Abstract
Inhibition of return (IOR) is the name that has been assigned to a response time (RT) delay to a stimulus presented at a recently stimulated spatial location. A commonly held explanation for the origins of IOR is that perceptual processing is inhibited and that this inhibition translates into slower RT. Three experiments with 10 subjects were used to directly test this perceptual explanation. The first two experiments assessed the level of perceptual facilitation present in the IOR paradigm using the frequency and latency of illusory line motion judgments. Contrary to the predictions of the perceptual view, the line motion and RT measures revealed only speeded processing at previously stimulated spatial locations. Experiment 3 required a simple detection response and used the same stimulus and timing parameters as those in Experiments 1 and 2. IOR was present, replicating the recent finding that judgments based on perceptual qualities of the stimulus do not demonstrate a RT delay, whereas simple detection tasks do show RT inhibition at previously stimulated locations. These findings are discussed in relation to a number of hypotheses about the origin of the RT delay.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abrams, R. A., &Dobkin, R. S. (1994). Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cueing on eye movement latencies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 467–477.
Abrams, R. A., & Pratt, J. (in press). Spatially-diffuse inhibition affects multiple locations: A reply to Tipper, Weaver, and Watson (1996).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
Downing, P., &Treisman, A. (1995). The shooting line illusion: Attention or apparent motion?Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,36, S856.
Downing, P., & Treisman, A. (in press). The line-motion illusion: Attention or impletion?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
Egly, R., Rafal, R. D., & Henik, A. V. (1992, November).Reflexive and voluntary orienting in detection and discrimination tasks. Paper presented at the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis.
Finley, G. (1985). A high-speed point plotter for vision research.Vision Research,25, 1993–1997.
Gibson, B. S., &Egeth, H. (1994). Inhibition and disinhibition of return: Evidence from temporal order judgments.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 669–680.
Goodale, M. A., &Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action.Trends in Neurosciences,15, 20–25.
Hikosaka, O., Miyauchi, S., &Shimojo, S. (1991). Focal visual attention produces motion sensation in lines.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,32, 716.
Hikosaka, O., Miyauchi, S., &Shimojo, S. (1993a). Focal visual attention produces illusory temporal order and motion sensation.Vision Research,33, 1219–1240.
Hikosaka, O., Miyauchi, S., &Shimojo, S. (1993b). Visual attention revealed by an illusion motion.Neuroscience Research,18, 11–18.
Hikosaka, O., Miyauchi, S., &Shimojo, S. (1993c). Voluntary and stimulus-induced attention detected as motion sensation.Perception,22, 517–526.
Houghton, G., &Tipper, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.),Inhibitory mechanisms in attention, memory and language (pp. 53–112). New York: Academic Press.
Kingstone, A., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (1992, June).Covert orienting in the split brain. Paper presented at the Canadian Society of Brain, Behaviour, and Cognitive Science, Quebec City.
Klein, R. M. (1980). Does oculomotor readiness mediate cognitive control of visual attention? In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.),Attention and performance VIII (pp. 259–276). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Klein, R. M. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search.Nature,334, 430–431.
Klein, R. M., &Pontefract, A. (1994). Does oculomotor readiness mediate cognitive control of visual attention? Revisited! In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.),Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious processes (pp. 333–350). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Klein, R. M., &Taylor, T. L. (1994). Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.),Inhibitory mechanisms in attention, memory and language (pp. 113–150). New York: Academic Press.
Kwak, H.-W., &Egeth, H. (1992). Consequences of allocating attention to locations and to other attributes.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 455–464.
Law, M. B., Pratt, J., &Abrams, R. A. (1995). Color-based inhibition of return.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 402–408.
Maylor, E. A. (1985). Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.),Mechanisms of attention: Attention and performance XI (pp. 189–204). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Maylor, E. A., &Hockey, R. (1987). Effects of repetition on the facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space.Neuropsychologia,25, 41–54.
Miyauchi, S., Hikosaka, O., &Shimojo, S. (1992). Visual attention field can be assessed by illusory line motion sensation.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,33, 1262.
Niemi, P., &Näätänen, R. (1981). Foreperiod and simple reaction time.Psychological Bulletin,89, 133–162.
Pontefract, A., & Klein, R. M. (1988).Assessing inhibition of return with simple and choice reaction time. Unpublished manuscript.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 3–25.
Posner, M. I., &Cohen, Y. (1980). Attention and the control of movements. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behaviour (pp. 243–258). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Posner, M. I., &Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. Bowhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., &Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function.Cognitive Neuropsychology,2, 211–228.
Pratt, J. (1995). Inhibition of return in a discrimination task.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 117–120.
Pratt, J., & Abrams, R. A. (in press). Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984).Computation and cognition: Toward a foundation for cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rafal, R. D., Calabresi, P. A., Brennan, C. W., &Sciolto, T. K. (1989). Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 673–685.
Schmidt, W. C. (1993).Auditory inhibition of return. Unpublished manuscript.
Schmidt, W. C. (in press). “Inhibition of return” without visual input.Neuropsychologia.
Schmidt, W. C., Fisher, B. D., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1996).Multiple onset stimuli elicit illusory line motion. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Schmidt, W. C., &Klein, R. M. (1996). Gradients, impletion, and attention in illusory line-motion.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,37, S529.
Schmidt, W. C., Klein, R. M., & Müller, H. J. (1996).Temporal order judgments do not reveal “inhibition of return”: A commentary on Gibson and Egeth (1994). Manuscript submitted for publication.
Steinman, B. A., Steinman, S. B., &Lehmkuhle, S. (1994). Line motion illusion reveals that focal visual attention is dominated by the M-stream.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,35, 1622.
Stelmach, L. B., &Herdman, C. M. (1991). Directed attention and perception of temporal order.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 539–550.
Sternberg, S., &Knoll, R. L. (1973). The perception of temporal order: Fundamental issues and a general model. In S. Kornblum (Ed.),Attention and performance IV (pp. 629–685). New York: Academic Press.
Tanaka, Y., &Shimojo, S. (1993). Location priming and probability priming are isolatable in detection and discrimination.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,34, 1234.
Tanaka, Y., &Shimojo, S. (1994). Location vs. feature: Two visual functions separated by reaction time in the pop out display.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,35, 1619.
Tanaka, Y., &Shimojo, S. (1995). Facilitation induced by color and shape repetition but not by location repetition.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,36, S902.
Tassinari, G., &Berlucchi, G. (1993). Sensory and attentional components of slowing of manual reaction time to non-fixated visual targets by ipsilateral primes.Vision Research,33, 1525–1534.
Terry, K. M., Valdes, L. A., &Neill, W. T. (1994). Does “inhibition of return” occur in discrimination tasks?Perception & Psychophysics,55, 279–286.
Tipper, S., Weaver, B., & Watson, F. (in press). Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations: A commentary on Pratt and Abrams (1996).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
Townsend, J. T. (1992). On the proper scales for reaction time. In H.-G. Geissler, S. W. Link, & J. T. Townsend (Eds.),Cognition, information processing, and psychophysics: Basic issues (pp. 105–120). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tsotsos, J. K. (1993). An inhibitory beam for attentional selection. In L. Harris & M. Jenkin (Eds.),Spatial vision for humans and robots (pp. 313–331). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ungerleider, L. G., &Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. G. Ingle & J. W. Mansfield (Eds.),Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549–586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ward, L. M. (1994). Supramodal and modality-specific mechanisms for stimulus-driven shifts of auditory and visual attention.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,48, 242–259.
Wolfe, J. M., &Pokorny, C. W. (1990). Inhibitory tagging in visual search: A failure to replicate.Perception & Psychophysics,48, 357–362.
Yantis, S., &Jones, E. (1991). Mechanisms of attentional selection: Temporally modulated priority tags.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 166–178.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NSERC Canada Postgraduate funding and an Honorary Izaak Walton Killam Scholarship to the author and by NSERC Canada Operating Grant A2600 to Zenon W. Pylyshyn.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmidt, W.C. Inhibition of return is not detected using illusory line motion. Perception & Psychophysics 58, 883–898 (1996). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205490
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205490