Skip to main content
Log in

Explicit and implicit memory for the QWERTY keyboard: the role of motor simulation and deictic gestures

  • Published:
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In three experiments, we investigated explicit and implicit knowledge about the location of letters on the QWERTY keyboard in young students, and the mechanisms involved. Participants completed a verbal report task in which they were asked to locate the 21 letters of the Italian alphabet on a blank QWERTY keyboard (explicit memory). Subsequently, they carried out a motor production task, i.e., typing letters on a blank keyboard (implicit memory). Consistent with previous studies and several theories emphasizing the importance of implicit knowledge in typing, results showed that explicit knowledge about the QWERTY keyboard is systematically worse than procedural knowledge (Experiment 1). These two types of knowledge, however, are related. Second, we showed that explicit memory for letter position was affected when participants were engaged in a secondary task that required hands/arms movements. Specifically, loading participants’ sensorimotor resources led to a decrease in explicit memory performance when the secondary task required hand/arm movements (hand/arms tapping) compared to when it required legs-feet movements (control condition). This result suggests that explicit knowledge is modulated by sensorimotor simulation (Experiment 2). Third, compared to a purely verbal response, pointing to the key on the keyboard did not improve explicit memory accuracy (Experiment 3). Taken together, the results indicate that sensorimotor simulation, and not just gestures, modulates the accessibility to explicit mental representations of verbal/spatial material, like letters on a keyboard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data and scripts are available via the Open Science Framework at: https://osf.io/xfh8v/

References

  • Alibali, M. W., Kita, S., & Young, A. J. (2000). Gesture and the process of speech production: We think, therefore we gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 593–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, D. J. (2013). Random effects structure for testing interactions in linear mixed-effects models. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 328.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breedlove, S. M., Watson, N. V., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (2010). Biological psychology: An introduction to behavioral, cognitive, and clinical neuroscience. Sinauer Associates.

  • Broaders, S. C., Cook, S. W., Mitchell, Z., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2007). Making children gesture brings out implicit knowledge and leads to learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 539–550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, H., & Xu, X. (2011). Representational gesture, pointing gesture, and memory recall of preschool children. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 35, 155–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church, R. B., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1986). The mismatch between gesture and speech as an index of transitional knowledge. Cognition, 23, 43–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crump, M. J., & Logan, G. D. (2010). Hierarchical control and skilled typing: Evidence for word-level control over the execution of individual keystrokes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1369–1380.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dargue, N., Sweller, N., & Jones, M. P. (2019). When our hands help us understand: A meta-analysis into the effects of gesture on comprehension. Psychological Bulletin, 145, 765–784.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Díez-Álamo, A. M., Díez, E., Alonso, M. A., & Fernandez, A. (2019). Absence of posture-dependent and posture-congruent memory effects on the recall of action sentences. PLoS One, 14(12), e0226297.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, K., & Post, L. (2015). Mechanisms of embodiment. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1525.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, K., Kaschak, M. P., & Zwaan, R. A. (2007). Body posture facilitates retrieval of autobiographical memories. Cognition, 102, 139–149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dutriaux, L., Dahiez, X., & Gyselinck, V. (2019). How to change your memory of an object with a posture and a verb. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 1112–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichenbaum, H., & Cohen, N. J. (2001). From conditioning to conscious recollection: Memory systems of the brain. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Garber, P., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2002). Gesture offers insight into problem‐solving in adults and children. Cognitive Science, 26(6), 817–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D. R., Grudin, J. T., Larochelle, S., Norman, D. A., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1983). A glossary of terms including a classification of typing errors. In Cognitive aspects of skilled typewriting (pp. 39–43). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). When gesture does and does not promote learning. Language and Cognition, 2, 1–19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin-Meadow, S., Levine, S. C., Zinchenko, E., Yip, T. K., Hemani, N., & Factor, L. (2012). Doing gesture promotes learning a mental transformation task better than seeing gesture. Developmental Science, 15, 876–884.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Grudin, J. T. (1983). Error patterns in novice and skilled transcription typing. In Cognitive aspects of skilled typewriting (pp. 121-143). New York, NY: Springer New York.

  • Halvorson, K. M., Bushinski, A., & Hilverman, C. (2019). The role of motor context in the beneficial effects of hand gesture on memory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81, 2354–2364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hostetter, A. B., & Alibali, M. W. (2008). Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 495–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hostetter, A. B., & Alibali, M. W. (2019). Gesture as simulated action: Revisiting the framework. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26, 721–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hothorn, T., Bretz, F., & Westfall, P. (2008). Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical Journal, 50, 346–363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ianì, F. (2019). Embodied memories: Reviewing the role of the body in memory processes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26, 1747–1766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ianì, F., & Bucciarelli, M. (2018). Relevance of the listener’s motor system in recalling phrases enacted by the speaker. Memory, 26, 1084–1092.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ianì, F., Burin, D., Salatino, A., Pia, L., Ricci, R., & Bucciarelli, M. (2018). The beneficial effect of a speaker’s gestures on the listener’s memory for action phrases: The pivotal role of the listener’s premotor cortex. Brain and Language, 180, 8–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ianì, F., Limata, T., Mazzoni, G., & Bucciarelli, M. (2021). Observer’s body posture affects processing of other humans’ actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74, 1595–1604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarosz, A. F., & Wiley, J. (2014). What are the odds? A practical guide to computing and reporting Bayes factors. The Journal of Problem Solving, 7, 2–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, R., & Johansson, M. (2014). Look here, eye movements play a functional role in memory retrieval. Psychological Science, 25, 236–242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kita, S., Alibali, M. W., & Chu, M. (2017). How do gestures influence thinking and speaking? The gesture-for-conceptualization hypothesis. Psychological Review, 124, 245–266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klooster, N. B., Cook, S. W., Uc, E. Y., & Duff, M. C. (2015). Gestures make memories, but what kind? Patients with impaired procedural memory display disruptions in gesture production and comprehension. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1054.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, A. C., Sloboda, J. A., & Woody, R. H. (2007). Psychology for musicians: Understanding and acquiring the skills. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Limata, T., Bucciarelli, M., Schmidt, S., Tinti, C., Ras, I. N., & Ianì, F. (2023). Action and posture influence the retrieval of memory for objects. Memory, 652–664.

  • Lisboa, T., Chaffin, R., & Begosh, K. T. (2010). Learning and memorizing in music performance: The role of performance cues. CEPROM XVIII: The musician in Creative and Educational Spaces of the 21st Century, 73.

  • Logan, G. D., & Crump, M. J. (2009). The left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing: The disruptive effects of attention to the hands in skilled typewriting. Psychological Science, 20, 1296–1300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D., & Crump, M. J. (2011). Hierarchical control of cognitive processes: The case for skilled typewriting. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 54, pp. 1–27). Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D., & Zbrodoff, N. J. (1998). Stroop-type interference: Congruity effects in color naming with typewritten responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 978–992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüdecke, D. (2018). Sjstats: Statistical functions for regression models. R package version 0.14. 0.

  • Macken, L., & Ginns, P. (2014). Pointing and tracing gestures may enhance anatomy and physiology learning. Medical Teacher, 36, 596–601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masumoto, K., Yamaguchi, M., Sutani, K., Tsuneto, S., Fujita, A., & Tonoike, M. (2006). Reactivation of physical motor information in the memory of action events. Brain Research, 1101, 102–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pinet, S., Zielinski, C., Alario, F., & Longcamp, M. (2022). Typing expertise in a large student population. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 7, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. D., & Thomas, L. E. (2021). Handbook of embodied psychology. Cham Switzerland: Springer International.

  • Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, K. M., Ashitaka, Y., Shimada, H., Ulrich, J. E., & Logan, G. D. (2014). What skilled typists don’t know about the QWERTY keyboard. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 162–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevanoni, E., & Salmon, K. (2005). Giving memory a hand: Instructing children to gesture enhances their event recall. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29, 217–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapp, K. M., & Logan, G. D. (2011). Attention to the hands disrupts skilled typewriting: The role of vision in producing the disruption. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 2379–2383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vendetti, M., Castel, A. D., & Holyoak, K. J. (2013). The floor effect: Impoverished spatial memory for elevator buttons. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 636–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes, C., Kydd, R., Sagar, M., & Broadbent, E. (2017). Upright posture improves affect and fatigue in people with depressive symptoms. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 54, 143–149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Willems, R. M., & Francken, J. C. (2012). Embodied cognition: Taking the next step. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 582.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, S. J., Gallo, D. A., & Beilock, S. L. (2009). Embodied memory judgments: A case of motor fluency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1359–1365.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Ianì.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Text of the typing test used in Experiments 2 and 3

  1. 1.

    Poi andarono alla ricreazione ma prima presero tutti i loro panieri con dentro la colazione che erano appesi ai muri dalle ore cinque.

  2. 2.

    In quel momento si fermava una carrozza davanti alla porta e poco dopo comparve il direttore col ragazzo in braccio col viso bianco e gli occhi chiusi.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ianì, F., Stockner, M. & Mazzoni, G. Explicit and implicit memory for the QWERTY keyboard: the role of motor simulation and deictic gestures. Atten Percept Psychophys 86, 602–615 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-023-02829-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-023-02829-8

Keywords

Navigation