Abstract
This paper describes a novel theoretical framework of how the position of a letter within a string is encoded, the SERIOL model (sequential encoding regulated by inputs to oscillations within letter units). Letter order is represented by a temporal activation pattern across letter units, as is consistent with current theories of information coding based on the precise timing of neural spikes. The framework specifies how this pattern is invoked via an activation gradient that interacts with subthreshold oscillations and how it is decoded via contextual units that activate word units. Using mathematical modeling, this theoretical framework is shown to account for the experimental data from a wide variety of string-processing studies, including hemispheric asymmetries, the optimal viewing position, and positional priming effects.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alpern, M. (1962). Introduction. In H. Dawson (Ed.),The eye (Vol. 3, pp. 3–5). New York: Academic Press.
Berndt, R. S., &Haendiges, A. N. (1997). Positional effects in dyslexic “visual errors”: Constraints on the interpretation of word substitutions.Brain & Language,60, 112–115.
Berry, M. J., Warland, D. K., &Meister, M. (1997). The structure and precision of retinal spike trains.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,94, 5411–5416.
Bjork, E. L., &Murray, J. T. (1977). On the nature of input channels in visual processing.Psychological Review,84, 472–484.
Bryden, M. P. (1982).Laterality: Functional asymmetry in the intact brain. New York: Academic Press.
Brysbaert, M. (1994). Interhemispheric transfer and the processing of foveally presented stimuli.Behavioural Brain Research,64, 151–161.
Brysbaert, M., Vitu, F., &Schroyens, W. (1996). The right visual field advantage and the optimal viewing position effect: On the relation between foveal and parafoveal word recognition.Neuropsychology,10, 385–395.
Carmon, A., Nachson, I., Isseroff, A., &Starinsky, R. (1976). Development aspects of visual hemifield differences in perception of verbal material.Brain & Language,3, 463–469.
Chastain, G. (1977). Feature analysis and the growth of a percept.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 291–298.
Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., &Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches.Psychological Review,100, 589–608.
Costello, A. D. L., &Warrington, E. K. (1987). The dissociation of visuospatial neglect and neglect dyslexia.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, & Psychiatry,50, 1110–1116.
Cubelli, R., Nichelli, P., Bonito, V., De Tanti, A., &Inzaghi, M.G. (1991). Different patterns of dissociation in unilateral spatial neglect.Brain & Cognition,15, 139–159.
De Ruyter van Steveninck, R. R., Lewen, G. D., Strong, S. P., Koberle, R., &Bialek, W. (1997). Reproducibility and variability in neural spike trains.Science,275, 1805–1808.
Ellis, A. W., Young, A. W., &Anderson, C. (1988). Modes of word recognition in the left and right cerebral hemispheres.Brain & Language,35, 254–273.
Estes, W. K., Allemeyer, D. H., &Reder, S. M. (1976). Serial position functions for letter identification at brief and extended exposure durations.Perception & Psychophysics,19, 1–15.
Eviatar, Z. (1999). Cross-language tests of hemispheric strategies in reading nonwords.Neuropsychology,13, 498–515.
Farid, M., &Grainger, J. (1996). How initial fixation position influences visual word recognition: A comparison of French and Arabic.Brain & Language,53, 351–368.
Faust, M., Kravetz, S., &Babkoff, H. (1993). Hemispheric specialization or reading habits: Evidence from lexical decision research with Hebrew words and sentences.Brain & Language,44, 254–263.
Fendrich, R., &Gazzaniga, M. S. (1989). Evidence of foveal splitting in a commissurotomy patient.Neuropsychologia,27, 273–281.
Forster, K. I., &Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behaviour,12, 627–635.
Frederiksen, J. R., &Kroll, J. F. (1976). Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 361–379.
Georgopoulos, A. P., Kalaska, J. F., Caminiti, R., &Massey, J. T. (1982). On the relation between the direction of two-dimensional arm movements and cell discharge in the motor cortex.Journal of Neuroscience,2, 1527–1537.
Grainger, J., &Jacobs, A. M. (1991). Masked constituent letter priming in an alphabetic decision task.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,3, 413–434.
Green, D. W., &Shallice, T. (1976). Direct visual access in reading for meaning.Memory & Cognition,4, 753–758.
Hammond, E. J., &Green, D. W. (1982). Detecting targets in letter and non-letter arrays.Canadian Journal of Psychology,36, 67–82.
Hellige, J. B. (1993).Hemispheric asymmetry: What’s right and what’s left? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hellige, J. B., &Cowin, E. L. (1996). Effects of stimulus arrangement on hemispheric differences and interhemispheric interaction for processing letter trigrams.Neuropsychology,10, 247–253.
Hellige, J. B., Cowin, E. L., &Eng, T. L. (1995). Recognition of CVC syllables from LVF, RVF, and central locations: Hemispheric differences and interhemispheric interactions.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,7, 258–266.
Hellige, J. B., &Scott, G. B. (1997). Effects of output order on hemispheric asymmetry for processing letter trigrams.Brain & Language, 59, 523–30.
Hellige, J. B., &Yamauchi, M. (1999). Quantitative and qualitative hemispheric asymmetry for processing Japanese kana.Brain & Cognition,40, 453–463.
Hopfield, J. J. (1995). Pattern recognition computation using action potential timing for stimulus representation.Nature,376, 33–36.
Humphreys, G. W., Evett, L. J., &Quinlan, P. T. (1990). Orthographic processing in visual word identification.Cognitive Psychology,22, 517–560.
Joliot, M., Ribary, U., &Llinas, R. (1994). Human oscillatory brain activity near 40 Hz coexists with cognitive temporal binding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,91, 11748–11751.
Katz, R. B., &Sevush, S. (1989). Positional dyslexia.Brain & Language,37, 266–289.
Koriat, A. (1985). Lateralization effects in pointed and unpointed Hebrew.British Journal of Psychology,76, 161–173.
Koriat, A., &Norman, J. (1985). Reading rotated words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 490–508.
Krumhansl, C. L., &Thomas, E. A. C. (1976). Extracting identity and location information from briefly presented letter arrays.Perception & Psychophysics,20, 243–258.
Lefton, L. A., Fisher, D. F., &Kuhn, D. M. (1978). Left-to-right pro cessing of alphabetic material is independent of retinal location.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,12, 171–174.
Lisman, J. E., &Idiart, M. A. P. (1995). Storage of 7 ± 2 short-term memories in oscillatory subcycles.Science,267, 1512–1515.
Llinas, R., &Ribary, U. (1993). Coherent 40-Hz oscillation characterizes dream state in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,90, 2078–2081.
Marks, N. L., &Hellige, J. B. (1999). Effects of bilateral stimulation and stimulus redundancy interhemispheric interaction.Neuropsychology,13, 475–487.
Mason, M. (1982). Recognition time for letters and nonletters: Effects of serial position, array size, and processing order.Journal of Experimental Psychology,8, 724–738.
Mayzner, M. S., &Tresselt, M. E. (1970). Visual information processing with sequential inputs: A general model for sequential blanking, displacement, and overprinting phenomena. In E. Harms & M. E. Tresselt (Eds.),Third Conference on the Fundamentals of Psychology: Various approaches to the study of perception (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 169, pp. 599–618). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review,88, 375–407.
Melamed, F., &Zaidel, E. (1993). Language and task effects on lateralized word recognition.Brain & Language,45, 70–85.
Mewhort, D. J. K., &Beal, A. L. (1977). Mechanisms of word identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology,3, 629–640.
Mewhort, D. J. K., Merikle, P. M., &Bryden, M. P. (1969). On the transfer from iconic to short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 89–94.
Montant, M., Nazir, T. A., &Poncet, M. (1998). Pure alexia and the viewing position effect in printed words.Cognitive Neuropsychology,15, 93–140.
Mozer, M. C. (1987). Early parallel processing in reading: A connectionist approach. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 83–104). London: Erlbaum.
Mozer, M. C., &Behrmann, M. (1992). On the interaction of selective attention and lexical knowledge: A connectionist account of neglect dyslexia.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,2, 96–123.
Orbach, J. (1967). Differential recognition of Hebrew and English words in right and left visual fields as a function of cerebral dominance and reading habits.Neuropsychologia,5, 127–134.
O’Regan, J. K., Levy-Schoen, A., Pynte, J., &Brugaillere, B. (1984). Convenient fixation location within isolated words of different length and structure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 289–298.
Perea, M. (1998). Orthographic neighbors are not all equal: Evidence using an identification technique.Language & Cognitive Processes,13, 77–90.
Peressotti, F., &Grainger, J. (1995). Letter-position coding in random consonant arrays.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 875–890.
Peressotti, F., &Grainger, J. (1999). The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 691–706.
Plaut, D. C., &Shallice, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology.Cognitive Neuropsychology,10, 377–500.
Proctor, R. W., &Healy, A. F. (1987). Task-specific serial position effects in comparisons of multiletter strings.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 180–194.
Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., &Baynes, K. (1992). Modes of lexical access in the callosotomized brain.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,4, 155–164.
Rieke, F., Warland, D. [K.], De Ruyter van Steveninck, R., &Bialek, W. (1997). Spikes: Exploring the neural code. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Seidenberg, M. S., &McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed developmental model of word recognition and naming.Psychological Review,96, 523–568.
Sieroff, E., Pollatsek, A., &Posner, M. I. (1988). Recognition of visual letter strings following injury to the posterior visual spatial attentional system.Cognitive Neuropsychology,5, 427–449.
Sieroff, E., &Posner, M. I. (1988). Cueing spatial attention during processing of words and letter strings in normals.Cognitive Neuropsychology,5, 451–472.
Strangert, B., &Brännström, L. (1975). Spatial interaction effects in letter processing.Perception & Psychophysics,17, 268–272.
Sugishita, M., Hamilton, C. R., Sakuma, I., &Hemmi, I. (1994). Hemispheric representation of the central retina of commissurotomized subjects.Neuropsychologia,32, 399–415.
Sugishita, M., Hemmi, I., Sakuma, I., Beppu, H., &Shiokawa, Y. (1993). The problem of macular sparing after unilateral occipital lesions.Journal of Neurology,241, 1–9.
Tiitinen, H., Sinkkonen, J., Rainikainen, K., Alho, K., Lavi-Kainen, J., &Näätänen, R. (1993). Selective attention enhances the 40-Hz response in humans.Nature,364, 59–60.
Townsend, J. T. (1971). A note on the identifiability of parallel and serial processes.Perception & Psychophysics,10, 161–163.
Trauzettel-Klosinski, S., &Reinhard, J. (1998). The vertical field border in hemianopia and its significance for fixation and reading.Investigations in Ophthalmology & Visual Science,39, 2177–2186.
Victor, J. D., &Purpura, K. P. (1996). Nature and precision of temporal coding in visual cortex: A metric-space analysis.Journal of Neurophysiology,76, 1310–1326.
Whitney, C. S. (2001).Position-specific effects within the SERIOL framework of letter-position coding. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Whitney, C. S. (in press). An explanation of the length effect for rotated words.Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Cognitive Modeling.
Whitney, C. S., &Berndt, R. S. (1999). A new model of letter string encoding: Simulating right neglect dyslexia.Progress in Brain Research,121, 143–163.
Whitney, C. S., Berndt, R. S., &Reggia, J. A. (1996). Simulation of neurogenic reading disorders with a dual-route connectionist model. In J. A. Reggia, E. Ruppin, & R. S. Berndt (Eds.),Neural modeling of brain and cognitive disorders (pp. 201–228). Singapore: World Scientific.
Wolford, G., &Hollingsworth, S. (1974). Retinal location and string position as important variables in visual information processing.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 437–442.
Young, A. W., &Ellis, A. W. (1985). Different modes of lexical access for words presented in the left and right visual hemispheres.Brain & Language,24, 326–358.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Whitney, C. How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8, 221–243 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196158
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196158