, (2011).

Google Scholar

[7] D. Jia, Slug Flow Induced Vibration in a Pipeline Span a Jumper and a Riser Section, in Offshore Technology Conference, (2012).

DOI: 10.4043/22935-ms

Google Scholar

[8] L. Chica, R. Pascali, P. Jukes, B. Ozturk, M. Gamino, and K. Smith, Detailed FSI Analysis Methodology for Subsea Piping Components, in ASME 2012 31st International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, 2012, pp.829-839.

DOI: 10.1115/omae2012-83710

Google Scholar

[9] M. A. Gamino, FSI Methodology for Analyzing VIV on Subsea Pipeline Free Spans with Practical Boundary Conditions, University of Houston, (2013).

DOI: 10.1115/omae2013-10419

Google Scholar

[10] A. Blanco and E. Casanova, A Preliminary Study on the Interaction Between Slug Flow and Vortex Induced Vibration in Fatigue Life of Submarines Pipelines, in ASME 2010 29th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, 2010, pp.545-550.

DOI: 10.1115/omae2010-20449

Google Scholar

[11] J. P. Pontaza, Fluid-Structure Interaction and Applications to Screening Pipeline Span VIV and Subsea Piping FIV, in Offshore Technology Conference, (2014).

DOI: 10.4043/25429-ms

Google Scholar

[12] F. -K. Benra, H. J. Dohmen, J. Pei, S. Schuster, and B. Wan, A Comparison of One-Way and Two-Way Coupling Methods for Numerical Analysis of Fluid-Structure Interactions, Journal of applied mathematics, vol. 2011, (2011).

DOI: 10.1155/2011/853560

Google Scholar

[13] Energy Institute. Guidelines for the avoidance of vibration induced fatigue failure in process pipework. London: Energy Institute, (2008).

Google Scholar

[14] U. CD-adapco, GUIDE Star CCM+ Version 7. 06, ed: CD-adapco, (2012).

Google Scholar