Brought to you by:

A publishing partnership

The following article is Open access

Comparison of the Composition of ICMEs from Active Regions and Quiet-Sun Regions

, , , , , , and

Published 2023 March 20 © 2023. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society.
, , Citation Jinrong Li et al 2023 ApJ 945 163 DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/acba90

Download Article PDF
DownloadArticle ePub

You need an eReader or compatible software to experience the benefits of the ePub3 file format.

0004-637X/945/2/163

Abstract

The composition of interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs), including the ionic charge states and elemental abundances of heavy elements, is tightly correlated with their source regions and eruption processes. This can help in analyzing the eruption mechanisms and plasma origins of CMEs, and deepen our understanding of energetic solar activities. The active regions and quiet-Sun regions have different physical properties; thus, from a statistical point of view, ICMEs originating from the two types of regions should exhibit different compositional characteristics. To demonstrate the differences comprehensively, we conduct survey studies on the ionic charge states of five elements (Mg, Fe, Si, C, and O) and the relative abundances of six elements (Mg/O, Fe/O, Si/O, C/O, Ne/O, and He/O) within ICMEs from 1998 February to 2011 August using data from the Advanced Composition Explorer. The results show that ICMEs from active regions have higher ionic charge states and relative abundances than those from quiet-Sun regions. For the active-region ICMEs, we further analyze the relations between their composition and flare class, and find a positive relationship between them, i.e., the higher the classes of the associated flares, the larger the means of the ionic charge states and relative abundances (except the C/O) within ICMEs. As more (less) fractions of ICMEs originate from active regions around the solar maximum (minimum), and active-region ICMEs usually are associated with higher-class flares, our studies might answer why the composition of ICMEs measured near 1 au exhibits a solar cycle dependence.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.

1. Introduction

Interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs; Manchester et al. 2017) are a counterpart of coronal mass ejections (CMEs; Forbes 2000; Forbes et al. 2006), which result from the eruption of magnetic flux ropes (MFRs; Chen 2011; Webb & Howard 2012) that can form prior to (Cheng et al. 2011; Patsourakos et al. 2013) and during (Song et al. 2014; Ouyang et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2017) eruptions. ICMEs can cause extreme space weather effects and affect the high-tech activities of humans (Gosling et al. 1991; Zhang et al. 2007; Xu et al. 2019). Investigating CMEs and ICMEs will help us predict space weather, and take timely precautions to reduce losses.

The composition of ICMEs, including the ionic charge states and relative abundances of heavy elements, can be obtained directly through in situ measurements. As the composition does not alter during ICME propagation in the interplanetary space (e.g., Owens 2018), ICMEs at 1 au and near the Sun have identical charge states and elemental abundances, which reflect the eruption characteristics and plasma origins of CMEs. Therefore, the in situ composition of ICMEs opens an important avenue for investigating CMEs (see the recent review by Song & Yao 2020).

According to the CME models (e.g., Lin & Forbes 2000), plasma heated by magnetic reconnections in the current sheet is transformed into the outer shell of MFRs along with the reconnected magnetic field lines (Song et al. 2015, 2016; Ye et al. 2021). As CMEs propagate outward, their electron density decreases rapidly. The ionization and recombination processes will be shut down when the density is low enough, making the ionic charge states freeze-in (Owocki et al. 1983). Therefore, the ionic charge states near 1 au can be used to infer information on electron temperature and density, as well as the ICME speed near the Sun (Landi et al. 2012); see also Shi et al. (2019) for a discussion in other contexts. For the metallic elements, such as Mg, Fe, and Si, their average values of ionic charge states, i.e., the 〈QMg〉, 〈QFe〉, and 〈QSi〉, are sensitive to the electron temperature (Lepri et al. 2001; Lepri & Zurbuchen 2004; Lepri et al. 2013). For the nonmetallic elements, such as C and O, the charge state ratios, e.g., C6+/C5+, C6+/C4+, and O7+/O6+, are used to indicate the temperature of coronal sources when freezing-in (Zhao et al. 2014, 2017a).

The elemental abundances of ICMEs are also employed to diagnose some issues related to CMEs, such as the plasma origin (Song et al. 2017), due to the first ionization potential (FIP) effect. The FIP effect is an elemental fractionation that occurs between the solar photosphere and the corona. The low-FIP elements (e.g., Mg, Fe, Si) are enhanced in abundance when they flow into the corona compared to the high-FIP elements (e.g., O). This leads to relative abundances, such as Fe/O, being higher in the corona (Laming 2004, 2009, 2015). Therefore, previous studies have explored the sources of ICME plasmas by comparing their elemental abundances with photospheric values. For example, Lepri & Rivera (2021) reported that the elemental abundances of prominences are similar to the photospheric values, which does not support the prominence material originating from the condensation of coronal plasma.

Many survey studies on the composition of ICMEs have been conducted in recent years. Zurbuchen et al. (2016) reported that the ICMEs with elevated Fe charge states have higher FIP fractionation than other ICMEs. Owens (2018) and Huang et al. (2020) found that fast ICMEs possess higher charge states and relative abundances compared to slow ones. Gu et al. (2020) and Song et al. (2021) demonstrated that the composition of ICMEs exhibits an obvious solar cycle dependence. Further, Song et al. (2022) compared the He abundance between ICMEs and solar wind, and concluded that both ICMEs and slow solar wind possess solar cycle dependence, while the fast solar wind does not show a dependence.

As both ICMEs and slow wind can originate from active regions and quiet-Sun regions, and more active regions appear in the solar atmosphere at the solar maximum, it is natural that more fractions of ICMEs and slow wind detected near 1 au originate from active regions around the solar maximum (e.g., Fu et al. 2017). If there exist obvious compositional differences between ICMEs from active regions and quiet-Sun regions, the solar cycle dependence of the composition of ICME can be explained reasonably by means of their source regions. Therefore, a comparative study on the composition of ICMEs between active regions and quiet-Sun regions is necessary. That is the major motivation for us to conduct this study. This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we introduce the instruments used in this study. In Section 3, the observations and results are displayed, which is followed by a summary and discussion in the final section.

2. Instruments

The in situ compositional data of ICMEs used in this study are provided by the Solar Wind Ion Composition Spectrometer (SWICS; Gloeckler et al. 1998) aboard the Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) located at the Lagrangian L1 point between the Sun and Earth. SWICS performs electrostatic selection, time-of-flight analysis, and total energy measurements for each solar wind ion. Through this triple combination measurement, SWICS can determine the mass, charge, and energy of solar wind ions of He, C, N, O, Ne, Mg, Si, S, and Fe, in the energy-per-charge range of 0.49–60 keV e−1. The SWICS data used in this paper have been recalibrated with an improved algorithm (Shearer et al. 2014), which resolves ion species with greater accuracy and includes charge state distributions with uncertainties less than 25%. The temporal resolutions are 1 and 2 hr for ionic charge states and elemental abundances, respectively.

The corresponding CMEs and their source regions are examined through the Large Angle and Spectrometric Coronagraph (LASCO; Brueckner et al. 1995) and the Extreme Ultraviolet Imaging Telescope (EIT; Delaboudinière et al. 1995) on board the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory. The soft X-ray (1–8 Å) fluxes of associated flares are from the Geostationary Operational Environment Satellite (GOES), which provides the integrated X-ray emission of the whole solar disk.

3. Observations and Results

3.1. ICMEs and Classifications

This study uses the online ICME catalog at the ACE science center 4 (Richardson & Cane 2010), as this catalog is based on ACE measurements. The optimal SWICS data are available from 1998 February to 2011 August, during which 319 ICMEs in total are listed in the catalog. For some ICMEs, the catalog also provides their corresponding CME information near the Sun, i.e., builds connections between ICMEs at the L1 point and corresponding CMEs near the Sun. In total 146 ICMEs have their corresponding information of CMEs observed by LASCO.

Employing the online catalog of LASCO CMEs (Gopalswamy et al. 2009), we first inspect the animations of LASCO and EIT, and try to find the source regions for each CME manually based on the temporal and spatial correlations. Then, the ICMEs are classified into three groups according to their source regions. In the 146 ICMEs with CME information, we eventually find the source regions for 96 cases, including 82 originating from active regions (Group I), 11 from quiet-Sun regions (Group II), and three from the intermediate regions (Group III). Group III means the source regions of CMEs covering both the active and quiet-Sun regions. In order to make the statistical results fully represent the differences between ICMEs from the active regions and quiet-Sun regions, the three ICMEs in Group III are not included in this survey study. Meanwhile, we also examine the GOES soft X-ray fluxes and find the associated flares for 72 active-region CMEs based on the GOES flare list. 5

The information for the 96 ICMEs with identified source regions is listed in Table 1. The first column gives the event number. Columns 2–4 show the disturbance time (typically related to the arrival of the ICME shock at Earth), and the start and end times of the ICME based on plasma and magnetic field observations. Column 5 is the time of the associated CME's first appearance in the field of view of LASCO. The next two columns display the CME group and the NOAA active-region numbers, and the last column shows the flare class associated with the CME. The active region number is acquired from the the Solar Monitor website, 6 and the flare information from the GOES flare list.

Table 1. Information on 96 ICMEs (CMEs) with Identified Source Regions

No.Disturbance Start TimeICME Start TimeICME End TimeCME in LASCOGroupActive Region No.Flare Class
11998 May 1 21:561998 May 2 05:001998 May 4 02:001998 Apr 29 16:58I08210M6.8
21998 Nov 7 08:151998 Nov 7 22:001998 Nov 9 01:001998 Nov 4 07:54I08375C1.6
31998 Nov 8 04:511998 Nov 9 01:001998 Nov 11 01:001998 Nov 5 20:44I08375M8.4
41998 Nov 13 01:431998 Nov 13 02:001998 Nov 14 12:001998 Nov 9 18:18I08378
51999 Apr 16 11:251999 Apr 16 18:001999 Apr 17 19:001999 Apr 13 03:30II
61999 Jun 26 20:161999 Jun 27 22:001999 Jun 29 04:001999 Jun 24 13:31I08595C4.1
71999 Jul 6 15:091999 Jul 06 21:001999 Jul 7 02:001999 Jul 3 19:54I08610
81999 Jul 26 23:331999 Jul 27 17:001999 Jul 29 12:001999 Jul 23 21:30I08636
91999 Jul 31 18:371999 Jul 31 19:001999 Aug 2 06:001999 Jul 28 09:06I08649M2.3
101999 Aug 11 23:001999 Aug 12 03:001999 Aug 14 00:001999 Aug 9 03:26I08657C4.3
111999 Aug 20 23:001999 Aug 20 23:001999 Aug 23 11:001999 Aug 17 13:31III
121999 Sep 22 12:221999 Sep 22 19:001999 Sep 24 03:001999 Sep 20 06:06II
131999 Oct 21 02:251999 Oct 21 08:001999 Oct 22 07:001999 Oct 18 00:06II
142000 Jan 22 00:232000 Jan 22 17:002000 Jan 23 02:002000 Jan 18 17:54I08831M3.9
152000 Feb 11 02:582000 Feb 11 16:002000 Feb 11 20:002000 Feb 08 09:30I08858M1.3
162000 Feb 11 23:522000 Feb 12 12:002000 Feb 13 00:002000 Feb 10 02:30I08858C7.3
172000 Feb 14 07:312000 Feb 14 12:002000 Feb 16 08:002000 Feb 12 04:31I08858M1.7
182000 Feb 20 21:392000 Feb 21 05:002000 Feb 22 12:002000 Feb 17 20:06I08872M2.5
192000 Apr 6 16:392000 Apr 7 06:002000 Apr 8 06:002000 Apr 04 16:32I08933C9.7
202000 Jun 4 15:022000 Jun 4 22:002000 Jun 6 22:002000 May 31 08:06II
212000 Jun 8 09:102000 Jun 8 12:002000 Jun 10 17:002000 Jun 6 15:54I09026X2.3
222000 Jul 15 14:372000 Jul 15 19:002000 Jul 17 08:002000 Jul 14 10:54I09077X5.7
232000 Jul 26 18:572000 Jul 27 02:002000 Jul 28 02:002000 Jul 23 05:30III
242000 Jul 28 06:342000 Jul 28 12:002000 Jul 30 13:002000 Jul 25 03:30I09097M8.0
252000 Aug 11 18:452000 Aug 12 05:002000 Aug 13 22:002000 Aug 9 16:30I09114C2.3
262000 Sep 8 12:002000 Sep 8 12:002000 Sep 10 10:002000 Sep 05 05:54I09152
272000 Oct 5 03:262000 Oct 5 13:002000 Oct 7 11:002000 Oct 2 20:26I09176
282000 Oct 28 09:542000 Oct 28 21:002000 Oct 29 22:002000 Oct 25 08:26I09199
292000 Dec 22 19:252000 Dec 23 00:002000 Dec 23 12:002000 Dec 18 11:50I09269C7.0
302001 Mar 3 11:212001 Mar 4 04:002001 Mar 05 02:002001 Feb 28 14:50I09364
312001 Mar 27 17:472001 Mar 28 17:002001 Mar 30 18:002001 Mar 25 17:06I09402C9.0
322001 Mar 31 00:522001 Mar 31 05:002001 Mar 31 22:002001 Mar 28 12:50I09397
332001 Mar 31 22:002001 Apr 1 04:002001 Apr 3 15:002001 Mar 29 10:26I09393X1.7
342001 Apr 4 14:552001 Apr 4 18:002001 Apr 5 12:002001 Apr 2 22:06I09393X20.0
352001 Apr 8 11:012001 Apr 8 14:002001 Apr 9 04:002001 Apr 6 19:30I09415X5.6
362001 Apr 11 13:432001 Apr 11 22:002001 Apr 13 07:002001 Apr 10 05:30I09415X2.3
372001 Apr 13 07:342001 Apr 13 09:002001 Apr 14 12:002001 Apr 11 13:31I09415M2.3
382001 Apr 28 05:012001 Apr 28 14:002001 May 1 02:002001 Apr 26 12:30I09433M7.8
392001 Sep 30 19:242001 Oct 1 08:002001 Oct 2 00:002001 Sep 28 08:54I09636M3.3
402001 Oct 1 21:152001 Oct 2 04:002001 Oct 2 12:002001 Sep 29 11:54I09636M1.8
412001 Oct 11 17:012001 Oct 12 04:002001 Oct 12 09:002001 Oct 9 11:30I09653M1.4
422001 Oct 21 16:482001 Oct 21 20:002001 Oct 25 10:002001 Oct 19 16:50I09661X1.6
432001 Oct 26 22:002001 Oct 27 03:002001 Oct 28 12:002001 Oct 22 18:26I09672X1.2
442001 Oct 28 03:192001 Oct 29 22:002001 Oct 31 13:002001 Oct 25 15:26I09672X1.3
452001 Nov 19 18:152001 Nov 19 22:002001 Nov 21 13:002001 Nov 17 05:30III
462001 Nov 24 06:562001 Nov 24 14:002001 Nov 25 20:002001 Nov 22 23:30I09704M9.9
472002 Mar 18 13:222002 Mar 19 05:002002 Mar 20 16:002002 Mar 15 23:06I09866M2.2
482002 Apr 17 11:072002 Apr 17 16:002002 Apr 19 15:002002 Apr 15 03:50I09906M1.2
492002 Apr 19 08:352002 Apr 20 00:002002 Apr 21 18:002002 Apr 17 08:26I09906M2.6
502002 May 11 10:142002 May 11 15:002002 May 12 00:002002 May 8 13:50I09934C4.2
512002 May 20 03:402002 May 20 10:002002 May 21 22:002002 May 16 00:50I09948C4.5
522002 May 23 10:502002 May 23 20:002002 May 25 18:002002 May 22 03:26II
532002 Jul 17 16:032002 Jul 18 12:002002 Jul 19 09:002002 Jul 15 20:30I10030X3.0
542002 Aug 18 18:462002 Aug 19 12:002002 Aug 21 14:002002 Aug 16 12:30I10069M5.2
552002 Sep 7 16:362002 Sep 8 04:002002 Sep 8 20:002002 Sep 5 16:54I10102C5.2
562002 Sep 19 06:002002 Sep 19 20:002002 Sep 20 21:002002 Sep 17 08:06I10114C8.6
572003 Feb 1 13:052003 Feb 1 19:002003 Feb 3 07:002003 Jun 30 10:06II
582003 Jun 16 18:002003 Jun 17 10:002003 Jun 18 08:002003 Jun 14 01:54II
592003 Oct 24 15:242003 Oct 24 21:002003 Oct 25 12:002003 Oct 22 08:30I10484
602003 Oct 28 02:062003 Oct 28 02:302003 Oct 28 09:002003 Oct 26 17:54I10484X1.2
612003 Oct 29 06:112003 Oct 29 11:002003 Oct 30 03:002003 Oct 28 11:30I10486X17.2
622003 Oct 30 16:192003 Oct 31 02:002003 Nov 2 00:002003 Oct 29 20:54I10486X10.0
632003 Nov 20 08:032003 Nov 20 10:002003 Nov 21 08:002003 Nov 18 08:50I10501M3.9
642004 Jan 22 01:372004 Jan 22 08:002004 Jan 23 17:002004 Jan 20 00:06I10540
652004 Jan 23 14:252004 Jan 23 23:002004 Jan 25 04:002004 Jan 21 04:54II
662004 Jul 22 10:362004 Jul 22 18:002004 Jul 24 08:002004 Jul 20 13:31I10652M8.6
672004 Jul 24 06:132004 Jul 24 14:002004 Jul 25 15:002004 Jul 22 07:31I10652C2.0
682004 Jul 25 15:002004 Jul 25 20:002004 Jul 26 22:002004 Jul 23 16:06I10652C1.0
692004 Jul 26 22:492004 Jul 27 02:002004 Jul 27 22:002004 Jul 25 14:54I10652M2.2
702004 Nov 7 18:272004 Nov 7 22:002004 Nov 9 10:002004 Nov 4 23:30I10696M5.4
712004 Nov 9 18:252004 Nov 9 20:002004 Nov 11 23:002004 Nov 7 16:54I10696X2.0
722004 Nov 11 17:102004 Nov 12 08:002004 Nov 13 23:002004 Nov 10 02:26I10696X2.5
732004 Dec 11 13:402004 Dec 12 22:002004 Dec 13 19:002004 Dec 8 20:26I10709C2.5
742005 Jan 08 17:002005 Jan 8 21:002005 Jan 09 18:002005 Jan 5 15:30II
752005 Jan 16 11:002005 Jan 16 14:002005 Jan 17 07:002005 Jan 13 17:54I10718C4.2
762005 Jan 18 21:002005 Jan 18 23:002005 Jan 20 03:002005 Jan 17 09:30I10720X3.8
772005 Jan 21 17:112005 Jan 21 19:002005 Jan 22 17:002005 Jan 20 06:54I10720X7.1
782005 Feb 20 12:002005 Feb 20 12:002005 Feb 22 07:002005 Feb 17 00:06I10734C4.9
792005 May 15 02:382005 May 15 06:002005 May 19 00:002005 May 13 17:12I10759M8.0
802005 May 20 03:002005 May 20 03:002005 May 22 02:002005 May 16 13:50I10759C1.2
812005 Jul 10 03:372005 Jul 10 10:002005 Jul 12 04:002005 Jul 7 17:06I10786M4.9
822005 Aug 9 00:002005 Aug 09 00:002005 Aug 9 19:002005 Aug 5 08:54I10792C2.6
832005 Aug 24 06:132005 Aug 24 14:002005 Aug 24 23:002005 Aug 22 01:31I10798M2.6
842005 Sep 2 14:192005 Sep 02 18:002005 Sep 3 04:002005 Aug 31 11:30I10803C2.0
852006 Jul 9 21:362006 Jul 10 21:002006 Jul 11 19:002006 Jul 6 08:54I10898M2.5
862006 Aug 19 11:312006 Aug 20 13:002006 Aug 21 16:002006 Aug 16 16:30I10904C3.6
872006 Dec 14 14:142006 Dec 14 22:002006 Dec 15 13:002006 Dec 13 02:54I10930X3.4
882006 Dec 16 17:552006 Dec 17 00:002006 Dec 17 17:002006 Dec 14 22:30I10930X1.5
892008 Dec 16 11:592008 Dec 17 03:002008 Dec 17 14:002008 Dec 12 08:54II
902010 Feb 11 00:002010 Feb 11 08:002010 Feb 12 03:002010 Feb 7 03:54I11045M6.4
912010 Apr 5 08:262010 Apr 5 12:002010 Apr 6 14:002010 Apr 3 10:33I11059B7.4
922010 Apr 11 13:042010 Apr 12 01:002010 Apr 12 15:002010 Apr 8 04:54I11060B1.5
932010 May 28 02:582010 May 28 19:002010 May 29 17:002010 May 24 14:06II
942011 Feb 18 01:302011 Feb 18 19:002011 Feb 20 08:002011 Feb 15 02:36I11158X2.2
952011 Aug 4 21:532011 Aug 05 05:002011 Aug 5 14:002011 Aug 2 06:36I11261M1.4
962011 Aug 5 17:512011 Aug 6 22:002011 Aug 7 22:002011 Aug 4 04:12I11261M9.3

Note. Note that Universal Time is used.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

3.2. Comparison between ICMEs from Different Regions

Figure 1 shows histograms of ionic charge states for ICMEs from active regions (red) and quiet-Sun regions (blue). In panels (a)–(f), the 〈QMg〉, 〈QFe〉, 〈QSi〉, C6+/C4+, C6+/C5+, and O7+/O6+ are displayed sequentially. Based on all of the corresponding data points we calculate the average values for each parameter, which are 9.424 (9.277), 12.510 (11.531), 10.279 (10.006), 9.630 (5.401), 2.055 (1.302), and 0.956 (0.606) correspondingly for ICMEs from active regions (quiet-Sun regions). These values are also marked with arrows in each panel. Overall, all of the ionic charge states are higher in ICMEs from active regions compared to those from quiet-Sun regions. This agrees with the expectation as the temperatures of reconnection regions are higher for active-region CMEs.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Histograms of 〈QMg〉 (a), 〈QFe〉 (b), 〈QSi〉 (c), C6+/C4+ (d), C6+/C5+ (e) and O7+/O6+ (f) in the ICMEs originating from active regions (red) and quiet-Sun regions (blue). The arrows and numbers in each panel indicate the corresponding average values.

Standard image High-resolution image

The histograms of the charge state of metallic elements (〈QMg〉, 〈QFe〉, and 〈QSi〉) show that they are obviously different for the two groups of ICMEs. The active-region ICMEs contain higher charge states. For example, the active-region ICMEs include a fraction of Fe ions with charge states higher than 16+, while the quiet-region ICMEs do not at all. For the nonmetallic elements, the average values of C6+/C4+, C6+/C5+, and O7+/O6+ within ICMEs from active regions are obviously higher than those from quiet-Sun regions by 78.3%, 57.8%, and 57.8%, respectively.

Figure 2 shows histograms of relative elemental abundances for ICMEs from active regions (red) and quiet-Sun regions (blue). The six panels display Mg/O, Fe/O, Si/O, C/O, Ne/O, and He/O sequentially, with the corresponding average values being displayed in each panel. It is obvious that the elemental abundances of active-region ICMEs contain a substantial fraction of higher abundances, and the average values of each parameter for active-region ICMEs are higher than those of the quiet-region ICMEs by 59.8% (from 0.184–0.294), 61.1% (from 0.185–0.298), 44.1% (from 0.179–0.258), 10.5% (from 0.486–0.537), 56.9% (from 0.167–0.262), and 71.7% (from 78.418–134.677), respectively. Note that large overlaps exist between the composition histograms of active-region and quiet-region ICMEs, although there are significant differences.

Figure 2.

Figure 2. Histograms of Mg/O (a), Fe/O (b), Si/O (c), C/O (d), Ne/O (e), and He/O (f) in the ICMEs originating from active regions (red) and quiet-Sun regions (blue). The arrows and numbers in each panel indicate the corresponding average values.

Standard image High-resolution image

3.3. Comparison between ICMEs with Different Flare Classes

The comparison between ICMEs from different regions clearly demonstrates that the active-region ICMEs have elevated ionic charge states and enriched elemental abundances, which should correlate with the high temperatures of the reconnection regions and magnetic structures of active regions. To further confirm this speculation, we examine the correlations between the composition of ICMEs and flare classes. As mentioned, we find the associated flares for 72 active-region ICMEs, including 21 (29, 20) events associated with C-class (M-class, X-class) flares, except for two ICMEs associated with B-class flares, which are not considered here due to their limited number.

Figure 3 presents histograms of 〈QMg〉, 〈QFe〉, 〈QSi〉, C6+/C4+, C6+/C5+, and O7+/O6+ for ICMEs associated with C-class (blue), M-class (orange), and X-class (red) flares. The arrows and numbers in each panel represent the corresponding mean values. To demonstrate the variations between ICMEs with weak and strong flares, we focus on the values of C-class and X-class flares. The average values for C-class flares are 9.323, 11.951, 10.062, 8.217, 1.832, and 0.679, respectively, while for X-class flares they are 9.570, 13.296, 10.557, 11.988, 2.322, and 1.319, respectively. It is clear that the ionic charge states of ICMEs associated with X-class flares are higher than those associated with C-class flares, in agreement with our expectation.

Figure 3.

Figure 3. Histograms of 〈QMg〉 (a), 〈QFe〉 (b), 〈QSi〉 (c), C6+/C4+ (d), C6+/C5+ (e), and O7+/O6+ (f) in the ICMEs associated with C-class (blue), M-class (orange), and X-class (red) flares. The arrows and numbers in each panel indicate the corresponding average values.

Standard image High-resolution image

Figure 4 displays histograms of Mg/O, Fe/O, Si/O, C/O, Ne/O, and He/O for ICMEs associated with C-class (blue), M-class (orange), and X-class (red) flares. Also, the arrows and numbers represent the corresponding means in each panel. The average values of each parameter associated with C-class (X-class) flares are 0.255 (0.336), 0.245 (0.320), 0.236 (0.276), 0.534 (0.536), 0.199 (0.388), and 122.649 (147.362), respectively. Again it is clear that the ICMEs associated with X-class flares possess higher elemental abundances compared to those associated with C-class flares. The statistical results shown in Figures 3 and 4 support that ICMEs associated with stronger flares possess more elevated ionic charge states and enriched elemental abundances. As both the M-class and X-class flares belong to strong events, the histograms of their composition are relatively similar.

Figure 4.

Figure 4. Histograms of Mg/O (a), Fe/O (b), Si/O (c), C/O (d), Ne/O (e), and He/O (f) in the ICMEs associated with C-class (blue), M-class (orange), and X-class (red) flares. The arrows and numbers in each panel indicate the corresponding average values.

Standard image High-resolution image

In addition, we perform a t-test using the Python routine stats.ttest_ind to examine whether the average values of the two groups are significantly different. The function runs the independent sample t-test and outputs a p-value and the test statistic. The p-value ranges from 0.0–1.0, and a small value (typically less than 0.05 or 0.01) indicates that the averages of the two groups are truly different. The t-test is conducted on all the compositional parameters as shown in Figures 14, i.e., between ICMEs from active regions and quiet-Sun regions, as well as ICMEs associated with C-class and X-class flares. The results show that almost all of the p-values are less than 0.01 except for that of the C/O of ICMEs associated with C-class and X-class flares, whose p-value is 0.928. This illustrates that most averages of the compositional parameters are significantly different at the 99% confidence level.

4. Summary and Discussion

Based on the ICME catalog available at the ACE science center (Richardson & Cane 2010) and the CME catalog at the CDAW (Gopalswamy et al. 2009), we manually found the source regions for 96 ICMEs from 1998–2011, including 82 from active regions, 11 from quiet-Sun regions, and three from the intermediate regions. The comparison of the composition of active-region and quiet-region ICMEs showed that the events from active regions possess elevated ionic charge states and enriched elemental abundances compared to those from quiet-Sun regions. For the 82 active-region ICMEs, we found the corresponding flares for 72 of them, including 21 (29, 20) events associated with C-class (M-class, X-class) flares, except for two events associated with B-class flares. The comparison between ICMEs with different flare classes demonstrated that ICMEs associated with X-class flares exhibited higher charge states and elemental abundances (except the C/O) compared to C-class flares.

Our survey studies support that the elevated charge states within ICMEs mainly result from the higher temperatures of reconnection regions during solar eruptions (Lepri & Zurbuchen 2004; Song et al. 2016), and agree with the expectations of popular CME models (Mikic & Linker 1994; Antiochos et al. 1999; Lin & Forbes 2000; Moore et al. 2001; Török et al. 2004; Kliem & Török 2006; Chen 2008). Our studies also support that the elemental abundances within ICMEs depend on both the magnetic structures of source regions and the X-ray features of associated flares, which are mainly correlated with the FIP effect (Laming 2004, 2015) and photoionization (Shemi 1991; Schmelz 1993), respectively. Further discussion can be found in Song et al. (2021) and Song et al. (2022).

As mentioned, previous studies have shown that the composition of ICMEs (Gu et al. 2020; Song et al. 2021, 2022) and slow solar wind (Aellig et al. 2001; Kasper et al. 2007; McIntosh et al. 2011; Kasper et al. 2012; Lepri et al. 2013; Alterman & Kasper 2019; Alterman et al. 2021) have an obvious solar cycle dependence. The solar cycle is well represented by the sunspot number, and the number of active regions increases from the solar minimum to the maximum. Therefore, it is natural that more CMEs occur in active regions around the solar maximum, which leads to more fractions of ICMEs detected near 1 au originating from active regions and are associated with stronger flares. This might answer why the composition of ICMEs measured near 1 au exhibits a solar cycle dependence (Song et al. 2021, 2022).

The situation is similar for slow solar wind, which can emanate from both active regions and quiet-Sun regions (e.g., Zhao et al. 2017a). More fractions of slow wind emanate from active (quiet-Sun) regions around the solar maximum (minimum; e.g., Fu et al. 2017); thus, the composition of slow wind measured near 1 au also exhibits the solar cycle dependence (Lepri et al. 2013; Song et al. 2022). On the contrary, the fast solar wind always originates from coronal holes, which leads to their composition, such as He abundance, detected near 1 au not exhibiting variation as obvious as that of the slow wind (Alterman & Kasper 2019; Alterman et al. 2021; Song et al. 2022) and ICMEs (Song et al. 2022) during the solar cycle.

The FIP effect is the main feature of the elemental abundance of the slow wind and ICMEs, while the gravitational settling (Raymond et al. 1997; Lenz et al. 1998; Raymond et al.1998; Raymond 1999) can modify signatures of the FIP effect in both the slow wind (Weberg et al. 2012) and ICMEs (Rivera et al. 2022). Rivera et al. (2022) reported that the ICMEs between 1998 and 2011 exhibited some gravitational settling effects in ∼33% of the ICME periods. They also found that the effect is most prominent during the solar minimum. The gravitational settling induces mass-proportional depletion of elements in the corona, and leads to the decrease of relative abundances such as Fe/O. This could also be a factor responsible for the solar cycle dependence of the relative abundances of partial heavy elements (Song et al. 2021).

The histograms of Mg/O, Fe/O, and Si/O shown in Figure 2 support the idea of strong FIP enhancement in active regions, while the Ne/O and He/O distributions do not as the FIPs of Ne (21.56 eV) and He (24.58 eV) are higher than that of O (13.61 eV). Song et al. (2021) suggested that the enhanced Ne/O in ICMEs from active regions could result from the photoionization effect of flares (Shemi 1991; Schmelz 1993). The pre-flare soft X-ray can create a slab-like region of nonthermal ionization ratios at the chromosphere base (Shemi 1991). As the photoionization cross-section ratio of Ne and O is 9:4 (Yeh & Lindau 1985) and the photoionized O can recombine through the charge transfer reaction with the neutral H, the Ne ions are mixed with the neutral O in the slab region and selected with the thermally ionized low-FIP elements for preferential transfer to the solar corona and ICMEs (Song et al. 2021).

Besides, there exist bare ion anomalies in both slow wind (Zhao et al. 2017b; Raymond et al. 2022) and ICMEs (Kocher et al. 2017), in which C6+ and other fully stripped ions are unusually low and they are called outlier wind or ICMEs. Rivera et al. (2021) reported that Ne/O is enhanced in the outlier ICMEs, which can also contribute to the high Ne/O of ICMEs from active regions. The number of outlier events is positively correlated with the solar cycle, so it could be another factor responsible for the solar cycle dependence of the relative abundances of some elements (Song et al. 2021).

However, both the photoionization effect and outlier can not explain the high He/O in active-region ICMEs because O has a larger photoionization cross section than He (Yeh & Lindau 1985) and the unusually low He2+ density of outlier ICMEs reduces the He/O (not shown). Since the mass of O is heavier than that of He, the gravitational settling might be adopted to explain the high He/O in active regions. More studies are necessary to clarify this speculation.

We thank the referee (Dr. J. Raymond) for the helpful comments and suggestions. Hongqiang Song thanks Drs. Xin Cheng and Bo Li for their discussions. We acknowledge the use of the ICME catalog at the ACE science center (Richardson & Cane 2010) and the CME catalog at CDAW (Gopalswamy et al. 2009). All the SWICS data are downloaded from the ACE science center. This work is supported by the NSFC grants U2031109, 11973031, and 12073042, and the National Key R&D Program of China 2022YFF0503003 (2022YFF0503000). H.S. is also supported by the CAS grant XDA-17040507.

Footnotes

Please wait… references are loading.
10.3847/1538-4357/acba90