Abstract
A rule-instantiation model and a similarity-to-exemplars model were contrasted in terms of their predictions of typicality judgments and speeded classificalions for members of logically defined categories. In Experiment 1, subjects learned a unidimensional rule based on the size of objects. It was assumed that items that maximally instantiated the rule were those farthest from the category boundary that separated small and large stimuli. In Experiment 2, subjects learned a disjunctive rule of the form “x ory or both.” It was assumed that items that maximally instantiated the rule were those withbothpositive values (x andy). In both experiments, the frequency with which different exemplars were presented during classification learning was manipulated across conditions. Thesefrequency manipulations exerted a major impact on subjects’ postacquisition goodness-of-example judgments, and they also influenced reaction times in a speeded classification task. The results could not be predicted solely on the basis of the degree to which the rules were instantiated. The goodnessjudgments were predicted fairly well by a mixed-exemplar model involving both relative-similarity and absolute-similarity components. It was concluded that even for logically defined concepts, stored exemplars may form a major component of the category representation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armstrong, S. L., Gleitman, L. R., &Gleitman, H. (1983). What some concepts might not be.Cognition,13, 263–308.
Ashby, F. G., &Gott, R. (1988). Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 33–53.
Ashby, F. G., &Maddox, W. T. (1990). Integrating information from separable psychological dimensions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 598–612.
Ashby, F. G., & Maddox, W. T. (in press). A response time theory of perceptual independence. To appear in J. P. Doignon & J. C. Falmagne (Eds.),Mathematical psychology: Current developments. Berlin: Springer.
Ashby, F. G., &Townsend, J. T. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence.Psychological Review,93, 154–179.
Barsalou, L. W. (1981).Determinants of graded structure in categories. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.
Barsalou, L. W. (1985). Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 629–654.
Bourne, L. E., Jr. (1982). Typicality effects in logically defined categories.Memory & Cognition,10, 3–9.
Brooks, L. R. (1987). Decentralized control of categorization: The role of prior processing episodes. In U. Neisser (Ed.),Concepts and conceptual development (pp. 141–174). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Carroll, J. D., &Wish, M. (1974). Models and methods for threeway multidimensional scaling. In D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, & P. Suppes (Eds.),Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 57–105). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Cartwright, D. (1941). Relation of decision-time to the categories of response.American Journal of Psychology,54, 174–196.
Emmerich, D. S., Garay, J. L., Watson, C. S., &Tanis, D. C. (1972). Response latency, confidence, and ROCs in auditory signal detection.Perception & Psychophysics,11, 65–72.
Ennis, D. M. (1988). Confusable and discriminabte stimuli: Comment on Nosofsky (1986) and Shepard (1986).Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 408–411.
Ennis, D. M., Palen, J., &Mullen, K. (1988). Amultidimensional stochastic theory ofsimilarity.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,32, 449–465.
Estes, W. K. (1986a). Array models for category learning.Cognitive Psychology,18, 500–549.
Estes, W. K. (1986b). Memory storage and retrieval processes in category learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 155–174.
Festinger, L. (1943). Studies in decision: I. Decision time, relative frequency of judgment, and subjective confidence as related to physical stimulus difference.Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 291–306.
Garner, W. R. (1974).The processing of information and structure. New York: Wiley.
Green, D. M., &Swets, J. A. (1966).Signal detection theory ana psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
Hayes-Roth, B., &Hayes-Roth, F. (1977). Concept learning and the recognition and classification of exemplars.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 321–328.
Hyman, R., &Frost, N. H. (1975). Gradients and schema in pattern recognition. In P. M. A. Rabbits & S. Dornic (Eds.),Attention ana Performance V (pp. 630–654). London: Academic Press.
Kellogg, R. T. (1981). Feature frequency in concept learning: What is counted?Memory & Cognition,9, 157–163.
Leeuwenberg, E. L. J. (1971). A perceptual coding language for visual and auditory patterns.American Journal of Psychology,84, 307–349.
Luce, R. D. (1963). Detection and recognition. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.),Handbook of mathematical psychology (pp. 103–189). New York: Wiley.
Medin, D. L., &Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning.Psychological Review,85, 207–238.
Medin, D. L., Wattenmaker, W. D., &Michalski, R. S. (1987). Constraints and preferences in inductive learning: An experimental study of human and machine performance.Cognitive Science,11, 299–339.
Neisser, U., &Weene, P. (1962). Hierarchies in concept attainment.Journal of Experimental Psychology,64, 640–645.
Neumann, P. G. (1974). An attribute frequency model for the abstraction of prototypes.Memory & Cognition,2, 241–248.
Norman, D. A., &Wickelgren, W. (1969). Strength theory and decision rules and latency in retrieval from short-term memory.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,6, 192–208,
Nosofsky, R. M. (1984). Choice, similarity, and the context theory of classification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 104–114.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1985a). Luce’s choice model and Thurstone’s categorical judgment model compared: Kornbrot’s data revisited.Perception & Psychophysics,37, 89–91.
Nosofsky, R. [M]. (1985b). Overall similarity and the identification ofseparable-dimension stimuli: Achoice model analysis.Perception & Psychophysics,38, 415–432.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identificationcategorization relationship.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 39–57.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1987). Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 87–108.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1988a). Exemplar-based accounts of relations between classification, recognition, and typicality.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 700–708.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1988b). Similarity, frequency, and category representations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 54–65.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1989). Further tests of an exemplar-similarity approach to relating identification and categorization.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 279–290.
Nosofsky, R. M. (in press). Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
Nosofsky, R. M., Clark, S. E., &Shin, H. J. (1989). Rules and exemplars in categorization, identification, and recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 282–304.
Pike, A. R. (1973). Response latency models for signal detection.Psychological Review,80, 53–68.
Posner, M. I., &Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis ofabstract ideas.Journal of Experimental Psychology,77, 353–363.
Reed, S. K. (1972). Pattern recognition and categorization.Cognitive Psychology,3, 382–407.
Reitman, J. S., &Bower, G. H. (1973). Storage and later recognition of exemplars of concepts.Cognitive Psychology,4, 194–207.
Restle, F. (1979). Coding theory ofthe perception of motion configurations.Psychological Review,86, 1–24.
Shepard, R. N. (1957). Stimulus and response generalization: Astochastic model relating generalization to distance in psychological space.Psychometrika,22, 325–345.
Shepard, R. N. (1958a). Stimulus and response generalization: Deduction ofthe generalization gradient from a trace model.Psychological Review,65, 242–256.
Shepard, R. N. (1958b). Stimulus and response generalization: Tests of a model relating generalization to distance in psychological space.Journal of Experimental Psychology,55, 509–523.
Shepard, R. N. (1964) Attention and the metric structure of the Stimulus space.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,1, 54–87.
Shepard, R. N. (1986). Discrimination and generalization in identification and classification: Comment on Nosofsky.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 58–61.
Shepard, R. N. (1987). Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science.Science,237, 1317–1323.
Shepard, R. N., Hovland, C. I., & Jenkins, H. M. (1961). Learning and memorization of classifications.Psychological Monographs,75(13, Whole No. 517).
Smith, E. E. (1968). Choice reaction time: An analysis of the major theoretical positions.Psychological Bulletin,69, 77–110.
Suppes, P. (1957).Introduction to logic. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
Thomas, E. A. C. (1971). Sufficient conditions for monotone hazard rate: An application to latency-probability curves.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,8, 303–332.
Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment.Psychological Review,34, 273–286.
Vandierendonck, A. (1988). Typicality gradient in well-defined artificial categories.Acta Psychologica,69, 61–81.
Ward, T. B., &Scott, J. (1987). Analytic and holistic modes of learning family-resemblance concepts.Memory & Cognition,15, 42–54.
Wickelgren, W. A. (1968). Unidimensional strength theory and component analysis of noise in absolute and comparative judgments.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,5, 102–122.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by Grant BNS 87-19938 from the National Science Foundation to Indiana University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nosofsky, R.M. Typicality in logically defined categories: Exemplar-similarity versus rule instantiation. Memory & Cognition 19, 131–150 (1991). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197110
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197110