A publishing partnership

Central Magnetic Field of a Magnetic White Dwarf Star

and

Published 2017 July 13 © 2017. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation Hridaya Shah and Kunnat Sebastian 2017 ApJ 843 131 DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/aa74dd

Download Article PDF
DownloadArticle ePub

You need an eReader or compatible software to experience the benefits of the ePub3 file format.

0004-637X/843/2/131

Abstract

Observations of over-luminous Type 1a supernovae have prompted researchers to come up with various hypotheses in order to explain them. One hypothesis is based on the explosion of a progenitor super-massive magnetic white dwarf star. These stars are assumed to have very strong magnetic fields inside of them. However, there is a lack of analytic proof of the existence of such magnetic fields in the magnetic white dwarf stars. In this work, we plan to address an analytic proof of the existence of very strong magnetic fields in the center of these magnetic white dwarfs. We will see that for a one Landau-level white dwarf star, with central density ${10}^{9}\mbox{--}{10}^{11}\,{\rm{g}}\,{\mathrm{cm}}^{-3}$, it is possible to have central magnetic fields of the order of ${10}^{13}\mbox{--}{10}^{15}G$ at least. In the presence of strong magnetic fields, the threshold densities chosen for this work that correspond to instabilities due to general relativity and pycnonuclear reactions have been found to increase so that the matter does not acquire instability at such central densities.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

1. Introduction

In recent years, some observations of over-luminous Type 1a supernovae have generated much interest in the astrophysical community. It has been proposed that the progenitor star of such a supernova is probably a super-massive white dwarf (WD) star in the mass range 2.4–2.8 solar masses (${M}_{\odot }$), which is much more than the Chandrasekhar limit of $1.44\,{M}_{\odot }$ (Howell et al. 2006; Scalzo et al. 2010). Some researchers have hypothesized the existence of very strong magnetic fields inside of the star in order to explain such a mass range (Das & Mukhopadhyay 2012).

One of the ways in which magnetic fields can be maintained once they are generated is by an alignment of spin magnetic moment of electrons. Unfortunately, there is no elementary-level derivation of the existence of strong magnetic fields of the order of ${10}^{13-15}G$ in the center of a magnetic white dwarf (MWD). In this work, we will address this issue by providing one such calculation for a cold, degenerate, extremely relativistic electron gas in a magnetic field. For simplicity, we have considered a spherically symmetric star. Also as a crude approximation, the magnetic field is static and almost uniform at every point inside the star, regardless of its direction. The magnetic field is assumed to be so strong that only one Landau level is occupied.

2. Calculation of the Central Magnetic Field for a One-Landau-level White Dwarf Star

The calculation given below is a theoretical proof of the existence of a very strong magnetic field $(\geqslant {10}^{13}G)$ in the center of an MWD. The resultant magnetic field at a field point ${\boldsymbol{r}}$ can be found from the equation (Wangsness 1986)

Equation (1)

where ${\mu }_{0}=4\pi \times {10}^{-7}{{NA}}^{-2}$ is the permeability of free space, $\bigtriangleup {\boldsymbol{r}}={\boldsymbol{r}}-{\boldsymbol{r}}^{\prime} $ is the position vector of the field point ${\boldsymbol{r}}$ relative to a source point ${\boldsymbol{r}}^{\prime} $, while ${{\boldsymbol{J}}}_{m}$ and ${{\boldsymbol{K}}}_{m}$ are, respectively, the magnetization (sometimes also called Amperian or bound) volume and surface current densities defined as

Equation (2)

and

Equation (3)

$V^{\prime} $ is the volume of the star and $S^{\prime} $ is the surface bounding this volume. The primes refer to the source point coordinates. There, of course, cannot be a surface current ${{\boldsymbol{K}}}_{m}$ inside of the star. Here, ${\boldsymbol{M}}$ is called magnetization or the magnetic dipole moment ${\boldsymbol{\mu }}$ per unit volume $\tau ^{\prime} $, and $\hat{n^{\prime} }$ is the outward normal to the volume. For most of what follows, the Appendix provides helpful information. We can write the magnetization ${\boldsymbol{M}}$ as

Equation (4)

If N is the total number of electrons in the volume $\tau ^{\prime} $, then by using Equations (27) and (42) in the Appendix we can write ${{\boldsymbol{\mu }}}_{\mathrm{total}}$ as

Equation (5)

where ${\mu }_{{sz}}$ is the z-component of the spin magnetic moment of an electron given by

Equation (6)

where g is the Landé g-factor which has a value very close to 2, ${S}_{z}=\tfrac{{\hslash }}{2}{\sigma }_{z}$, and ${\mu }_{{\rm{B}}}$ is the Bohr magneton. Notice that ${\sigma }_{z}=-1$ as mentioned in the Appendix. Therefore, Equation (4), with the use of Equations (5) and (43), becomes

Equation (7)

letting

Equation (8)

Using Equation (7), the equations for ${{\boldsymbol{J}}}_{m}$ and ${{\boldsymbol{K}}}_{m}$ become

Equation (9)

and at $r^{\prime} =R$ (the stellar radius)

Equation (10)

since $R=a{\xi }_{1}$ and ${\xi }_{1}=\pi $, which is the upper limit of ξ restricted by the fact that the value of Θ must not become negative because then ρ becomes negative as can be seen from Equation (44) i.e., the boundary of the star is defined by $\xi ={\xi }_{1}=\pi $. Also, in the above equation $\hat{n^{\prime} }$ becomes $\hat{r^{\prime} }$ at the boundary of the star. Therefore, Equation (1) becomes

Equation (11)

For simplicity, we can evaluate the above equation for a field point along the positive z-axis. Using

Equation (12)

and

Equation (13)

the magnetic field ${\boldsymbol{B}}$ can be found as follows:

Equation (14)

Here $\theta ^{\prime} $ is the angle between ${\boldsymbol{r}}$ and ${\boldsymbol{r}}^{\prime} $. In the above equation, we have made use of

Equation (15)

and

Equation (16)

so that the $\hat{x}$ and $\hat{y}$ components vanish on integrating over $\phi ^{\prime} $ and we are left with only the z-component of ${\boldsymbol{B}}$. Using Equations (9) and (13), we have

Equation (17)

Making use of the table of integrals after letting $\mu =\cos \theta ^{\prime} $ in the above equation and then integrating it with respect to the variable μ from the new limits −1 to 1, we get

Equation (18)

This integral has been split into parts in order to include contributions from all of the source points $0\leqslant r^{\prime} \leqslant z$ and $z\leqslant r^{\prime} \leqslant R$. See Figure 1 for further clarification. Indicated in the diagram are the position vectors of the source and field points: ${\boldsymbol{r}}^{\prime} $ and ${\boldsymbol{z}}$, as well as their difference vector, $\bigtriangleup {\boldsymbol{r}}$. The integral above has taken into account contributions from all such source point vectors ${\boldsymbol{r}}^{\prime} $, in order to find the magnetic field at an arbitrary field point ${\boldsymbol{z}}$ within the star. Because we are, in particular, interested in finding the central B-field; i.e., field at the center of the star, we expand the sine and cosine functions in the above equation into a Taylor series and also neglect terms of higher order for $z/a\ll 1$ to get

Equation (19)

as $z\to 0$. Substituting Equation (8) into Equation (19), we get the central magnetic field Bcen as

Equation (20)

which for central densities in the range ${10}^{12-14}{{\rm{kg\; m}}}^{-3}$ becomes

Equation (21)

i.e., the lower limit of central magnetic field is of the order of ${10}^{13\mbox{--}15}G$.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Calculation of the magnetic field at an arbitrary point on the z-axis within the star.

Standard image High-resolution image

3. Justification for Such a Spin Alignment inside of the Star

The spin alignment is assumed to have begun when the star was still a main-sequence star. Volume and surface currents would be the source of a magnetic field in such a star. Such a non-zero initial field would start the spin alignment process. When this star collapses to become a degenerate star like a WD, invoking flux conservation, one can justify for the magnetic field amplification (Woltjer 1964).

Also, while in a single-degenerate binary star system, such an MWD could accrete mass from its companion star and shrink in size because of increased gravitational contraction (Das & Mukhopadhyay 2013; Das et al. 2013). The magnetic flux could, again, be conserved in this process and become further amplified. This quasi-equilibrium situation of accretion and shrinking continues until the magnetic field exceeds the critical field Bcr and, for some values of the magnetic field as well as Fermi energy, only one Landau level is occupied (Das & Mukhopadhyay 2013; Das et al. 2013). This means that all of the electrons inside of the WD have been aligned in the spin-down state. In the extreme relativistic case, there would then be volume current densities ${{\boldsymbol{J}}}_{m}$ in the $\hat{\phi }$-direction, as can be seen from Equation (9). They are responsible for maintaining such a strong field once it has been generated.

A very common source of confusion is the model of an electron gas in an external magnetic field. The interaction energy of a dipole in a magnetic field is $-{\boldsymbol{\mu }}.{\boldsymbol{B}}$, where B is the local field. B is the field that is present at the location of the dipole if the dipole were to be removed, assuming, of course that this does not affect the surroundings. The presence of this field could be due to an external applied field, as well as due to the presence of the field of the other dipoles in the specimen (Mandl 1988). In our case, the presence of this local field would be due to the magnetization currents, and also the field of the other dipoles that produce the magnetization ${\boldsymbol{M}}$. Thus, we can see that if the equation of state in a magnetic field obeys a relation as given in Equation (38); i.e., for an extremely relativistic situation, we can have central magnetic fields at least of the order of 1013–15G, depending on the density.

4. Summary

In this work, we have given a sample calculation estimating the magnetic field at the center of a magnetic white dwarf star proving that if all of the electrons inside of the star were aligned in the spin-down state by volume current densities, then a very strong central B-field is certainly possible. Although the proof given above is for a simple model and is strictly theoretical, this might also be a possibility in an actual physical star if its equation of state very closely matches $P\propto {\rho }^{2}$. It is as if the whole star is one giant structure of highly ordered magnetic domains. It would certainly be interesting to see if similar calculations are possible for other equations of state.

We thank the anonymous referee for the invaluable suggestions that helped improve the quality of our manuscript.

Appendix: Equation of State of a One-Landau-level Extremely Relativistic Electron Gas in a Magnetic Field

On solving the relativistic Dirac equation, one obtains the energy eigenvalues of a free electron in an external static and a uniform magnetic field oriented in the z-direction, which are given by Lai & Shapiro (1991):

Equation (22)

where $\nu =n+\tfrac{1}{2}+\tfrac{1}{2}{\sigma }_{z}$ is the Landau quantum number and can take on values $\nu =0,1,2,\ldots $, which are known as Landau levels. Here, $n=0,1,2,\ldots $ is the principal quantum number, ${\sigma }_{z}=\pm 1$ is the spin quantum number or the spin of the electron, and $b=\tfrac{B}{{B}_{{cr}}}$ is the dimensionless magnetic field. The critical value of magnetic field Bcr is given by Lai & Shapiro (1991) and Das & Mukhopadhyay (2012) as

Equation (23)

Notice that for one Landau level (i.e., $\nu =0$) case that has been considered, ${\sigma }_{z}=-1$. This means that all of the electrons inside of the star are aligned in the spin-down state. The number density ne of a relativistic electron gas in a volume V in a magnetic field is given by Lai & Shapiro (1991) and Das & Mukhopadhyay (2012) as

Equation (24)

where ${-\kern-5.0pt\lambda} =\tfrac{{\hslash }}{{mc}}$ is the Compton wavelength of an electron, ${D}_{\nu }$ is the degeneracy of the Landau level ν such that ${D}_{\nu }=1$ for $\nu =0$ and ${D}_{\nu }=2$ for $\nu \geqslant 0$, and ${x}_{F}(\nu )=\tfrac{{p}_{F}(\nu )}{{mc}}$ is the unitless Fermi momentum defined by Lai & Shapiro (1991) and Das & Mukhopadhyay (2012) as

Equation (25)

where ${\epsilon }_{F}=\tfrac{{E}_{F}}{{{mc}}^{2}}$ is the unitless Fermi energy. The upper limit of the summation ${\nu }_{m}$ is defined by

Equation (26)

where ${\epsilon }_{F\max }=\tfrac{{E}_{F\max }}{{{mc}}^{2}}$ is the unitless maximum Fermi energy of the system. The matter density ρ is related to the electron number density via

Equation (27)

where ${\mu }_{e}$ is the mean molecular weight per electron and ${m}_{H}$ is the mass of a hydrogen atom. The electron energy density ${\varepsilon }_{e}$ at $T=0K$ is

Equation (28)

where

Equation (29)

and the pressure due to such a gas is given by Lai & Shapiro (1991) and Das & Mukhopadhyay (2012) as

Equation (30)

where

Equation (31)

Shown below is a simple calculation that gives the equation of state in the extreme relativistic limit (i.e., ${E}_{F}\gg {{mc}}^{2}$ or ${\epsilon }_{F}\gg 1$) for a one-Landau-level system (i.e., for $\nu =0$).

The electron energy density ${\varepsilon }_{e}$ and the electron number density ne, corresponding to $\nu =0$, can be found from Equations (28), (29), (24), and (25) to be, respectively,

Equation (32)

and

Equation (33)

where

Equation (34)

Now, in the extreme relativistic limit, Equations (32) and (33), respectively, become

Equation (35)

and

Equation (36)

Substituting the above two equations into Equation (30) we get

Equation (37)

The matter density inside of the WD is given by Equation (27). Therefore, combining Equations (27), (34), (36), and (37) we get

Equation (38)

where

Equation (39)

is a constant for a particular value of magnetic field. Pressure and density of a polytropic star can be respectively expressed (Chandrasekhar 1958) as

Equation (40)

Equation (41)

where K is a constant, ${\rho }_{c}$ is the central density of the star, Θ is a dimensionless variable, and n is the polytropic index. Comparing Equation (38) with Equation (40) gives us n = 1. The solution of the Lane–Emden equation corresponding to this polytropic index (Chandrasekhar 1958) is given by

Equation (42)

where the dimensionless variable ξ is related to the radial distance r by

Equation (43)

where a is a scaling factor. Therefore, we have for a n = 1 polytrope

Equation (44)

Please wait… references are loading.
10.3847/1538-4357/aa74dd