Abstract
Two experiments, one using a between-Ss and one a within-Ss design, showed that response latencies to single attribute probe stimuli were longer when the target stimulus embodied two attributes (form and color) rather than a single attribute. The magnitude of this “mixed attribute effect” was influenced by the probability of attribute relevance, but the “probability effect” was mostly due to a “repetition effect,” such that latencies on trials involving repetitions of the same attribute were shorter than when the relevant attribute was shifted. Implications of these results are drawn for the issues of holistic vs attributized representation of the target stimulus and serial vs parallel search of a set of attributes. Although no class of models can be ruled out on the basis of these experiments, constraints can be imposed on the versions of each that are compatible with the data presented.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allport, D. A. Parallel encoding within and between elementary stimulus dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics, 1971, 10, 104–108.
Atkinson, R. C., Holmgren, J. E., & Juola, J. F. Processing time as influenced by the number of elements in a visual display, Perception & Psychophysics, 1969, 6, 321–326.
Donderi, D., & Case, B. Parallel visual processing: Constant same-different decision latency with two to fourteen shapes, Perception & Psychophysics, 1970, 8, 373–375.
Egeth, H. E. Parallel vs serial processes in multidimensional stimulus discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics, 1966, 1, 245–252.
Frost, N. Encoding and retrieval in visual memory tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972, 95, 317–326.
Garner, W. R., & Felfoldy, G. L. Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing. Cognitive Psychology, 1970, 1, 225–241.
Hawkins, H. L. Parallel processing in complex visual discrimination, Perception & Psychophysics, 1969, 5, 56–64.
Kroll, N. E. A., Parkinson, S. R., & Parks, T. E. Sensory and active storage of compound visual and auditory stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972, 95, 32–38.
Lockhead, G. R. Processing dimensional stimuli: A note. Psychological Review, 1972, 79, 410–419.
Moray, N. Where is capacity limited? A survey and model. Acta Psychologica, 1967, 27, 84–92.
Peeke, S. C., & Stone, G. C. FOCal and nonfocal processing of color and form. Perception & Psychophysies, 1973, 14, 71–80.
Platt, J. R. Strong inference. Science, 1964, 146, 347–352.
Posner, M. I.. Boies, S. J., Eichelman. W. H., & Taylor, R. L. Retention of visual and name codes of single letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 79(1, Pt. 2).
Posner, M. I., & Mitchell, R. F. Chronometric analysis of classification, Psychological Review, 1967, 74, 392–409.
Rabbitt, P. M. A. Times for analyzing stimuli and selecting responses, British Medical Bulletin, 1971, 27, 259–265.
Rabbitt, P. M. A., & Vyas, S. What is repeated in the “repetition effect.” InAttention and performance IV. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
Saraga, E., & Shallice, R. Parallel processing of the attributes of single stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 1973, 13, 261–270.
Sternberg, S. High-speed scanning in human memory. Science, 1966, 153, 652–654.
Stone, G. C. Response latencies in visual search involving redundant or irrelevant information. Perception & Psychophysics, 1971, 9, 9–14.
Taylor, M. M., Lindsay, P. H. & Forbes, S. M. Quantification of shared capacity processing in auditory and visual discrimination. Acta Psychologica, 1967, 27, 223–229.
Townsend, J. T. A note on the identifiability of parallel and serial processes, Perception & Psychophysics, 1971, 10, 161–163.
Townsend, J. T. Some results concerning the identifiability of parallel and serial processes, British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 1972, 25, 168–199.
Townsend, J. T. A note on the identifiability of parallel and serial processes. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, in press.
Tversky, B. Pictorial and verbal encoding in a short-term memory task. Perception & Psychophysics, 1969, 6, 225–233.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by Grant MH 18146 and by the California Department of Mental Hygiene.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stone, G.C., Peeke, S.C. Relative frequency of attribute relevance and response times in visual search. Memory & Cognition 2, 453–462 (1974). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196904
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196904