Abstract
In the present study, we contrasted models in whichfamiliarity orstrength is the sole basis for recognition judgments (e.g., Gillund & Shiffrin, 1984) with models incorporating retrieval of specific information in a recall-like process (e.g., Humphreys, 1976, 1978; Humphreys & Bain, 1984). We also examined the possibility that an item’s “strength” is determined in part by the match between the verbal encoding contexts at study and at test. In two experiments, study items were presented in triplets. In Experiment 1 recognition was tested with all possible combinations of one-, two-, or three-item targets and distractors; in addition, three different decision criteria were employed in different lists. Experiment 2 included cued recognition among other test conditions. Recognition performance did not increase as more cues were added to the probe, a finding that is inconsistent with Humphreys’s model and other models of that type. Both studies were well fit by a version of the Search of Associative Memory model for recognition (Gillund & Shiffrin, 1984).
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, J. A., Silverstein, J. W., Ritz, S. A. &Jones, R. S. (1977). Distinctive features, categorical perception and probability learning: Some applications of a neural model.Psychological Review,84, 413–451.
Arnold, P. G. (1976).On the nature of associations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Atkinson, R. C. &Juola, J. F. (1973). Factors influencing speed and accuracy of word recognition. In S. Komblum (Ed.),Attention and performance IV. New York: Academic Press.
Atkinson, R. C. &Juola, J. F. (1974). Search and decision processes in recognition memory. In D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, & P. Suppes (Eds.),Contemporary developments in mathematicalpsychology: Learning, memory, & thinking (Vol. 1). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Bower, G. H., Black, J. B. &Turner, T. J. (1979). Scripts m memory for text.Cognitive Psychology,11, 177–220.
Cunningham, T. F., Healy, A. F. &Williams, D. M. (1984). Effects of repetition on short-term retenUon of order information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, & Cognition,10, 575–597.
Fischler, I. &Juola, J. F. (1971). Effects of repeated tests on recognition time for information in long-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology,91, 54–58.
Gillund, G., Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.Psychological Review,91, 1–67.
Glucksberg, S. &Mccloskey, M. (1981). Decisions about ignorance: Knowing that you don’t know.Journal of Erperimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,7, 311–325.
Herrmann, D., Frisina, R. D., &Conti, G. (1978). Categorization and familiarity in recognition involving a well-memorized list.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 428–440.
Hintzman, D. L. (1984). Minerva 2: A simulation model of human memory.Behavtor Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,16, 96–101.
Humphreys, M. S. (1976). Relational information and the context effect in recognition memory.Memory & Cognition,4, 221–232.
Humphreys, M. S. (1978). Item and relational information: A case for context independent retrieval.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 175–187.
Humphreys, M. S. &Bain, J. D. (1984). Recognition memory: A cue and information analysis.Memory & Cognition,11, 583–600.
Humphreys, M. S. & Bain, J. D. (1985, May).Cue and information analyses as alternatives to the information processing approach to human memory. Invited address, 57th meeting of the Midwest Psychological Association, Cincago.
Kintsch, W. (1974).The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kintsch, W. &Van Duk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production.Psychological Review,85, 363–394.
Kučera, H. &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Lee, C. L. &Estes, W. K. (1981). Item and order information in shortterm memory: Evidence for multilevel perturbation processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,7, 149–169.
Light, L. L. &Carter-Sobell, L. (1970). Effects of changed semantic context on recognition memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,9, 1–11.
Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.Psychological Review,87, 252–271.
Mandler, G., Rabinowitz, J. C. &Simon, R. A. (1981). Coordinate organization: The holistic representation of word pairs.American Journal of Psychology,94, 209–222.
Marcel, A. J. (1980). Conscious and preconscious recognition of polysemous words: Locating the selective effects of prior verbal context. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.),Attention and performance VIII. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Muroock, B. B., JR. (1974).Human memory: Theory and data. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
Murdock, B. B., JR. (1982). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information.Psychological Review,89, 609–626.
Murdock, B. B., JR. &Anderson, R. E. (1975). Encoding, storage and retrieval of item information. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Muter, P. (1984). Recognition and recall of words with a single meaning.Journal of Experlmental Psychology: Learning, memory, & Cognition,10, 198–202.
Pike, R. (1984). Comparison of convolution and matrix distributed memory systems for associative recall and recogmtion.Psychological Revtew,91, 281–293.
Reder, L. M., Anderson, J. R. &Bjork, R. A. (1974). A semantic interpretation of encoding specificity.Journal of Experimental Psychology,107, 648–656.
Thomson, D. M. (1972). Context effects in recognilaon memoryJournal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,11, 497–511.
Thorndike, E. L, &Lorge, I. (1944).The teacher’s word book of 30,000 words New York: Columbia University Press.
Thorndyke, P. W. (1977). Cognitive structures ~n comprehension and memory of narrative discourse.Cognitive Psychology,9, 77–110,
Tulving, E., &Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes ~n episodic memory.Psychological Review,80. 352–373.
Underwood, B. J. &Humphreys, M. S. (1979). Context change and the role of meaning in word recognition.American Journal of Psychology,92, 577–609.
Winograd, E. &Conn, C P. (1971). Evidence from recogmtion memory for specific encoding of unmodified homographs.Journat of Verbal Learntng& Verbal Behavior,10, 702–706
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by NIMH grant 12717 and an Indiana University Waterman research grant to Richard Shiffrin.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clark, S.E., Shiffrin, R.M. Recognition of multiple-item probes. Memory & Cognition 15, 367–378 (1987). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197727
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197727