Polydimethylsiloxane mechanical properties: A systematic review

: Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) has been a promising material for microfluidic, particularly in lab-on-chip. Due to the panoply of good physical, mechanical and chemical properties, namely, viscosity, modulus of elasticity, colour, thermal conductivity, thermal coefficient of expansion, its application has been increasingly requested in quite different areas. Despite such characteristics, there are also some drawbacks associated, and to overcome them, several strategies have been developed to modify PDMS. Given the great variety of relevant conducted research in this field, the present work aims to gather the most relevant information, the advantages and disadvantages of some of the techniques used, and also identify potential gaps and challenges in it. To this end, a systematic literature review was conducted by collecting data from four different databases, Science Direct, American Chemical Society, Scopus, and Springer. Two authors independently screened the references, extracted the key information, and assessed the quality of the included studies. After the analysis of the collected data, 25 studies were selected that addressed the various mechanical properties of PDMS and how to modify them in order to suit a particular application


Introduction
Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) is a silicon-based organic polymer composed of a repeating unit [SiO(CH3)2]. At room temperature, it is in the rubber state because it has a glass transition temperature of less than −120 ℃ [1]. PDMS is an elastomer polymer often constructed with micrometric dimensions for use in many science and engineering applications [2]. PDMS has been commonly used as an alternative to glass for manufacturing microfluidic devices, since the introduction into soft lithography using PDMS to produce mechanically robust devices for microfluidic purposes and/or creating lab-on-a-chip devices [3][4][5][6][7].
The main advantages of PDMS are: easy manufacturing, non-toxicity, non-flammability, good elasticity, optical transparency [8,9], biocompatibility [10,11], high gas permeability [12,13], high compressibility [14], high flexibility [15,16], viscoelasticity, and it is chemically and thermally stable [17][18][19]. In addition, PDMS is capable of modifying and blending with other materials, further expanding its application range [20,21]. For these reasons, this elastomer is widely used in lubricants [22], photovoltaic panels [23,24], optical systems (adaptive lenses) [25], blood analogues [26], microvalves [27] and in the soft lithography procedure, thus becoming one of the most widely used materials for microfluidic devices and lab-on-a-chip device creation [5,[28][29][30]. PDMS also features simple processing, short time, easy control with low cost, easy to work with, and easy to change [4]. Furthermore, it is quite fast in its micro-molding prototyping ability and the ability to adhere to flat surfaces without the need to use adhesives. It is not brittle when compared to other materials such as glass or silicon [31]. PDMS also exhibits water and oxidation resistance, high impact strength, good electrical insulation, relatively insensitive to clear UV [32].
Moreover, PDMS offers high values of elasticity [33], due to the fact that exists in a very compact form. So, when subjected to a tensile force, the polymer is stretched releasing its stress, and then returns to its initial state when the load is removed. The polymer has its elasticity determined by the ability of its regions, which are close together, to slide over each other. This property is influenced by the number of cross-links that exist, the more cross-linked the PDMS, the less elastic it will be. As the PDMS is a soft material, it is very sensitive to low loads. In addition, PDMS is a visco-hyperelastic material, and strain rate effects are commonly observed [34][35][36].
However, it also has some disadvantages, such as its hydrophobic surface, which can cause difficulties when trying to investigate hydrophobic analytes, as biomolecules that often soak into the channel surfaces. Filling microchannels in PDMS can often be difficult [3], however, there are many methods used to improve the surface properties of PDMS [37,38], such as the use of oxygen plasma [39,40] The main disadvantage is that fibers and films are not formed due to the low cohesive forces. For this purpose, mass terminal groups are introduced to increase the cohesive forces of Polydimethylsiloxane [32].
Regarding its applicability, polydimethylsiloxane has been widely used in the field of analytical chemistry due to its favourable physicochemical properties and is gaining importance in the fabrication of lab-on-a-chip devices, as indicated above. These devices utilize a combination of mechanical, optical, and electrical properties of PDMS and thus have revolutionized bioanalysis [41]. On the other hand, PDMS has also been widely used in the biomedical industry due to its biocompatible material and biomechanical behaviour being similar to biological tissues, with applications in the study of aneurysm behaviour and devices such as micropumps, optical systems, and organ-on-a-chip platforms [34,[42][43][44]. In an industrial context, silicones have been used in many protective coating systems for substrates due to their unique physical and chemical properties, namely, polydimethylsiloxanes because they have highly cross-linked molecular chains with enhanced mechanical properties [45]. On the other hand, PDMS has become a ubiquitous material for printing microcontacts, although there are few methods available to standardize a PDMS stamp completed in a single step [46].
In this paper, the main properties of PDMS will be mentioned, namely the mechanical properties. For example, the PDMS obtained with the standardized ratio of 10:1 with its curing agent, has a modulus of elasticity of G = 250 kPa, due to its low glass transition temperature (T = −125 ℃); low change of modulus of elasticity with temperature variation (1.1 kPa/C); small temperature variations of the physical constants (except for thermal expansivity α = 20 × 10 −5 k ); high dielectric strength (14 V/µm); a wide temperature range (−100 ℃ to 100 ℃) and low chemical reactivity, except at pH extremes [47].
The main objective of this systematic review is to show the existence of different ways to change the mechanical properties of PDMS, for example, modifying the formation ratio, curing time, and curing temperature [48]. On the other hand, it is intended to give a summary of treatments describing the results obtained in each one, in order to help the reader to choose the best treatment according to the characteristics that the PDMS needs to have for the intended application.

Search strategy and selection criteria
Since the start of the research on August 22 of 2020, studies were searched that included different ways to modify the mechanical properties of PDMS. For this, a search was conducted in ScienceDirect (SD), Scopus, American Chemical Society (ACS), and Springer. The keywords used were PDMS properties or PDMS polymer properties or Polydimethylsiloxane properties and PDMS mechanical properties. Exclusion criteria were review articles, systematic review articles, metaanalysis, book chapters, conference papers, patents, reports, content that has no interest in the research area, ambiguity, written in a language other than English, and publications before 2011. The analysis of the results was done following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA), whose flowchart is presented and summarized in Figure 1. This is a valuable tool that helps authors improve the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Data collection
First, the related titles were selected. Subsequently, all abstracts were read and those that did not fit the objective of the systematic review were excluded. According to the defined exclusion criteria, the full texts were reviewed, and finally, the data were extracted. The data extracted were test design, setting, quantitative results and limitations of the reported study, and other important comments.

Outcomes
The findings of interest were how to change the properties of PDMS and how the change made contributes to improving a particular mechanical characteristic. It was noted that all the studies found used experimental methods and the discussion of results used comparative methods between pure PDMS and modified PDMS.
Some of the selected studies showed poor results, i.e. mechanical properties were weakened, others resorted to complex and ambiguous physical and chemical methods, e.g. molecular rearrangements.

Data analysis
After the inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined, the resulting titles were read and selected. Duplicate documentation was then removed, and the abstracts were further examined and evaluated. These first two steps were performed by 3 authors. However, the full reading was only performed by 2 authors. Tables 1 and 2 show how the concordance of inclusion, exclusion and doubt (in abstract only) was reached. In case of doubt, the article was read in its entirety. Table 1 shows the different opinions that the authors may have, and which conclusion is reached, contemplating 3 opinions with the same evaluation weight. Note that in case of doubt, the study was fully read. Table 2 only contemplates the opinion of the two authors.
The completion of the tables was considered unambiguously adequate. In case of disagreement, in the case of Table 2, the reading should be redone and discussed if the article is effectively included or excluded. In case of ongoing disagreement, the systematic review supervisor should be consulted.

Results
Twenty-five studies were identified for review, of which were divided into different types of modification of the mechanical properties of PDMS.
Of these 25 studies, 8 were based on structural modifications, i.e., at the molecular structure level of PDMS, 2 studies related to modifications by chemical induction, 6 studies related to the incorporation of nanoparticles capable of improving mechanical properties, 2 studies related to numerical predictions, and 7 studies related to iterative methods, trial-error process, to determine which is the best method to improve mechanical properties and confirm this optimization. On the other hand, all the presented methods of improving the mechanical properties of PDMS tend to improve those that are required for a particular application. However, that improvement in one particular property may lead to the improvement of another, or, however, may lead to the weakening of another. Table 3 is presented a synthesis of different methods used to modify the main mechanical properties of PDMS. Dual-functional polymer system that combines shape memory with selfhealing properties. It consists of a polymer network with permanent covalent crosslinking and abundant weak hydrogen bonds. The former introduces elasticity and maintains the permanent shape, and the latter contributes to the temporary shape via network rearrangement.
Capable of efficiently self-healing for 6 h at room temperature; The resulting polymer has shape memory effects triggered by body temperature.
The precise adjustment of the thermal transition temperature of shape memory polymer is highly complex.
The resultant polymer has shape memory effects triggered by body temperature. [49] Study of the effect of aliphatic and aromatic diisocyanate structures on the mechanical properties, thermal degradation, hydrophobicity, and surface properties of polysiloxanebased polyurethane elastomers.

-
In the tensile test, H12MDIPU shows the largest elongation at break. HDIPU shows a larger modulus, and TDIPU has the highest tensile strength. [50] Characterization of the viscoelastic behaviour of polymers using nanoindentation, showing a linear experimental relationship for PDMS samples with different viscosities and elasticities.
-Nanoindentation is theoretically not sufficient and therefore conventional test results cannot be met. It may result from the difference in test methods, as nanoindentation evaluates local properties, while DMA evaluates average properties. More extensive research is needed in this area.
Experimentally measured coefficients described well the elastic and viscous behaviour expected from the crosslinking density of the PDMS samples. [51]

Continued on next page
Structural process The use of treated Maghnite as catalyst and as inorganic reinforcement for the development of PDMS nanocomposites.
The increased mass ratio of Maghnite improves thermal stability; Improved mechanical properties of the nanocomposites compared to pure PDMS; the composite materials acquired good adsorption capacity compared to the pure polymer. Efficient, fast, and environmentally friendly method. - The use of treated Maghnite, as a catalyst and as an inorganic reinforcement for the development of PDMS nanocomposites, has shown that it is an efficient, fast, and green method for obtaining PDMS nanocomposites with improved properties. [52] Synthesis of copolymers of Polydimethylsiloxane and Polyethylene Oxide (PDMS-PEO) for the fabrication of amphiphilic surfaces.
The contact angle on the surface of the PDMS-PEO copolymer when placing the water droplet is equal to the contact angle of the native PDMS, however, after about 40 s, the droplet starts to spread, decreasing the contact angle. The larger the amount of vinyl incorporated, the smaller the contact angle will be.
When evaluating the absorbance spectrum, the copolymer is not as transparent as native PDMS, not absorbing significantly in the visible zone where most of the fluorescence measurement is done by laser. Young's modulus varies with the amount of vinyl added to PDMS. When it is low in amount, it exhibits a lower Young's modulus than the native PDMS for a ratio of 10:1. However as the amount of vinyl is increased, the Young's modulus increases, approaching the value of pure PDMS.
The cross-linked copolymer (a material that allows for the incorporation of hydrophilic functional groups) exhibits acceptable for application to high speed, high-efficiency, and chemical separations. [3] Structural characteristics and gas permeation properties of bi-soft segment PDMS/PU membranes.
The vibration of SI-O-SI elongations increases with increasing PDMS membrane content. The permeabilities of CO 2 , O 2 , and N 2 gases increase with increasing PDMS membrane content, while the CO 2 /N 2 and O 2 /N 2 ratios do not change significantly.
The degree of crosslinking decreases sharply, when the PDMS content increases by 75% of its weight. With increasing PDMS content, some hydroxyl groups were not reacted, decreasing the degree of crosslinking.
The permeability ratio was higher for the bisoft segment membranes described in this work than in the case of PDMS pure.
[53] The untreated and flame treated PDMS-PIL (square pillar pattern) surfaces show higher roughness when compared to PDMS-REC (rectangular pattern) and PDMS-FLT (flat PDMS); The longer the flame treatment duration generates more oxygen and silicon-based groups, leading to the formation of hydrophilic and the decrease in carbon concentration, which will make the surface superhydrophobic and superoleophobic.
Flame treatment leads to a lack of surface roughness of the PDMS micropattern, negatively affecting the hydrophobicity. Therefore, the flame treatment should not exceed 30 s.
Surfaces exhibited superhydrophobic and superoleophobic properties that led to water and EG droplets rolling off almost immediately and the samples had great stability of superhydrophobicity and superoleophobicity. [55] Chemical process Plasma treatment of the PDMS surface for optimization of optical properties and hydrophilicity.
Two types of tests are tested, the first is a comparison between plain PDMS and a fused silica glass for the determination of the replica substrate. And the second test is the use of plasma to improve the hydrophilic properties of PDMS.
In the visible light domain and being tested the smooth side of both PDMS and fused silica glass, PDMS shows 5% better transmittance, regarding the rough side, PDMS shows 17% better transmittance. Relatively to the reflectance the fused silica glass shows better than PDMS at the wavelength of 300-1200 nm, both on the smooth and rough side. PDMS is used as a replica substrate since it has a low cost and high activity in optical applications such as sunlight.
Regarding plasma treatment, it shows a much higher root-mean-square surface roughness value after plasma treatment on both the smooth and rough sides; After plasma treatment, on the plasma surfaces, the roughness increases, the electric field strength increases, and the scattering regularity of free electron concentration increases.
The surface thickness increases significantly after plasma treatment in both zones of the PDMS.
The results showed that the PDMS substrate presents a diversity of optical properties and also indicates that PDMS is a great potential to be used as a replica, low-cost, highactive substrate for optical applications, such as solar energy.

[4]
Continued on next page

Modification method
Principle of operation Advantages Disadvantages/limitation Main results Ref.

Chemical process
Modification of the PDMS surface through a combination of physical and chemical modification routes.
After the nanopattern PDMS was exposed to air plasma, a polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) treatment was performed.
The amount of oxygen in PVA-nano -PDMS is about 33%, higher than the value of 29% in pure nano-PDMS; With increasing plasma exposure time, the contact angle was decreased, improving its hydrophilicity; PDMS modified with the nanostructures shows better stability and lower contact angle values; If the amount of PVA layers increases, the contact angle decreases; The standardized PDMS with PVA coating has better long-term stability.
There is no difference of any kind between the spectra of nanoPDMS and the plasmatreated sample, which confirmed that plasma treatment has no lasting influence on the surface hydrophilicity of PDMS. The thermal and mechanical stability of PDMS is improved. In the case of MCM-41 Silica particles, the coefficient of thermal expansion decreases with increasing concentration; In the case of A380 Silica particles, they exhibit higher elastic modulus and better transparency due to smaller particle size compared to A380 Silica particles; Compared to pure PDMS, there is an increase in elastic modulus by about 7 times with the incorporation of silica particles.
Decreased transmittance of PDMS when the incorporation of silica nanoparticles occurs, both A380 fumed silica and MCM-41 mesoporous silica; In the case of MCM-41 Silica particles, the coefficient of thermal expansion decreases with increasing concentration; In the case of A380 Silica particles, they exhibit higher elastic modulus and better transparency than the bigger particle size of A380 silica particles; The elastic modulus increase by about 7 times with the incorporation of silica particles; The swelling ratio of PDMS in toluene was decreased to 0.68 when the concentration of nanoparticles was 10 wt%. A380 and MCM-41 nanoparticles had similar effects on the swelling property of PDMS. [ An innovative technique that saves materials since it promotes a computational prediction.
Approximations, for example, the elasticity of a polymer is a very complex problem, so for simplicity, the authors ignore surface effects and try to map the dependence of the bulk modulus on the crosslinking rate only.
The results seem to indicate that elastic properties of PDMS depend to the major extend on the crosslinking ratio and the particular network topology is of a less importance. [62] Performing a biaxial tensile test at different speeds. Numerical studies using the most popular constitutive models were also performed for comparison with the experimental measurements.
Technique suitable for measuring displacement fields in hyperelastic materials; The numerical models do not fully characterize the hyperelastic behaviour.
Based on the average error analysis of the constitutive model and of the displacement profiles, it was possible to establish a direct relationship. [ Excellent performance in temperature-dependent thermal and mechanical properties; Excellent flexibility and heat absorption capacity; Can be useful for design and manufacturing in a wide range of potential applications.
-Thermal and mechanical properties can be improved greatly by considering the phase change characteristics of the paraffin components. [15] Measurement of the mechanical properties of graded (layered) PDMS based on the ratio of base polymer blend to curing agent.
Great tenacity; Great compactness; Can be applied to produce flexible electronic components with extreme mechanical gradients and stronger graded adhesives.
-Graded PDMS was extended to a large elongation ratio before fracture and had a high upturn in stress at elongation, resulting in toughness values that were quite high. Increase the range of mechanical properties of graded PDMS, a material with more compatibility with technological processes was rendered. [48] Characterization of PDMS and compatibility study. To this end, 5 PDMS samples with a different cure, surface, and structural property ratios were forged; The PDMS formulations were analysed to investigate the effects with various biomedical processes, microfabrication, and micromachining.
Shows the results of the various sample formulations when subjected to centrifugation, allowing you to get a speed-thickness graph; Chemical exposure and the effects on the degradation of the PDMS microtextures; Oxygen plasma exposure provides information about the recoverability of hydrophilicity, and demonstrates that at higher exposures, hydrophilicity does not decrease; Different sterilization techniques confirm the usefulness of different PDMS formulations for biomedical applications. On the other hand, different sterilization techniques allow a continuous or improved hydrophobic behaviour. Nanoindentation provides the various mechanical properties that each cure has. As for tensile testing, it is confirmed that tensile strength is higher the fewer sterilization effects. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy provides the surface element concentration as a function of the amount of crosslinker.
There were techniques applied that did not result in many contributions to optimize the mechanical properties or induce changes, for example, chemical immersion did not result in major changes in the hydrophilicity of the PDMS surface; Sterilization did not affect PDMS surface microtextures, element concentration, or hydrophilia.
It was the PDMS with 14.3 wt% of cross-linker formulation that exhibited the highest tensile strength and storage modulus. Therefore, mechanical properties of PDMS could be altered (by changing the polymer to cross-linker ratio) without variations in surface chemistry.

[63]
Continued on next page

Advantages Disadvantages/ limitation
Main results Ref.

Interactive process
Determination of the mechanical properties of a PDMS elastic rubber for sensor applications.
Thickness decreases with increasing rotation rate; Thickness increases with decreasing time; The shear modulus increases with temperature; The shear modulus is independent of the typical frequency used for an elastic material; For better adhesion of PDMS to an oxidized silicon wafer, a primer, such as TMSM was used. - The results show that PDMS is a rubber elastic material, with Young's modulus ≈ 750 kPa. When a primer is used, very good adhesion is obtained between cured PDMS and polished surfaces. Adhesive strengths up to 180 kPa [47] Experimental study of the mechanical performance of PDMS at various temperatures.
The specific heat capacity of PDMS decreases along the glass transition temperature and increases with increasing temperature at a slow rate; With decreasing temperature, the thermal diffusivity of PDMS increases; The thermal conductivity of PDMS decreases with decreasing temperature; The coefficient of thermal expansion increases with increasing temperature; Hardness increases with decreasing temperature; Compression increases with decreasing temperature, leading to increased hardening.

-
The shore hardness and compressive modulus of PDMS significantly increased, with the decrease of temperature; The ultimate compressive strength increased first and then decreased with the decrease of temperature; With the decrease of temperature, the damage mode of PDMS material transitioned from microcrack damage caused by plastic squeeze slip. [64] Polymers confined to a small dimension are subjected to high deformation in order to realize the precision of the functioning of polymer devices at nanoscales.
For a given indentation, the slope increases with decreasing film thickness; Whether the indentation curves obtained by the Hertzian method of force indentation contact by a penetrator, or the force curves obtained by FEA simulation of thin compression elastomer, these all approximate for any given polymer thickness; Young's modulus varies with the regions where it is found, regions that have 3 different thicknesses. The first region where Young's modulus is independent of indentation, the second region where Young's modulus increases with indentation and exhibits increasing stiffness, and the third region just after contact where Young's modulus is extremely high initially and decreasing thereafter; The Young's modulus of the thin film, region 1, approaches the value of the bulk material; The measured Young's modulus can be dramatically reduced in small indentations, but significant contact hardening is permanence; The reduction in molecular mobility at the interface that is induced by the attraction between the identifier and the surface also contributes to surface hardening.

Discussion
As shown in the results, there is a wide variety of methods to modify the mechanical properties of PDMS based on the molecular structure of PDMS, by synthesis, for example, to improve visibility (Figure 2a) [3], molecular rearrangement, for instance, for shape memory (Figure 2b) [49] or improvement of permeability (Figure 2c) [53], treatment at the structural level [55], like hydrophobia (Figure 2d) [54], coating to optimize the molecular structure [20] or indentation for characterization and structure improvement [17]. On the other hand, modifications can resort to chemical processes that despite being more complex are quite useful in decreasing to hydrophilic behaviour of PDMS. Figure 2. Improvement of the (a) appearance and clarity, reprinted with permission from [3], (b) shape memory properties of PDMS [49], (c) permeability [53], (d) hydrophobia [54].
As for the process of incorporation of nanoparticles, the process can be of varying complexities, for example, foams are complicated and consume a lot of energy in the process but have a very positive effect in terms of improved compressive strength, better toughness and better-softening behaviour [22]. The same happens with the incorporation of carbon nanotube nanocomposites, which darken the PDMS and lead the surface imperfections but improve the elasticity (Figure 3a) [1] and hardness of PDMS. As for the incorporation of Vanadium nanoparticles, these enhance better tensile strength and better curing efficiency, however, it darkens PDMS and excessive incorporation may impair the curing process [23] or thermo-expandable microspheres to improve energy absorption efficiency (Figure 3b) [56].
Regarding the process that used numerical simulation, this is without a doubt an innovative and promising idea since it can reduce the testing time and the associated cost. On the other hand, it is still a premature process, which needs many improvements and studies to give credibility to this process of analysis and optimization of mechanical properties. However, it can be used as a comparative and auxiliary tool to help in materials characterization (Figure 4a,b) [33].  So far, the authors are able to give an indication of the idea and the potential it may have, however, they report that many approximations are made [24]. The same happens with numerical studies capable of measuring the displacement of hyperelastic materials, however, their behaviour is not completely defined [25]. Finally, the iterative methods, trial-error, which has been adopted by several authors, to reach a sample capable of satisfying the need in face of the application or present studies about various samples tested for demonstration effect.
In the case of iterative studies for PDMS performance exposure, the authors prepare several PDMS samples with the study variable changed, for example, the study of several PDMS samples with different curing agents [14,27], resorts to the characterization of the samples and indicates the behaviour of all of them against pure PDMS, where in the first case, it indicates which of the samples shows better behaviour of toughness, compactness, and strength, while in the second case, the study explores the characteristics of the various samples for biomedical applications, microfabrication, and micromachining.
Other studies are also presented, for example, the effect of the heating temperature of PDMS and how this relates to the mechanical properties of PDMS [28,29], as well as subjecting samples to various deformations [14] or studying PDMS samples with a specific application, for example, for sensor applications [13].
It is relevant to compare and discuss the studies already conducted, pondering on the inherent characteristics of each of the studies, i.e., sensitivity and specificity of the appropriate tests presented in each study. However, it was not possible to make a comparison that was sufficiently faithful to reality, since not all studies provided the necessary information for this, and all were highly dependent on the application for which the modification is intended. In addition, another important parameter is the cost-effectiveness per trial of each method, which cannot be defined or inferred due to the lack of well-reasoned literature, i.e., only one article.
Therefore, the presentation expressed here is supported by a brief explanation of the modification process, main advantages, and disadvantages of each method. It would be relevant to compare the studies based on the specificity and sensitivity of the assays. However, we chose not to do so because not all studies provide these values were not considered due to the low number of samples tested.
The selected studies show that the most appropriate method to the application to which the improvement is intended should be adopted because not all have the same degree of complexity and not all focus on the improvement of the variable to be optimized.
In addition to the selected articles, others were read within the physical properties of PDMS. The reading of these articles is justified by the interrelation with the mechanical properties. Since the study of physical properties is necessary and determinant for the characterization of mechanical properties, it was found pertinent to analyze them [30].

Conclusions and future perspectives
This paper brings together different types of treatments that allow different types of changes in PDMS giving it various characteristics.
The treatments can be of various types, such as the incorporation of structural processes, chemical processes, and incorporation of nanoparticles.
However, to obtain results, some types of processes were used to visualize some results with the change of one more variable. The article studied present iteration processes for obtaining the expected results and simulation processes for visualizing results previously with the changes made.
Thus, the summary table (Table 3), presents what type of treatment to use for the intended application, knowing exactly what types of results are obtained for the treatment to be used, making it very easy to choose the type of changes that one wants to obtain in PDMS, from increasing the elasticity modulus, Young's modulus, transparency, tensile strength, stiffness, flexibility, among other characteristics.
By adding new elements to PDMS, the material, with the introduction of new mixtures, incorporations, and manipulations, will gain new applications at the industrial and commercial levels.
On the other hand, the numerical part will tend to help and optimize the testing process as it allows to characterize and predict the behaviour it will have when manufactured, significantly reducing the time and cost with samples.