The Conceptual Design of Differential Mechanisms

Article Preview

Abstract:

The purpose of this paper is to present a design approach based on the geometric constraints of joints for synthesizing differential mechanisms with two degrees-of-freedom, including some mechanisms with the same functions but distinct structures. The concept of virtual axes is presented. And, there are five steps in the design process. Step 1 is to decide fundamental entities by the properties of existing mechanisms and the technique of number synthesis, and 10 suitable fundamental entities of differential mechanisms are available. Step 2 is to compose geometric constraints, and 14 items are obtained. Step 3 is to compose links, and 15 items are derived. Step 4 is to assign fixed constraints for inputs or outputs, and 15 results are found. The final step is to particularize the obtained events by the properties of existing mechanisms and the structures of fundamental entities. As a result, 8 feasible results for differential mechanisms with two degrees-of-freedom and two basic loops are obtained in which 2 are existing designs and the other 6 are novel.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

973-978

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

[1] L.P. Mooers, U.S. Patent 832, 991. (1906).

Google Scholar

[2] H. M. Patch, U.S. Patent 1, 283, 283. (1918).

Google Scholar

[3] W. E. Altmann, U.S. Patent 2, 967, 438. (1961).

Google Scholar

[4] S. Hirose: Robot Grippers (IFS, Bedford 1986).

Google Scholar

[5] M. Morozumi and S. Kishi: JSME International Journal Vol. 56 (1990), p.1542.

Google Scholar

[6] H. S. Yan and L. C. Hsieh: ASME Transactions, Journal of Mechanical Design Vol. 116 (2) (1994), p.565.

Google Scholar

[7] S. Kota and S. Bidare: ASME Transactions, Journal of Mechanical Design Vol. 119 (1997), p.284.

Google Scholar

[8] C. H. Hsu and Y. C. Wu: JSME International Journal, Series C Vol. 41 (2) (1998), p.299.

Google Scholar

[9] D. Z. Chen and K. L. Yao: ASME Transactions, Journal of Mechanical Design Vol. 122 (2000), p.472.

Google Scholar