The Comparison of Physicochemical Properties of Four Cross-Linked Sodium Hyaluronate Gels with Different Cross-Linking Agents

Article Preview

Abstract:

Abstract:PurposeThe physicochemical properties of four Cross-linked sodium hyaluronate gels(CHA) with different cross-linking agents were conpared.In order to research out the different stability and Enzyme-resistant properties of these CHA.Methods The CHA hydrogels were prepared with different cross-linking agents, such as PEG20000, PDE, BDDE and ADH. The optimal reaction conditions were determined by single factor experiment. Dynamic viscosity was tested by Stabinger method. Intrinsic viscosity was tested by Uzziah's viscosity method. The in vitro Enzyme-resistant properties of CHA-gels were analysed by carbazole and spectrophotometry. Results The concentrations of NaOH/HCl, concentrations of HA and the ratio of cross-linking agent to HA were significant conditions which influenced the physicochemical properties of CHA gels. PDE-CHA and PEG20000 gels have best Dynamic viscosity, PDE-CHA gel has best Intrinsic viscosity, ADH-CHA and BDDE-CHA gels have better Enzyme-resistant properties than PEG20000-CHA and PDE-CHA gels.Conclusion The CHA-gel prepared under optimal reaction conditions have different physical and chemical properties, which set foundation for developing double cross-linked gel with both excellent stability and Enzyme-resistant properties.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 396-398)

Pages:

1506-1512

Citation:

Online since:

November 2011

Export:

Price:

[1] Chen Jian ying,Wang Min,Liu Jie. J. Chinese Journal of Biochemical Pharmaceutics, 2008, 29 (4) : 262-265.(In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[2] Bitter T, Muir HM. J. Anal Biochem, 1962, 4:330–4.

Google Scholar

[3] Mi PC,Wang BC,Feng W,Du HJ. J. Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research 2008 ,April 1,No.14.

Google Scholar

[4] Hollander DA, Schmandra T, Windolf J. J. Wounds, 2000, 12:111–5.

Google Scholar

[5] Baumann L. Dermal fillers .J. Cosm Derma 2004, 4:249–50.

Google Scholar

[6] HE Yan—li. J. Food and Drug.2005,7(8),37-40.

Google Scholar

[7] Waring MJ, Parsons D. J. Biomaterials 2001, 22:903–12.

Google Scholar

[8] Campoccia D, Doherty P, Radice M, et al. J. Biomaterials 1998, 19:2101–27.

Google Scholar

[9] Milella E, Brescia E, Massaro C, et al. J. Biomaterials 2002, 23:1053–63.

Google Scholar

[10] Milella E, Brescia E, Massaro C, et al. J. Biomed Mater Res 2005, 52:695–700.

Google Scholar

[11] Pinto-Alphandary H, AndremontA, Couvreur P. J Biomaterials 2006, 36:345–23..

Google Scholar

[12] Tatiana S, Brian CA, Peter HC. J. Biomaterials 2005, 26:359–71.

Google Scholar

[13] Luo Y, Kirker KR, Prestwich GD. J. Control Release 2000, 69:169–84.

Google Scholar

[14] Marco M. J. Biomacromolecules 2005, 6:1205–23.

Google Scholar

[15] Tian WM, Zhang CL, Hou SP, et al. J. Control Release 2005, 102:13–25.

Google Scholar

[16] Laurent TC, Laurent UB, Fraser JR. J. Immunol Cell Biol 1996, 74:1–5.

Google Scholar

[17] Park, K., Shalaby, W. S. W., & Park, H. (1993). Biodegradable hydrogels for drug delivery. Lancaster: Technomic Pub.

Google Scholar

[18] China Pharmacopeia (2000 edition) Ⅱ,appendix VI G: viscosity measurements method. (In Chinese)

Google Scholar