THE «SOVEREIGNTY OF THE IMAMATE» (SIYÀDA TAL-IMÀMA) OF THE JAZÜLIYYA-GHAZWÁMYYA: A SUFI ALTERNATIVE TO SHARIFISM?

This article details the doctrine of the at-Tá'ifa al-Jazüliyya, a populist and politically active Sufi order that dominated Moroccan mysticism throughout the sixteenth century. This doctrine focused on the concept of paradigmatic sainthood (qutbiyya) and was influenced by two different models of religious authority. The first model saw authority as an acquired property, which was vested in the Sufi shaykh who best mirrored the qualities of the Prophet Muhammad. The second model conceived of authority as an ascribed property, and saw it as an inborn grace (baraka) that was transmitted via descent through the Prophetic bloodline. In the writings of the Jazüliyya shaykh Abdallah al-Ghazwânî (d. 935/1528-9), both models of authority were seen as part of the «prophetic inheritance» (al-wiràtha an-nabawiyyd), and were reconciled through the doctrine of the «sovereignty of the imamate» (siyadat al-imáma). In this doctrine, the axial saint of Moroccan Sufism, whom al-Ghazwànï called the jaras or «Bell-saint», stood as the successor (khalifa) to the Prophet Muhammad and prime interpreter of Islam. He thus took on many of the qualities of the Shi'ite Imam, an posed a serious challenge to the political leaders of the time.

This polemic describes the background to what Clifford Geertz, following a long tradition of colonial scholarship, has referred to as the «Maraboutic Crisis» -the attempt by Moroccan Sufis from the fifteenth to the seventeenth centuries to challenge the political authority of the state 2.There is little doubt that the objet of Zarrùq's criticism is the Tabbá'iyya, or the followers of ' ^Abd al-"^Aziz at-Tabbà' (d.914/1508-.9), the successor to Muhammad ibn Sulaymán al-Jazùlï (d.869/1465) as leader of the Jazùliyya Sufi order.But what does this description of Moroccan Sufism really tell us?Must we take Zarrùq's critique at face value and assume that Sufi populism was as ignorant and worldly as he suggests?Or does other evidence provide a different image?
In the generation after Zarrùq an Algerian Sufi named 'Abdallah al-Khayyât (d.939/1533) settled in Morocco and founded a zàwiya on the Zerhoun massif outside of the city of Meknès.Jawdhir as-simàty a seventeenth-century exploit-narrative (Ar.manqaba, pi.manàqib) of this saint, paints a picture of Sufi populism that is significantly different from that of Zarrùq: At the záwiya of [al-Khayyát] there were about a thousand people who had memorized the Qur'an {hamalat al-Qur'ân), such that on every tree and rock in the forest near his house one could find two or three students reciting the Qur'an.Formal teaching {tadrîs al-'ilm) went on nonstop at his záwiya every day.Usually, the shaykh taught the Risála of Ibn Abi Zayd [al-Qayrawání] and the Hikam of Ibn 'Atâ'illàh [al-Iskandarî].However, the students had to rely on [other instructors] at the záwiya for [most of] their studies because the shaykh would often rise [from his lectures] in a spiritual state (hàl) and go off into seclusion» ^.
Here one can find no evidence of Sufi populism's supposed enmity toward the learned and learning.Quite the opposite; it seems as if al-Khayyáfs principal mission in life was educational.Yet according to Zarrùq's critique of Moroccan Sufism, this should not have been the case.On the surface, al-Khayyàt seems to have been the very type of sufi that Zarrùq disliked the most.In the first place, he was an ecstatic, a detail that is proven by his habit of cutting short his lectures and abando-ning his students in a state of Ml In addition, he belonged to two Sufi orders that often received the censure of Moroccan ulama: the Jazûliyya through an Arab disciple of Muhammad ibn Sulaymán al-Jazùlî called «Sïdï Hasan Ajana», and the RashidÍ5^a-Milyaniyya via the Algerian ecstatic Ahmad ibn Yûsuf al-Milyànï (d.929/1523) 4.
But there was more to al-Khayyát's Sufism than merely ecstatic behaviour or populism.This shaykh was also an accomplished intellectual who was well-trained in the mystical traditions of the Mashriq.He was introduced to the teachings of the Rifà'iyya Sufi order by his father, who had lived for thirty years in Egypt.While there, his father even studied under Ahmad Zarruq ^.What is more, al-Khayyàt's most important teacher, the ecstatic Ahmad ibn Yüsuf al-Milyànï, was also a disciple of Zarrùq.Far from being an opponent of the state, al-Kha5Ayàt remained loyal to the powers of his day and sought to make peace between the Marinid-Wattasid rulers of Fez and their rivals, the Sa'dian Sharifs.He even went so far as to counsel other Sufis to stay out of politics, saying, «Brothers, disagreement causes enmity and enmity brings trouble; so leave the power over worldly affairs to the princes» ^.
Clearly, the phenomenon of Sufi populism was more complex than Ahmad Zarruq cared to admit.This should not come as a surprise to the student of Moroccan Sufism, for populism has characterized this tradition since its inception.Many shaykhs' saw themselves not only as teachers of disciples, but also as social reformers and active, if often reluctant, players in the political arena.
For a juridically-trained Sufi like Zarrùq, who was deeply scarred by the revolution of 869/1465, which resulted in the murder of the Marinid sultan 'Abd al-Haqq II, the sacking of the Jewish quarter in Fez, and the temporary rise to power of the Idrisid Sharifs, the charisma of the Sufi shaykh was potentially dangerous.As a scholar, Zarrùq was a product of the apparatus of legal education created by the Marinid ulama and was heavily invested in the regime of authority that had upheld the primacy of Maliki jurisprudence and sultanic power for more than ^ ar-Rífí, Jawàhir as-simàt, 8v-1 Ov. 5 Ibid,14v.Despite his quietism, al-Khayyát may have been murdered by the Sa'dians because he did not support them strongly enough.See Muhammad Ibn 'Askar, Dawhat an-náshir li-mahàsin man kàna fñ-Maghrib min mashd'îkh al-qarn al-áshir (Ra.bat,Í977),83.two centuries ^.The idea that an alternative model of authority might be found outside of this apparatus worried him.After all, as 'Abdallah al-Khayyát said, competition breeds conflict and conflict breeds disorder (fitnd), the ultimate nightmare of the ulama ^.
This fear was far from unsubstantiated.Many fifteenth and sixteenth century Moroccan Sufis were indeed noted for challenging the apparatuses of power and control.Such a challenge can be seen, for example, in the introduction to Wazifat al-Jazüliyya al-Ghazwàniyya, the only original collection of litanies from the Jazüliyya Sufi order still in existence.This work was compiled by Muhammad al-Harwï at-Tálib (d.964/1557), who was the muqaddam of the Jazüliyya zàwiya in Fez.Popularly known as «Sïdï Muhammad Tálib», he was a close associate of the Jazülite master 'Abdallah al-Ghazwànï (d.935/1528-9), who was a bitter enemy of the Marinid-Wattasid regime.In the following selection from al-Harwï's wazïfa, there is little doubt that it is the Sufi shaykhs, and not the sultan or the ulama, who possess the most privileged form of authority: [The Sufi shaykhs] are the crowns of the kingdom (tijàn al-mamlakd) and the moons of existence (aqmàr al-wujüd), illuminating [the earth] with the light of their inheritance from and adherence to the honest and trustworthy Messenger (may Allah bless and preserve him).They are the followers of [Allah's] Straight Path and guides to the Noble Master.He who agrees to follow and serve them will attain the full recompense of the One who gives birth to no sons; but the one who rejects them and falls from their way has stumbled into a great ocean and a bottomless pit and has brought upon himself a grievous punishment and a terrible calamity 9.This passage illustrates the highly sectarian nature of Jazülite ideology, which dominated Moroccan Sufism throughout the sixteenth century.In a previous article, I focused on 'Abdallah al-Ghazwànï's career as a political activist and how this related to his role as a spiritual exem- plar and imam for Morocco as a whole ^^.Here, I will concentrate on the Jazülite doctrine of paradigmatic sainthood (qutbiyyd), which legitimized the political actions of populist shaykhs during the so-called «Maraboutic Crisis».This doctrine was the result of an attempt to harmonize two competing models of authority.The first model was based on the Muhammad paradigm of Islam as elaborated in a long tradition of writing by both mystics and jurists.According to this view, authority was an acquired property, and was vested in the «man of knowledge» {'àlim) who most completely conformed to the prophetic archetype.The second model, by contrast, was based on ascribed authority, which was conceived as an inborn grace (barakd) that was passed on in the Prophet's bloodline.This «Sharifian» model of authority was assimilated into Moroccan Sufism through the influence of the Shadhiliyya and Qádiriyya Sufi orders, whose founders saw Prophetic descent as a potential indicator of sainthood and spiritual leadership.
In Jazülite doctrine, both ascribed and acquired forms of authority were considered valid, and were seen as twin facets of the «prophetic inheritance» {wiràtha nabawiyyd) of the Muslim saint.Within the framework of this system, where saintly authority could be both ascribed and acquired, the shaykhs of the Jazüliyya posed a powerful challenge to the authority structures of their day.The Ghazwàniyya branch of the Jazüliyya possessed the most developed form-of this ideology and contested the authority of political and religious figures through their doctrine of the «Sovereignty of the Imamate» {siyàdat aHmàmd).According to this theory of leadership, the axial saint {qutb) of Moroccan Sufism -rather than the sultan or the ulama-exercised authority over Morocco as the successor {khalifa) to the prophet Muhammad and the interpreter of the word of God.By thus taking on some of the attributes of the Shi'ite Imam, he functioned as a divinely-guided «trustee of Islam», much like the jurist (faqih) in Ayatollah Khomeini's vilàyat-i faqîh ii.
The concept of the «imitatio Muhammadi», or imitation of the Prophet Muhammad, upon which the Jazülite model of acquired autho-rity was based, has a long history in Islam i^.Imitating the Prophet as a «beautiful example» (uswa hasand) is enjoined on Muslims in the Qur'án and provides the basis for both hadith science and Islamic jurisprudence 13.Among Sufis, adherence to the Muhammadan paradigm came to involve the complete assimilation of the Prophetic Sunna-a practice which included Muhammad's actions, words, and judgments, as well as the divinely-inspired consciousness that gave rise to them.Throughout the premodern period, many Sufis became famous for following the Sunna to a degree far exceeding that of the ordinary believer.
This attitude is reflected in the writings of a number of early mystics, such as the Iranian Sufi Abu Nasr as-Sarrâj (d.378/988).This systematizer of the Sufi path included a «Book of the Example and Imitation of the Messenger of God» (Kitàb al-uswa wa'l-iqtidà' bi-Rasül Allah) in his influential Kitàb al-luma'^^.For as-Sarraj, Muhammad is the archetype for all of humanity.Thus, his example must be emulated in every possible way.This means not only patterning one's behavior on the ritualistic aspects of the Muhammadan Sunna but also adhering to the Prophet's etiquette, his moral and spiritual states, and even his inner realities i^.Indeed, says as-Sarràj, it is only by making their own natures conform to the Prophetic nature that Sufis can be compared to Muhammad's Companions ^^.
The Muhammadan paradigm is also integral to the concept of Sharifism.This second model of authority, which has become distinctive to Moroccan Islam, grew out of a regional tradition of veneration for the descendants of the Prophet (Mor.Ar. shanf, pi.shurafd) that dates to the second Islamic century.It would be a mistake, however, to conceive of this tradition as something that emerged sui-generis out of the Moroccan cultural substrate.Rather, it seems to have come about as the result of a promotional campaign conducted by the descendants of the first Sharifian ruler of Morocco, «Mùlày» Idrïs ibn 'Abdallah (d.177/ 793).
The Idrisids of Morocco are direct descendants of Muhammad's grandson al-Hasan (d.ca.49/669).When Idrïs I fled the Arabian peninsula for the Far Maghrib, he carried with him a form of archaic Shi'ism that was similar to Zaydism i^.He and his successors rejected the Husaynid imamate advocated by Ismà'îlï and Ithnà' 'Asharï Shi'ites in favor of a specifically Hasanid model of legitimacy.The birth of this doctrine can be traced to a widespread uprising of al-Hasan's descendants after the death of Müláy Idrîs's father, 'Abdallah al-Kàmil in 143/ 760-61 18.The Idrisids' own, unique claim to authority can be dated at least to the year 197/812, when a coin was minted that designated Idrïs II as the mahdi^^.The exclusive nature of the Idrisid da'wa is also illustrated by a tradition which recounts the admonition given by Idrïs II to the Awraba Berbers when they pledged their support for him at Walïlï in 188/804: «Do not submit to anyone other than ourselves, for the establishment of [God's] truth (iqámat al-haqq) that you seek is only to be found in us» ^o.
The Idrisid model of authority is directly linked to the Muhammadan paradigm in accounts detailing the imamate of Mùlày Idrïs II (d.213/829).In works of Idrisid hagiography, such as Nazm ad-durr wa'l-'iqyàn by the Algerian Abu 'Abdallah at-Tanasî (d.899/1494), this imam and his descendants are portrayed as the prime exemplars of the Muhammadan Sunna.As the following pajssage from at-TanasFs work demonstrates, this exemplarity was based on virtues that were seen as byproducts of a genealogically-acquired Muhammadan baraka.
[Said Dàwùd ibn al-Wásim, a companion of Müláy Idrïs II]: I was amazed by what I saw of [Mùlày Idrïs's] bravery, strength, and firmness of resolve.Then he turned toward me and said, «Oh Dàwûd, why is it that I see you staring at me so much?»I said, «Oh Imam, I am amazed at the quahties in you that I have seen in no one else».«What are they?» he asked.«Your goodness, your beauty, the firmness of your intellect, the openness of your demeanor, and your determination in fighting the enemy», I answered.Then he said: «Oh Dàwùd, what you have seen is what we have inherited from the baraka of our ancestor the Messenger (may God bless and preserve him) and from his prayers for us and blessing upon us.This [the Prophet] has passed on as a legacy to our father, the Imam 'Ali (may God honor his countenance)» ^i.
A direct link between the Idrisid model of authority and Moroccan Sufism was established by the Banü Mizwár Sharifs of the northern Moroccan region of Ghumára.The ancestor of this branch of the Idrisids, Ahmad Mizwár, was a great-grandson of Idrïs II who settled in the late ninth century at a site known as Hajar an-Nasr (Escarpment of the Eagle) 22.As the name mizwár (Ber.leader or spokesman) implies, this ascetic is said to have exercised spiritual authority over the Sanhája Berber tribes of Ahl Sarîf, Banü Yüsuf and Sumáta.When the chiefs of these tribes asked him to choose a member of his family to live among them and favor them with the baraka of the Prophet, he selected his son, «Sïdî Sellàm».To honor the young Sharif, who had recently married, the tribes renamed themselves «Banü 'Arüs» (Sons of the Bridegroom), the appelation by which they are known today ^3.
For the next century and a half, the descendants of Sïdî Sellàm established themselves among the Banü 'Arüs while maintaining a reputation for holiness that was based as much on their Hasanid descent as on their pious and ascetic practices.Between the years 559/1164 and 563/1168, an ascetic named Sulaymán, but later nicknamed «Mashïsh» (Ber.Little Cat), sired a child named 'Abd as-Salàm, who would become the patron saint of Moroccan Sufism ^^.
'Abd as-Salám ibn Mashïsh (d.ca.625/1228) appears to have consciously patterned his life on the Idrisid interpretation of the Muhammadan paradigm.Like the Prophet himself, he lived for sixtythree years.Like a potential imam, he appropriated the forms of legal and religious knowledge that comprised the epistemological foundations of Idrisid authority.This involved mastering Qur'anic studies and Maliki jurisprudence under the guidance of Banü 'Arüs Sharifs.In his middle years, 'Abd as-Salàm was a mujàhid, or defender of the faith, and lived in Sabta, where he supported himself by transmitting his knowledge of the Qur'an to others.In the final phase of his life he embraced Sufism, and devoted twenty years to the worship and contemplation of God on the heights of Jabal al-'Alam (Flag Mountain).This period culminated in his encounter with his only disciple, the fellow Idrisid and founder of the Shadhiliyya Sufi order, Abu '1-Hasan ash-Shàdhïlï (d.656/1258) ^5. in the end, like other Idrisid imams in previous generations, he died as a martyr for Islam, opposing both injustice and illegitimate forms of knowledge 2^.
Although modern scholars have tended to pass over the Sharifian aspects of Shadhïlî Sufism, there is little doubt that both 'Abd as-Salàm ibn Mashish and his student ash-Shàdhilï gave great importance to their Hasanid origins.Some Egyptian sources even trace the intellectual origins of Shádhilism to the Rifà'iyya Sufi order, whose founder Ahmad ar-Rifà'ï (d.578/1183) was also a Hasanid Sharif 27.As for Ibn Ma-sMsh's own master in Sufism, he too was a Sharif: 'Abd ar-Rahmân al-'Attàr from Sabta, who was called «az-Zayyàt» or «al-Madam» because he resided in the oil-sellers' quarter of Medina while devoting himself to worship at the Prophet's mosque ^s.This Muhammadan aspect of al-MadanFs spirituality was passed on by Müláy 'Abd as-Salám to Abü'l-Hasan ash-Shâdhilï, who stated: «Were the Prophet to be veiled from me for but the blink of an eye, I would not count myself among the Muslims» 29.
What was the influence of these models of acquired and ascribed authority on the doctrines of the Jazùliyya Sufi order?Because most of Muhammad ibn Sulaymàn al-Jazùlï's doctrinal works have not survived the passage of time, the answer to this question must be traced through the disciples of his successor, 'Abd al-'Aziz at-Tabbà'.The writings of at-Tabbà's students rely heavily on the theories of the «Perfect Human The foundations of the Jazûlite model of religious authority were laid by '^Ali Sálih al-Andalusï (d.before 914/1508-9), a refugee from Granada who preceded Muhammad al-Harwi as head of the Jazùliyya zàwiya in Fez ^^.In Shark rahbat al-amán, al-Andalusî uses al-Jîlï's concept of the «Muhammadan Image» (as-süra al-muhammadiyya) as the basis for a theory of paradigmatic sainthood.This appears in a lengthy commentary on a wisdom-saying (hikma) of al-Jazülí that was known among the Jazùlij^a by its opening sentence: rahbat alamán tarîq al-aqtáb (The Terrain of Safety is the way of the axial saints): The Terrain of Safety is the way of the axial saints.The Terrain of Safety-above it are the Gardens, the gardens of miracles (rawdàt al-karàmàt).Above these are the Fields (al-mayàdîri), the fields of those who have arrived.Above this is the Musk, the musk of those who have attained (misk al-wàsilm).Above this is the Ambergris, the ambergris of those who are brought near Cantar al-mutaqarrabírí).Above this is the Moon, the moon of [Allah's] intimates (qamar al-musta'nisîn).Above this are the Rewards (majàlib), the spoils (ghanà'ini) reserved for those in [Allah's] care (li-ahl al-inàya) ^i.
For al-Andalusï, this passage describes the miracles that are bestowed as rewards for Sufis who have experienced the divine presence (alhadra al-aliyya).Such rewards are only granted to Sufis who follow the path to God with «humility and submissiveness, accompanied by the ultimate in asceticism, contentment, and an unwavering adherence to orthodoxy» (i'tiqád al-khafq fil-jamá'a) ^2.All miracles, says al-Andalusï, ultimately derive from the knowledge of the Prophet Muhammad.To deny that miracles exist, therefore, is to deny the Sunna of God and His Messenger: «He who is ignorant of God's acts of grace (latá'if Allah) is ignorant of God.He who is ignorant of God is ignorant of divine guidance and the laws {ahkàrri) of God.He who is ignorant of God and the laws of God has nearly become an unbeliever» (Ja-qad kàda yakün káfiran) ^^.
To achieve sainthood, the seeker must find a guide who can teach him the knowledge of Muhammad; only then is he ready to begin his quest for enlightenment.This journey, says al-Andalusi, will consume one's entire life, for prophetic knowledge is «an ocean without a shore» ^4.To embark upon this ocean, one must find a «boat», which are the exoteric sciences of Islam (al-ulüm an-naqliyyd).In Foucauldian terms, the metaphor of the boat foregrounds the «external visage» of the dominant episteme of Islam, which is the SharFa.In this way, the disciplinary aspects of Sufism are brought to bear so that the potentially subversive charisma of the saint is tamed by the norms of the Law ^^.
Submitting to the regime of the SharFa, the Sufi occupies himself with prayer, fasting, and invocations on behalf of the Prophet Muhammad.In time, he progresses to the stage of legal responsibility (taklif) and receives the personal invocation (wird) that he will use for the rest of his life.At this point, he begins to practice more advanced Sufi disciplines, such as retreat, the mortification of desires, self-criticism {muhàsabd), and self-awarenes (muràqaba).To reinforce the knowledge gained from these practices he travels frequently, befriending the members of his brotherhood and visiting other Sufi shaykhs.If they are alive, he sits at their feet and learns from them.If they are dead, he honors them with the ritual of visiting (ziyàra).
If he is fortunate, the seeker will eventually transcend the formal apparatuses of knowledge by witnessing God through the extinction of his personal attributes.This is the stage of what Foucault called the «insurrection of subjugated knowledge» ^^.Here, the ordinarily suppressed «internal visage» of Sufism replaces the dominant «external visage» of Islamic praxis.In the thrall of this new and subversive know-ledge, all of the socially-contextualized knowledge of the seeker is obliterated: «his essence and attributes, his names, acts, thoughts, ability, choice, determination, desires, and cares -what comes from him and through him, including his speech».The Sufi has now attained the most basic level of sainthood, which is intimacy with the Real (waláyd).Here the seeker experiences oneness with the divine essence, his attibutes merge with the divine attributes, his names merge with the divine names, and his actions are perceived as proceeding from the divine will.According to al-Andalusï, this is also the stage of miracles, for paranormal phenomena now issue forth from the saint by necessity rather than choice.These miracles are the visible signs of his sainthood and are a function of the specialized role (takhsis) that he is destined to play in the social world.
Upon achieving walàya, the seeker becomes liberated from both body and society (in a very un-Foucaultian way) by obliterating his social self in the ultimate Truth.As he loses touch with his bodily consciousness, he becomes infused with the divine presence (al-hadra al-ulühiyyd).At this point, a trans-social «return of knowledge» occurs: through the awareness of ultimate oneness (wahdániyyd), the saint acquires knowledge of the divine attributes and understands the «meaning» of the Supreme Name (fahm al-ism al-azlrn) ^'^, Here, the seeker has attained the highest stage of his quest-a station that is beyond physical description and which can only be expressed metaphorically.Now known as a «friend of God» (wall Allah), his external visage is replaced by that of the Prophet Muhammad: «[Muhammad] is their lord, their imam, their means to their Master, and the epitome of [Allah's] favor upon them.Were it not for [Muhammad], they would not be themselves or other than themselves.For the totality of their existence is through [Muhammad's] existence and all are illuminated by his radiance.Allah sanctifies them with the holiness of [Muhammad's] light» 3^.
This experience, says al-Andalusï, is what al-Jazùlï describes in «The Terrain of Safety», where the Jazùlite saint is identified with Ibn al-'ArabFs «Perfect Human Being».As such, he and his fellows are exalted over other human beings and act as substitutes for God's messengers (abdàl ar-rusut).Like their predecessors the historical prophets and messengers, they are the vicegerents of God on earth and the agents that God uses to govern His dominion: Allah makes [the axial saints] His vicegerents in managing the affairs (tasrij) of His dominion because of His concern for [mankind] and in order that they take refuge in them.He grants them knowledge from His own presence Çilman min ladunihi) and, by means of His support and design, directs them toward the preservation of His religion.He makes them guides (adilld) to His presence and oneness and to His commands and prohibitions, and makes them visible in the world so that through them He may demonstrate the proof [of Himself] to His worshippers and so relate them to His names and attributes.In the material world they are the objects of His self-awareness: [they express] His will.His desire, His laws, His actions.His choices, and His management of affairs, according to the principles of justice Çadt) and good conduct (ihsárí) ^9.
Because he is a substitute for the prophets, the sainthood of authority (wilàyd) is more relevant to the role of the Jazùlite saint than the sainthood of intimacy (waláyd).Because he is empowered to manage or dispose of the affairs of others, he possesses the right to inherit all of the states of Muhammad, Messenger of God {mîràth ahwál an-nabî).The Jazülite saint is thus a veritable mirror for the Muhammadan Image, and stands analogically as the «Muhammad» of his time: When Allah, in His Glory and Majesty, desires to creates His worshippers and all of His creation...He concentrates in pre-eternity (fi'lazat) on the radiance of the purity of His glory and beauty and ignites (qadhafd) from it the glory and beauty of our Prophet Muhammad (may God bless and preserve him).Then, He makes of [the Prophet] a pure, illuminating, beautiful, perfect, and great light and makes from that light a mirror and an eye for knowledge.. Then Allah displays [Himself] before [the mirror] through His attributes and active names and imprints (intaba'd) the images of His actions, attributes, and names on the mirror of perception before its creation.[This is done] so that his names and attributes will be linked to [the human archetype] and so that [mankind] can know the first of them as well as the last... Then Allah creates heirs (warathd) to [the Prophet Muhammad] from his community, who inherit from him one-by-one and learn from him in each generation ^^.

This mirroring of the Prophet Muhammad means that the saint has reached the «point of complete knowledge» (nuqtat al-ilm al-kamàlî),
where saintly authority partakes directly from divine sovereignty.The «city» (madina) of this spiritual kingdom is the Prophet Muhammad, the «gate» (báb) of the city is 'All, the founder of the Sufi way and the paradigmatic imam, and the «key» (miftáh) to the gate is the Nurturer (ghawth) or Axis of the Age (qutb az-zamàrî), the «heir to the supernal station» (wárith al-maqàm al-dla) "^i.
Al-AndalusFs use of light imagery in Sharh rahbat al-amàn recapitulates the «Light of Muhammad» {nür Muhammad) metaphor that has been a part of both Sufi and Shi'ite discourse since the ninth century C. E. "^2.In particular, he interprets the famous «Light Verse» of the Qur'àn (XXIV [an-Nür], 35) as a metaphor for the Light of Muhammad-an exegesis which follows that of the Iraqi Sufi Sahl at-Tustari (d.283/ 896) "^3.For al-Andalusï, the Jazülite shaykh is a lamp lit by the oil of supernal knowledge, which is set in the niche of Muhammad's light.As a way of highlighting Jazülite Sufism's acceptance of the ideology of Sharifism, he affirms that this light is only passed down through the family of the Prophet.He thus traces its transmission from 'Ali to 'Abd al-Qàdir al-JOànï (d.561/1166), and thence via ash-Shàdhilï to al-Jazüli 44.
'Alid symbology is even more explicit in the works of al-AndalusFs student 'Abdallah al-Ghazwám.This successor to at-Tabbà' as Shaykh al-Jama'a of the Jazùliyya was a Bedouin Arab from the ash-Shàwiya region near the modern Moroccan capital of Rabat.Early in his career as a Sufi shaykh, he maintained a záwiya among the Banù Fazankár tribe of northern Morocco, whose homeland lay in the shadow of Jabal al-'Alam, the site of the tomb of 'Abd as-Salàm ibn MasMsh.Al-Ghazwànï was strongly influenced by the traditions of both Shàdhilï Sufism and Idrisid Sharifism.As a historical figure, he played an important role in the eventual victory of Sharifism, for he gave crucial support to Sharifian political aspirations and institutionalized the annual pilgrimage to the tomb of 'Abd as-Salám ibn Mashîsh 45.
gives proof of his station through the attributes of power and prestige (al-hiba al-qadiriyya) ^9.
Al-Jïlï was not the first mystic, however, to use the bell as a metaphor for divine self-expression.It was also linked to Ibn al-'Arabi's theory of the Muhammadan Reality through the art of letter divination.In this latter tradition, the Arabic letter mîm -which stands for the name Muhammad-is visualized as the clapper of a bell, whose «rope» (the downward-hanging tail of the mini) symbolizes the connection between the material world and the divine archetypes.According to Shams al-ma'árif al'kubrà, a widely-read work on divination by Ahmad al-Bunï (d.622/1225): «The bell tolls for each man.He who listens to it is elevated and is taken from the world for union with Allah, which is the goal of prayer» ^o.
For al-Ghazwànï, the bell represents the Logos, which «peals out» (ajrasd) the Muhammadan Reality to the material world ^i.The «piercing sound» {saràsir) of the bell -the pealing or reverberation of the archetypes on the verge of materialization-causes a subtle harmonic to pervade the world of forms.This divine harmonic is understood by each saint according to his ability.The fully actualized Sufi master {ashshaykh al-wàsit) is able to understand this «music», and uses it to guide his disciples on The Muhammadan Way (at-tanqa al-muhammadiyyd).At its culmination, this spiritual path leads to the station of the Perfect Human Being or the Bell-saint, who presides over the locus of supreme authority that al-Ghazwànï terms the «Sovereignty of the Immamate» {siyàdat al-imâma).Here the Bell-saint inherits the authority of all previous prophets (al-wiràtha an-nabawiyyd) ^^.This gives the Jaras sovereignty over his fellow human beings: «If you knew the truth of what lies deep within you, you would be a messenger (rasüt) to your peers and a leader (qà'im) because of the rights you possess over the one who seeks you out...You would be appointed caliph {istakhlafukd) by the people of your time... and would have attained the perfection of the Muhammadan Sunna» ^^.
The terminology employed in this passage suggests that al-Ghazwànï may have been responsible for what Mercedes Garcia-Arenal and others have identified as the «Fatimid» aspects of Jazülite doctrine ^' ^.This hypothesis is confirmed many times in an-Nuqta al-azaliyya, where the Bell-saint is described in terms that clearly recall the Shilte doctrine of the imamate.Depending on the role that the Jaras is supposed to perform at a specific point in time, he may be called «King» (malik), «The Exemplar of His Time» (qudwat ahl zamànihi)», «Vicegerent of God on Earth» (khalifat Allah fi'l-ard), «The Sovereign Imam» (as-sayyid al-imám), «The One Who Has Arisen» (al-qá'im), «Commander» (alamir), «Disposer of Affairs» (sahib at-tamf), «The Supreme Paradigm» (al-mathal al-a'là)y or «The Mirror of God» (mir'át Allah) ^^.
Equally significant is the fact that the Jaras is granted the following prerogatives, which also recall those of the Shi'ite Imam: 5.After death he is transported from his tomb to God's Paradise (jannat Allah) and intercedes for supplicants until the Day of Resurrection.
6. His status on earth is similar to that of the prophets in respect to the honor, reverence, and obedience that are due to him ^^.
The Bell-saint exercices his sovereignty over society through a process that al-Ghazwànï calls hukm al-anbà'.This refers to the fact that to fulfill his role, the Jaras must make himself known to others.This is because he acts as a «messenger» or «witness» for his fellow human beings (wa yakünu ar-rasülu 'alaykum shahïdan) in guiding them toward the Truth 58.He exercises this authority on his own behalf, without needing to justify his actions by analogy (qiyàs) or by recourse to the opinions of the ulama ^^.God alone is the guarantor of the Bell-saint's judgments and makes His wishes known through divine addresses (mukhàtabât) and inspirational revelations {wahy al-ilhàrri) ^o.
Being the recipient of divine election {istifà'iyyd) like the Prophet himself, the Jaras is the hope (aman) of every Sufi and the imam of every saint.He is the Salvation of God (sa'àdat Allah) on earth, the Guidance of God (hidáyat Allât) in heaven, the Favor of God (ridá'Allah) in his sovereignty, and the Glory of God Çizz Allah) in his prophetically-derived knowledge.Inasmuch as it is derived from the archetypical knowledge of Muhammad, the knowledge of the Jaras encompasses both the exoteric and the esoteric aspects of the Sunna.Following him is thus legally obligatory (wájib) for all who recognize his station, and his disciples are bound to him by nothing less than a «pledge of salvation» (bay'at as-sdàdd) ^^.
The question of possible Shilte influences on Jazùlite ideology is problematized by the fact that many of the attributes of the Shi'ite Imam were applied by Sufis to their own shaykhs as far back as the ninth century C. E. For example, al-Hàkîm at-Tirmidhï's theory of the «Seal of Sainthood» (khàtim al-walàya) is clearly a Sufi gloss on the Shi'ite doc-trine of the Hidden Imam ^^.On this basis, one would go too far to assert that al-Ghazwànï was a crypto-Shilte just because he used 'Alid terminology.However, it is equally misleading to say that his doctrines were purely Sunni.This is proven by the accusations of heresy that were leveled at al-Ghazwànï and his followers by some juridical Sufis and Moroccan ulama.The real truth of the matter lies somewhere in between.Al-Ghazwànï's theories were based on Sufi traditions that were formulated in the context of Sunni intellectual life.In addition, they show little evidence of the specific forms of Neoplatonism (such as in the doctrine of «Universal Mind» [al-aql al-kulli\) that define true Fatimid thought.It is even more unlikey that they were based on Ithnà' 'Ashari precedents.No members of this sect were to be found in Morocco in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries and al-Ghazwànï himself never traveled outside of Morocco.Therefore, if one wishes to look for possible Shi'ite influences on Jazülite ideology, it seems best to start closer to home -with the traditions of Idrisid Shi'ism discussed at the beginning of this paper.
Apart from Abdallah Laroui and Mercedes García-Arenal, few scholars have taken the Shi'ism of the Idrisids very seriously ^^.This is partly because modern Morocco takes pains to identifiy itself with Sunni orthodoxy.According to this stance, there is nothing to link either the Moroccan state or its religious institutions to the doctrines that have long separated Shi'ites from Sunnis.This is certainly correct.However, those who accept this position uncritically forget that the Hasanid doctrines that were disseminated by the Idrisids in the ninth century had little to do with either Ismà'ïlï or Ithnà' 'Asharï Shi'ism.Idrisid Shi'ism was a largely political doctrine that saw legitimacy as vested in any Idrisid qà'im who «stands up» against injustice or unbelief.There is nothing here to prevent an Idrisid imam from being a Maliki jurist or a Sufi shaykh -roles that were in fact played by the patron saint of Moroccan Sufism, Mulày 'Abd as-Salàm ibn Mashïsh.
To say that al-Ghazwànï's doctrines show Shi'ite influence is not to say that al-Ghazwànï was a Shi'ite, or even that he always agreed with the political agenda of the Sharifs.On the contrary, relations between al-Ghazwànï and the Idrisids of northern Morocco were mixed at best.Furthermore, it was not even necessary for the Bell-saint to be a bloodrelation of the Prophet Muhammad.For al-Ghazwànï, Muhammadan nobility (sharaj) was inherited only as a pontentiality.All Muslims can attain nobility not only through their birth, but also through their actions.Even those who claim sharaf by birth must earn the right to be called a sharïf through virtuous conduct.In the final analysis, says al-Ghazwànï: «Those who are ennobled by reputation are better than those who are ennobled by birth» (shurafà' al-hasab afdal min shurafà' annasab) ^^.
It is at this point that al-Ghazwànï's theory of saintly authority departs most decisively form the 'Alid doctrines that provided much of its terminology.Although Sharifs were well represented in the Jazüliyya-Ghazwàniyya Sufi order, they were intrinsically no better than anyone else.To be fully actualized, the nobility of Prophetic descent had to be confirmed by recognizably pious and virtuous acts.It was a basic tenet of the Jazüliyya that anyone who asimilates the Muhammadan paradigm and loves the Prophet to a sufficient degree can call himself a «Sharif».Although the point cannot be proven conclusively, it is very likely that the widespread attribution of Sharifian status to Moroccan saints after the sixteenth century was at least partly the result of this notion.
A theoretical problem that is left unresolved by al-Ghazwànï is that the convergence of Prophet and saint in the person of the Jaras is accompanied by revelatory states that orthodox Muslims consider to be the prerogative of the Prophet alone.This is because the Bell-saint, as the Perfect Human Being, is completely absorbed (Jam ' mutlaq) in the Muhammadan archetype.Thus, his union with the Muhammadan paradigm is heralded by miracles that mimic the Prophet's own.These include divine inspiration (ilhâm), the direct perception of God (mushahada), and even revelation itself (wahy) ^^.Although al-Ghazwànï is careful to state that the revelation of God's word (wahy al-kalàm) has ended with the death of Muhammad, he nonetheless maintains that inspirational revelation {wahy al-ilhàni) will continue until the end of time.Whether it was done intentionally or not, this ambiguity is never resolved, as the following poem by al-Ghazwanï demonstrates: First, we came together at the fountainhead of reality, And second, we separated at the appearance of sainthood.
Third, everything was brought together at the fusion For a especific purpose, including the prophethood of mankind.
Fourth, another fusion, the glory of our mission.
In every locality proclaiming and interpreting every sign.
Fifth, a truth, a right of our fusion, «Those of inflexible resolve» (ûluw al-azrri) in the night of my sublimity 66.
This was the mission for which the Lord of Humanity was delegated, Muhammad the imitated, the exemplar of my exemplarity ^^.
The Bell-saint of the Jazüliyya-Ghazwániyya was the most potent manifestation of sainthood in Moroccan mysticism.Combining Shi'ite conceptions of the Imamate with the Muhammadan archetype as defined by Ibn al-'ArabFs theory of the Muhammadan Reality and al-JilFs corollary of the Muhammadan Image, this supremely paradigmatic figure was tailor-made to assume the role of savior of Islam in a country that had fallen into social turmoil and political prostration.According to al-Ghazwànï's theory of the Sovereignty of the Imamate, all holy persons, from the educated head of a Sufi order (shaykh at-tà'ifd) to the ecstatic and even illiterate majdhüb, had a right to claim the Muhammadan Inheritance.By being absorbed into the Muhammadan Image, each saint could identify himself by analogy with the historical Muhammad, Messenger of God.
The popularity of this theory in early-modern Morocco put the official ulama and juridical Sufis like Ahmad Zarrüq in an awkward position.Although many of them shared the Jazülite shaykhs' desire for social reform and jihad, they were understandably concerned that the Jazülite doctrine of a saintly imamate might undermine long-estab-blished structures of authority.More than at any other time since the late Almoravid period, the Sufis of sixteenth and seventeenth century Morocco involved themselves politically as defenders of the faith, moral censors, and agents of the collective v^ill.In time, however, their efforts were undone by their own proteges, the Sharifs of southern Morocco.By basing their own theory of sovereignty on the bedrock of blood-descent from the Prophet rather than on the more slippery ground of the Muhammadan Image, first the Sa'dians and later the 'Alawites took the ideological high ground away from the Jazüliyya and their successors.Al-Ghazwànï and his disciples may have seen themselves as sovereigns of the spiritual realm, but on the material battlefield where they chose to contest authority, they were out of their element.Here, it was the man of the sword -and increasingly the cannon or the arquebuse-who reigned supreme.

ABSTRACT
This article details the doctrine of the at-Tá'ifa al-Jazüliyya, a populist and politically active Sufi order that dominated Moroccan mysticism throughout the sixteenth century.This doctrine focused on the concept of paradigmatic sainthood (qutbiyya) and was influenced by two different models of religious authority.The first model saw authority as an acquired property, which was vested in the Sufi shaykh who best mirrored the qualities of the Prophet Muhammad.The second model conceived of authority as an ascribed property, and saw it as an inborn grace (baraka) that was transmitted via descent through the Prophetic bloodline.In the writings of the Jazüliyya shaykh Abdallah al-Ghazwânî (d.935/1528-9), both models of authority were seen as part of the «prophetic inheritance» (al-wiràtha an-nabawiyyd), and were reconciled through the doctrine of the «sovereignty of the imamate» (siyadat al-imáma).In this doctrine, the axial saint of Moroccan Sufism, whom al-Ghazwànï called the jaras or «Bell-saint», stood as the successor (khalifa) to the Prophet Muhammad and prime interpreter of Islam.He thus took on many of the qualities of the Shi'ite Imam, an posed a serious challenge to the political leaders of the time.