Abstract
In an attempt to elucidate the nature of the subject’s strategy in a two-interval forcedchoice auditory detection task, event-related potentials were studied at two intensities which yielded mean accuracies of 82% and 98%. Subjects reported the observation interval in which they judged the signal to be present and the confidence of the judgment. Principal components varimax analyses yielded four components: a CZ maximal P300, a Slow Wave, a slow negative shift, and a late negative component. The P300 amplitude findings suggest that different strategies are utilized for high-confidence and low-confidence detections. At high confidence, P300 amplitude is large for the observation interval in which the signal is presented, indicating a strategy involving serial independent detection. However, the P300 latency findings at high confidence suggest that absence of the signal in the first observation interval is nonetheless noted: P300 latency in response to signal presence is shorter for the second observation interval than for the first observation interval. At low confidence, P300 is small or absent for both observation intervals, indicating a deferred decision, presumably arrived at through comparison of the two percepts.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference Note
Friedman, D.P300 and slow wave: The effects of quartile revisited. Paper presented at the Society for Psychophysiolngical Research meeting, Washington, D.C., October 1981.
References
Barrett, C., Halliday, A. M., Halliday, E., &Rudolf, N. de M. The later components of the somatosensory evoked potential and the P300 in a threshold detection task. In J. E. Desmedt (Ed.),Cognitive components in cerebral eventrelated potentials and selective attention. Progress in clinical neurophysiology. Basel: Karger, 1979.
Campbell, K. B., Courchesne, E., Picton, T. W., &Squires, Z. C. Evoked potential correlates of human information processing.Biological Psychology, 1979,8, 45–68.
Duncan-Johnson, C. C. P300 latency: A new metric of information processing.Psychophysiology, 1981,18, 207–215.
Duncan-Johnson, C. C., &Donchin, E. On quantifying surprise: The variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability.Psychophysiology, 1977,14, 456–467.
Egan, J. P., Greenberg, G. Z., &Schulman, A. I. Interval of time uncertainty in auditory detection. In J. A. Swets (Ed.),Signal detection and recognition by human observers. New York: Wiley, 1964.
Emmerich, D. S., Gray, J. L., Watson, C. S., &Tanis, D. C. Response latency, confidence, and ROCs in auditory signal detection.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,11, 65–72.
Fitzgerald, P. G., &Picton, T. W. Temporal and sequential probability in evoked potential studies.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1981,35, 188–200.
Friedman, D., Simson, R., Ritter, W., &Rapin, I. The late positive component (P300) and information processing in sentences.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1975,38, 255–262.
Friedman, D., Vaughan, H. G., Jr., &Erlznmever-Kimling, L. Stimulus and response related components of the late positive complex in visual discrimination tasks.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1978,45, 319–330.
Hillyard, S. A., Courchesne, E., Krausz, H. I., &Picton, T. W. Scalp topography of the P3 wave in different auditory decision tasks. In W. C. McCallum & J. R. Knott (Eds.),The responsive brain. Bristol: Wright, 1976.
Hillyard, S. A., Squires, K., Bauer, J. W., &Lindsay, P. H. Evoked potential correlates of auditory signal detection.Science, 1971,172, 1357–1360.
Jennings, J. R., &Woods, C. The ε-adjustment for repeatedmeasures analysis of variance.Psychophysiology, 1976,13, 277–278.
Johnson, R., Jr., &Donchin, E. Sequential expectancies and decision making in a changing environment: An electrophysiological approach.Psychophysiology, 1982,19, 183–200.
Kerkhof, G. A. Event-related potentials and auditory signal detection: Their diurnal variation for morning-type and eveningtype subjects.Psychophysiology, 1982,19, 94–103.
Picton, T. W., Campbell, K. B., Baribeau-Braun, J., &Proulx, G. B. The neurophysiology of human attention: A tutorial review. In J. Requin (Ed.),Attention and performance VII. Hillsdale, N. J: Erlbanm, 1978.
Renault, B., &Lesevre, N. A trial by trial study of the visual omission response in reaction time situations. In D. Lehmann & E. Callaway (Eds.),Human evoked potentials: Applications and problems. New York: Plenum, 1979.
Ritter, W., Simeon, R., Vaughan, H. G., Jr., &Friedman, D. A brain event related to the making of a sensory discrimination.Science, 1979,203, 1358–1361.
Ritter, W., &Vaughan, H. G., Jr. Averaged evoked responses in vigilance and discrimination: A reassessment.Science, 1969,164, 326–328.
Ruchkin, D. S., Munson, R., Sutton, S., & Kietzman, M. L. P300 and Slow Wave in a message consisting of two events.Psychophysiology, in press.
Ruchkin, D. S., &Sutton, S. Emitted P300 potentials and temporal uncertainty.Electroencephaiography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1978,45, 268–277. (a)
Ruchkin, D. S., &Sutton, S. Equivocation and P300 amplitude. In D. Otto (Ed.),Muitidisciplinary perspectives in event-related brain potential research. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1978. (b)
Ruchkin, D. S., & Sutton, S. P300 and slow wave—Association and dissociation. In A. W. K. fnOaillard & W. Ritter (Eds.),Tutorials in event related potential research: Endogenous components. Amsterdam: North Holland, in press.
Ruchkin, D. S., Sutton, S., Kietzman, M. L., &Silver, K. Slow Wave and P300 in signal detection.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1980,50, 35–47.
Ruchkin, D. S., Sutton, S., &Stega, M. Emitted P300 and slow wave potentials in guessing and detection tasks.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1980,49, 1–14.
Schulman, A. I., &Mitchell, R. R. Operating characteristics from yes/no and forced-choice procedures.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1966,40, 473–477.
Shelburne, S. A., Jr. Visual evoked responses to word and nonsense syllable stimuli.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1972,32, 17–25.
Squires, K., Donchin, E., Hernino, R. T., &Mccarthy, G. On the influence of task relevance and stimulus probability on event-related potential components.EIectroencepha/ography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1977,42, 1–14.
Squires, K., Hillyard, S. A., &Lindsay, P. H. Cortical potentials evoked by confirming and disconfirming feedback following an auditory discrimination.Perception & Psychophysics, 1973,13, 25–31.
Squires, K., Squires, N., &Hillyard, S. A. Decision related cortical potentials during an auditory signal-detection task with cued observation intervals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1975,1, 268–279. (a)
Squires, K., Squires, N., &Hillyard, S. A. Vertex evoked potentials in a rating-scale detection task: Relation to signal probability.BehavioralBiology, 1975,13, 21–34. (b)
Squires, N., Squires, K., &Hillyard, S. A. Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable stimuli in man.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1975,38, 387–401.
Sutton, S., Braren, M., Zubin, J., &John, E. R. Evoked potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty.Science, 1965,150, 1187–1188.
Sutton, S., & Ruchrin, D. S. The late positive complex— Advances and new problems. In R. Karrer, J. Cohen, & P. Tueting (Eds.), Brain and information: Event-related potentials. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, in press.
Sutton, S., Tueting, P., Zubin, J., &John, E. R. Information delivery and the sensory evoked potential.Science, 1967,155, 1436–1439.
Towey, J., Rist, F., Hakerem, G., Ruchkin, D. S., &Su’rroN, S. N250 latency and decision time.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1980,15,365–368.
Treisman, M., &Leshowitz, B. The effects of duration, area, and background intensity of the visual intensity difference threshold given by the forced-choice procedure: Derivations from a statistical decision model for sensory discrimination.Perception & Psychophysics, 1969,6, 281–295.
Tueting, P., Sutton, S., &Zubin, J. Quantitative evoked potential correlates of the probability of events.Psychophysiology, 1970,7, 385–394.
Wilkinson, R. T., &Seales, D. M. Event related potentials in signal detection.BiologicalPsychology, 1978,7, 13–28.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by a USPHS grant, N1NCDS 11199.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sutton, S., Ruchkin, D.S., Munson, R. et al. Event-related potentials in a two-interval forced-choice detection task. Perception & Psychophysics 32, 360–374 (1982). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206242
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206242