Welcome to the InfoSci Platform
Reference Hub3
A Theory of Social Agentivity and its Integration into the Descriptive Ontology for Linguistic and Cognitive Engineering

A Theory of Social Agentivity and its Integration into the Descriptive Ontology for Linguistic and Cognitive Engineering

Edward Heath Robinson
Copyright: © 2011 |Volume: 7 |Issue: 4 |Pages: 25
ISSN: 1552-6283|EISSN: 1552-6291|EISBN13: 9781613509869|DOI: 10.4018/ijswis.2011100103
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Robinson, Edward Heath. "A Theory of Social Agentivity and its Integration into the Descriptive Ontology for Linguistic and Cognitive Engineering." IJSWIS vol.7, no.4 2011: pp.62-86. http://doi.org/10.4018/ijswis.2011100103

APA

Robinson, E. H. (2011). A Theory of Social Agentivity and its Integration into the Descriptive Ontology for Linguistic and Cognitive Engineering. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), 7(4), 62-86. http://doi.org/10.4018/ijswis.2011100103

Chicago

Robinson, Edward Heath. "A Theory of Social Agentivity and its Integration into the Descriptive Ontology for Linguistic and Cognitive Engineering," International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS) 7, no.4: 62-86. http://doi.org/10.4018/ijswis.2011100103

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

The agentivity of social entities has posed problems for ontologies of social phenomena, especially in the Descriptive Ontology for Linguistic and Cognitive Engineering (DOLCE) designed for use in the semantic web. This article elucidates a theory by which physical and social objects can take action, but that also recognizes the different ways in which they act. It introduces the “carry” relationship, through which social actions can occur when a physical action is taken in the correct circumstances. For example, the physical action of a wave of a hand may carry the social action of saying hello when entering a room. This article shows how a system can simultaneously and in a noncontradictory manner handle statements and queries in which both nonphysical social agents and physical agents take action by the carry relationship and the use of representatives. A revision of DOLCE’s taxonomic structure of perdurants is also proposed. This revision divides perdurants into physical and nonphysical varieties at the same ontological level at which endurants are so divided.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.