Can oil and gas exploration deliver on prediction?

References

1. Binns, P. and Corbett, P.
   [2012]. Risk and uncertainty from frontier to production – a review.First Break, 30, 57–64.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Blystad, P. and Søndena, E.
   [2005]. Exploration history on the Norwegian Continantal Shelf, 1990–2002: expectations and results. In: Doré, A.G. and Vining, B.A. (Eds.), Petroleum Geology: North-West Europe and Global Perspectives – Proceedings of the 6th Petroleum Geology Conference, Geological Society, London, 63–68.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bond, M. and Carragher, P.D.
   [2018]. Addressing the causes of uncalibrated predictions and underperformance in oil and gas ventures. Workshop 15, 80th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstract and Slides.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Brown, M.L., Fosvold, L, Garza, A.J. and Cook, D.M.
   [2000]. A look to the past to avoid old traps in the future. In: Ofstad, K, Kittelsen, J.E. and Alexander-Marrack, P. (Eds.), Improving the Exploration Process by Learning from the Past, Proceedings of the Norwegian Petroleum Society Conference.Norwegian Petroleum Society Special Publications, 9, 9–14.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chellingsworth, L., Bentley, M., Kane, P., Milne, K. and Rowbotham, P.
   [2011]. Human limitations on hydrocarbon resource estimates – why we make mistakes in data rooms.First Break, 29, 49–57.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Dickson, M.
   [2018]. North Sea exploration performance – how have we done? And what’s next? Workshop 15, 80th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstract and Slides.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Fosvold, L., Thomsen, M., Brown, M., Kullerud, L., Ofstad, K. and Heg-gland, K.
   , 2000. Volumes before and after exploration drilling: results from the project: Evaluation of Norwegian Wildcat Wells (Article 2). In: Ofstad, K, Kittelsen, J.E. and Alexander-Marrack, P. (Eds.), Improving the Exploration Process by Learning from the Past, Proceedings of the Norwegian Petroleum Society Conference. Norwegian Petroleum Society Special Publications, 9, 33–46.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Harper, F.G.
   [2000]. Prediction accuracy in petroleum prospect assessment: a 15 year retrospective in B P. In: Ofstad, K., Kittelsen, J.E. and Alexan-der-Marrack, P. (Eds.), Improving the Exploration Process by Learning from the Past, Proceedings of the Norwegian Petroleum Society Conference. Norwegian Petroleum Society Special Publications, 9, 15–21.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Keith, G.
   [2018]. Overconfidence and optimism in the oil industry: surfacing systematic biases and distortions in probabilistic practice.Workshop 15, 80th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstract and Slides.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Loizou, N.
    [2005]. West of Shetland exploration unravelled – an indication of what the future may hold.First Break, 23, 9–15.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Meulengracht, C.S.
    [2018]. The oil industry is notoriously poor at prediction - modern software is partly to blame: debate opposer’s speech.Workshop 15, 80th EAGE Conference & Exhibition 2018, Extended Abstract and Slides.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Milkov, A.V.
    [2015]. Risk tables for less biased and more consistent estimation of probability of geological success (PoS) for segments with conventional oil and gas prospective resources.Earth Science Reviews, 150, 453–476.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Milkov, A.V.
    [2017]. Integrate instead of ignoring: base rate neglect as a common fallacy of petroleum explorers, AAPG Bulletin, 101, 1905–1916.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Milkov, A.V.
    [2018]. Exploration success equation.Workshop 15, 80th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstract and Slides.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Myers, K.
    [2018]. Analogue play statistics for improved pre-drill risking: North Sea case study.Workshop 15, 80th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstract and Slides.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Ofstad, K., Kullerud, L. and Helliksen, D.
    , 2000a. Evaluation of Norwegian Wildcat Wells (Article 1). In: Ofstad, K., Kittelsen, J.E. and Alexan-der-Marrack, P. (Eds.), Improving the Exploration Process by Learning from the Past, Proceedings of the Norwegian Petroleum Society Conference. Norwegian Petroleum Society Special Publications, 9, 23–31.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Ofstad, K., Øvretveit, A., Kullerud, L. and Heggland, K.
    , 2000b. Probability of discovery and the reasons for dry wells: results from the project: Evaluation of Norwegian Wildcat Wells (Article 3). In: Ofstad, K., Kittelsen, J.E. and Alexander-Marrack, P. (Eds.), Improving the Exploration Process by Learning from the Past, Proceedings of the Norwegian Petroleum Society Conference.Norwegian Petroleum Society Special Publications, 9, 47–55.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Quirk, D.G. and Ruthrauff, R.G.
    [2006]. Analysis of reserves discovered in petroleum exploration.Journal of Petroleum Geology, 29, 125–146.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Quirk, D.G. & Ruthrauff, R.G.
    [2008]. Toward consistency in petroleum exploration: A systematic way of constraining uncertainty in prospect volumetrics.AAPG Bulletin, 92, 1263–1291.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Quirk, D.G., Howe, M.J. and Archer, S.J.
    [2017]. Yet-to-find in play analysis: a combined deterministic-probabilistic method of estimating undiscovered hydrocarbon resources.Journal of Petroleum Geology, 40, 217–248
    [Google Scholar]
21. Quirk, D.G.
    [2018]. The oil industry is notoriously poor at prediction - modern software is partly to blame: Debate proposer’s speech.Workshop 15, 80th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstract and Slides.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Rose, P.R.
    [1987]. Dealing with risk and uncertainty: How can we improve?AAPG Bulletin, 71, 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Rudolph, K.W. and Goulding, F.J.
    [2017]. Benchmarking exploration predictions and performance using 20+ years of drilling results: one company’s experience: AAPG Bulletin, 101, 161–176.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Sluijk, D. and Parker, J.R.
    [1986]. Comparison of predrilling predictions with postdrilling outcomes usng Shell’s Prospect Appraisal System. In: Rice, D.D. (Ed.), Oil and Gas Assessment – Method and Applications, AAPG Studies in Geology, 2, 55–58.
    [Google Scholar]