Kinematic Stability of Masonry Arches

Article Preview

Abstract:

To quantify the safety of masonry arches and vaults using limit-analysis, various types of safety factors have been devised. The most well-known were introduced by Heyman: a “static factor of safety” (or load factor) assessing how vulnerable the structure is to increases in the living loads and a “geometrical factor of safety” assessing how critical the thickness of the structure is for its stability. In non seismic areas, one of the main risks of total or partial collapse of arches and vaults is excessive displacement of the supports (following walls or soil deformation). Limit analysis technique can be used to analyse this risk, quantifying movements permitted before collapse and evolution of the thrust on the supports. This analysis can be combined with pathological investigations and displacement monitoring to study the evolution of the risk and define a “kinematic factor of safety”. A software program was developed (a) to compute domains of stability for particular mechanisms of deformation, (b) to study possibility of transitions between mechanisms during deformation and (c) to interactively study the influence of movements of the supports on thrust and stability. Scaled physical models are used to validate the limit analysis approach, using an experimental rig where horizontal and vertical displacements are controlled by computer. A high-speed camera is used to study transition between mechanisms. Finally it is referred to techniques integrating this kinematic approach into a more general probabilistic approach, taking into account various uncertainties in the structure (shape, thickness, loads, movements).

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 133-134)

Pages:

429-434

Citation:

Online since:

October 2010

Authors:

Export:

Price:

[1] Frézier, A F (1737-39). La theorie et la pratique de la coupe des pierres et des bois pour la construction des voutes et autres parties des batiments civils et militaire., Strasbourg, France : J. -D. Doulsseker fils, L. -H. Guérin aîné.

DOI: 10.1051/mattech/196043070178

Google Scholar

[2] Viollet le Duc, E E (1854-1868). Dictionnaire raisonné de l'architecture française du XIe au XVIe siècle., Paris, France : A. Morel.

DOI: 10.30965/9783846763346_013

Google Scholar

[3] Beranek, W J (1989). Understanding of structures, Stable-Unstable, structural consolidation of ancient buildings, 29-43.

Google Scholar

[4] Heyman, J (1966). The stone skeleton., International journal of solids and structures, 2, 249-279.

Google Scholar

[5] Briccoli Bati, S, Paradiso, M, and Tempesta, G (1997). Archi in muratura soggetti a carichi e cedimenti delle imposte., Laterizio, 60, 436-443.

Google Scholar

[6] Smars, P (2000). Etudes sur la stabilité des arcs et voûtes, confrontation des méthodes de l'analyse limite aux voûtes gothiques en Brabant., PhD thesis, K.U. Leuven, (2000).

Google Scholar

[7] Ochsendorf, J A (2002). Collapse of Masonry Structures., PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.

Google Scholar

[8] Ochsendorf, J A (2006). The masonry arch on spreading supports., Structural Engineer, 84(2), 129-135.

Google Scholar

[9] Mainstone, R J (1997). Structural analysis, structural insights, and historical interpretation, Journal of the society of architectural historians, 56(3), 316-340.

DOI: 10.2307/991244

Google Scholar

[10] Smars, P (2008). Influence of friction and tensile resistance on the stability of masonry arches, in Structural Analysis of historical constructions, Bath (UK), 1199-1206.

DOI: 10.1201/9781439828229.ch138

Google Scholar

[11] Calipous website. [Online]. Available: http: /smars. yuntech. edu. tw/calipous.

Google Scholar

[12] ICOMOS. (2003). Principles for the analysis, conservation and structural restoration of architectural heritage, ICOMOS Charter.

Google Scholar

[13] Livesley, R K (1978). Limit analysis of structures formed from rigid blocks., International journal for numerical methods in engineering, 12, 1853-1871.

DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620121207

Google Scholar

[14] Livesley, R K (1992). A computational model for the limit analysis of three-dimensional masonry structures., Meccanica, 27, 161-172.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00430042

Google Scholar

[15] Schueremans, L, Smars, P, and Van Gemert, D (2001a). Safety of arches - a probabilistic approach, in 9th Canadian masonry symposium (Spanning the Centuries with Masonry), 12pp.

DOI: 10.1515/rbm-2001-5596

Google Scholar

[16] Schueremans, L, Van Gemert, D, and Smars, P (2001b). Safety assessment of masonry arches using probabilistic methods., International Journal for restoration of buildings and monuments, 7(5), 517-538.

DOI: 10.1515/rbm-2001-5596

Google Scholar