Electromagnetic Response for Horizontal Electric Dipole Source Considering Conduct & Displacement Current

Jia Bin Yan; Xiang Yu Huang; Peng Yu Wu

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.513-517.3340

Paper Titles

Optimal Placement and Sizing of Distributed Generation in Smart Distribution System
p.3322

Power Equipment Control in Four-Footed Bearing-Burden Robot Dog
p.3328

A Design of Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum Module with Variable Bandwidth Based on FPGA
p.3332

Design and Implementation of Remote Intelligent Control System Based on Cortex-M3
p.3336

Electromagnetic Response for Horizontal Electric Dipole Source Considering Conduct & Displacement Current
p.3340

Research on Combined Environmental Stress Test for Hybrid Integrated DC/DC Converter
p.3345

Sparse Representation of the Human Vision Information and the Saliency Detection Algorithm
p.3349

Image Segmentation Algorithm Research for Sport Graphics Based on Artificial Life
p.3354

A Novel Approach Based on Multi-Layer Background Subtraction and Seed Region Growing for Sport Graphics Segmentation
p.3358

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 513-517Electromagnetic Response for Horizontal Electric...

Electromagnetic Response for Horizontal Electric Dipole Source Considering Conduct & Displacement Current

Abstract:

Electromagnetic (EM) field is often referred to diffusion (quasi-static assumption) that displacement currents are neglected during data processing in geophysical application, while the ratio of conduct currents to displacement currents is higher than 10, that is ,we think EM field is diffusion dominated and wave dominate for the ratio less than 0.1. Our simulating with Horizontal Electric Dipole Field indicated that frequency range of wave dominated is that the ratio is less than 0.007, the magnitude curves of EM component and impedance referring to diffusion and wave are different from those of diffusion. And in transform zone () the curves are different from those of wave and diffusion.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 513-517)

Pages:

3340-3344

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.513-517.3340

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

February 2014

Authors:

Jia Bin Yan*, Xiang Yu Huang, Peng Yu Wu

Keywords:

Conduction Current, Displacement Current, Electromagnetic Waves (EMW)

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Ward, S. H., and G.W. Hohmann, Electromagnetic theory for geophysical applications, in M. N. Nabighian, ed., Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics[M], SEG, 1988, 131–312.

DOI: 10.1190/1.9781560802631.ch4

Google Scholar

[2] Zhdanov, M. S., Geophysical inverse theory and regularization problems[M]: Elsevier Science. (2002).

Google Scholar

[3] Persson, L. & Pedersen, L.B., The importance of displacement currents in RMT measurements in high resistivity environments[J], J. Appl. Geophys., 2002. 51(1), 11–20.

DOI: 10.1016/s0926-9851(02)00198-2

Google Scholar

[4] Kerry Key, 1D inversion of multicomponent, multifrequency marine CSEM data: Methodology and synthetic studies for resolving thin resistive layers[J]: Geophysics, 2009, 74 ( 2): F9–F20.

DOI: 10.1190/1.3058434

Google Scholar

[5] Duff C. Stewart, Walter L. Anderson, Thomas P. Grover, Shallow subsurface mapping by electromagnetic sounding in the 300 kHz to 30 MHz range: Model studies and prototype system assessment[J], Geophysics, 1994, 59 ( 8): 1201–1210.

DOI: 10.1190/1.1443678

Google Scholar

[6] Meincke P. Linear GPR inversion for lossy soil and a planar air-soil interface[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2001, 39(12): 2713 2721.

DOI: 10.1109/36.975005

Google Scholar

[7] Annan, A. P., Transmission dispersion and GPR: J. Environ. Eng[J]. 1996, Geophys: 125–136.

Google Scholar