Reference Hub3
Analyzing and Comparing Ontologies with Meta-Models

Analyzing and Comparing Ontologies with Meta-Models

Islay Davies, Peter Green, Simon Milton, Michael Rosemann
ISBN13: 9781591403753|ISBN10: 1591403758|ISBN13 Softcover: 9781591403760|EISBN13: 9781591403777
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-375-3.ch001
Cite Chapter Cite Chapter

MLA

Davies, Islay, et al. "Analyzing and Comparing Ontologies with Meta-Models." Information Modeling Methods and Methodologies: Advanced Topics in Database Research, edited by John Krogstie, et al., IGI Global, 2005, pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-375-3.ch001

APA

Davies, I., Green, P., Milton, S., & Rosemann, M. (2005). Analyzing and Comparing Ontologies with Meta-Models. In J. Krogstie, T. Halpin, & K. Siau (Eds.), Information Modeling Methods and Methodologies: Advanced Topics in Database Research (pp. 1-16). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-375-3.ch001

Chicago

Davies, Islay, et al. "Analyzing and Comparing Ontologies with Meta-Models." In Information Modeling Methods and Methodologies: Advanced Topics in Database Research, edited by John Krogstie, Terry Halpin, and Keng Siau, 1-16. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2005. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-375-3.ch001

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite

Abstract

High-level ontologies provide a model of reality and are of increasing popularity for the evaluation of modeling methods. Most of the common modeling methods have been studied using ontologies such as the BWW representation model and Chisholm’s ontology. However, at this stage only limited guidance is provided for the selection and evaluation of the appropriate ontology. The aim of this chapter is to propose meta-models for analyzing, comparing, and engineering ontologies. It discusses a methodology using extracts of meta-models for two well-known ontologies that had been used previously in Systems Analysis and Design research. The approach provides a theoretical analysis technique for evaluating these ontologies according to their equivalence, depth of structure, and comprehensiveness of scope.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.