Abstract
There is considerable evidence indicating that cuing a specific portion of an object results in the entire object’s being attended to. In the present study, we examined whether previous experience with an object could halt perceptual (i.e., amodal) completion. In Experiment 1, two parallel rectangles were initially displayed, and then the middle portions of these objects were occluded. Attentional cuing effects were found for both discrete portions of the completed rectangles. In the final two experiments, four discrete objects were initially displayed, followed by the same occluder as that used in the first experiment. The appearance of the occluder (500 msec before the cue in Experiment 2, 100 msec before the cue in Experiment 3) allowed the four discrete objects to be completed into two rectangles. Attentional cuing effects were found for the completed rectangles in both experiments, indicating that previous experience was not sufficient to halt the amodal completion of objects.
Article PDF
References
Behrmann, M., Zemel, R., &Mozer, M. (1998). Object-based attention and occlusion: Evidence from normal subjects and a computational model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1011–1036.
Brawn, P. T., &Snowden, R. J. (2000). Attention to overlapping objects: Detection and discrimination of luminance changes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 342–358.
Bruno, N., Bertamini, M., &Domini, F. (1997). Amodal completion of partly occluded surfaces: Is there evidence for a mosaic stage?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23,1412–1426.
Davis, G., &Driver, J. (1997). Spreading of visual attention to modally versus amodally completed regions.Psychological Science,8, 275–281.
Egly, R., Driver, J., &Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 161–177.
Egly, R., Rafal, R., Driver, J., &Starrveveld, Y. (1994). Covert orienting in the split brain reveals hemispheric specialization for objectbased attention.Psychological Science,5, 380–383.
Gold, J., Murray, R. F., Bennett, P. J., &Sekuler, A. B. (2000). Deriving behavioral receptive fields for visually completed contours.Current Biology,10, 663–666.
He, Z. J., &Nakayama, K. (1992). Surfaces versus features in visual search.Nature,359, 231–233.
Joseph, J. S., &Nakayama, K. (1999). Amodal representation depends on the object seen before partial occlusion.Vision Research,39, 283–292.
Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., &Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specif ic integration of information.Cognitive Psychology,24, 175–219.
Kellman, P., &Shipley, T. F. (1991). A theory of visual interpolation in object perception.Cognitive Psychology,23, 141–221.
Mattingley, J. B., Davis, G., &Driver, J. (1997). Preattentive fillingin of visual surfaces in parietal extinction.Nature,275, 671–674.
Moore, C. M., Yantis, S., &Vaughan, B. (1998). Object-based visual selection: Evidence from perceptual completion.Psychological Science,9, 104–110.
Mozer, M. C., Zemel, R. S., Behrmann, M., &Williams, C. K. I. (1992). Learning to segment images using dynamic feature binding.Neural Computation,4, 650–665.
Murray, R. F., Sekuler, A. B., &Bennett, P. J. (1999). Grouping of partially occluded contours for symmetry judgement [Abstract].Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,40, S359.
Nakayama, K., Shimojo, S., &Silverman, G.H. (1989). Stereoscopic depth: Its relation to image segmentation, grouping, and the recognition of occluded objects.Perception,18, 55–68.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 3–25.
Ramachandran, V. S., &Anstis, S. (1983). Perceptual organization of moving patterns.Nature,304, 529–531.
Rensink, R.A., &Enns, J. T. (1998). Early completion of occluded objects.Vision Research,38, 2489–2505.
Ringach, D. L., &Shapley, R. (1996). Spatial and temporal properties of illusory contours and amodal boundary completion.Vision Research,36, 3037–3050.
Sekuler, A. B. (1994). Local and global minima in visual completion: Effects of symmetry and orientation.Perception,23, 529–545.
Sekuler, A. B., &Palmer, S. E. (1992). Perception of partly occluded objects: A microgenetic analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,121, 95–111.
Sekuler, A. B., Palmer, S. E., &Flynn, C. (1994). Local and global processes in visual completion.Psychological Science,5, 260–267.
Shimojo, S., Silverman, G. H., &Nakayama, K. (1989). Occlusion and the solution to the aperture problem.Vision Research,29, 619–626.
Shore, D. I., &Enns, J. T. (1997). Shape completion time depends on the size of the occluded region.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 980–998.
Sugita, Y. (1999). Grouping of image fragments in primary visual cortex.Nature,401, 269–272.
vanLier, R. (1999). Investigating global effects in visual occlusion: From a partly occluded square to the back of a tree-trunk.Acta Psychologica,102, 203–220.
Wertheimer, M. (1950). Laws of organization in perceptual forms. In W. D. Ellis (Ed.),A source book of Gestalt psychology (pp. 71–88). New York: Humanities Press. (Original work published 1923)
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 601–621.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NSERC grants to J.P. and A.B.S.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pratt, J., Sekuler, A.B. The effects of occlusion and past experience on the allocation of object-based attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8, 721–727 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196209
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196209