Research article Special Issues

Voluntary carbon information disclosures, corporate-level environmental sustainability efforts, and market value

  • Received: 23 December 2021 Revised: 13 March 2022 Accepted: 06 April 2022 Published: 12 April 2022
  • JEL Codes: G30, M50, Q51, Q56

  • Based on global 500 companies, this study examines whether the market incorporates the corporations' voluntary carbon emissions disclosures as part of their environmental sustainability efforts, thus increasing their market value. Proxies used to measure the corporations' ecological sustainability efforts include the choice of voluntary carbon disclosures, carbon emissions amounts, carbon intensity, and carbon disclosure quality. During the study period, those companies that chose to disclose their carbon information to the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), saw the market value their efforts towards environmental sustainability by increasing their market value. This study also compared the market value of disclosing and non-disclosing firms and found that non-disclosing companies had higher market value than did disclosing firms. However, this relationship was statistically insignificant. This study uses the more extensive data set, extended period, and more robust econometric approach (Difference GMM) and extends the boundaries of accounting research to incorporate environmental-related disclosures. Therefore, this most recent study can provide new insights to researchers, investors, and policymakers in the present context of environmental sustainability and business sustainability.

    Citation: Jaspreet K. Sra, Annie L. Booth, Raymond A. K. Cox. Voluntary carbon information disclosures, corporate-level environmental sustainability efforts, and market value[J]. Green Finance, 2022, 4(2): 179-206. doi: 10.3934/GF.2022009

    Related Papers:

  • Based on global 500 companies, this study examines whether the market incorporates the corporations' voluntary carbon emissions disclosures as part of their environmental sustainability efforts, thus increasing their market value. Proxies used to measure the corporations' ecological sustainability efforts include the choice of voluntary carbon disclosures, carbon emissions amounts, carbon intensity, and carbon disclosure quality. During the study period, those companies that chose to disclose their carbon information to the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), saw the market value their efforts towards environmental sustainability by increasing their market value. This study also compared the market value of disclosing and non-disclosing firms and found that non-disclosing companies had higher market value than did disclosing firms. However, this relationship was statistically insignificant. This study uses the more extensive data set, extended period, and more robust econometric approach (Difference GMM) and extends the boundaries of accounting research to incorporate environmental-related disclosures. Therefore, this most recent study can provide new insights to researchers, investors, and policymakers in the present context of environmental sustainability and business sustainability.



    加载中


    [1] Akbas H, Canikli S (2019) Determinants of voluntary greenhouse gas emission disclosure: An empirical investigation on Turkish firms. Sustainability 11: 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010107 doi: 10.3390/su11010107
    [2] Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58: 277–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968 doi: 10.2307/2297968
    [3] Assidi S (2020) The effect of voluntary disclosures and corporate governance on firm value: A study of listed firms in France. Intl J Discl Governance 17: 168–179. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-020-00090-1 doi: 10.1057/s41310-020-00090-1
    [4] Barth M, McNichols M (1994) Estimation and market valuation of environmental liabilities relating to superfund sites. J Acc Res 32: 177–209. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491446 doi: 10.2307/2491446
    [5] Barth M, Beaver W, Landsman W (2001) The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard-setting: Another view. J Acc Econ 31: 77–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00019-2 doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00019-2
    [6] Bebbington J, Larrinaga-Gonza'lez C (2008) Carbon trading: Accounting and reporting issues. Eur Acc Rev 17: 697–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180802489162 doi: 10.1080/09638180802489162
    [7] Ben-Amar W, Chang M, McIlkenny P (2017) Board gender diversity and corporate response to sustainability initiatives: Evidence from the carbon disclosure Project. J Bus Eth 142: 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2759-1 doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2759-1
    [8] Bond S, Hoeffler A, Temple J (2001) GMM estimation of empirical growth models. Avaiable from: https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/nufeconwp/0121.htm.
    [9] Brouwers R, Schoubben, F, Van Hulle C (2018) The influence of carbon cost pass through on the link between carbon emission and corporate financial performance in the context of the European Union Emission Trading Scheme. Bus Strat Env 27: 1422–1436. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2193 doi: 10.1002/bse.2193
    [10] Campbell C, Sefcik S, Soderstrom N (2003) Disclosure of private information and reduction of uncertainty: Environmental liabilities in the chemical industry. Rev Quant Fin Acc 21: 349–278. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:REQU.0000004783.24513.ea doi: 10.1023/B:REQU.0000004783.24513.ea
    [11] CDP (2018) An introduction to 2018 scoring. Available from: https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance#1.
    [12] Chapple L, Clarkson P, Gold D (2013) The cost of carbon: Capital markets effects of the proposed emission trading scheme. J Acc Fin Bus Stud 49: 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12006 doi: 10.1111/abac.12006
    [13] Cheema-Fox A, Laperla R, Serafeim G, et al. (2021) Decarbonizing everything. Financ Anal J 77: 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2021.1909943 doi: 10.1080/0015198X.2021.1909943
    [14] Clarkson P, Li Y, Pinnuck M, et al. (2015) The valuation relevance of greenhouse gas emissions under the European Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme. Eur Acc Rev 24: 551–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2014.927782 doi: 10.1080/09638180.2014.927782
    [15] Cotter J, Najah M (2011) Institutional investor influence on global climate change disclosure practices. Aust J Manage 37: 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896211423945 doi: 10.1177/0312896211423945
    [16] Defra (2014) Measuring and reporting environmental impacts: Guidance for businesses. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/measuring-and-reporting-environmental-impacts-guidance-for-businesses.
    [17] Dhaliwal D, Li O, Tsang A, et al. (2011) Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. Acc Rev 86: 59–100. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000005 doi: 10.2308/accr.00000005
    [18] Dhar B, Sarkar S, Ayittey F (2020) Impact of social responsibility disclosure between implementation of green accounting and sustainable development: A study on heavily polluting companies in Bangladesh. Corporate Social Responsibility Env Manage 29: 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2174 doi: 10.1002/csr.2174
    [19] Elsayih J, Tang Q, Lan Y (2018) Corporate governance and carbon transparency: Australian experience. Acc Res J 31: 405–422. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-12-2015-0153 doi: 10.1108/ARJ-12-2015-0153
    [20] Ganda F, Milondzo K (2018) The impact of carbon emissions on corporate financial performance: Evidence from the South African firms. Sustainability 10: 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072398 doi: 10.3390/su10072398
    [21] Giannarakis G, Zafeiriou E, Sariannidis N, et al. (2016) Determinants of dissemination of environmental information: An empirical survey. J Bus Econ Manage 17: 749–764. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2016.1195771 doi: 10.3846/16111699.2016.1195771
    [22] Griffin P (2017) The Carbon Majors Database: CDP Carbon Majors Report 2017. Available from: http://www.truevaluemetrics.org/DBpdfs/Carbon/CDP/CDP-Carbon-Majors-Report-2017.pdf.
    [23] Griffin P, Lont D, Sun E (2017) The relevance of greenhouse gas emission disclosures. Contemp Acc Res 34: 1265–1297. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12298 doi: 10.1111/1911-3846.12298
    [24] Hahn R, Lülfs R (2014) Legitimizing negative aspects in GRI-oriented sustainability reporting: A qualitative analysis of corporate disclosure strategies. J Bus Eth 123: 401–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1801-4 doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1801-4
    [25] Hahn R, Reimsbach D, Schiemann F (2015) Organizations, climate change, and transparency: Reviewing the literature on carbon disclosure. Organ Env 28: 80–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575542 doi: 10.1177/1086026615575542
    [26] Healy P, Palepu K (2001) Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. J Acc Econ 31: 405–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00018-0 doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00018-0
    [27] Hughes S, Anderson A, Golden S (2001) Corporate environmental disclosures: Are they useful in determining environmental performance? J Acc Public Policy 20: 217–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4254(01)00031-X doi: 10.1016/S0278-4254(01)00031-X
    [28] Jaggi B, Allini A, Macchioni R, et al. (2018) Do investors find carbon information useful? Evidence from Italian firms. Rev Quant Financ Acc 50: 1031–1056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-017-0653-x doi: 10.1007/s11156-017-0653-x
    [29] Johnston D, Sefcick E, Soderstrom N (2008) The value relevance of greenhouse gas emissions allowances: An exploratory study in the related United States SO2 Market. Eur Acc Rev 17: 747–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180802481615 doi: 10.1080/09638180802481615
    [30] Kanwal M, Khan H (2021) Does carbon asset add value to clean energy market? Evidence from EU. Green Financ 3: 495–507. https://doi.org/10.3934/GF.2021023 doi: 10.3934/GF.2021023
    [31] Kim E, Lyon T (2011) When does institutional investor activism increase shareholder value?: The Carbon Disclosure Project. J Econ Anal Policy 11: 1–29. https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.2676 doi: 10.2202/1935-1682.2676
    [32] Kim YB, An HT, Kim JD (2015) The effect of carbon risk on the cost of equity capital. J Clean Prod 93: 279–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.006 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.006
    [33] Konar S, Cohen M (2001) Does the market value environmental performance? Rev Econ Stat 83: 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1162/00346530151143815 doi: 10.1162/00346530151143815
    [34] Krishnamurti C, Velayutham E (2018) The influence of board committee structures on voluntary disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions: Australian evidence. Pacific Basin Financ J 50: 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2017.09.003 doi: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2017.09.003
    [35] Lee S, Park Y, Klassen R (2015) Market responses to firms' voluntary climate change information disclosure and carbon communication. Corporate Social Resp Env Manage 22: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1321 doi: 10.1002/csr.1321
    [36] Leszcensky L, Wolbring T (2019) How to deal with reverse causality using panel data? Recommendations for researchers based on a simulation study. Sociol Methods Res. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124119882473 doi: 10.1177/0049124119882473
    [37] Li D, Huang M, Ren S, et al. (2018) Environmental legitimacy, green innovation, and corporate carbon disclosure: Evidence from CDP China 100. J Bus Eth 150: 1089–1104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3187-6 doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3187-6
    [38] Li. Z, Liao G, Albitar K (2020) Does corporate environmental responsibility engagement affect firm value? The mediating role of corporate innovation. Bus Strat Env 29: 1045–1055. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2416 doi: 10.1002/bse.2416
    [39] Luo L, Tang Q (2014) Does voluntary carbon disclosure reflect underlying carbon performance? J Contemp Acc Econ 10: 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2014.08.003 doi: 10.1016/j.jcae.2014.08.003
    [40] Luo L, Lan Y, Tang Q (2012) Corporate incentives to disclose carbon information: Evidence from the CDP global report. Int Financial Manage Acc 23: 93–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-646X.2012.01055.x doi: 10.1111/j.1467-646X.2012.01055.x
    [41] Matisof D, Noonan D, O'Brian J (2013) Convergence in environmental reporting: Assessing Carbon Disclosure Project. Bus Strat Env 22: 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1741 doi: 10.1002/bse.1741
    [42] Matsumura E, Prakash R, Vera-Muñoz S (2014) Firm-Value effects of carbon emissions and carbon disclosures. Acc Rev 89: 695–724. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50629 doi: 10.2308/accr-50629
    [43] Roodman D (2009) How to do Xtabond?: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stat J 9: 86–136. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1536867X0900900106
    [44] Qian W, Schaltegger S (2017) Revisiting carbon disclosure and performance: Legitimacy and management views. British Acc Rev 49: 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.05.005 doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2017.05.005
    [45] Utomo M, Rahayu S, Kaujan K, et al. (2020) Environmental performance, environmental disclosure, and firm value: Empirical study of non-financial companies at Indonesia Stock Exchange. Green Financ 2: 100–113. https://doi.org/10.3934/GF.2020006 doi: 10.3934/GF.2020006
    [46] Velte P, Martin S, Lueg R (2020) Carbon performance and disclosure: A systematic review of governance-related determinants and financial consequences. J Cleaner Prod 254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120063 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120063
    [47] Wegener M, Elayan F, Felton S, et al. (2013) Factors influencing corporate environmental disclosures. Acc Persp 12: 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12007 doi: 10.1111/1911-3838.12007
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2541) PDF downloads(375) Cited by(1)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Tables(11)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog