Surface Roughness and Cutting Force Components Evaluation in Hard Turning by Differently Shaped Cutting Tools

Article Preview

Abstract:

There is a difference in machining by the cutting tool with defined geometry and undefined geometry. That is one of the reasons of implementation of hard turning into the machining process. In current manufacturing processes is hard turning many times used as a fine finish operation. It has many advantages – machining by single point cutting tool, high productivity, flexibility, ability to produce parts with complex shapes at one clamping. Very important is to solve machined surface quality. There is a possibility to use wiper geometry in hard turning process to achieve 3 – 4 times lower surface roughness values. Cutting parameters influence cutting process as well as cutting tool geometry. It is necessary to take into consideration cutting force components as well. Issue of the use of wiper geometry has been still insufficiently researched.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

26-32

Citation:

Online since:

August 2016

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] BARTARYA, G., CHOUDHURY, S. K. 2012. State of the art in hard turning. In: International Journal Machine Tools & Manufacture 53, 1-14.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.08.019

Google Scholar

[2] GRZESIK, W., WANAT, T. 2006. Surface finish generated in hard turning of quenched alloy steel parts using conventional and wiper ceramic inserts. In: International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 46.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.01.009

Google Scholar

[3] KLOCKE, F., KRATZ, H. 2005. Advanced tool edge geometry for high precision hard turning. In: Annals of the CIRP, 54 (1): 47–50.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60046-8

Google Scholar

[4] LALWANI, D. I., MEHTA, N. K., JAIN, P. K. 2008. Experimental investigations of cutting parameters influence on cutting forces and surface roughness in finich hard turning of MDN250 steel. In: Journal of Materials Processing Technology 206, 167 – 179.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.12.018

Google Scholar

[5] NESLUSAN, M., GRZESIK, W., ZAK, K. 2012. Analysis of surface roughness on bearing steel parts after cutting, superfinishing and burnishing operations. In: Journal of Machine Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 1.

Google Scholar

[6] SAMARDZIOVA, M., NESLUSAN, M. 2013. Roughness improvement in hard turning when changing cutting parameters and using differently shaped ceramic tools. In: Novel Trends in Production Devices and System. Trans Tech Publications.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.474.345

Google Scholar

[7] TOENSHOFF, HK., ARENDT, C., BEN AMOR, R. 2000. Cutting hardened steel. In: Annals of the CIRP 49 (2): 1 – 19.

Google Scholar

[8] STACHURSKI, W., KRUSZYNSKI, S., MIDERA, S. 2013. Influence of Cutting Conditions in Turning with Wiper Type Inserts on Surface Roughness and Cutting Forces. In: Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering.

Google Scholar

[9] Cichosz, P. 2007. Kszta ltowanie warstwy wierzchniej przedmiot´ow obrabianych ostrzami typu Wiper, Obróbka skrawaniem, Wysoka produktywno, Wydawnictwo Politechniki Wrocawskiej, 199–204.

Google Scholar