Design Quality Assessment Method of the Primary and Secondary School Teaching Building Engineering Design System

Article Preview

Abstract:

The purpose of this paper is to study the evaluation theories on engineering design quality of the primary and secondary school teaching building. In this research the specific seismic performances of primary and secondary school buildings was analyzed. Then, the design quality evaluation index system of primary and secondary School buildings and multi-layered evaluation system were established according to the system engineering theory of builing engineering design. A fuzzy comprehensive evaluation precedure was finally shown. The result indicated the hidden problems and management defects can be accurately found through this evaluation system with using the quality and quantity analysis way. It was helpful to greatly increase the ability to forecast, prevent and control engineering accidents, by which the prevention-after-accident quality management model of building engineering design can change into self-control type.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1572-1578

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] XinGaowei. Scismic Evaluation of Masonry Structurcs Basedon Push-over Method for Primary and Middle School Bundings [D]. Xian University of Architecture and Technology, 2009:2-2.

Google Scholar

[2] Ma Yubo. Design of the Teaching Building [J]. Heilongjiang Science and Technology Information, 2012, (4):256-256.

Google Scholar

[3] Tian Xiaoxia. The Teaching Building Seismic Disadvantages and Post-earthquake Assessment Method [J]. Jiangxi Chemical Industry, 2009(4):152-153.

Google Scholar

[4] Zhou Qiang, Sun Baitao. Seismic Damage Analysis of Typical Masonry Teaching Buildings in Meizoseismic Area of Wenchuan Earthquake [J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 2010(4):467-468.

Google Scholar

[5] Adem Dogangun.Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the May l, 2003 Bingol Earthquake in Turkey.Engineering Structures[J], 2004:841—856.

Google Scholar

[6] Xia Qingwen. On corresponding measures of structure design from the teaching building destruction in Wenchuan earthquake [J]. Shanxi Architecture, 2009(12):75-76.

Google Scholar

[7] Liang Xianchao, Li Hong. Pondering on Anti-seismic Property of School Buildings [J]. Jiangsu Architecture, 2009(3):24-25.

Google Scholar

[8] ZHANG Zong-yao. LI Zhi-min. Architectural Design of Primary and Secondary School[M]. Beijing: China Architecture&Building Press, 2009:4-6.

Google Scholar

[9] SHA Kai-xun. Evaluation Method of Building Engineering Design Quality[J]. Construction Economy, 2004, (4):80-84.

Google Scholar

[10] H.G. Han C.Y. Su,Y. Stepanenko. Adaptive Control of a Class of Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinearly Parameterized Fuzzy Approximators[J]. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems, 2001, 9(2): 315-323.

DOI: 10.1109/91.919252

Google Scholar

[11] David M•Gann, Ammon J•Salter Et.Design Quality Indicator as a tool for thinking[J], Building Research&Information (US), 2003, 31(5): 318.

DOI: 10.1080/0961321032000107564

Google Scholar

[12] Caroline Cole-Colander. Designing the Customer Experience[J]. Building Research&Information U.K., 2003, 31(5): 357-366.

DOI: 10.1080/0961321032000088025

Google Scholar

[13] eljko M. Torbica and Robert C. Stroh. Customer Satisfaction in Home Building[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management U.S., 2001, (1): 82-86.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2001)127:1(82)

Google Scholar

[14] Thomas A.Markus Lessons From the Design Quality Indicator[J], Building Research&Information (US), 2003, 31(5): 400-401.

Google Scholar

[15] Lin Huangbin. Zeng Qifang. Characteristic and Earthquake Disaster Control of Elementary and Middle School Building[J]. South Architecture, 2006(12): 85—90.

Google Scholar

[16] XIAO Wei-pin. Building System Engineering[M]. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 1992: 2-119.

Google Scholar

[17] GUO Chun-dong, CHEN Ai-zu. Research on quality evaluation mode of highway engineering [J]. Hebei Journal of Industrial Science and Technology, 2006, 23(3):139-142.

Google Scholar

[18] LU Lan. WANG Ling-dong. BIAN Li-ping. Safety Fuzzy Evaluation of Building Sites[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2003(11):49-53.

Google Scholar

[19] YE Ling. HU Xing-fu. The fuzzy comprehensive appraisal method of industrial architecture plan[J]. Sichuan Building Science, 2006(2):168-171.

Google Scholar

[20] SU Yong-qiang. HUANG Ling. Research on safety fuzzy assessment method for building project design[J]. Coal Engineering, 2006, (7):76-78.

Google Scholar

[21] SU Yong-qiang. HUANG Ling. Safety Fuzzy Assessment Method for Building Engineering Design[J]. Proceeding of The second international conference on modelling and simulation, 2009: 329-332.

Google Scholar

[22] SU Yong-qiang. CAI Jing-luo. Evaluation Theory and Method of Quality for Building Engineering Design Document[J]. Proceedings of the third international conference on modelling and simulation. 2010: 97-101.

Google Scholar

[23] SU Yong-qiang. Evaluation Method of Building Engineering Design Quality[J]. 2010 2nd IEEE International Conference on information management and engineering, 2010: 55-61.

Google Scholar