Surface Modification Analysis after Shot Peening of AA 7075 in Different States

Sebastjan Žagar; Janez Grum

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.768-769.519

Paper Titles

In Situ Strain Measurements during Casting Using Neutron Diffraction
p.484

Influence of Final Hand Polishing Process on Surface Residual Stress Field of Japanese Sword
p.492

3D Model of Shot Dynamics for Ultrasonic Shot Peening
p.503

Mechanical Surface Treatment Technologies for Improving HCF Strength and Surface Roughness of Blisk-Rotors
p.510

Surface Modification Analysis after Shot Peening of AA 7075 in Different States
p.519

Residual Stress Depth Distribution after Piezo Peening of Quenched and Tempered AISI 4140
p.526

Influence of Shot Peening Parameters on Residual Stresses in Flake and Vermicular Cast Irons
p.534

Graphite Morphology's Influence on Shot Peening Results in Cast Irons
p.542

The Influence of Shot Peening Process on the Residual Stress and Microstructure in Deformed Surface Layer of S30432 Austenitic Stainless Steel
p.550

HomeMaterials Science ForumMaterials Science Forum Vols. 768-769Surface Modification Analysis after Shot Peening...

Surface Modification Analysis after Shot Peening of AA 7075 in Different States

Abstract:

The paper deals with the effect of different shot peening (SP) treatment conditions on the ENAW 7075-T651 aluminium alloy. Suitable residual stress profile increases the applicability and life cycle of mechanical parts, treated by shot peening. The objective of the research was to establish the optimal parameters of the shot peening treatment of the aluminium alloy in different precipitation hardened states with regard to residual stress profiles in dynamic loading. Main deformations and main residual stresses were calculated on the basis of electrical resistance. The resulting residual stress profiles reveal that stresses throughout the thin surface layer of all shot peened specimens are of compressive nature. The differences can be observed in the depth of shot peening and the profile of compressive residual stresses. Under all treatment conditions, the obtained maximum value of compressive residual stress ranges between -200 MPa and -300 MPa at a depth between 250 μm and 300 μm. Comparison of different temperature-hardened aluminium alloys shows that changes in the Almen intensity values have greater effect than coverage in the depth and profile of compressive residual stresses. Positive stress ratio of R=0.1 was selected. Wöhler curves were determined in the areas of maximum bending loads between 30 - 65 % of material's tensile strength, measured at thinner cross-sections of individual specimens. The results of material fatigue testing differ from the level of shot peening on the surface layer.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

International Conference on Residual Stresses 9 (ICRS 9)

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 768-769)

Pages:

519-525

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.768-769.519

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2013

Authors:

Sebastjan Žagar, Janez Grum

Keywords:

Aluminium Alloy, Blind Hole Drilling, Fatigue Testing, H-Drill, Residual Stress, Shot Peening

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

References

[1] O. Higounenc: Correlation of shot peening parameters to surface characteristic, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Shot peening, 2005, 28-35.

Google Scholar

[2] C.A. Rodopoulos, S.A. Curtis, E.R. de los Rios, J. SolisRomero: Optimisation of the fatigue resistance of 2024-T351 aluminium alloys by controlled shot peening-methodology, results and analysis, Int. J. Fatigue Vol. 26, 2004, 849-856.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.01.003

Google Scholar

[3] M. Benedetti, T. Bortolamedi, V. Fontanari, F. Frendo: Bending fatigue behaviour of differently shot peened Al 6082 T5 alloy, Int. J. Fatigue Vol. 26, 2004, 889-897.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.12.003

Google Scholar

[4] R. Clausen, J. Stangenberg: Roughness of shot-peened surfaces-definition and measurement, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Shot peening, 1999, 69-77.

Google Scholar

[5] R. Herzog, W. Zinn, B. Scholtes, H. Wohlfahrt: The Significance of Almen Intensity for the Generation of Shot Peening Residual Stresses, The Sixth Int. Conf. on Shot Peening, San Francisco 1996, USA, Ed.: J. Champaigne, p. pp.270-281.

DOI: 10.1002/3527606580.ch21

Google Scholar

[6] H. Chang, F.C. Schoenig, J.A. Soules: Non-destructive Residual Stress Measurement with Using Eddy Current, The Sixth Int. Conf. on Shot Peening, San Francisco 1996, USA, Ed.: J. Champaigne, p. pp.356-384.

Google Scholar

[7] Benedetti M, Fontanari V, Scardi P, Ricardo CLA, Bandini M. Reverse bending fatigue of shot peened 7075-T651 aluminium alloy: The role of residual stress relaxation. Int. J. Fatigue Vol. 31. 2009, 1225-1236.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.11.017

Google Scholar

[8] Standard Test Method for Determining Residual Stresses by the Hole Drilling Strain Gage Method, ASTM E 837-01, 1995, pp.694-703.

DOI: 10.1520/e0837-01e01

Google Scholar

[9] Tech note TN 503-5, Measurement of Residual Stresses by the Hole-Drilling Strain Gage Method, Vishay Measurements Group, (1993).

Google Scholar

[10] P.V. Grant, J.D. Lord, MATC(MN)31, National Physical Laboratory, UK, (2002).

Google Scholar

[11] Schulze V. Modern Mechanical Surface Treatment: States, Stability, Effects, WILEY-VCH Verlag Gmbh & Co. KGaA, 2005. 371 p. ISBN 3-527-31371-0.

Google Scholar