An Environmental Impact of a Wooden and Brick House by the LCA Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

The main objective of this paper thesis is to determine the environmental impact of two houses made of two alternative materials - a wooden and a brick house - using a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). By comparing the material composition of their design to determine the environmental impacts of global warming, human health, consumption of resources and ecosystem quality. An overall comparison showed that the materials for the construction of a wooden house have less negative impact on the environment than materials for the construction of a brick house. Using the GWP method, results show that the materials for the construction of a brick house leave twice the carbon footprint in the environment than materials for a wooden house. This resultant state is mainly due to the use of natural materials in the wooden house (wood, fibre insulation), unlike the materials used in the brick house (ceramic masonry, insulation from stone wool) and so on.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

204-209

Citation:

Online since:

April 2016

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S. Švehlák, et al., in Slovak language: Podpoľanie tradície a súčasnosť, Bratislava: Obzor, 1979, p.193.

Google Scholar

[2] Agenda 21, Agenda 21, Agenda 21 on Sustainable Construction, CIB Report Publication 237, Rotterdam, (1999).

Google Scholar

[3] S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Y. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor, H.L. Miller (Eds. ), Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Cambridge University Press, NY, USA, (2007).

Google Scholar

[4] M. Buyle, J. Braet, A. Audenaert, Life cycle assessment in the construction sector: a review, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 26 (2013), p.379–388.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.001

Google Scholar

[5] F. Asdrubali, C. Baldassarri, V. Fthenakis, Life cycle analysis in the construction sector: guiding the optimization of conventional Italian buildings, Energy and Buildings, 64 (2013), p.73–89.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.04.018

Google Scholar

[6] ISO 14040: 2006, Environmental management. Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework (ISO 14040: 2006).

DOI: 10.1065/lca2005.03.001

Google Scholar

[7] ISO 14044: 2006, Environmental management. Life cycle assessment - Requirements and guidelines (ISO 14044: 2006).

DOI: 10.3403/30290345

Google Scholar

[8] Pré Consultant 2015, http: /www. pre. nl/simapro.

Google Scholar

[9] A. Eštoková, M. Porhinčák, Environmental analysis of two building material alternatives in structures with the aim of sustainable construction, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 17, 1 (2015), pp.75-83.

DOI: 10.1007/s10098-014-0758-z

Google Scholar

[10] M. Ondová, A. Eštoková, Analysis of the environmental impact of concrete-framed family house using LCA method, Ciencia E Tecnica Vitivinicola, 29, 7 (2014), pp.267-376.

Google Scholar