Farmers’ Participation in Territorial Planning: A Methodological Approach for the Case Study of Huerta de Valencia

Stefano Corsi; Chiara Mazzocchi; Giovanni Mottadelli; Guido Sali

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.11.351

Paper Titles

The Role of Cultural Assets in European and United States Urban Regeneration
p.323

Land Value Recapture in the US: The Case of San Francisco
p.330

Integrated Urban Regeneration: The Opportunity of Enhancing the Open Spaces
p.338

Credit Access and Urban Regeneration in the United States
p.344

Farmers’ Participation in Territorial Planning: A Methodological Approach for the Case Study of Huerta de Valencia
p.351

Challenging Inclusivity Urban Agriculture and Community Involvement in San Diego
p.356

Territorial Milieu as Driver for Sustainability through Urban Regeneration Initiatives: The Case of San Diego, CA
p.364

BERGAMOT - A Green and Multifunctional Asset Exclusive from the Province of Reggio Calabria
p.376

A Geographic Glimpse over Urban Agriculture
p.380

HomeAdvanced Engineering ForumAdvanced Engineering Forum Vol. 11Farmers’ Participation in Territorial Planning: A...

Farmers’ Participation in Territorial Planning: A Methodological Approach for the Case Study of Huerta de Valencia

Abstract:

Participation in planning has become progressively important in territory management. As regards Territorial Planning, farmers are among the main stakeholders. In fact multifunctionality of agriculture admits a new role to primary sector. In particular the management of open areas is particularly strategic in peri-urban areas, where competition for resources is highest than in other areas, especially for the land. In this context, the involvement of farmers as privileged stakeholders to land management is even more important. This paper proposes a methodological approach for the evaluation of peri-urban land use plans by farmers. In particular, it has been considered the "Territorial Action Plan of Valencias Huerta (TAPVH).

By email Full Text Pdf

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Engineering Forum (Volume 11)

Pages:

351-355

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.11.351

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

June 2014

Authors:

Stefano Corsi, Chiara Mazzocchi*, Giovanni Mottadelli, Guido Sali

Keywords:

Agricultural Multifunctionality, Community Planning, Farmers, Participatory Process

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Permissions:

Creative Commons CC BY 4.0

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] T. C. Beierle, D. M. Konisky: Values, conflict and trust in participatory environmental planning, in: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management Vol. 19, No. 4, (2000), p.587–602.

DOI: 10.1002/1520-6688(200023)19:4<587::aid-pam4>3.0.co;2-q

Google Scholar

[2] A. Bond, J. Palerm, P. Haigh: Public participation in EIA of nuclear power plant decommissioning projects: a case study analysis, in: Environmental Impact Assessment Review, No. 24, (2004), p.617–641.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2004.02.002

Google Scholar

[3] D. Corvi, F. Sacchi: Prove di governo metropolitano, in: Urbanistica informazioni (2012), pp.245-246.

Google Scholar

[4] E. Defrancesco, P. Gatto, F. Runge, S. Trestini: Factors affecting farmers' participation in agri-environmental measures: a northern Italian perspective, in: Journal of agricultural economics, Vol. 59, No. 1, (2008), p.114–131.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2007.00134.x

Google Scholar

[5] C. Mazzocchi, G. Sali, S. Corsi: Land use conversion in metropolitan areas and the permanence of agriculture: Sensitivity Index of Agricultural Land (SIAL), a tool for territorial analysis, in: Land Use Policy, No. 35, (2013), pp.155-162.

DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.05.019

Google Scholar

[6] J. Milligan, T. O' Riordan, S. A. Nicholson-Cole, A. R. Watkinson: Nature conservation for future sustainable shorelines: lessons from seeking to involve the public, in: Land Use Policy, No. 26, (2009), p.203–213.

DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.01.004

Google Scholar

[7] C. Morris, C. Potter: Recruiting the new conservationists: farmers' adoption of agrienvironmental schemes in the U.K., in: Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 11, (1995), pp.51-63.

DOI: 10.1016/0743-0167(94)00037-a

Google Scholar

[8] A. Muñoz Criado: Plan de la Huerta de Valencia, un paisaje milenario, Laimprenta CG, Spain (2006).

Google Scholar

[9] J. Primdahl: Agricultural landscapes as places of production and for living in owner's versus producer's decision making and the implications for planning, in: Landscape and Urban Planning, No. 46, (1999), pp.143-150.

DOI: 10.1016/s0169-2046(99)00038-9

Google Scholar

[10] G. Sali, S. Corsi, C. Mazzocchi: Rural development policies and land use change: the Lombardy case study. Book 1 I 135 - 141. Proceedings of the 6th International Scientific conference Rural Development 2013,. ISSN 2345-0916 online, ISSN 1822-3230 print.

Google Scholar

[11] A. Scott, P. Shannon: Local landscape designations in Scotland: opportunity or barrier to effective landscape management, in: Landscape and Urban Planning, No. 81, (2007), pp.257-269.

DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.01.008

Google Scholar

[12] M. Stenseke: Local participation in cultural landscape maintenance: lessons from Sweden, in: Land Use Policy, No. 26, (2009), pp.214-223.

DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.01.005

Google Scholar

[13] Information on http: /www. ine. es.

Google Scholar

[14] Information on http: /www3. istat. it/censimenti/agricoltura2010/questionario. pdf.

Google Scholar