Ergonomic Analysis of the Master of Minimally Invasive Surgical Robot

Article Preview

Abstract:

How to well design the master console is one of the key techniques of master-slave surgical robot system. Related to the slave arms, to the surgeon and to the other components of the console the two master arms need to satisfy all requirements of different aspect. In this paper the ergonomic problem is treated. Operated by the surgeon the master arm should be placed in a suitable position. In addition, it should also have good back-drivability. Some analyses and rationales are made to solve these problems.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 418-420)

Pages:

2018-2023

Citation:

Online since:

December 2011

Export:

Price:

[1] J. Alfonso Pamanes G, S. Zeghloul, J.P. Lallemand.On the Optimal Placement and Task Compatibility of manipulators. Proceedings of the 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Sacramento, California -April (1991)

DOI: 10.1109/icar.1991.240363

Google Scholar

[2] David Hsu, Jean-Claude Latombe, Stephen Sorkin. Placing a Robot Manipulator Amid Obstacles for Optimized Execution. Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning .Porto, Portugal - July (1999)

DOI: 10.1109/isatp.1999.782972

Google Scholar

[3] Pamanes-Garcia J A. criterion for the Optimal Placement of Robotic manipulators. Proceedings IFAC Information control problems in manufacturing Technology, Madrid, Spain, 1989.

Google Scholar

[4] Abdel-Malek K,Wei Yu. Placement of Robot Manipulators to Maximize Dexterity. International Journal of Robotics and Automation, 2004, 19(1), 206-2029, 6-14

DOI: 10.2316/journal.206.2004.1.206-2029

Google Scholar

[5] Shaun Selha, Pierre Dupont, Robert Howe, David Torchiana. Dexterity optimization by port placement in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. 2001 SPIE International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Advanced Manufacturing, Newton, MA, 28-31 October

DOI: 10.1117/12.454734

Google Scholar

[6] John T. Feddema.Kinematically Optimal Robot Placement for Minimum Time Coordinated Motion. Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Minneapolis, Minnesota - April (1996)

DOI: 10.1109/robot.1996.509229

Google Scholar

[7] J. Alfonso Pamanes G. Said Zeghloul. Optimal Placement of Robotic Manipulators Using Multiple Criteria. Proceedings of the 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Sacramento, California -April (1991)

DOI: 10.1109/robot.1991.131708

Google Scholar

[8] Jingke Yu, Rong Liu, Houxiang Zhang, Jianwei Zhang. Design and Development of an Assisting Robotic Arm in Minimally Invasive Breast Surgery. Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, December 15 -18, 2007, Sanya, China

DOI: 10.1109/robio.2007.4522186

Google Scholar

[9] A.L. Trejos, R.V. Patel, I. Ross, B. Kiaii. Optimizing port placement for robot-assisted minimally invasive cardiac surgery. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY ,Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 2007; 3: 355–364.

DOI: 10.1002/rcs.158

Google Scholar

[10] Ramazan Unal, Gullu Kiziltas, Volkan Patoglu. A Multi-criteria Design Optimization Framework for Haptic Interfaces. Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environments and Teleoperator Systems 2008, 13-14 March, Reno, Nevada, USA

DOI: 10.1109/haptics.2008.4479949

Google Scholar

[11] Human Dimensions of Chinese adults. GB 10000-88

Google Scholar

[12] Murat Cenk Cavugoglul, Isela Villanueva, Frank Tendick. Workspace Analysis of Robotic Manipulators for a Teleoperated Suturing Task. Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Maui, Hawaii,USA, Oct. 29 -Nov. 03,(2001)

DOI: 10.1109/iros.2001.976402

Google Scholar

[13] P.Squires. The shape of the normal work area. Report 275.Medical Research Laboratories, (1956)

Google Scholar