Experimental Investigation on Steel-Plate-Masonry Composite Column Compressive Behavior

Deng Hu Jing; Shuang Yin Cao; Hai Tao Zhou

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.255-260.591

Paper Titles

Multifractal Analysis of Reinforcing Steel Bars with Nonuniform Corrosion Degree
p.569

Fire Performance of Reinforced Concrete Beams Strengthened with CFRP Sheets Bonded with an Inorganic Adhesive
p.574

Analysis and Calculation of the Force of Glass Panel of the Point Supported Glass Curtain Wall
p.580

Stability Analysis of Roof Structure with Steel Tubular Arch-Truss
p.587

Experimental Investigation on Steel-Plate-Masonry Composite Column Compressive Behavior
p.591

Analysis on Secondary Effect of Corrugated Webs in Steel-Concrete Composite Beams
p.596

The Construction Technology of Light Masonry Retaining Structure Used in Fluctuating Belt of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area
p.602

Experiment of the SCT Joint under Complicated Loading
p.607

Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis on the Steel Frame with Semi-Rigid Connection under Periodic Load
p.614

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 255-260Experimental Investigation on Steel-Plate-Masonry...

Experimental Investigation on Steel-Plate-Masonry Composite Column Compressive Behavior

Abstract:

The steel-plate-masonry composite structure is an innovative type of structural scheme popular in masonry structures with load-bearing walls removed for a large space. A total of 4 column specimens under static loading were tested to mainly study the failure modes, load-carrying capacity, and strain distribution in the critical cross-section. Results show that the composite columns started an initial failure from local buckling of the steel plate located between binding bolts; the main factors influencing load-carrying capacity included thickness of the steel plate, type of injected material, and initial column eccentricity; the working performance of the composite column with epoxy adhesive was better than that with cement grout; and re-distribution of compressive stress existed in the steel plates of the column. Also, the ratio of service load-carrying capacity to ultimate capacity of the steel-plate-masonry composite column is about 70%.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advances in Civil Engineering, CEBM 2011

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 255-260)

Pages:

591-595

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.255-260.591

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

May 2011

Authors:

Deng Hu Jing, Shuang Yin Cao, Hai Tao Zhou

Keywords:

Column, Compressive Behaviour, Local Buckling, Steel-Plate-Masonry

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

References

[1] H.A. Moghaddam: Lateral load behavior of masonry infilled steel frames with repair and retrofit. J Struct Eng, ASCE 2004; 130(1), p.56–63.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2004)130:1(56)

Google Scholar

[2] R. Perera, S. Gуmez, E. Alarcуn: Experimental and analytical study of masonry infill reinforced concrete frames retrofitted with steel braces. J Struct Eng, ASCE 2004; 130(12), p.2032–(2039).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2004)130:12(2032)

Google Scholar

[3] S.J. Hardy, M.A. Al-Salka: Composite action between steel lintels and masonry walls. Struct Eng Rev 1995; 7(2), p.75–82.

Google Scholar

[4] S.J. Hardy: Design of steel lintels supporting masonry walls. Eng Struct 2000; 22(6), p.597–604.

DOI: 10.1016/s0141-0296(99)00004-8

Google Scholar

[5] L. Galano, V. Gusella: Reinforcement of masonry walls subjected to seismic loading using steel x-bracing. J Struct Eng, ASCE 1998; 124(8), p.886–895.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1998)124:8(886)

Google Scholar

[6] M. Taghdi, M. Bruneau, M. Saatcioglu: Seismic retrofitting of low-rise masonry and concrete walls using steel strips. J Struct Eng, ASCE 2000; 126(9), p.1017–1025.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2000)126:9(1017)

Google Scholar

[7] A. Borri, P. Casadei, G. Castori, et al. Strengthening of brick masonry arches with externally bonded steel reinforced composites. J Compos Constr, ASCE 2009; 13(6), p.468–475.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000030

Google Scholar

[8] B.D. Ewing, J.K. Kowalsky: Compressive behavior of unconfined and confined clay brick masonry. J Struct Eng, ASCE 2004; 130(4): 650–661.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2004)130:4(650)

Google Scholar

[9] Y.Y. Ou, N.K. Liu: Analysis of flexural behavior of masonry column strengthened by wrapped steel outside under axial compression. Bldg Struct 2006; 36(11), p.27–29 [in Chinese].

Google Scholar

[10] S.M. Zhuo, M.H. Lin, L.M. Chen: The strength and deformation of brick column reinforced by enclosing angle steel lath. Bldg Struct 1994; 24(5): 12–17 [in Chinese].

Google Scholar

[11] D.H. Jing, S.Y. Cao, H.Z. Guo. Application of steel plate-masonry composite structure technology for underpinning of masonry walls. China Civ Eng J 2009; 42(5), p.55–60 [in Chinese].

Google Scholar

[12] H.T. Zhou: Theoretical analysis and experimental study on compressive behavior of steel plate-masonry composite column. Master thesis, Southeast Univ, Nanjing, China, 2009, 73 pp [in Chinese].

Google Scholar