Reference Hub18
A Comparison of the Perceived Importance of Information Systems Development Strategies by Developers from the United States and Korea

A Comparison of the Perceived Importance of Information Systems Development Strategies by Developers from the United States and Korea

Chung S. Kim, Dane K. Peterson
Copyright: © 2003 |Volume: 16 |Issue: 2 |Pages: 18
ISSN: 1040-1628|EISSN: 1533-7979|ISSN: 1040-1628|EISBN13: 9781615200245|EISSN: 1533-7979|DOI: 10.4018/irmj.2003040101
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Kim, Chung S., and Dane K. Peterson. "A Comparison of the Perceived Importance of Information Systems Development Strategies by Developers from the United States and Korea." IRMJ vol.16, no.2 2003: pp.1-18. http://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2003040101

APA

Kim, C. S. & Peterson, D. K. (2003). A Comparison of the Perceived Importance of Information Systems Development Strategies by Developers from the United States and Korea. Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), 16(2), 1-18. http://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2003040101

Chicago

Kim, Chung S., and Dane K. Peterson. "A Comparison of the Perceived Importance of Information Systems Development Strategies by Developers from the United States and Korea," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ) 16, no.2: 1-18. http://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2003040101

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

This study examined the perceptions of Information Systems (IS) developers from the U.S. and Korea with regards to the strategies that are considered crucial for IS success. The results of a principal component analysis revealed that the IS development strategies could be classified into four categories: (1) Organizational Integration, (2) Team Member Characteristics, (3) Project Leader Traits, and (4) Project Development Management. ANOVA results indicated that developers from both countries viewed Organizational Integration as the most important component and Project Development Management as the least important component. However, while IS developers in the U.S. viewed Team Member Characteristics as the second most important component, Korean IS developers rated the Project Leader Traits as the second most important component. Moreover, the IS developers from the U.S. rated Organizational Integration and Team Member Characteristics as significantly more important than did the IS developers from Korea. The results were discussed in terms of Hofstede’s model of national culture.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.