Commentary on the Article: “Auditory and Visual Attention in Normal and ADHD-Inattentive-subtype Children”

by Baghdadi G., Towhidkhah F., Rostami R.

Published in: Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, 2018

Introduction: The research article by Baghdadi G., Towhidkhah F., and Rostami R. investigates auditory and visual attention capabilities in normal children compared to those diagnosed with the inattentive subtype of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Their study is crucial given the need to understand more deeply the specific challenges faced by children with ADHD, particularly those categorized under the inattentive subtype, and how these challenges differ from normal developmental patterns.

Study Summary: The authors focus on both auditory and visual attention by administering an integrated visual and auditory continuous performance test to a group of twelve normal children and eight children diagnosed with ADHD-inattentive subtype. Their findings reveal that ADHD children show significant deficits in auditory attention compared to their normal peers, as evidenced by increased mean and variability of reaction times and higher error rates in response to auditory stimuli.

Methodological Considerations: The methodological approach of integrating both auditory and visual stimuli within the same testing session is commendable as it mirrors real-world conditions where children often face overlapping sensory demands. This integration provides a more comprehensive assessment of sensory processing and attention management than if each sensory modality were tested in isolation.

However, the sample size is relatively small, which might limit the generalizability of the findings. Future studies could enhance reliability by including a larger cohort and possibly considering a wider age range to explore developmental changes in attention processing in ADHD and normal populations.

Critical Analysis: The study’s results suggest a pronounced impairment in auditory attention in children with ADHD-inattentive subtype, which is less documented in the literature compared to visual attention deficits. This highlights the potential underestimation of auditory attention issues in standard ADHD assessments, which predominantly focus on visual attention tasks. The implication is significant for educational strategies and interventions, which may need to adjust to address these auditory attention deficits more explicitly.

Additionally, the finding that ADHD children have a greater variability in response times aligns with the existing literature suggesting that inconsistency in performance is a hallmark of ADHD. This inconsistency can be particularly challenging in academic and social settings, where steady performance is often required.

Conclusion and Future Directions: Baghdadi G., Towhidkhah F., and Rostami R.’s study is a valuable contribution to the field of neurodevelopmental disorder research, providing insights that could influence future diagnostic criteria and intervention methods for ADHD. The emphasis on the need for tools that better measure auditory attention is well justified based on their findings. For future research, it would be beneficial to incorporate neuroimaging techniques to explore the neurological underpinnings of the observed behavioral disparities in auditory and visual attention in ADHD.

In summary, this research article offers essential insights that could help refine our understanding of ADHD, particularly the inattentive subtype, and underscores the importance of incorporating a variety of sensory modalities into diagnostic and therapeutic frameworks.

Citation: Baghdadi G, Towhidkhah F, Rostami R (2018). Auditory and Visual Attention in Normal and ADHD-Inattentive-subtype Children. J Neurol Disord Stroke 6(1): 1136. DOI: 10.47739/2334-2307/1136.

 

References

1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2. Brown, T. E. (2005). Attention Deficit Disorders and Comorbidities in Children, Adolescents, and Adults. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
3. Castellanos, F. X., & Proal, E. (2012). Large-scale brain systems in ADHD: Beyond the prefrontal-striatal model. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(1), 17-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.007
4. Diamond, A. (2005). Attention-deficit disorder (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder without hyperactivity): A neurobiologically and behaviorally distinct disorder from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (with hyperactivity). Development and Psychopathology, 17(3), 807-825. doi:10.1017/S0954579405050388
5. Faraone, S. V., & Biederman, J. (2005). What is the prevalence of adult ADHD? Results of a population screen of 966 adults. Journal of Attention Disorders, 9(2), 384-391. DOI: 10.1177/1087054705281478
6. Kooij, J. J. S., & Francken, M. H. (2010). Diagnostic Interview for ADHD in adults 2.0 (DIVA 2.0). The Hague, Netherlands: DIVA Foundation.
7. Rutter, M., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2003). Using sex differences in psychopathology to study causal mechanisms: Unifying issues and research strategies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44(8), 1092-1115. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00194
8. Tannock, R. (1998). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Advances in cognitive, neurobiological, and genetic research. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39(1), 65-99. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00301
9. Visser, S. N., Danielson, M. L., Bitsko, R. H., Holbrook, J. R., Kogan, M. D., Ghandour, R. M., Perou, R., & Blumberg, S. J. (2014). Trends in the parent-report of health care provider-diagnosed and medicated ADHD: United States, 2003–2011. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 53(1), 34-46.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2013.09.001
10. Wehmeier, P. M., Schacht, A., & Barkley, R. A. (2010). Social and emotional impairment in children and adolescents with ADHD and the impact on quality of life. Journal of Adolescent Health, 46(3), 209-217. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.09.009