Anorectal Manometric Dysfunctions in Newly Diagnosed, Early-Stage Parkinson's Disease

Patients

Consecutive newly diagnosed PD patients were enrolled from April 2008 to May 2009 at the Movement Disorders Clinic, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital. A clinical diagnosis of PD was made according to the UK Brain Bank Criteria.9 At the time of the study, none of the patients had ever taken medication for Parkinsonism. The evaluation included a detailed medical and drug history, physical and neurological examinations, a brief neuropsychiatric assessment, and structural brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Only patients with early-stage PD [i.e., ≤stage 2 according to the modified Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) scale] and disease duration (i.e., manifestations of motor symptoms) not exceeding 2 years were included in this study. Excluded from the study were 1) patients with neurological abnormalities related to atypical PD or secondary Parkinsonism, 2) patients with diabetic neuropathy, and 3) patients taking medications known to influence anorectal motility, such as levodopa, dopamine agonists, anticholinergics, or GI dysmotility remedies.

This study was approved by the local ethics committee, and all patients gave their informed consent to participate.

Clinical assessments

All patients were subsequently evaluated using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), the H&Y scale, and the Korean version of the Mini-Mental Status Examination. In addition, the patients were asked to complete a self-administered scale to evaluate the presence and frequency or severity of large-bowel symptoms during the last 3 months. The self-administered questionnaire consisted of the following seven items: 1) low abdominal pain or discomfort, 2) constipation, 3) either excessive strain during defecation or difficulty with expulsion, 4) involuntary loss of stools (i.e., fecal incontinence), 5) incomplete bowel emptying (tenesmus) after having been to the toilet, 6) loose stool or diarrhea, and 7) difficulty relaxing the anal sphincter. Each symptom was scored with respect to either frequency (1=never or rare, 2=often, 3=frequent, and 4=always) or severity (1=no symptoms; 2=minimum or mild symptoms present but causing little distress or disturbance; 3=moderate symptoms causing some distress or disturbance; and 4=severe symptoms representing a major source of distress or disturbance).

Finally, the patients were questioned about the onset of each described symptom that occurred prior to the onset of the motor symptoms of PD.

Anorectal manometry testing and analysis

The measurements were performed as described previously.10 All subjects were investigated in the left lateral position. The investigation was performed with a multilumen manometric catheter (outer diameter: 4 mm), with distal side openings spaced 5 mm apart. Three lumens were continuously perfused (0.5 mL/min) with bubble-free distilled water using a low-compliance pneumohydraulic capillary-infusion system (Arndorfer, Milwaukee, WI, USA) and were connected via an external transducer (P23 Db, Statham Instruments, Oxnard, CA, USA) to a multichannel polygraph (R511 A, Beckman, Irvine, CA, USA).

Both resting and squeeze anal sphincter pressures were obtained as follows: after a 3-min run-in period, the highest sphincter pressure in the anal canal at rest (normal=54-74 mm Hg) and during three squeezes. Patients were asked to squeeze the anal sphincter as strongly and for as long as possible; the longest time interval (in seconds) between the onset of increase in anal sphincter pressure and the return of the pressure curve to baseline was recorded and defined as the duration of maximum squeeze (normal=20-28 s). The rectal pressure and anal canal pressure during straining were also recorded by asking patients to bear down as if they were seated on the commode and attempting to open their bowels. Normal anal relaxation on strains was defined as >20% relaxation from baseline; otherwise, relaxation was recorded as absent or with paradoxical contraction.

The cough reflex was elicited by asking the patient to blow against a fixed pressure level into a manometer, to blow up a balloon, or simply to cough voluntarily. This test was repeated three times in each patient, with a 30-s rest interval between each attempt. For each maneuver the difference between the baseline pressure and the highest intrarectal pressure, and the difference between the baseline and the highest intra-anal pressure were measured. Among the three attempts, the profile showing the highest increase in these pressures was selected for analysis.

The rectal sensation threshold was tested using a compliant rectal balloon inflated with air at a continuous rate of 100 mL/min. Thresholds (in milliliters) for first sensation, urge to defecate, and maximum tolerated volume (pain) were recorded.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 15.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). To determine whether bowel symptoms worsened with manometric abnormalities, the symptoms were first analyzed as a categorical variable according to the presence or absence of each symptom, and then treated with a continuous severity score. In addition, patients were categorized into the following two subgroups: 1) with no or mild problems (a score for each item of ≤1), and 2) with moderate-to-severe problems (a score for each item of ≥2). Finally, demographic or parkinsonian motor symptoms were compared. Statistical analyses were performed using independent-samples t-test or Pearson's chi-square test, and the statistical significance level was established at p<0.05. Data are presented as mean±SD values.

Demographic data

Eight of the 19 patients who were enrolled were male. The age at examination was 66.3±10.6 years, and the duration of parkinsonian motor symptoms was 1.0±0.2 years. The severity of parkinsonian motor symptoms was as follows: the H&Y stage was 1.6±0.4 and the total UPDRS score was 25.9±13.8. Four, eight, and seven patients were scored as H&Y stages 1, 1.5, and 2, respectively. The Korean version of the Mini-Mental Status Examination score was 27.2±2.0 (range, 24-30).

The frequencies of anorectal symptoms were as follows (Table 1): lower abdominal discomfort or pain, 42.1%; constipation, 57.9%; excessive straining for defecation, 68.4%; fecal incontinence, 31.6%; tenesmus, 63.2%; loose stool or diarrhea, 10.5%; and failure to relax the anal sphincter, 31.6%. Only one patient scored 0 on the self-administered scale. Eleven patients (57.9%) responded that the anorectal symptoms developed before the onset of parkinsonian motor symptoms and worsened after the onset, and two patients reported that the onset of the two types of symptoms (i.e., anorectal and neurological) occurred approximately simultaneously, with only months between them.

Table 1
Clinical and anorectal manometric findings of each patient

• Click for larger image

Results of anorectal manometry

The findings of the anorectal manometry test were abnormal in 12 of the 19 patients (Table 1). Manometric recordings during squeezing attempts showed inability to contract the anus in two patients (i.e., lack of anal contraction and short duration of lasting). Straining attempts revealed lack of anal inhibition and paradoxical contraction (anismus) in 7 patients; the remaining 12 patients exhibited normal anal inhibition and good relaxation of the external anal sphincter. In the cough-reflex test, 3 patients exhibited abnormally decreased anal tone with voluntary coughing, suggesting fecal incontinence; the other 16 patients exhibited a normal cough reflex (i.e., the anal tone increased reactively with voluntary coughing). Rectal sensory dysfunction was also observed in two PD patients with severe constipation. An increase in the threshold for first sensation was observed in these patients, and the threshold of continuous rectal sensation and sensation of desire to defecate were not detectable with the maximal tested volume (i.e., 300 mL).

Correlation between clinical and manometric findings

These abnormalities were more common in patients with more severe anorectal symptoms, as measured using the self-reported autonomic scale; however, more than 40% of the patients with no or minimal symptoms also exhibited manometric abnormalities (Table 2). With regard to each item in the questionnaire, the severities of constipation, straining for defecation, and failure to relax the anal sphincter were strongly correlated with the pattern of anismus in anorectal manometry (anismus group vs. normal group: 5.1±2.7 vs. 1.0±1.0; p=0.003), whereas fecal incontinence and fecal urgency symptoms were associated with cough-reflex abnormalities (fecal incontinence group vs. normal group: 2.3±1.2 vs. 0.3±0.5; p=0.003). These abnormalities were marginally associated with UPDRS; however, no correlation was found between anorectal dysmotility and the patients' age or illness duration (Table 3).

Table 2
Anorectal manometry findings in patients according to the bowel symptoms

• Click for larger image

Table 3
Association among clinical parameters and manometric diagnosis, mean+S.D., n (%)

• Click for larger image