Correlation of Tensile Test Parameters and Bendability of High-Strength Steels

Article Preview

Abstract:

The aim of the study was to investigate correlation between bendability and tensile properties of high-strength steels. Strength and elongation in tensile test have traditionally been basic values in evaluating bending properties. Advanced high-strength (AHS) steels often have tendency for strain localization, causing risk of fractures and impairing the shape of the bend. Practice has shown that tensile test results, indicating bendability well, are not sufficiently accurate when using AHS steels. Since tensile test is a fast, simple and cheap testing method, it would be beneficial to rework it to suit better for predicting of bendability. In this study, the usability of tensile test results to predict failures in bending AHS steels has been investigated. The most common failures and failure mechanisms in bending are also presented. Test materials used were 6 mm thick AHS wear-resistant, protection and structural steels with good and poor bending properties. Minimum bending radii were determined and then compared with ten-sile test results to estimate the correlation. Conventional tensile test results, fracture surfaces and necking through width and thickness were analyzed. Correlation coefficient for measured tension properties and minimum bending radius was calculated. Results showed that in tensile test, have the best correlation with minimum bending radius with necking through the thickness and actual strain in necking area.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 554-557)

Pages:

12-20

Citation:

Online since:

June 2013

Export:

Price:

[1] J. Steninger, A. Melander. The relation between bendability, tensile properties and particle structure of low carbon steel. Scan. J. of Met. 11 (1982) 55-71.

Google Scholar

[2] M. Dao, M. Lie. A micromechanics study on strain- localization induced fracture initiation in bending using crystal plasticity models. Phil. Mag. A, 81 (2001) 1997-2020.

DOI: 10.1080/01418610108216649

Google Scholar

[3] J. Sarkar, T.R.G. Kutty, D.S. Wikinson, J.D. Embury, D.J. Lloyd. Tensile properties and bendability of T4 treated A6111 aluminum alloys. Mater. Sci. and Eng. 369 (2004) 258-266.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2003.11.022

Google Scholar

[4] A.E. Valkonen. Plastic Deformation and Roughness of Free Metal Surfaces. Metallurgical Engineering, The Ohio State University: Columbus, 1987, 459.

Google Scholar

[5] K. Hatakeyaman, A. Sugawara, T. Tojyo, K. Ikeda. Factors Affecting Bend Formability of Tempered Copper Alloy Sheets. Mat. Tran. 43 (2002) 2908-2912.

DOI: 10.2320/matertrans.43.2908

Google Scholar

[6] European Standard: Bend test of metallic materials. EN ISO 7438:2000.

Google Scholar

[7] G.E. Dieter, Mechanical Metallurgy, in: M.B. Bever, M.E. Shank, C.A. Wert, R.F. Mehl (Eds.), Sheet-Metal Forming, Bending, London, 1988, pp.680-684.

Google Scholar

[8] A.R. Ragab, Ch.A. Saleh. Evaluation of Bendability of Sheet Metals Using Void Coalescence Models. Mat. Sci. and Eng. 395 (2005) 102-109. [1] J. van der Geer, J.A.J. Hanraads, R.A. Lupton, The art of writing a scientific article, J. Sci. Commun. 163 (2000) 51-59.Reference to a book:

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2004.12.011

Google Scholar

[2] W. Strunk Jr., E.B. White, The Elements of Style, third ed., Macmillan, New York, 1979. Reference to a chapter in an edited book:

Google Scholar

[3] G.R. Mettam, L.B. Adams, How to prepare an electronic version of your article, in: B.S. Jones, R.Z. Smith (Eds.), Introduction to the Electronic Age, E-Publishing Inc., New York, 1999, pp.281-304.

Google Scholar

[4] R.J. Ong, J.T. Dawley and P.G. Clem: submitted to Journal of Materials Research (2003)

Google Scholar

[5] P.G. Clem, M. Rodriguez, J.A. Voigt and C.S. Ashley, U.S. Patent 6,231,666. (2001)

Google Scholar

[6] Information on http://www.weld.labs.gov.cn

Google Scholar